What Is the District S Mission Statement ?

Killingly Public Schools

Achievement Data

2014-2015

What is the district’s mission statement?

It is the mission of the Killingly Public Schools to improve the quality of life and self esteem of all students. It will do so by:

1. Creating and maintaining an enthusiastic educational environment;
2. Challenging all students to achieve at their highest level;
3. Fostering respect for human differences;
4. Adjusting to an ever-changing world; and
5. Maintaining a partnership with the community.

What is the district’s vision statement?

The District’s Vision Statement is set forth as the “Philosophy” which underlies its Mission. The Philosophy – as defined by the Board of Education - is as follows:
“The Board believes that the educational process in our schools should be supported by educators, students, parents/guardians, and the entire community, for a commitment to today’s education is a commitment to society’s future.”

What are the district’s core beliefs or values?

Killingly Public Schools believe that in our democratic society each person, without exception, is an important resource to our nation. We further believe that it is the primary function of our schools to develop this resource to the greatest extent possible.
Our Schools must provide challenges and experiences, which continually foster the development of students’ academic competencies, interests, abilities, and attitudes. Equipped with motivation skills, knowledge and values, individuals will be prepared to realize personal success and responsible citizenship.

Killingly Board of Education Goals: School Year 2014-2015

1. To increase graduation rates by 3-5%.
2. To implement universal full day Kindergarten and provide an additional 20-30 pre-kindergarten slots for four-year old youth.
3. To continue to improve school climate in each school building as measured by the following multiple indicators:
4. Surveys
5. Improved attendance rates
6. Decrease in discipline referrals
7. Exit interviews for all staff
8. To increase academic opportunities all students.
9. To close the achievement gap of all at risk groups by 50% in reading by 2015.
10. To implement writing rubrics for all content areas.

STAR Assessment Results

2014-15

STAR Reading Assessment 2014-2015

Number of Students / Grade / Pretest / Posttest / Change / Pre Percentile Rank / Post Percentile Rank / Change
155 / First / 93 / 220 / 127 / 37 / 57 / 20
147 / Second / 200 / 338 / 138 / 36 / 51 / 15
167 / Third / 341 / 449 / 108 / 44 / 51 / 7
161 / Fourth / 454 / 573 / 119 / 46 / 55 / 9
163 / Fifth / 571 / 709 / 138 / 47 / 56 / 9
165 / Sixth / 706 / 838 / 132 / 49 / 56 / 7
173 / Seventh / 804 / 904 / 100 / 48 / 51 / 3
181 / Eighth / 906 / 1028 / 122 / 48 / 53 / 5
201 / Ninth / 875 / 957 / 82 / 33 / 37 / 4
184 / Tenth / 980 / 1058 / 78 / 38 / 46 / 8
156 / Eleventh / 1038 / 1050 / 12 / 43 / 42 / -1
155 / Twelfth / 1093 / 1130 / 37 / 46 / 51 / 5

STAR Reading Assessment Comparison 13/14 to 14/15

Number of Students 13/14 / Number of Students 14/15 / Grade / Posttest 13/14 / Posttest
14/15 / Post Percentile Rank 13/14 / Post Percentile Rank 14/15
- / 155 / First / - / 220 / 4 / - / 62
- / 147 / Second / - / 338 / - / 39
80 / 167 / Third / 500 / 449 / 60 / 57
87 / 161 / Fourth / 589 / 573 / 58 / 51
173 / 163 / Fifth / 710 / 709 / 56 / 51
176 / 165 / Sixth / 823 / 838 / 55 / 55
189 / 173 / Seventh / 906 / 904 / 53 / 51
191 / 181 / Eighth / 984 / 1028 / 50 / 53
229 / 201 / Ninth / 979 / 957 / 40 / 37
184 / 184 / Tenth / 997 / 1058 / 39 / 46
164 / 156 / Eleventh / 1094 / 1050 / 48 / 42
153 / 155 / Twelfth / 1029 / 1130 / 37 / 51

