Advancement for Clinical Faculty, NTE Research; NTE Non-Research; Lecturers

Advancement for Clinical Faculty, NTE Research; NTE non-Research; Lecturers

Eligible faculty and staff of the College of Veterinary Medicine (CVM) may submit their credentials for review for advancement as outlined in the University Faculty Handbook (5.4.1.6.3), the College Governance Document (6.5), and the Departmental Governance Documents. The portfolio should be submitted on or before the requested deadline for submission and should be submitted in both an electronic copy in a book-marked pdf file and a corresponding tabbed hard copy of your portfolio. The candidate is responsible for the formatting, accuracy, and content of the portfolio.

The portfolio should be organized/formatted as follows:

• Advancement Cover Sheet (Complete sections 1 -7) see attached format

• Factual Information Sheet – see attached format

• Tab 1 – CV
• Tab 2 – PRS statements (which were in place during the review time frame)
• Tab 3 – Annual reviews written and submitted by the chair
• Tab 4 – Portfolio narrative (no more than 10 pages)
• Tab 5 – Appendices (supporting materials)

SuggestedPortfolioContentSummary:

1.Advancementcoversheet(Sections1-7)

2.Factualinformation Sheet

3.An updated and accurateCV

4.AllPRSstatementsgeneratedduringthecontractperiod

5.Allannualreviewsfromthedepartmentduringthe last3annualreviewcycles

6.PortfolioNarrative(Thenarrative shouldnot toexceed10pages total; supportingdocuments are placedinappendices)

Theportfolionarrativesection isanopportunityforyou todocumentand explainthevariousaspectsofyourprofessionalactivitiesand effortwithinthereviewperiod. Inthenarrativeyoushould includestatementsof yourgoalsand philosophies forteaching*(up to 1 page),professionalpractice (up to1page),institutionalservice(up to 1page),and scholarship (ifapplicablefrom yourPRS(upto1page)).

(*TheCenterforExcellencein Learning and Teaching ( hasinformationto assistin

preparationof astatementforteaching philosophy and a teaching portfolio).

Thefollowing areoutcomemeasuresyou may wish to use to summarizeand providein thenarrative as appropriate to your position.

Documentation of,evidenceof,and impactof professionalpracticeactivities

•Peerreviewsof clinicalpracticeactivities

•Innovativeor uniquecontributionstotheclinicalpractice

•Clientand referring veterinarian responses/reviews/evaluations

•Letter(s)from serviceleader(s)indicating impactoftheindividual

•On dutyclinicschedule (weeksof“onthefloor” clinicalservice)

•Individualfaculty memberand servicenumbersforcaseaccession/yearandrevenuegenerated/yearfortheperiod underreview

•Documentation ofeffectivenessand competency in professionalpractice

Documentation of,evidenceof,and impactof teaching activities

•Tabulationof graduatestudentsand/orhouseofficerstrained andwhetherthey weresuccessfulinobtaining eithertheiradvanced degreeor boardcertification

•Comparativestudentreviewofdidacticpresentations(teachingevaluations)

•Comparativestudentreviewofclinicalrotationalteaching activities(teaching evaluations)

•Peerreviewofdidacticstudentpresentations

•Peerreviewofclinicalrotationalteaching activities

•Reviewsofthecandidate’steaching effectivenessbygraduatestudents,post-doctoralstudents,residents,or interns

Note: itshould beclearto thecommitteehowmuch teaching theindividualdoesin clinicalanddidacticcourses,whetherthecoursesarecoreorelectivecourses,and howeffectivetheindividual’scontributionsarein thatcourse.Effectivenessin teaching should be demonstrated.

Documentation of,evidenceof,and impactof Outreach activities

•Quantity of invitedlectures

•Audienceofinvited lectures(i.e.local,national,international)

Documentation of,evidenceof,and impactof scholarlyactivities

•Tabulationof granting activities(both awarded and applied for)

•Tabulationof published peerreviewedmanuscriptsindicating authorshipand impactfactors

•Tabulationofmanuscriptswhich areaccepted forpublicationor arein press

•Rolein authorshipofmanuscripts(primary orprincipleauthor)

•Tabulationofmanuscriptsthathavebeensubmitted forpeerreviewpublication

•Collaborationeffortsincluding jointauthorships

•Plans for research/scholarly activities, measurable outcomes and milestones, and specific timelines

Documentation of, evidence of, and impact of department/college/university service and citizenship

• Evidence of support for the university, college and department mission and activities
• Evidence of support of the collegiality standards of the university, college, and department
• Quantity and quality of committee service
• Evidence of appropriate citizenship within the department and college

Summary of highlights of professional accomplishments and specific goals including a work plan of the subsequent years during progress towards advancement, if applicable.

7.Appendices (supporting materials)

Supporting documents should be provided to demonstrate effectiveness in teaching and competency in professional practice. Documents may include but are not limited to: individual teaching evaluations, syllabi prepared for courses, creative teaching materials, client evaluations, documentation of case numbers/income, materials prepared for continuing education offerings, peer evaluations for teaching or professional practice effectiveness, and other documents that form the basis for the narrative summary described above.

Cover Sheet for Advancement

College of Veterinary Medicine

1) Full Name:

2) Current Title & Department:

3) Campus Address:

4) Date of first appointment at ISU as NTE Faculty:

5) Number of semesters in which the candidate has taught at least one course at ISU as NTE Faculty:

6) Highest Degree Earned:

Degree Institution Date Field

7) Normal course load taught by the individual during the academic year: ______credit hours

8) Voting record on this recommendation: (Include those that apply) (Please follow the policy against double voting if you report both a Committee vote and an Eligible Department Faculty vote)

Departmental Review Committee (totals) Yes_____ No_____ Abstain_____ Absent_____

Department Faculty (totals) Yes_____ No_____ Abstain_____ Absent_____

Recommendation of Chair Yes_____ No_____

Dean's Recommendation Yes_____ No_____

Appendices (supporting materials)

Supporting documents should be provided to demonstrate effectiveness in teaching and competency in professional practice. Documents may include but are not limited to: individual teaching evaluations, syllabi prepared for courses, creative teaching materials, client evaluations, documentation of case numbers/income, materials prepared for continuing education offerings, peer evaluations for teaching or professional practice effectiveness, and other documents that form the basis for the narrative summary described above.

Quantitative Summary of Productivity at ISU

The goal of this summary is to provide Advancement Committees a concise consistent quantitative overview of candidates from each College. The candidate is responsible for completion and accuracy. These tables will be expanded as to outcomes and performance in your Advancement overview.

PRS Assignment

Teaching-Sinceinitialappointmentorsincelastpromotion:

*Indicate #ofsemesters orrotationstaughtperyearandindicateafter# as S=semesterorR=rotationforeach course

Advising (at ISU since appointment or last promotion)

Graduate Advising

Professional DVM advising (residents, Interns)

Veterinary Student Advising

Undergraduate Advising

Professional Practice

Total professional practice (clinical, diagnostic) hours per year = hours per week multiplied by dutyweeks per year) since the last promotion or advancement

Scholarship and Research

For table summary, list numbers in each category. The listing is based on work performed at ISU since appointment or last promotion, whichever is more recent. Works prior to appointment at ISU would be included only in this table where formal time on the tenure clock was granted and documented in the Letter of Intent and should be noted separately by *. Major conferences defined as those having national or international attendance.

Scholarly Products and Number during this Promotion Period

Total Grants during this review period