Jerry James Stanton

Care of 4340 South Allen Road

Allen, Michigan U.S.A

near 49227

Only legal spelling and style of name

and state.

David Coyle & Brent Wiegle Attorney General Bill Schuette 3-A District Court Branch County G. Mennen Williams Building

Courthouse 31 Division St.535 Ottawa Street

Coldwater Michigan near 49036Lansing Michigan Near 48909

Certified Mail # Certified Mail #

Sheriff of Branch County Clerk of the Court

Attn: Warren Cannon, SheriffMichigan Supreme Court

ET, AL 925 W. Ottawa St.,

580 Marshall Road Lansing, Michigan near 48913

Coldwater, Michigan near 49036 US certified mail #

Certified Mail #

Safety Director Brent A, Pehrson John D. Hutchinson, City Attorney

Lewis Eastmead 100 West Chicago Street

Coldwater Police DepartmentColdwater Michigan near 49036

57 Division StreetUS certified Mail #

Coldwater, Michigan 49036

US certified Mail #

LAWFULL NOTICE AND COMPLAINT OF ABDUCTION AND UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT, RETURN OF FICTITIOUS VOID JUDGEMENTS AND CITATION, CHALLENGE OF JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY, AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS (IN THE ALTERNATIVE) BY SPECIAL APPEARANCE

Now comes, Jerry James Stanton, a sovereign free white inhabitant of the Union state of Michigan, who is over 21 years old and who has the rights to which all men who are free are entitled. Who is not under the power of another, such as the implied jurisdiction of any Corporation or Government and I have the right to make valid or not any contract by my actions. In short, I am Sovereign. I live in honor and now state for the record in affidavit form.

Lawful Notice of abduction and unlawful imprisonment and taking of private property.

On July 20th 2011 about, 6 P.M. I was traveling in my private noncommercial car on private personal business, going west on U.S. 12 a Federal right away for free passage on the land though the CORPORATE CITY OF COLDWATER Michigan. When I was forced off the road by flashing emergency lights, and abducted off private property parking lot under the pretence of arrest by an armed man with a gun named, Lewis Eastmead, ID No; 25 a employee of the Corp; of the CITY OF COLDWATER. My body and private car were searched, my private property car was stolen without warrant or arrestsupported by probable cause and taken without consent or lawful authority. All my private property was taken from me, including my private car except for my clothes that were on my body at the time, without a receipt being given or authority shown.

I was taken and lodged in BRANCH COUNTY JAIL, against my consent and locked in a drunk holding location, then a holding cell without access to phone to obtain legal counsel or ability to notify family or friends of my abduction and to get them as witnesses for my defense and to witness these crimes. I was denied access to paper, writing materials, or a law dictionary to write a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the purpose of release from unlawful imprisonment. Was told many times I would have to sign and cooperate before the sheriff department was required to give me any natural rights.

The Sheriff Department’s sign in rule, is signing a commercial agreement, in order to exercise ones unalienable rights, which would automatically be null and void and a violation of the Michigan Constitution. No person has a lawful right to impair, a man’s right to contract or force a private man into a commercial contract with a fictitious capitis deminutio name on the heading, in order to exercise one’s unalienable right to find a lawful legal counsel and to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his or her favor. This would also be a bill of attainder and expressly forbidden by the constitution.

see:

CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1963

§ 20 Rights of accused in criminal proceedings.

Sec. 20. In every criminal prosecution, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, which may consist of less than 12 jurors in prosecutions for misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year; to be informed of the nature of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him or her; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his or her favor; to have the assistance of counsel for his or her defense; to have an appeal as a matter of right, except as provided by law an appeal by an accused who pleads guilty or nolo contendere shall be by leave of the court; and as provided by law, when the trial court so orders, to have such reasonable assistance as may be necessary to perfect and prosecute an appeal.

Blacks Law Dictionary 7th Edition [Capitis Deminutio] [ Latin “reduction of status]Roman law.

STATE CONSTITUTION (EXCERPT)
CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1963

§ 10 Attainder; ex post facto laws; impairment of contracts.

Sec. 10.

No bill of attainder, ex post facto law or law impairing the obligation of contract shall be enacted.

A bill of attainder (also known as an act of attainder or writ of attainder) is an act of a legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a judicial trial.

The U.S Supreme court ruled:

The respondents are not immune from such a proceeding. Only recently, this Court recognized that "the action of an officer of the sovereign (be it holding, taking or otherwise legally affecting the plaintiff's property) can be regarded as so 'illegal' as to permit a suit for specific relief against the officer as an individual . . . if it is not within the officer's statutory powers or, if within those powers . . . if the powers, or their exercise in the particular case, are constitutionally void." Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp., 337 U.S. 682, 701-702. The same is true here, where the acts complained of are beyond the officer's authority under the Executive Order.*fn13

On July 21, 2011, I was forced into a room against my consent by two sheriff deputies, placed before a TV monitor where a David Coyle claimed he was a judge and was giving me an arraignment hearing. To the best of my recall, I stated; I was there only under duress and challenged his jurisdiction and authority first thing. It was never shown or proved, I never consented or made any plea before him. Coyle claimed he could plead and would plead for me, without my consent and did so against my objection.