STAR Mathematics Assessment 2014-2015

Number of Students / Grade / Pretest / Posttest / Change / Pre Percentile Rank / Post Percentile Rank / Change
148 / First / 229 / 394 / 165 / 34 / 51 / 17
147 / Second / 349 / 516 / 167 / 26 / 56 / 30
156 / Third / 504 / 594 / 90 / 53 / 53 / 0
153 / Fourth / 596 / 673 / 77 / 56 / 60 / 3
155 / Fifth / 634 / 722 / 88 / 45 / 57 / 12
161 / Sixth / 718 / 794 / 76 / 51 / 63 / 12
167 / Seventh / 752 / 788 / 36 / 49 / 51 / 2
187 / Eighth / 776 / 815 / 39 / 49 / 50 / 1
199 / Ninth / 753 / 802 / 49 / 36 / 44 / 8
193 / Tenth / 808 / 846 / 38 / 54 / 58 / 4
161 / Eleventh / 836 / 860 / 24 / 53 / 57 / 4
124 / Twelfth / 850 / 875 / 25 / 53 / 57 / 4

STAR Mathematics Assessment Comparison13/14 to 14/15

Number of Students 13/14 / Number of Students 14/15 / Grade / Posttest
13/14 / Posttest
14/15 / Post Percentile Rank 13/14 / Post Percentile Rank
14/15
148 / First / 165 / 51
147 / Second / 167 / 56
161 / 156 / Third / 596 / 90 / 60 / 53
164 / 153 / Fourth / 656 / 77 / 53 / 60
175 / 155 / Fifth / 724 / 722 / 59 / 57
176 / 161 / Sixth / 767 / 794 / 53 / 63
190 / 167 / Seventh / 791 / 788 / 53 / 51
188 / 187 / Eighth / 777 / 815 / 38 / 50
226 / 199 / Ninth / 792 / 802 / 43 / 44
170 / 193 / Tenth / 805 / 846 / 46 / 58
126 / 161 / Eleventh / 835 / 860 / 50 / 57
98 / 124 / Twelfth / 836 / 875 / 45 / 57

Guided Reading Level Data

Percent of Students at Grade Level in Reading

KPS 2014-15 Guided Reading Level Data
Grade Level / Total At/Above Goal / Total in Grade / Percent at Benchmark or Above
K / 135 / 177 / 76%
1st / 93 / 165 / 56%
2nd / 118 / 155 / 76%
3rd / 127 / 166 / 77%
4th / 116 / 162 / 72%
5th / 99 / 169 / 59%
6th / 151 / 170 / 89%

Percent of Students at Grade Level in Reading

GRL
Grade Level Comparison
2013-14 / 2014-15
K / 60.0% / 76.3%
1st / 61.0% / 56.4%
2nd / 71.5% / 76.1%
3rd / 68.5% / 76.5%
4th / 72.5% / 71.6%

Kindergarten Breakdown of Guided Reading Level Data

Kindergarten 2014-15
(177 Students)
Intensive / 14%
Strategic / 9%
Benchmark / 37%
Above Benchmark / 38%

Goodyear

PAF Data re Cognitive Standards:

Cog #6: Relates number to quantity

Cog #14: Uses writing to convey meaning

Percentage of studentsachieving benchmark

Cog 6 Cog 14

SY 09-10 59% 59%

SY 10-11 57% 68%

SY 11-12 45% 51%

SY 12-13 57% 52%

SY 13-14 64% 82%

SY 14-15 76% 84%

Killingly High School Advanced Placement Results

2006-2015

KPS AP Results / Five / Four / Three / Two / One / Total / Passing %
2006 / 5 / 8 / 20 / 6 / 2 / 41 / 80.49%
2007 / 5 / 13 / 11 / 10 / 2 / 41 / 70.73%
2008 / 0 / 1 / 5 / 7 / 3 / 16 / 37.50%
2009 / 7 / 10 / 7 / 5 / 0 / 29 / 82.76%
2010 / 7 / 18 / 24 / 15 / 6 / 70 / 70.00%
2011 / 15 / 12 / 20 / 8 / 4 / 59 / 79.66%
2012 / 9 / 24 / 21 / 9 / 9 / 72 / 75.00%
2013 / 11 / 25 / 64 / 29 / 12 / 141 / 70.92%
2014 / 7 / 29 / 36 / 29 / 18 / 119 / 60.50%
2015 / 12 / 30 / 45 / 24 / 15 / 126 / 69.00%
TOTAL / 59 / 140 / 208 / 118 / 56 / 581 / 70.05%

