The CERN Neutrino Factory Working Group

NF Note 28

16th August 2000

The CERN Neutrino Factory Working Group

Status Report and Work Plan

B.Autin, J.-P.Delahaye, R.Garoby, H.Haseroth, K.Hübner,

C.D.Johnson, E.Keil, A.Lombardi, H.Ravn, H.Schönauer [1]

A. Blondel[2]

1Introduction

The production of neutrinos from the decay of muons circulating in a storage ring (neutrino factory) has of late attracted considerable attention. The original interest started with the study of muon colliders [1,2]. These colliders could open the way to lepton collisions at extremely high energies. Circular electron colliders are limited in energy due to the high synchrotron radiation emitted by the electrons. Although this radiation decreases with larger radius of the accelerator, it increases with the fourth power of the energy. For this reason it seems unrealistic to build circular machines with higher energies than LEP. The only possibility for higher energies seemed to be linear colliders with all their technical challenges. Another solution is the use of heavier leptons in circular colliders, as the limiting synchrotron radiation power at the same energy is inversely proportional to the fourth power of their rest mass, g4. Muon beams seem to be possible candidates for this purpose. Muons can be produced by the decay of pions, which in turn can easily be produced by bombarding a target with high-energy protons. The most serious problem is the production of muon beams with the high phasespace density necessary for collider operation. In spite of some impressive progress towards this goal, no technically feasible solution has yet been found. A substantial R&D effort will be required to make progress.

With the recent confirmation of neutrino oscillations, the situation has changed drastically. Highenergy muons, stored in a decay ring with long straight sections pointing towards distant detectors, provide a unique beam of highenergy electron neutrinos. This allows precise determination of several parameters of the neutrino mass matrix, possibly including the CP violating phase, which would otherwise be inaccessible. The reduced requirements (compared to a muon collider) of this neutrino factory have brought much closer to reality the concept of high intensity muon machines. The R&D effort for the muon colliders turns out to be very useful for a neutrino factory, and the increased interest from the physics side has produced a spate of activity on the accelerator side, so that considerable progress has been made towards a neutrino factory design [3,4,5]. It is interesting to note that, in turn, a part of this progress is also beneficial for the design of a muon collider.

CERN is proposing a reference scenario, which serves as guide line for its activities in this direction. With the help of other laboratories, CERN has initiated a study on some of the many technological challenges of such a facility. Discussions about the exact scope of the different collaborations are under way.

2The basic concept of the CERN neutrino factory scenario

The reference scenario described here is based on a particular situation at CERN. It is intended as a working hypothesis that is in part CERN specific, while being dominated by the wish to achieve the required high muon fluence [26].

The requirements, as expressed in the Nufact99 workshop at Lyon [11], set a target fluence of 1021 muons per year injected into the storage ring. The present CERN accelerators are not suited to easy upgrade of the available beam power. However, a proposal [6,7] has been made to replace the CERN PS injector complex (50 MeV linac and 1.4 GeV booster) by a linear accelerator, destined primarily as injector into the PS for the LHC beam. It is intended to offer a higher brilliance LHC beam from the PS. The basic idea in proposing to build this linac is to re-use the cavities, klystrons and auxiliary equipment from LEP after this machine has been shut down. Average beam power.of 4MW appears to be feasible. We envisage in our scenario a beam energy of only 2.2 GeV, which is low, compared to other proposals. The results of the HARP experiment [9], which will measure pion production in this energy range, should produce data next year and this will be crucial in the final assessment of our choice.