On July 24, 2011 I was forced into chains and taken to Branch County Court house by the Branch County Sheriff’s Department. A David Coyle again claimed to be a judge in this matter again. The first thing I did was to challenge jurisdiction of the judge and court and standing of the plaintiff. Again David Coyle refused to show and prove jurisdiction, no plaintiff present.

David Coyle brought in an adult man, he claimed to be a attorney for me, against my consent. I had never seen or talked to this man previous to this occasion. David Coyle allowed this stranger to testify against me in a court without jurisdiction, without being sworn in, and without first hand knowledge or proof of any statements made. Denying Jerry James Stanton any due process, absent of a lawful complaint, absent of a Corpus delicti, absent of a injured party, acting without jurisdiction makes the action by this group of STATE LICENSED ATTORNEY’S void on its face and are being returned as void.

(Note) June 9, 2009 I publish a three quarter page article on the corruption in Branch County Courts and law enforcement, that was sent to about twenty seven thousand homes and business’s in the area. David T Coyle and Brent Weigle were one of the first names mentioned. Even if they were lawful judges and all jurisdictional issue’s were shown and proved on the record neither could ever qualify as a unbiased judge and would have recusal of their self’s as judge.

Affiant hereby returns without dishonor, and without prejudice, the attached fictitious void judgments Notice/Bill of the 3-1 District Court Branch County, as claimed to be created by, its Magistrate/Judge.

Affiant is not now, never has been, and can never be legally identified as “STANTON/JERRY”, STANTON JERRY JAMES”, and/or “STANTON/JERRY/JAMES”, as indicated on the notices he now returns without dishonor and without prejudice.

§ 1 Defines a name in relevant part as "the word or combination of words by which a person is distinguished from other individuals..." Petition of Dengler, 246 N.W. 2d 758 (N.D. 1976).

This private man is not required to answer or respond to such [Capitis Deminutio] name.

Blacks Law Dictionary 7th Edition [Capitis Deminutio] [ Latin “reduction of status]

CHALLENGED JURISDICTION

Jurisdiction was challenged by this writer, a private man, in a forced appearance in 3-A court and a David Coyle proceeded without jurisdiction being shown or proved and unlawfully claiming his own jurisdiction and authority without fact, law or evidense.

By special appearance, I Jerry James Stanton, challenges this said Court’s jurisdiction, David Coyle’s or a Brent Weigle’s authority, plaintiffs standing to even arrest anyone and take private property without a signed warrant in this action or any action against me in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011.

Until these lawful requirements are meet as required by law, this private man stands on his unalienable rights not to be forced in to a commercial agreement or a process that does not recognize his unalienable nature rights as acquired by the Michigan Constitution and endless case law. My presence at these unlawful proceedings so far has been by the use of fraud, deception, unlawful force and imprisonment. This writer has and will return all documents from said persons claiming to be judges, Attorneys, legal counsel and law enforcement officers as void till all documentation of jurisdiction, standing of plaintiff, lawful authority are shown, proven on the record, and all documents have my proper lawful Christian name, address on them and are properly signed by there creator.

I, Jerry James Stanton, do this as an unalienable natural right, which no government actor has the authority to take away. As evidenced by and stated by US Supreme Court:

As in our intercourse with our fellow-men certain principles of morality are assumed to exist, without which society would be impossible, so certain inherent rights lie at the foundation of all action, and upon a recognition of them alone can free institutions be maintained. These inherent rights have never been more happily expressed than in the Declaration of Independence, that new evangel of liberty to the people: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident' — that is so plain that their truth is recognized upon their mere statement — 'that all men are endowed' — not by edicts of Emperors, or decrees of Parliament, or acts of Congress, but 'by their Creator with certain inalienable rights' — that is, rights which cannot be bartered away, or given away, or taken away except in punishment of crime — 'and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and to secure these' — not grant them but secure them — 'governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.'

(emphasis added)

Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 756 4 S.Ct. 652 (1884)

There is no mysticism in the American concept of the State or of the nature or origin of its authority. We set up government by consent of the governed, and the Bill of Rights denies those in power any legal opportunity to coerce that consent. West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 641 (1943).

“The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. " (emphasis added) West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnett 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)(Opinion, J. Jackson)

AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS

On July 20, 2011, I Jerry James Stanton, was forced off Highway US 12 in Coldwater Michigan about 6:00 PM, abducted and my private property taken by force by an armed man by the name of Lewis Eastmead.

I, Jerry James Stanton, was locked in a holding cell at the BRANCH COUNTY JAIL, against my consent for six days and denied my unalienable rights as described on page one though five.

