LEARNING NEEDS STATEMENT

AN EMPIRICAL UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEMS IN HEALTH CARE.

1. Knowledge of the United States health care system and its reform. Possess the ability to remember and recall pertinent historical information and facts.

2. A contextual awareness of the US health system in relation to global public health, utilizing the experience of other country’s examples to better health care and its reform.

3. Understanding the relationship and complicationsbetween poverty and health.

WHOLEHEARTED PROFESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE WITH OTHERS.

4. An ability to passionatelycommunicate an understanding for an issue, and engage people to collaborate together behinda cause.

5. Leadership skills toproject and see out a purposeful vision. Motivate, mediate conflict, and find efficient, sustainable solutions for both macroscopic and everyday issues.

6. An appreciation for the role service plays in our health care community and society at large and its value, with a focus on how to both maximize current efforts and inspire new.

INSIGHTFUL APPLICATION OF UNDERSTANDING AND CORRESPONDENCE.

7. Develop and inspire creativity in relation to addressing problems faced by our health care system today, and the perspective that small steps make a big change.

8. Employ economical and political methods and considerations as a frame of reference while working toward sustainable innovative solutions for health care reform.

9. Connect the aforementioned objectives together into cohesive solution, completing the design and presentation of a productive, professional business model centered on the improvement of health care reform.

Additional Concerns

As my program initiatives and needs are parallel that of a Master’s in Health Administration and a Master’s in Public Health, I would like to look into petitioning it for approval as a licensed program. I would also like to incorporate licensures and programs such as Six Sigma and LEAN, in addition to Toast Masters, to work to address my learning needs.

Methods of Assessment

Scale
0 = No competence at all.
1 = Low or minimal levels of knowledge/skill.
2 = Modest levels of knowledge/skill.
3 = Some degree of expertise, but not mastery.
4 = Early stage of mastery
5 = Mastery with depth and broad application
6 = Mastery at a nearly unique level
7 = Perfect mastery (theoretical limit of what humans can achieve)