A neutrino factory requires the production of beam pulses consisting of relatively short trains of very short proton bunches (nanoseconds). This allows the use of bunch rotation to reduce the large energy spread within the muon bunches. The pulse repetition rate must not be too high; otherwise the energy consumption of the subsequent machines becomes too high. Also it would be wasteful if a new injection into the storage ring took place before the previous batch had decayed (the ring design employs fullaperture kickers and so injection kills the previous circulating muon beam). The linac cannot directly provide a suitable beam; hence it will operate with H- ions and inject into an accumulator ring, using charge exchange injection to achieve a large circulating proton current. Bunches will be formed in this ring with suitable rf cavities. They will be transferred into a compressor ring for further shortening of their length. The linac will operate at 75 Hz and initial pulse duration of 2.2ms at a mean current of 11mA during the pulse. After accumulation and compression the resulting beam pulses, now shortened to 3.3ms - the revolution period in the accumulator and compressor rings, contain a bunch train comprising 140 bunches spaced at 44 MHz frequency. The repetition rate is 75Hz. It is assumed that the accumulator and compressor rings will be accommodated in the old ISR tunnel.

This beam will irradiate the production target. In the FNAL study [5] a stationary carbon target has been chosen. This has many advantages, but it is only applicable to the lower beam power assumed in this study and for the higher energy of their proton driver. In our case at 4MW and 2.2GeV, to ensure adequate cooling we must use a moving target. Some work has begun at RAL on the development of a moving toroidal target made out of solid material; an alternative possibility is a liquid (metal) target. Some liquid metal experience is available at CERN and we plan to investigate this option.

It is necessary to capture the pions produced in the target. The FNAL study has chosen for this purpose a 20T solenoidal field. The solenoid magnet is expensive and needs substantial maintenance, especially when used around a target exposed to high beam power. At CERN there is considerable experience with magnetic horns, for the collection of antiprotons and in the production of (conventional) neutrino beams. It is therefore worthwhile to investigate the possibility of using a magnetic horn also for the neutrino factory.

Because of the high repetition rate and the large number of bunches, an rf system is proposed for the manipulation of the muons after the pion decay. The rf system will capture and phaserotate the muon bunches, and it will also be used in the ionisation cooling of the muon beam. Further acceleration of the muons to 2GeV is performed in a special linac with solenoid focusing up to around 1GeV, followed by more conventional quadrupole focusing. Subsequent acceleration takes place in two Recirculating Linacs (RLA) to an energy of 50GeV. The muons are then injected into a storage ring (decay ring) where they are kept for the duration of the useful beam lifetime (1.2ms at this energy). The muons decaying in the long straight sections of this ring produce the required neutrino beams. A schematic layout of this CERN reference scenario is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Isometric schematic of the CERN reference scenario for a Neutrino Factory

3Brief description of individual subsystems of the reference scenario

3.1 The SPL Study

3.1.1 Present design

The Superconducting Proton Linac (SPL) accelerates H- up to 2.2 GeV kinetic energy in bursts of 2.2ms duration, at a rate of 75Hz. The mean current during the pulses is 11mA for an average beam power of 4MW. The main characteristics of the SPL beam are listed in Table1. For the neutrino factory the beam burst is accumulated over 660 revolutions of the accumulator ring that transforms it into a 3.3 ms train of 140 bunches. These are then individually reduced in length in a compressor ring before being sent to the pion production target. Table1 summarises some of the parameters of the SPL in this mode of operation.

Beam Current, mA / 11
Energy (kinetic), GeV / 2.2
Invariant transverse rms emittance, mm / 0.6
Beam energy spread (Ö5s) MeV / ±2
Bunch length (total: Ö5s), ps / 24
Linac length, m / 800
rf frequency, MHz / 352
Overall rf power, MW / 31
Number of klystrons / 46

Table 1 The 2.2GeV Superconducting H¯ linac parameters in quasi-CW mode

The beam from the ion source is bunched at 352MHz by an RFQ and chopped at 2MeV to minimise capture losses in the synchrotron accumulator. Conventional room temperature accelerating structures are used up to 120MeV. Above this energy superconducting rf cavities are employed. Up to 1GeV, new low-beta structures are needed, while 116LEP-2 cavities in 29 cryostats are used afterwards (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Layout of the Superconducting Linac