I Jerry James Stanton was forced under duress by BRANCH COUNTY sheriff deputies to appear before a man named David Coyle claiming to be a judge and having jurisdiction over me without any fact, law, standing of plaintiff or jurisdiction on the record being shown or available to me, no injured party, Corpus deleti, lawful complaint, arrest warrant, grand jury investigation, signed contract or agreement by me, was presented, all in a force contact that allowed no constitutional due process or rights availed to me.

I Jerry James Stanton am not or ever have been a commercial driver or owned a commercial vehicle, or property used in commerce or knowingly and willingly contracted my unalienable rights away, and have no commercial contract with the STATE OF MICHIGAN INC, or any of its subdivisions.

Return of Citation not consenting and Four Various 3-A Court of Branch County documents as void, Request for Production of Records

A "void judgment" as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken there under, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack10/13/58 FRITTS v. KRUGH. SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97.

Citation from employee Eastmead returned with request for records and admissions.

Sent August 2, 2011

Safety Director Brent A, Pehrson

Lewis Eastmead ID NO. 25 Verified Mail 7008 3230 0002 6304 1988

Coldwater Police Department

57 Division Street

Coldwater, Michigan near 49036

John D. Hutchinson, City Attorney Verified Mail #7008 3230 0002 6304 1995

100 West Chicago Street

rColdwater Michigan near 49036

3A District Court Branch County

Courthouse 31 Division St.

Coldwater Michigan near 49036 Verified mail#7008 3230 0002 6304 2008

Void documents returned to 3-a Branch County Court.

Two unsigned bond papers with no proper named party or address dated 7-27-2011.

Two Actions in Court papers with no proper named party or address, 7-27-2011

18 U.S.C.

[ ] Involuntary judgment by acknowledging or procuring to be acknowledged any judgment in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1506);

18 U.S.C. §1506. Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail

Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect; or,

Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

 ß 100 Parties [46 Am Jur 2d JUDGMENTS]

A judgment should identify the parties for and against whom it is rendered, with such certainty that it may be readily enforced, and a judgment which does not do so may be regarded as void for uncertainty

Blacks Law Dictionary 7th Edition [Capitis Deminutio] [ Latin “reduction of status] Roman law. A diminution or abridgment of a person’s legal status.

COUNTY OF BRANCH INC; and the CITY OF COLDWATER INC; there employee’s and agents have no more authority than a private corporation, and I choose not to contract with them.

When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation.” U.S. v. Burr. 309 U.S. 22; See 22 U.S.C.A. 286e. Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia. 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et. Seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103.

NOTICE OF NONCONSENT

At no time can or does the Affiant consent to any action of the civil law Courts of COUNTY OF BRANCH in regards to his unalienable Rights of free passage on the ‘public right of way’, as being a fundamental Right as shown in his documents of Public Record (supra) neither state nor local ordinance can ever trespass upon his Right (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 628 (1943)) when exercised in a manner considerate of the safety, well being, and Rights of use of others, and no legal standing against Rights can exist absent a signed verified complaint of another inhabitant exercising their Right to free passage seeking remedy in a common law court.

My private car has a public notice on it clearly stating it is noncommercial and privately owned. And I do, and will use it for private travel and personal use on the public right away.

NOTICE OF CRIMINAL ACTS

Affiant hereby places the recipients of this Instrument on NOTICE of the fact that any Attempt to Arrest the Affiant under the guise of justification by misapplying the above indicated commercial laws or laws under commerce, is a continuing and conspiratorial Criminal Act of Trespass upon Affiant’s fundamental, antecedent, and in perpetuum Rights including his Civil liberties, Right to Free unmolested passage on the Public Right of Way, Right to meaningful due process of law, Right to be let alone, Right to have Rights, and Right to Defend Rights, as all protected under the Declaration of Independence and the federal and state Constitutions.

CHALLENGE AND DEMAND FOR VERFICATION OF AUTHORITY

Any evidence or verified knowledge to the contrary of these sworn facts as presented by Jerry James Stanton in this Notice and complaint to the above addressed parties, persons and agents Brent A, Pehrson, Lewis Eastmead, employee’s of the chartered CITY OF COLDWATER INC, DAVID COYLE and BRENT WIEGLE employee’s of the chartered COUNTY OF BRANCH INC, and Warren Cannon, elected Sheriff ET, AL deputies of the charted COUNTY OF BRANCH INC and John D. Hutchinson, City Attorney ofchartered CITY OF COLDWATER INC.You have 21 days to respond in writing to the show and present facts, signed under oath of affirmation as true and correct or concede the facts presented here are true and correct.

Under Michigans Freedom of Information Act and as a unalienable right of a wrongly accused and injured party, by STATE chartered actors agents, and employee’s involved, provide all documentation of all laws, statutes, charters, certificates of authority, contracts, Oath of Offices, bonds required to have the authority to arrest, hold and judge against the consent the private man Jerry James Stanton and all documents that show Jerry James Stanton is now or ever has been in any activity in commerce that would require a license from the corporate STATE OF MICHIGAN or any of its chartered subdivisions in order to exercise his common right to free passage on the public right away, private property or that his private car is not private property owned and controlled by him alone as a right.