Preliminary Analysis
Airport Development in Zanzibar
Preliminary PPP Analysis
1Airport Development in Zanzibar
Contents
Purpose & Scope
Background
Current Situation
Terminal 2 Development
Analysis
Traffic Projections
Revenue Projections
Options Under Consideration
1.Development of Terminal 2, Operated by ZAA
2.Development of Terminal 2, Operated by Private Company
3.Development, Financing, Maintenance & Operations of Zanzibar International Airport
Preliminary Conclusions
Preliminary Recommendation
Figures
Figure 1 Aerial Photo of Existing Airport Facilities
Figure 2 Aerial photos of existing terminal and new terminal under construction at ZIA
Figure 3 Projected Growth in Passenger Traffic ZIA – 3 Growth Scenarios
Figure 4 Historical & Projected Revenue, Expenses and EBITDA – High-Growth Scenario – 2000-2040
Figure 5 Projected Revenue, Expenses and EBITDA – Medium-Growth Scenario – 2000-2040
Figure 6 Projected Revenue, Expenses and EBITDA – Low-Growth Scenario – 2000-2040
Tables
Table 1 Passenger Service and Security Charges, Domestic & International
Table 2 15 & 25-year present value of Revenues, Expenses & EBITDA 2016-2040 High-Growth
Table 3 15 & 25-year present value of Revenues, Expenses & EBITDA 2016-2040 Medium-Growth
Table 4 15 & 25-year present value of Revenues, Expenses & EBITDA 2016-2040 Low-Growth
1Airport Development in Zanzibar
Purpose & Scope
This preliminary PPP analysis for the Abeid Amani Karume International Airport (Zanzibar International Airport, or ZIA), has been developed as part of the activities under a contract with the World Bank for development of a PPP Policy and Guidelines and preliminary assessment of potential PPP projects for the Government of Zanzibar. Below we provide details on the current state of ZIA, the Government of Zanzibar’s plans for development of the airport and air transport sector, and recommendations for PPP structures to promote those developments.
Background
Current Situation
The Zanzibar International Airport has undergone significant development over the last several years to upgrade its capacity in terms of the size of aircraft it can accommodate as well as an increase in the number of passengers processed at the airport. The runway and aprons have recently been expanded, and a new 25,000 square meter terminal building with a capacity of 1.6 million passengersp.a. is currently under construction. The two airports at Zanzibar and Pemba together handled close to800,000 passengers (estimated) in 2013 and growth is expected to increase as more airlines provide regular service to the island, and as the tourism sector on both islands continues to develop.
The Government’s vision for Zanzibar is to become a regional hub for East Africa, although there is stiff competition from Nairobi, Addis Ababa, Kilimanjaro, and Dar es Salaam for this position. Several additions, once the new terminal building is operational, are under consideration for Zanzibar Airport including development of a new cargo terminal and fuel farm, as well as potential development of a maintenance hangar for large Boeing aircraft and other supporting infrastructure. Development of a heliport, aviation school, and airport hotel are also under consideration. The government is open to the idea of bringing in a private company to operate and maintain the airport, which would most likely include a requirement to further develop the Pemba island airport.
This analysis will focus only on Zanzibar International Airport given its importance as the main airport receiving passenger traffic for both Unguja and Pemba islands. Currently approximately 50% of the arriving passengers come from Dar es Salaam while the remaining 50% come from other domestic and international origins. Having recently completed extension of the runway and with ongoing taxiway and apron rehabilitation, the airport can now handle up to Boeing 777 aircraft (Class E). All passengers must deplane on the apron and walk to the terminal building – there are currently no boarding bridges.
As can be seen in the figure below, the airport area is quite large with room for development, however enforcement of property lines has been lax over the last several years and housing developments have encroached on airportproperty significantly. The airport area is a designated free zone by ZIPA, however development of a free zone area has not yet taken place and relocation is under consideration.
Figure 1
Aerial Photo of Existing Airport Facilities
Source: Consultant using photo from Google Maps
Terminal 2 Development
As mentioned above, the new Terminal 2 building, located adjacent to the existing terminal (as seen in the figure below), will include construction of a 25,000 square meter facility with capacity to handle up to 1.6 million passengers to accommodate growth through the project period. The new terminal will have 3 Class E boarding bridges and 2 bridges for Class D aircraft. There is hope of doubling the number of international flights arriving directly to Zanzibar (from 10 to 20 flights per week) with the addition of the new terminal building and accompanying facilities.