Four-Year Graduation Rate 2010-14

KHS Graduation Rate Data 2013 and 2014

Category / 4-Year Graduation Rate / Still Enrolled / Other
YEAR / 2013 / 2014 / 2013 / 2014 / 2013 / 2014
All Students / 76.6 / 83.8 / 9.3 / 5.4 / 14.0 / 10.8
Hispanic / 66.7 / * / 16.7 / * / 16.7 / *
Non-Hispanic / 76.9 / 84.4 / 9.1 / 5.0 / 13.9 / 10.6
Indian or Alaska Native / * / * / * / * / * / *
Asian / 85.7 / * / 14.3 / * / †† / *
Black / * / * / * / * / * / *
White / 78.4 / 86.6 / 9.2 / 4.7 / 12.4 / 8.7
Two or More Races / 70.0 / * / †† / * / 30.0 / *
Male / 69.8 / 77.3 / 12.3 / 6.2 / 17.9 / 16.5
Female / 83.3 / 89.7 / 6.5 / 4.7 / 10.2 / 5.6
ELL / * / * / * / * / * / *
Non-ELL / 76.9 / 84.1 / 9.0 / 5.5 / 14.2 / 10.4
Eligible For Lunch / N/A / 74.4 / N/A / 7.0 / N/A / 18.6
Eligible For Free Lunch / 68.5 / 70.3 / 11.0 / 7.8 / 20.5 / 21.9
Eligible For Reduced Lunch / 75.8 / 86.4 / 6.1 / 4.5 / 18.2 / 9.1
Not Eligible For Lunch / 82.4 / 90.7 / 9.3 / 4.2 / 8.3 / 5.1
Special Education / 56.0 / 77.3 / 16.0 / 9.1 / 28.0 / 13.6
Non-Special Education / 79.4 / 84.6 / 8.5 / 4.9 / 12.2 / 10.4

Smarter Balance Assessments

2015

SBA District and State Comparison 2015

English Language Arts
Percent at Meets or Exceeds the Achievement Level
Grade / KPS / STATE
3 / 48 / 53.6
4 / 53 / 55.0
5 / 54.2 / 58.5
6 / 65.7 / 55.6
7 / 57.2 / 57.1
8 / 57.5 / 54.0
11 / 40.0 / 53.4

SBA Results 2015: District Reference Group G

SBA District and State Comparison SBA

Mathematics
Percent at Meets or Exceeds the Achievement Level
Grade / KPS / STATE
3 / 42 / 48.0
4 / 28 / 44.2
5 / 23.8 / 36.9
6 / 41.8 / 37.3
7 / 29.5 / 38.8
8 / 16.3 / 36.8
11 / 20.0 / 30.6

SBA Results 2015: District Reference Group G

Science Connecticut Mastery Test

2015

CMT Science Results 2015: Fifth Grade
Proficient & Above / 2015 / 2014 / 2013 / 2012 / 2011
KIS / 80.9% / 80.7% / 78.5% / 72.9% / 75.1%
STATE / 79.1% / 77.5% / 75.3% / 76.1% / 74.2%
Goal & Above / 2015 / 2014 / 2013 / 2012 / 2011
KIS / 48.1% / 46.0% / 48.3% / 48.9% / 45.1%
STATE / 55.4% / 52.8% / 54.7% / 56.0% / 49.9%
CMT Science Results 2015: Eighth Grade
Proficient & Above / 2015 / 2014 / 2013 / 2012 / 2011
KIS / 80.5% / 73.2% / 66.5% / 66.4% / 70.7%
STATE / 76.7% / 70.1% / 68.0% / 67.2% / 66.8%
Goal & Above / 2015 / 2014 / 2013 / 2012 / 2011
KIS / 61.1% / 50.5% / 40.2% / 47.0% / 46.2%
STATE / 61.1% / 53.0% / 51.6% / 51.5% / 54.4%

