Superior Court Penalties

Regions and Judges of Ontario

South West Ontario Judicial Region Summary

Peter Karl Roscoe

Nov 2008

South West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Sw – South West Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

Penalties Against Men / Penalties Against Women
Total / Major / Total / Major
Judge / 1 / 2 / # p / # sr / # p / # sr / # p / # sr / # p / # sr
Leitch / F / Sw / 5 / 4 / 2 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Marshman / F / Sw / 14 / 3 / 9 / 2 / 5 / 1 / 1 / 0
Morrisette / F / Sw / 3 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Nolan / F / Sw / 3 / 3 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1
Rady / F / Sw / 5 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0
Templeton / F / Sw / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Abbey / M / Sw / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Brokenshire / M / Sw / 3 / 0 / 3 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Campbell / M / Sw / 19 / 6 / 11 / 3 / 7 / 2 / 2 / 1
Cusinato / M / Sw / 8 / 3 / 3 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Dandie / M / Sw / 3 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Desotti / M / Sw / 7 / 0 / 4 / 0 / 2 / 2 / 1 / 1
Ducharme / M / Sw / 3 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Granger / M / Sw / 5 / 1 / 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Harper / M / Sw / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Heeney / M / Sw / 12 / 1 / 9 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0
Jenkins / M / Sw / 4 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Kennedy / M / Sw / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Patterson / M / Sw / 6 / 2 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Quinn JG / M / Sw / 7 / 5 / 7 / 5 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0
Rogin / M / Sw / 2 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Vogelsang / M / Sw / 11 / 2 / 5 / 0 / 4 / 1 / 1 / 1
Female / 6 / 31 / 11 / 17 / 6 / 10 / 3 / 2 / 1
Male / 15 / 95 / 22 / 59 / 14 / 22 / 6 / 4 / 3
Total / 22 / 126 / 33 / 76 / 20 / 32 / 9 / 6 / 4

Southwest Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 2

N = 24 Mean = 24.9 Total = 597.6

1.000 3.600 3.600 4.500 4.500 5.000 5.000 7.700 10.00 10.10 18.30 22.80 23.00 23.10 24.00 25.00 25.00 28.00 29.00 36.00 37.90 50.00 60.00 140.0

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 17 Mean = 33.9 Total = 576.3

7.000 8.000 10.00 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 43.00 46.00 50.00 186.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 28 Mean = 14.5 Total = 406.0

0.6000 1.500 1.500 1.800 1.900 2.000 2.100 2.300 3.000 3.000 3.300 4.500 4.500 7.000 7.500 8.000 12.00 12.10 12.40 12.60 15.00 15.00 19.30 30.60 41.00 46.80 49.00 85.00