The entire rf infrastructure and all cavities between 1 and 2.2GeV can be built from recuperated LEP hardware, leading to a cost-effective machine. The main new elements to be constructed are:

1.  The 120 MeV room temperature Linac

2.  The new low-beta superconducting cavities for the section between 120 and 1000 MeV

3.  The focusing ,diagnostic and control equipment

4.  The cryoplant

5.  The civil engineering for the 800 m accelerator tunnel and the technical gallery

Radiation handling is a key concern at these high beam powers. In order to permit hands-on maintenance, losses must be kept below 1W/m, a challenging figure that requires an adequate machine design with a careful control of beam halo as well as an effective collimation systems. The large aperture of the LEP-2 cavities is an important advantage in this respect because most of the halo particles that develop after the initial collimation are transported to the end of the linac and dumped in collimators where radiation issues are localised and properly addressed.

3.1.2 Potential evolution

The design of the muon collection, cooling and acceleration is still evolving. The choice of the actual SPL characteristics is based upon the recently proposed CERN scheme [8], which defines the parameters for the 2.2 GeV proton beam hitting the target. Any evolution of the scheme will have consequences on the proton driver. The CERN HARP experiment [9] will determine the efficiency of protons of various energies for the production of pions and muons. Depending on its results, the interest of 2.2GeV protons will either be confirmed or not. This will have important consequences for the future of the SPL proposal.

3.2 Other uses of the SPL

Although re-designed for the needs of a neutrino factory, the attractiveness of the SPL is that can replace the present injectors of the PS and improve its performance. The brilliance of the proton beam for LHC in the PS can be doubled and the maximum PS intensity can be increased by a substantial amount with immediate benefits for users like SPS in fixed-target mode (CNGS). Moreover, the present ISOLDE facility can be supplied with a beam which is up to 5 times more intense (up to 10 mA, limited by the present ISOLDE lay-out) and better matched to the target capabilities, without interfering with the PS needs. In a future stage, the next generation ISOL facility, as discussed in the new NuPECC report [31], which will need up to 100mA, can also be accommodated.

The proton beam from the SPL may also be used for highintensity stoppedmuon physics and to produce a low-energy neutrino beam in the conventional way. A study of the interest for such a beam is being conducted in the Physics Working Group.

3.3 Accumulator and Compressor Ring

The CERN reference scenario uses the 2.2GeV SPL (Section3.1) combined with an accumulator and a compressor ring that could be situated in the ISR tunnel [27]. The ring parameters (Table 2) have followed the evolution of the SPL study, and are now well adapted to the parameters of the 44MHz rf muon phase rotation, cooling and acceleration section. The choice of this rf frequency determines the harmonic number of h = 146. Consequently140 bunches (plus 6 empty buckets) fill the circumference of both rings. The repetition rate has been chosen to be 75 Hz.

Accumulator / Compressor
Circumference, m / 945 / 945
Beam kinetic energy, GeV / 2.2 / 2.2
Revolution period (b=0.954), ms / 3.3 / 3.3
rf harmonic number / 146 / 146
Number of turns / 660 / ~7
Repetition rate, Hz / 75 / 75

Table 2 Main parameters of accumulator and compressor rings

Figure 3 Accumulator Compressor scheme for a Neutrino Factory

Contrary to initial ideas of designing nearly isochronous lattices to economise rf voltage, both rings now feature high-t lattices ensuring fast debunching of the very short (0.5ns) linac microbunches as well as very fast rotation (~7 turns) in the compressor. The high t raises the synchrotron frequency and is thus also instrumental in smoothing the accumulated distribution in longitudinal phase-space. The feasibility of H- injection (injecting 660 turns could entail intolerable foil heating) and of the final bunch rotation has been shown. Simulations including the effect of space charge on momentum compaction and of the microwave instability have not revealed any problems. Both accumulator and compressor lattices are designed; details of the intersection and the transfer between the rings remain to be studied. A schematic of the accumulator/compressor scheme detailing the bunch time structure is shown in Figure 3.