Special Education Data

2009-2014

Local - Special Education Enrollment –KPS
Grade / 2009-2010 / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
PK / 60 / 61 / 49 / 46 / 44 / 50
K / 20 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 18 / 26
1st / 23 / 20 / 26 / 22 / 26 / 25
2nd / 22 / 24 / 22 / 28 / 27 / 10
3rd / 23 / 17 / 26 / 30 / 24 / 24
4th / 28 / 21 / 18 / 29 / 25 / 19
5th / 25 / 34 / 24 / 18 / 29 / 25
6th / 39 / 24 / 37 / 24 / 15 / 28
7th / 27 / 27 / 24 / 33 / 19 / 23
8th / 22 / 25 / 30 / 27 / 26 / 15
9th / 22 / 35 / 25 / 48 / 35 / 14
10th / 23 / 20 / 28 / 20 / 23 / 38
11th / 14 / 14 / 19 / 21 / 12 / 38
12th / 12 / 15 / 14 / 17 / 17 / 27
Transition / - / - / - / - / - / 3
Total / 300 / 299 / 317 / 342 / 340 / 362
Special Education -Total Out of District Placement K-12
Grade / 2009-2010 / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014
OOD/Sunrise / 2014-2015
OOD/Sunrise
PK / - / - / - / - / 1/0 / 2/0
K / 1 / 1 / 2 / 4 / 3/1 / 1/1
1st / 0 / 3 / 4 / 7 / 2/0 / 1/3
2nd / 3 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6/2 / 3/0
3rd / 4 / 3 / 4 / 4 / 4/2 / 6/3
4th / 2 / 5 / 5 / 6 / 3/3 / 4/3
5th / 2 / 1 / 4 / 4 / 6/2 / 2/5
6th / 2 / 2 / 2 / 6 / 6/2 / 5/3
7th / 4 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 5/2 / 4/3
8th / 4 / 5 / 5 / 7 / 2/7 / 6/3
9th / 11 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 11/10 / 2/8
10th / 11 / 12 / 13 / 10 / 12/7 / 7/10
11th / 4 / 8 / 11 / 12 / 7/2 / 6/7
12th / 12 / 17 / 22 / 18 / 4/2 / 9/2
Transition / - / - / - / - / 9/3 / 8/3
Total / 60 / 67 / 86 / 96 / 81/45 (126) / 68/54 (122)
Special Education Enrollment – Total OOD & Local
Grade / 2009-2010 / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
PK / 60 / 61 / 49 / 46 / 45 / 52
K / 21 / 24 / 26 / 29 / 22 / 28
1st / 23 / 23 / 30 / 29 / 28 / 29
2nd / 25 / 26 / 26 / 33 / 35 / 13
3rd / 27 / 20 / 30 / 34 / 30 / 33
4th / 30 / 26 / 23 / 35 / 31 / 26
5th / 27 / 35 / 28 / 22 / 37 / 32
6th / 41 / 26 / 39 / 30 / 23 / 36
7th / 31 / 30 / 28 / 38 / 26 / 30
8th / 26 / 30 / 35 / 34 / 35 / 24
9th / 33 / 40 / 31 / 56 / 56 / 24
10th / 34 / 32 / 41 / 30 / 42 / 55
11th / 18 / 22 / 30 / 33 / 21 / 51
12th / 24 / 32 / 36 / 35 / 39 / 38
Transition / - / - / - / - / 16 / 14
Total / 420 / 427 / 452 / 484 / 486 / 485

KPS Attendance Data

2010-2015

KPS Attendance Data 2010-15

KPS Attendance Data 2010-15

KPS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
Attendance / 95.91% / 94.08% / 92.72% / 94.16% / 94.19%
Chronic / 84.34% / 84.67% / 77.53% / 80.79% / 79.91%
# of Chronic / 418/2534 / 402/2535 / 424/2546 / 313/2411 / 299/2538
% Chronic / 16.50% / 15.86% / 16.65% / 12.98% / 11.78%

KPS Attendance Data 2010-2015

KHS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
Attendance / 95.91% / 94.08% / 92.72% / 94.16% / 92.53%
Chronic / 77.68% / 82.91% / 76.82% / 75.84% / 77.63%
# of chronic / 187/770 / 193/797 / 216/870 / 167/827 / 154/828
% Chronic / 24.29% / 24.22% / 24.83% / 20.19% / 18.60%
KIS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
Attendance / 95.99% / 94.55% / 94.60% / 95.13% / 94.78%
Chronic / 84.38% / 86.45% / 85.75% / 86.89% / 83.07%
# of chronic / 129/813 / 116/812 / 102/781 / 80/747 / 71/766
% of Chronic / 15.87% / 14.29% / 13.06% / 10.71% / 9.27%
KCS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
Attendance / 95.11% / 95.97% / 92.66% / 95.50% / 95.25%
Chronic / 87.01% / 97.11% / 72.29% / 85.01% / 83.30%
# of chronic / 54/486 / 54/485 / 56/464 / 29/397 / 33/415
% Chronic / 11.11% / 11.13% / 12.07% / 7.30% / 7.95%
KMS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
Attendance / 96.22% / 95.75% / 93.48% / 95.24% / 95.20%
Chronic / 82.90% / 85.95% / 72.07% / 86.47% / 80.39%
# of chronic / 48/465 / 39/441 / 50/431 / 37/440 / 41/529
% Chronic / 10.32% / 8.84% / 11.60% / 8.41% / 7.75%