Female Cost Penalties

N = 11 Mean = 9.2 Total = 101.2

1.500 2.000 2.700 5.000 5.500 5.800 6.500 8.000 14.00 18.00 32.50

Southwest Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / Case / 5 / 6 / 7 / Description
Campbell / M / Sw / M / M / Roby v. Roby, 2003 CanLII 2111 (ON S.C.) / mj / C / 5.5 K fine for first contempt and 7.5 K fine for second contempt, fines made post bankruptcy debt, security denied, unstated cost penalty
Quinn / M / Sw / sr / L / Bubis v. Jones, 2000 CanLII 22571 (ON S.C.) / mj / C / Both man and wife found in contempt, suspended sentences, custody reversed to wife
Quinn / M / Sw / sr / M / Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.) / mj / C / Court finds man guilty of contempt for failing to submit disclosure on it’s own motion, 5 days in jail
Leitch / F / Sw / sr / M / Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.3 / 3.3 K costs for variation, 3.3 K retroactive arrears, 1.4 K credit card lump, 10.5 K arrears, FRO may apply for commital of there’s a default, previous 3 K cost penalty by Harper J
Marshman / F / Sw / F / F / Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.8 / Wife gets 1.8 K in costs from interim motion
Marshman / F / Sw / M / M / Deelstra v. Van Osch, 2003 CanLII 2007 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 30.6 / Divorce action, 4 day trial, wife gets custody 30.6 K
Marshman / F / Sw / M / M / Dietrich v. Franklin, 2003 CanLII 41467 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 41.0 / Divorce action and appeal, 41 K costs
Marshman / F / Sw / M / M / Giguere v. Giguere, 2004 CanLII 5004 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 12.1 / Trial of support, 12.1 K costs
Marshman / F / Sw / M / M / MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2004 CanLII 8945 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 49.0 / Wife gets 49 K in 6 day trial, 12 K more costs of appeal in 2005, 36 K retroactive support, 10.7 K total monthly support
Marshman / F / Sw / F / F / Morrison v. Morrison, 2003 CanLII 1950 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 7.5 / Divorce action, 7.5 K costs
Marshman / M / Sw / sr / F / Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 0.6 / Interim motion 0.6 K costs
Marshman / F / Sw / M / M / Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 4493 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 8.0 / 2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month, 2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month 8 K costs
Nolan / F / Sw / sr / L / P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 12.6 / Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
Campbell / M / Sw / M / M / Biggin v. Maloney, 2006 CanLII 7511 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.5 / Simple case, 1.5 K costs
Campbell / M / Sw / F / F / Brennan v. Brennan, 2002 CanLII 2742 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 2.1 / Interim motion,both parties claim to have spent over 30 K, 2.1 K costs
Campbell / M / Sw / F / F / Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2004 CanLII 5858 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 85.0 / Divorce action, wife gets 85 K
Campbell / M / Sw / sr / F / DePace v. Michienzi, 2000 CanLII 22460 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 19.3 / Mans pleadings struck 19.3 K costs
Campbell / M / Sw / sr / M / Ficca v. Ficca, 2004 CanLII 6226 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.9 / Motion to change access, 1.9 K costs
Campbell / M / Sw / sr / F / Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 7.0 / Divorce action, man must pay 7 K costs
Campbell / M / Sw / M / F / Waywell v. Waywell, 2004 CanLII 7577 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 2.0 / Wife asks 30 K for interim support relief and gets 2 K
Cusinato / M / Sw / M / F / Dias v. Dias, 2005 CanLII 41541 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 2.3 / Interim motion on sale of property, 2.3 K costs
Cusinato / M / Sw / M / F / Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 31729 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 12.4 / Support variation, 12.4 K costs, 41 K US arrears
Cusinato / M / Sw / sr / M / Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 15.0 / Mans pleadings struck, house vested to wife as security, 15 K costs
Cusinato / M / Sw / M / M / Simpson v. Simpson, 2006 CanLII 819 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 4.5 / All issues settled prior to trial except spousal support, 4.5 K costs
Dandie / M / Sw / F / M / Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 15.0 / 105 K costs overturned on appeal and left for new trial judge, 15 K costs of appeal against man
Desotti / M / Sw / M / M / Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 5488 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 12.0 / Divorce action with 3 day trial, wife gets 12 K, husband asks 45 K
Desotti / M / Sw / F / M / Leblanc v. Longpre, 2006 CanLII 33319 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.0 / 3 K costs interim motion
Harper / M / Sw / sr / M / Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.0 / Default on support 3.0 K costs, man does not comply with disclosure
Jenkins / M / Sw / M / M / Rizzo v. Rizzo, 2001 CanLII 28119 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.5 / 1.5 K costs interim motion
