PhD evaluation 2016

Feedback on supervision 2016

Must assess at least one of the supervisors listed below.

Supervisor: Name

Co-supervisor: Name

  1. Me and the supervisor(s) have at the beginning of this year agreed on the supervision process and our mutual rights and duties (frequency and forms of meetings, communication and feedback forms, deadlines/timeframe for submission of results, articles, presentations, etc. and giving feedback, etc.).

yes, no, more or less, yes from earlier

  • Please comment and/or explain your assessment.
  1. I exercised all the rights and performed all the duties agreed with the supervisory at the start of this (academic) year/in the doctoral studies contract (frequency and forms of meetings, communication and feedback forms, deadlines/timeframe for submission of results, articles, presentations, etc. and giving feedback, etc.), followed the good practice of doctoral studies applicable in the University of Tartu, and made every effort to ensure smooth cooperation.

I fully agree, I agree, I disagree, I fully disagree, so-so

  • Please comment and/or explain your assessment.
  1. The supervisor exercised all the rights and performed all the duties agreed at the start of this (academic) year/in the doctoral studies contract (frequency and forms of meetings, communication and feedback forms, deadlines/timeframe for submission of results, articles, presentations, etc. and giving feedback, etc.), followed the good practice of doctoral studies applicable in the University of Tartu, and made every effort to ensure smooth cooperation.

I fully agree, I agree, I disagree, I fully disagree, so-so

  • Please comment and/or explain your assessment.
  1. The supervisor found time for me (depending on my needs)

sufficiently, rather sufficiently, rather insufficiently, completely insufficiently

  • Please comment and/or explain your assessment.
  1. Meetings with the supervisor (for discussing research/articles, analysing results, etc.) and/or the supervisor’s feedback were constructing and effective.

I fully agree, I agree, I disagree, I fully disagree, so-so

  • Please comment and/or explain your assessment.
  1. I evaluate cooperation with my supervisor with the following grade

A(excellent); B(very good); C(good); D(satisfactory); E(poor); F(insufficient)

  • Please comment and/or explain your assessment.
  1. What can I do to make supervision more effective in the future?

1