The terminal is being built by Beijing Construction Engineering Group Ltd. and supervised by ADPI through contracts with the Ministry of Infrastructure and Communication. The total cost for the new terminal is estimatedat US $130 million through what we understand to be a turnkey construction contract with a loan from the Chinese Ex-Im Bank. Construction began in 2011, was halted in 2012 pending disputes over aspects of the airport that did not meet ICAO standards, and is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2015. Exact details of the financing are unknown.
The main issue affecting the project has been the location of the new terminal, which was constructed too close to the taxiway limiting the size of aircraft that can park at the gates facing the taxiway and runway. Redesign of the terminal will include expansion of the apron to the south side of the terminal building where larger aircraft will be able to park. This will significantly limit the number of aircraft that can board at one time, however it has been determined that this redesign will be able to accommodate expected growth in both the number of passengers and size of aircraft that will be using the new terminal.
Figure 2
Aerial photos of existing terminal and new terminal under construction at ZIA
Source: Consultant using photo from Google Maps
As shown in the photo above, the current terminal is too small to accommodate boarding bridges and the apron limits the number of aircraft that can park at the airport. Additionally, both large and small aircraft must compete for space in the same area. The photo above also shows the new terminal construction, located quite close to the extended taxiway on the East side and to housing developments which have encroached on airport property on the West side.
Analysis
Traffic Projections
Below we present a preliminary analysis of both projected traffic and projected revenue for the Zanzibar International Airport based on historical traffic data and tariff rates provided by the Zanzibar Airport Authority. For the 25-year traffic projections,we estimate high, medium and low-growth scenarios based on historical GDP growthin Zanzibar. These growth scenarios are depicted in the graph below.
Figure 3
Projected Growth in Passenger Traffic ZIA – 3 Growth Scenarios
Source: Consultant analysis based on historical traffic data provided by ZAA
As the graph indicates, according to the high-growth scenario, total passenger traffic is projected to increase to almost 4 million passengers in the year 2040 showing growth of 6.11% CAGR between 2016-2040, while in the medium and low-growth scenarios passenger traffic is expected to increase to approximately3 million and 2 million passengers respectively (representing 5.19% and 3.89% CAGR between 2016 and 2040). Planned capacity for the new Terminal 2 is 1.6 million p.a. meaning that in all three scenarios, projected traffic will surpass total capacity prior to the end of the 25-year projection period requiring expansion of the Terminal 2 facility or construction of a third terminal facility. In allthree cases, terminal expansion or construction of a new terminal would need to begin prior to 2040 in order to accommodate growth.These scenarios are “unrestricted” scenarios assuming that the relevant infrastructure (hotels, restaurants, access roads, energy production, water, solid waste, housing, etc.) is developed with enough anticipation to cater to projected passenger growth, either by the government or under PPP arrangements.
Revenue Projections
The revenue analysis provides a projection of estimated total revenues, operating costs and EBITDA for the ZIA based on historical and projected traffic for the high, medium and low-growth scenarios. It is important to note that this revenue analysis is based on projections and estimated operating costs based on similar airport operations and does not include information from the ZAA’s audited financial statements. The analysis estimates a split of 50% international passengers and 50% domestic passengers with tariff rates as follows:
Table 1
Passenger Service and Security Charges, Domestic & International
Domestic Passenger Service Charge / Tzs 10,000
Domestic Safety Fee / Tzs 1,000 (Increasing to 3,000 in 2015)
International Passenger Service Charge / US $40.00
International Safety Fee / US $8.00
Source: ZAA
The revenue analysis also takes into consideration the following additional assumptions:
- Using historical and projected financial statements for the Tanzania Airports Authority (TAA) as a comparison, passenger service charges are assumed to make up approximately 60% of total revenues, and the remaining 40 percent includes landing and parking fees as well as adequate development of commercial activities;
- Using historical and projected financial statements for TAA as a comparison, total operating expenses are assumed to make up approximately 80% of total revenues through the first 3 years of project operations 2016-2018, decreasing by 5% every 3 years starting in 2019 based on an assumption of more efficient, modern facilities and increasing operating efficiency under management of a private operator. Operating costs reduce to 60% of operating revenues in 2030 remaining constant through 2040;
- The safety fee charged to domestic departing passengers is assumed to increase from Tzs 1,000 to Tzs 3,000 in the year 2015;
- The terminal construction period is assumed to end in 2015, with 2016 as the first year of operations;
- Passenger service charge and security feesare assumed to grow at the rate of U.S. inflation for international passengers and Tanzanian inflation for domestic passengers, based on IMF inflation projections through 2019 (held constant thereafter);
- Present value of revenues, costs and EBITDA are calculated for the projected asset life (2016-2040) at discount rates of 12% (Tanzania), 6% (China) and 3% (low-rate comparison);
- Revenues and costs were projected based on high, medium and low-growth scenarios based on projected GDP growth, projected tourism growth, and projected population growth, as described in the section on traffic analysis above.