KPS Preschool Enrollment

Enrollment Numbers / June 3, 2013 / June 2, 2014 / June 1, 2015
Pre-K / 77 / 83 / 109
Pre-K Special Ed / 45 / 55 / 51
Total / 122 / 138 / 160

Discipline Data

2010-2015

KPS Discipline Totals

KIS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
ISS / 364 / 307 / 229 / 162 / 134
OSS / 99 / 144 / 94 / 47 / 21
BUS / 23 / 23 / 14 / 5 / 7
OFFICE / 1361 / 1748 / 1387 / 880 / 546
KMS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
ISS / 4 / 0 / 2 / 2 / 6
OSS / 2 / 4 / 5 / 11 / 7
BUS / 1 / 1 / 3 / 5 / 2
OFFICE / 127 / 114 / 146
KCS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
ISS / 1 / 0.75 / 0 / 7 / 5.5
OSS / 1.5 / 6.5 / 5 / 8 / 19
BUS / 1 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 4
OFFICE / 455 / 265 / 355 / 279 / 240
KHS / 2010-2011 / 2011-2012 / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
ISS / 1442 / 957 / 959 / 802 / 642
OSS / 24 / 23 / 60 / 26 / 10
BUS / 0 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0
OFFICE / 859 / 923 / 584 / 736 / 1035

KPS Office Referral Data 2012-2015

KPS / 2012-2013 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
Office Referrals / 2453 / 2009 / 1967

Parent and Staff Survey Results

Parent Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 - Climate

My child's teacher(s) treat my child with respect. / My child’s teacher(s) care about my child. / Parents feel comfortable talking to teachers at this school. / My child's teacher(s) help make my child excited about school. / I feel welcome at this school.
13/14 / 14/15 / 13/14 / 14/15 / 13/14 / 14/15 / 13/14 / 14/15 / 13/14 / 14/15
KCS / 3.7 / 3.9 / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.5
KHS / 3.2 / 3.3 / 3.1 / 3.2 / 3 / 3.4 / 2.8 / 2.6 / 3.2 / 3.4
KIS / 3.2 / 3.5 / 3.3 / 3.5 / 3.1 / 3.4 / 2.8 / 3.2 / 3.2 / 3.4
KMS / 3.7 / 3.8 / 3.7 / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.5 / 3.6 / 3.7
Grand Total / 3.4 / 3.7 / 3.4 / 3.7 / 3.3 / 3.6 / 3.1 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.5

Parent Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 - Climate

At least one adult at school knows my child well. / My child's teacher(s) notice when my child is good at something. / My child's teacher(s) motivate my child to do well in school. / My child’s teacher(s) have high expectations for my child.
2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
KCS / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.5 / 3.7 / 3.5 / 3.6
KHS / 3.4 / 3.3 / 3.2 / 3.3 / 3 / 3.2 / 3.1 / 3.4
KIS / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.3 / 3.4 / 3.1 / 3.3 / 3.2 / 3.5
KMS / 3.7 / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.5 / 3.6
Grand Total / 3.5 / 3.6 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.3 / 3.6 / 3.3 / 3.5

Parent Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15– Academics

My child is learning a lot in school this year. / My child's teacher(s) challenge my child to do his/her best. / My child is academically successful. / I talk with my child's teacher(s) about what I can do to help my child learn.
2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
KCS / 3.5 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.7 / 3.5 / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.5
KHS / 3.1 / 3.1 / 3 / 3.5 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 2.9 / 2.8
KIS / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.2 / 3.5 / 3.2 / 3.5 / 3 / 3.2
KMS / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.6 / 3.4 / 3.5
Grand Total / 3.3 / 3.5 / 3.3 / 3.6 / 3.3 / 3.6 / 3.2 / 3.4

Parent Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 – Academics

I know how my child is doing in school before I get my child's report card. / I talk with my child's teacher(s) about my child's schoolwork. / My child's teacher(s) are knowledgeable about the subjects they teach. / My child's teacher(s) give my child helpful comments on his/her schoolwork.
2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015 / 2013-2014 / 2014-2015
KCS / 3.3 / 3.5 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.6
KHS / 3.1 / 3.2 / 2.9 / 2.6 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 2.9 / 3.4
KIS / 3 / 3.4 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3 / 3.3
KMS / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.5 / 3.5
Grand Total / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.1 / 3.3 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.2 / 3.5

