Unclassified
Midterm Review of the DFAT Ending Violence Against Women (EVAW)
Program in Afghanistan
DFAT MANAGEMENT RESPONSE
Initiative Summary
Initiative Name / Ending Violence Against Women ProgramAidWorks initiative number / INK880
Commencement date / 13 December 2012 / Completion date / 30 December 2017
Total Australian $ / A$24.7 million
Total other $ / A$5.5 million (The United Kingdom’s Department for International Development co-finances the Asia Foundation component of the initiative under a delegated cooperation arrangement)
Implementing partner(s) /
- United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women)
- United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
- The Asia Foundation (TAF)
- Afghan Women's Network (AWN)
- Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC)
Country/Region / Afghanistan
Primary sector / Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW)
Initiative objective/s / The initiative supports national efforts to reduce violence against women (VAW) throughthree main objectives:
- Women affected by violence have increased access to better services in target areas
- Women affected by violence have increased access to justice in target provinces, through both formal and community-based justice mechanisms
- Improved violence prevention practices, including more effective community awareness and advocacy and engagement of women in peace processes.
Evaluation Summary
Evaluation Objective:
Policy objectives of the independent Mid-Term Review (MTR) of the EVAW Programwere twofold:
- Verify and assess progress to date and make recommendations for any modifications required over the remaining program duration to maximise results; and
- Identify opportunities for future policy and program support in the EVAW sector in Afghanistan.
Evaluation Completion Date: 7 March 2016
Evaluation Team: Marie Huber (Team Leader) and Nabila Musleh (National EVAW Expert).
Summary of key findings
- The MTR found the EVAW Program to be highly effective and making progress towards its objectives and goal of a sustained reduction in VAW. Across all three outcomes, the MTR found activities had been effective.Overall, the Program’s activities were found to constitute a holistic approach to preventing, combatting and facilitating access to response services regarding VAW. Also, the Theory of Change was found to be generally robust and underlying assumptions were largely validated by the review.
- The MTR found the program is generally aligned with Afghan Government frameworks, objectives and prioritiesand government partners are largely supportive of program activities. Partners also work closely with the Government, including signing a series of MoUs with government counterparts that support project activities.
- The MTR made recommendations to improve service gaps for VAW survivors,risk management processes, monitoring and evaluation and supporting partner capacity development.
DFAT’s response to the evaluation report
- The MTR report was managed and guided by DFAT’s Afghanistan program in Kabul and Canberra, in consultation with UN Women, TAF, UNFPA, AWN, AIHRC and the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID).Adam Smith International provided logistical support.
- DFAT considers the MTR report to be of high quality. It has addressed the Terms of Reference thoroughly. Thereport is also consistent with the Evaluation Plans and Evaluation Tools documents, which were prepared by the MTR team in consultation with DFAT’s Afghanistan program, DFAT’s Office of Development Effectiveness andDFID.
- DFAT will take the MTR recommendations into consideration in implementing current EVAW Program activities and designing the next phase of activities. DFAT held an internal peer review with the MTR Team Leader on 26 February 2016 to discuss the MTR findings and draw broader lessons for DFAT’s work in Afghanistan, regionally and globally.
- DFAT has discussed the MTR recommendations with UN Women, TAF, UNFPA, AWN, AIHRC and DFID and sought EVAW Program partners’ feedback on proposed actions in this management response.
- DFAT’s response to each MTR recommendation is laid out in the attached table.
DFAT Management Response –Afghanistan EVAW Program Mid-Term Reviewpage 1 of 6
UNCLASSIFIED
Unclassified
DFAT’s response to the specific recommendations made in the report
Recommendation
/ Response / Actions / ResponsibilityEffectiveness
- Assess the options and resources required to facilitate programming in more remote districts.
- Undertake a thorough assessment of service gaps for survivors and coordinate with other donors.
- Clarify key concepts and agree on terminology and use of language throughout program activities.
MoWA endorsement of this list. / DFAT
- Undertake an assessment of service bottlenecks for services to VAW survivors.
- Incorporate a psychosocial support training component into UN Women capacity support to WPCimplementing local partners, and look at options for utilizing civil society organizations providingpsychosocial services
- Involve Police Academy trainers at provincial level in addition to MoI trainers.
- Establish and support a mechanism for women and girls trained through the Young Women LeadersProgram (YWLP) to facilitate their access to positions in relevant government institutions.
- Require a case review mechanism in program components that work with traditional dispute resolution(TDR) bodies for case resolution.
- Undertake a thorough assessment of case handling by community-based bodies such as Community Dialogue Groups (CDG) andFamily Resolution Committees (FRCs), which are currently making a low number of referrals.
- Improve coordination and support to local partners, particularly in facilitating effective coordination with provincial stakeholders and government institutions.
Sustainability
- Identify and assess options for building linkages between program activities and efforts to build the government’s capacity to undertake gender-responsive programming, and promote further progress towards on-budget solutions within the EVAW sector.
- Identify and support the utilization of activities that help to promote sustainable access to resources andmaterials provided through the program.
Monitoring and Evaluation
- Revise the PAF with the participation of all program implementing partners, with particular emphasis on refining the intermediate outcomes and indicators, and develop a data collection plan.
Efficiency
- Develop a formal security incident reporting mechanism, and protocols for the steps that should be takenwhen a participant or staff member is under threat.
- One Core Steering Group (CSG) meeting each year should be dedicated to reviewing the PAF, and each partner reporting ontheir progress on each indicator and utilizing the forum to reflect on progress at a programmatic andoutcome level.
- Rather than incorporating local partners into the CSG, an annual mechanism that facilitates directinteraction of local partners with DFAT should be established.
- Develop a ToR for the CSG and assign responsibilities to members in developing agendas and proactivelyengaging in providing input on meeting content.
- DFAT to take a role in developing an effective platform for donor coordination specifically in relation to the EVAW sector.
- Improve coordination with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).
DFAT Management Response –Afghanistan EVAW Program Mid-Term Reviewpage 1 of 6
UNCLASSIFIED