The simple revenue analysis performed based on the assumptions above provided an estimate of the ZAA’s or future airport operator’s ability to repay debt and fund additional development activities. Below we present the results of the revenue analysis for the high, medium and low-growth scenarios, as well as the 15 and 25-year sums and present values of revenue, expenses and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) at the benchmark discount rates of 12%, 6%, and 3%.
Under the high-growth scenario, total estimated revenues from the beginning of operations in 2016 to the end of the project period in 2040 grow from US $20.8 million to US $87.5 million while operating expenses increase from US $16.6 to US $52.5 and EBITDA increases from US $4.2 million to US $35 million representing a growth in EBITDA margin from 20% to 40%.The graph below illustrates this high-growth trend.
Figure 4
Historical & Projected Revenue, Expenses and EBITDA – High-Growth Scenario – 2000-2040
Source: Consultant projections based on traffic & tariff data provided by ZAA
Table 2
15 & 25-year present value of Revenues, Expenses & EBITDA 2016-2040 High-Growth
Operating Revenue / $501,143,565 / $200,944,594 / $304,122,912 / $385,963,597 / $1,183,914,897 / $267,726,341 / $508,033,525 / $754,535,809
Operating Expenses / $341,818,355 / $143,724,150 / $212,616,163 / $266,559,851 / $751,481,154 / $183,793,198 / $334,962,531 / $487,703,178
EBITDA / $159,325,210 / $57,220,444 / $91,506,749 / $119,403,746 / $432,433,742 / $83,933,143 / $173,070,994 / $266,832,631
Source: Consultant projections based on traffic & tariff data provided by ZAA
Based on the revenue, operating expense and EBITDA projections above, the 15-year and 25-year sum and present values were calculated to provide a clearer picture of the repayment capacity of the airport based on the high-growth scenario and assumptions above. The 25-year present value calculations, which consider the entire project period from 2016-2040, show that at a 12% discount rate, present value of EBITDA would reach US $83.9 million, and at the 6% and 3% discount rates would reach US $173 million and US $266.8 million respectively. At the 6% and 3% discount rates, repayment of the $130 million loan for Terminal 2 construction could be paid back, however at the Tanzanian benchmark discount rate of 12%, repayment would not be possible without government subsidization.
Under the medium-growth scenario, total estimated revenues from the beginning of operations in 2016 to the end of the project period in 2040 grow from US $20.7 million to US $70.1 million while operating expenses increase from US $16.6 to US $42 and EBITDA increases from US $4.2 million to US $28 million represented in the figure below. This scenario, based on tourism growth, shows a modest reduction in operating revenues, expenses and EBITDA compared to the high-growth scenario, as well as a modest reduction in the 15 and 25-year present value of revenue, operating expenses and EBITDA at the 12%, 6% and 3% discount rates, as shown in Table 2 below.
Figure 5
Projected Revenue, Expenses and EBITDA – Medium-Growth Scenario – 2000-2040
Source: Consultant projections based on traffic & tariff data provided by ZAA
Table 3
15 & 25-year present value of Revenues, Expenses & EBITDA 2016-2040 Medium-Growth
Operating Revenue / $461,115,794 / $188,546,865 / $282,644,609 / $356,920,826 / $1,027,476,680 / $244,383,503 / $452,480,657 / $663,283,812
Operating Expenses / $315,740,515 / $135,367,578 / $198,386,912 / $247,481,733 / $655,557,047 / $168,869,561 / $300,288,540 / $431,299,525
EBITDA / $145,375,279 / $53,179,287 / $84,257,698 / $109,439,093 / $371,919,634 / $75,513,942 / $152,192,117 / $231,984,287
Source: Consultant projections based on traffic & tariff data provided by ZAA
Under the low-growth scenario, total estimated revenues from the beginning of operations in 2016 to the end of the project period in 2040 grow from US $19.6 million to US $49million while operating expenses increase from US $15.6 to US $29.4 and EBITDA increases from US $3.9 million to US $19.6 million, as shown in the figure below. This scenarioshows a significant reduction in operating revenues, expenses and EBITDA compared to the high and medium-growth scenarios, as well as a significant reduction in the 15 and 25-year present value of revenue, operating expenses and EBITDA at the 12%, 6% and 3% discount rates, as shown in Table 4 below.