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 - Leadership

School administrators communicate a clear vision for this school. / School administrators value teacher feedback. / Administrators at this school behave in a professional manner. / The principal in this school is open to constructive feedback.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 3.4 / 2.3 / 3.1 / 2.3 / 3.7 / 2.6 / 3.1 / 2.0
KCS / 2.5 / 2.8 / 2.7 / 2.9 / 2.7 / 3.1 / 2.4 / 2.7
KHS / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.0 / 2.4 / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.3 / 2.4
KIS / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.2 / 3.5 / 3.1 / 3.2
KMS / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3.3 / 3.3 / 3.3 / 3.4 / 3.3 / 3.1
Grand Total / 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 2.9 / 3.0 / 2.8 / 2.8

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 - Leadership

I feel comfortable going to at least one member of this school's administrative team if I have a problem. / The principal sets high expectations for students. / The principal sets high expectations for staff.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 3.6 / 2.7 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.5
KCS / 3.0 / 3.4 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.0 / 3.0
KHS / 2.8 / 3.2 / 2.1 / 2.1 / 2.4 / 2.3
KIS / 3.5 / 3.6 / 3.0 / 3.3 / 3.2 / 3.6
KMS / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3.7
Grand Total / 3.2 / 3.4 / 2.8 / 2.9 / 2.9 / 3.1

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 – Results and Expectations

Adults treat students with respect at this school. / Students treat adults with respect at this school. / I know what is expected of me at this school. / I believe students are getting a high-quality education at this school.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 3.5 / 3.3 / 3.5 / 3.2 / 3.8 / 3.0 / 3.6 / 3.7
KCS / 3.3 / 3.3 / 2.9 / 2.9 / 3.3 / 3.3 / 3.0 / 3.3
KHS / 3.1 / 3.1 / 2.6 / 2.4 / 2.8 / 3.1 / 2.7 / 2.9
KIS / 3.3 / 3.2 / 2.4 / 2.4 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 2.8 / 3.1
KMS / 3.3 / 3.4 / 3.1 / 3.0 / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.4 / 3.5
Grand Total / 3.2 / 3.2 / 2.7 / 2.6 / 3.2 / 3.3 / 2.9 / 3.2

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 – Results and Expectations

This school's discipline program is effective. / Learning from other teachers at this school has improved my performance in the classroom. / I receive timely feedback on my performance and progress toward goals.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3.3 / 3.3 / 2.8
KCS / 2.8 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 2.5 / 2.8
KHS / 1.4 / 1.5 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 2.0 / 2.9
KIS / 2.3 / 2.4 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.2 / 3.4
KMS / 3.2 / 2.9 / 3.3 / 3.5 / 3.2 / 3.6
Grand Total / 2.2 / 2.3 / 3.1 / 3.3 / 2.7 / 3.1

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15– Climate

At this school, there is honest communication on important school issues. / This school is sensitive to issues regarding race, gender, sexual orientation and disabilities. / I feel like I am a part of this school's community. / Parents are given opportunities to be involved at this school.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 3.1 / 2.0 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.3 / 3.6 / 3.2
KCS / 2.6 / 3.0 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.1 / 3.2 / 3.3 / 3.5
KHS / 2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 / 3.3 / 2.7 / 3.0 / 2.8 / 3.0
KIS / 2.8 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.3 / 3.1 / 3.1 / 3.2 / 3.3
KMS / 3.3 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 3.2 / 3.3
Grand Total / 2.6 / 2.6 / 3.2 / 3.3 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.1 / 3.2

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 – Climate

Teachers in this school support each other. / Staff morale is high at this school. / Teachers at this school hold each other accountable for meeting expectations.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 3.3 / 3.7 / 3.0 / 2.1 / 3.3 / 3.2
KCS / 3.2 / 3.3 / 2.3 / 2.6 / 3.0 / 3.0
KHS / 2.7 / 3.0 / 1.8 / 1.8 / 2.6 / 2.6
KIS / 3.0 / 3.1 / 2.4 / 2.7 / 2.7 / 3.0
KMS / 3.4 / 3.6 / 2.9 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.4
Grand Total / 3.0 / 3.2 / 2.3 / 2.3 / 2.8 / 2.9