Patterson / M / Sw / ex / F / Sheffiel-Lambros v. Sheffiel, 2005 CanLII 4449 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 4.5 / Deceased husband does not appear and is given a 4.5 K cost penalty
Quinn / M / Sw / sr / M / Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 46.8 / 46.8 K costs of divorce action
Ducharme / M / Sw / ex / M / Elliott v. Elliott, 2004 CanLII 30969 (ON C.A.) / mn / D / Noted in default and an order made for a reference into a pension asset not ruled on at trial
Rogin / M / Sw / M / M / Wigle v. Wigle, 2003 CanLII 2359 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / 17 K arrears of spousal support, charging order, costs
Vogelsang / M / Sw / F / M / Kohl v. Finnis, 2000 CanLII 22445 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Default on support, variation refused, 36 K arrears, mans drivers license suspended
Volgesang / M / Sw / M / M / Marchese v. Marchese, 2004 CanLII 34429 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Default on costs and support, threat of pleadings struck and contempt, support order imputed
Sw / sr / M / Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, 1 K per month spousal support, no children
Sw / sr / L / P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
Marshman / F / Sw / F / F / Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ep / Wife gets exclusive interim possession of family home
Dandie / M / Sw / F / M / Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ep / Wife gets exclusive possession and man gets occupancy rent, overturned on appeal
Granger / M / Sw / M / M / Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 383 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support
Sw / sr / L / P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) / mn / F / Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
Abbey / M / Sw / M / M / Garlough v. Garlough, 2002 CanLII 2845 (ON S.C.) / mn / F / Preservation order against family trust, wife gets house and support
Campbell / M / Sw / F / F / Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2003 CanLII 1959 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Security and non dissipation orders against man continued
Vogelsang / M / Sw / M / M / Roby v. Roby, 2003 CanLII 2111 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Man declares bankruptcy, multiple contempts, non dissipation order, 12.5 K in costs post bankruptcy, support recovery and reset on actual post bankruptcy income
Leitch / F / Sw / sr / M / Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 31.0 / Man claims 41 K income and is imputed to 72 K per year
Marshman / F / Sw / M / F / Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 25.0 / $ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handyman, wife earns 19 K
Marshman / F / Sw / sr / F / Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 23.0 / Man imputed to 85 K from previous imputation of 62 K, wife gets ¾ of assets due to lump sum and costs
Marshman / F / Sw / M / M / Hofsteede v. Hofsteede, 2006 CanLII 2052 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 7.0 / Man claims 76 K income and is imputed to 83 K, wife claims 10 K income and is imputed to 25 K
Rady / F / Sw / F / M / Raptis v. Raptis, 2006 CanLII 25413 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 10.0 / Man claims a 16 K income and is imputed to 26 K, most arrears rescinded
Templeton / F / Sw / M / M / Hogan v. Hogan, 2004 CanLII 31372 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 46.0 / Man claims 39 K income, imputed to 85 K
Brokenshire / M / Sw / M / M / Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 14.0 / 140 K lump sum added to equalization for mans depletion of jointly owned trucking company, average depletion 41 K per year but man imputed to 55 K, wife unemployed imputerd to 12 K, wife gets 1.4 K total support per month
Campbell / M / Sw / M / F / Babinsky v. Babinsky, 2006 CanLII 32912 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 13.0 / Man claims 28 K income and is imputed to 41 K, man owes 30 K arrears, 21 K of it to social services
Campbell / M / Sw / M / M / Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 186.0 / Man imputed from 64 K claimed to 250 K, separation agreement overturned and man must pay 3.4 K instead of 2.5 K per month
Campbell / M / Sw / M / F / Depace v. Michienzi, 2000 CanLII 22560 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 43.0 / Mans claims ongoing losses and is imputed to 43 K
Cusinato / M / Sw / M / M / Simpson v. Simpson, 2005 CanLII 44188 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 8.0 / Man claims 52 K income and is imputed to 60 K
Dandie / M / Sw / F / M / Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / Mans income imputed to 48 K and wifes income imputed to 18 K
Desotti / M / Sw / M / F / Gibson v. Gibson, 2005 CanLII 5487 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 25.0 / Unemployed man is imputed to 25 K per year, he recieves 1 L per month spousal saupport for 24 months
Granger / M / Sw / F / M / Visnjic v. Visnjic, 2000 CanLII 22592 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 50.0 / Man says he earns no income and is imputed to 50 K per year
Heeney / M / Sw / M / F / Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / Man imputed to 150 K, wife imputed to 15 K, Man must pay 3.1 K per month in total support, wife mild