Figure 6
Projected Revenue, Expenses and EBITDA –Low-Growth Scenario – 2000-2040
Source: Consultant projections based on traffic & tariff data provided by ZAA
Table 4
15 & 25-year present value of Revenues, Expenses & EBITDA 2016-2040 Low-Growth
Operating Revenue / $393,346,413 / $165,078,565 / $244,373,786 / $306,540,063 / $809,908,448 / $206,617,771 / $370,026,602 / $532,544,317
Operating Expenses / $270,761,871 / $119,100,284 / $172,430,353 / $213,683,155 / $520,699,092 / $144,023,808 / $247,822,043 / $349,285,708
EBITDA / $122,584,542 / $45,978,281 / $71,943,433 / $92,856,907 / $289,209,356 / $62,593,964 / $122,204,559 / $183,258,609
Source: Consultant projections based on traffic & tariff data provided by ZAA
Based on the above analysis, the current Zanzibar International Airport Development project is compatible with the Government’s PPP strategy. Our financial projections confirm that in all cases the PPPwill be able to pay in full its operating expenses and partially or totally service the debt incurred for construction of the new terminal, depending on actual traffic growth at the airport with the addition of the new terminal. In the most conservative scenarios, the PPP formula will require some government funding for development of basicairport infrastructure. Under a private operator, it is believed that greater efficiency and development of commercial opportunities would be achieved, which would result in increased revenue and greater cost savings, making the airport attractive to potential airport operators.
Options Under Consideration
This section presents the main options for development and operation of the Zanzibar International Airport including development of the new Terminal 2 facility.
1.Development of Terminal 2, Operated by ZAA
The first option presented involves a purely government approach to airport development and operations, in line with the current Terminal 2 development. The Government of Zanzibar, through a China Ex-Im Bank loan made to the Ministry of Finance and signed by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Communication, has incurred debt of approximately US $130 million for a turnkey construction project to develop a new terminal at the Zanzibar International Airport, as described above. Once construction is finished, the airport will be turned over to the Zanzibar Airport Authority who would assume operation of the new facility. While this option falls in line with the status quo, the Government acknowledges that the ZAA does not currently have the capacity or the necessary financial resources to operate or maintain the Terminal 2 facility..
2.Development of Terminal 2, Operated by Private Company
The second option for consideration would involve development of the Terminal 2 facility under the current arrangement (China Ex-Imbank loan and turnkey development of Terminal 2 through existing construction contract), with operations of Terminal 2 contracted to the private sector under a PPP arrangement, and operations of Terminal 1 remaining with the ZAA. This option would involve a tendering process according to the proposed PPP Policy to select the most qualified company willing to provide the best financial arrangements to ZAA and the Government (including revenues sufficient to repay the China Exim Bank loan for Terminal 2).
This option would allow ZAA to benefit from efficiency gains and additional financing from the private operator to ensure the new terminal is run according to international standards, in a manner likely to attract new airlines and flights and to leverage commercial opportunities in the new Terminal. The PPP arrangement should include operations, maintenance, and financing of future development related to Terminal 2. The structure of the PPP arrangement will depend on a variety of considerations, including the projected traffic and resulting revenues of the airport with the addition of the new terminal. As part of the PPP agreement, the private sector operator would be required to pay the government a fixed and/or variable fee adequate enough to contribute towards servicing the China Ex-Im Bank loan and provide sufficient revenue to the government. This would be negotiated as part of the draft contract included in the tendering documents for the concession.
3.Development, Financing, Maintenance & Operations of Zanzibar International Airport
The third option includes development of the Terminal 2 facility under the current arrangement (China Ex-Im bank loan and turnkey development of Terminal 2 through existing construction contract), with operations contracted to the private sector under a PPP arrangement for the entire airport, including.the new Terminal 2. This option would involve a tendering process according to the proposed PPP Policy to select the most qualified company, willing to provide the best financial arrangements to ZAA and the Government (including revenues sufficient to repay the China Exim Bank loan for Terminal 2)..