Staff Survey Comparison Data 13/14 to 14/15 – Other

The professional development I received this year provided me with teaching strategies to better meet the needs of my students. / I have access to the technology that I need at this school. / I have access to other resources that I need for my class(es). / Overall, I feel adequately trained to do my job successfully.
2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15 / 2013-14 / 2014-15
GECC / 2.8 / 2.9 / 3.3 / 2.3 / 2.8 / 2.8 / 3.6 / 3.3
KCS / 2.9 / 2.9 / 2.9 / 3.0 / 3.0 / 3.1 / 3.2 / 3.6
KHS / 2.0 / 2.4 / 3.0 / 3.0 / 2.8 / 2.7 / 3.1 / 3.5
KIS / 2.5 / 2.7 / 2.7 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 2.8 / 3.3 / 3.4
KMS / 2.8 / 2.9 / 2.7 / 2.7 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.3 / 3.6
Grand Total / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.9 / 2.8 / 2.8 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.5

KPS Teacher Evaluation Data

2014-15

KPS 2014-15 Teacher Evaluation Data at the Indicator Level

KPS Teacher Evaluation Ratings CCT/SESS Rubrics at the Indicator Level / Below Standard / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary
1a / 10 / 349 / 217
1b / 22 / 292 / 259
1c / 30 / 328 / 185
2a / 9 / 251 / 82
2b / 28 / 230 / 82
2c / 34 / 226 / 61
3a / 37 / 394 / 128
3b / 79 / 353 / 122
3c / 1 / 56 / 401 / 90
4a / 6 / 121 / 92
4b / 6 / 90 / 78
4c / 4 / 95 / 71
Totals / 1 / 321 / 3130 / 1467

KPS 2014-15 Teacher Evaluation Data at the Indicator Level

KPS Teacher Evaluation Ratings CCT/SESS Rubrics at the Indicator Level / Below Standard / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary
1a / 0% / 2% / 61% / 38%
1b / 0% / 4% / 51% / 45%
1c / 0% / 6% / 60% / 34%
2a / 0% / 3% / 73% / 24%
2b / 0% / 8% / 68% / 24%
2c / 0% / 11% / 70% / 19%
3a / 0% / 7% / 70% / 23%
3b / 0% / 14% / 64% / 22%
3c / 0% / 10% / 73% / 16%
4a / 0% / 3% / 55% / 42%
4b / 0% / 3% / 52% / 45%
4c / 0% / 2% / 56% / 42%
Totals / 0% / 7% / 64% / 30%

KPS 2014-15 Teacher Evaluation Data at the Domain Level

KPS Percentage of Ratings by Domain Level / Below Standard / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary
Domain 1: Environment (n=1692) / 0% / 4% / 57% / 39%
Domain 2: Planning (n=1003) / 0% / 7% / 70% / 22%
Domain 3: Instruction (n=1660) / 0% / 10% / 69% / 20%
Domain 4: Professionalism (n=563) / 0% / 3% / 54% / 43%

KPS 2014-15 Teacher Evaluation Data: Summative Rating

EOY Teacher Ratings (counts) / Below Standard / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary
Student Outcomes / 1 / 12 / 112 / 96
Whole School / 0 / 0 / 214 / 7
Performance / 0 / 7 / 155 / 59
Parent Feedback / 0 / 2 / 96 / 123
Summative Rating / 0 / 1 / 107 / 113
EOY Teacher Ratings (Percent n=221) / Below Standard / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary
Student Outcomes / 0% / 5% / 51% / 43%
Whole School / 0% / 0% / 97% / 3%
Performance / 0% / 3% / 70% / 27%
Parent Feedback / 0% / 1% / 43% / 56%
Summative Rating / 0% / 0% / 48% / 51%

KPS Teacher Evaluation Survey Data

School / The goal setting conference was conducted in a timely manner. / I received sufficient guidance in creating SMART goals. / Formal and informal observations adhered to defined time lines in the evaluation plan. / Feedback was provided in a timely manner.
GECC / 3.0 / 2.8 / 3.1 / 2.7
KCS / 3.5 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.1
KHS / 3.2 / 3.1 / 3.1 / 3.1
KIS / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.7 / 3.7
KMS / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.7 / 3.7
School / Feedback was specific and meaningful. / Feedback helped improve my practice. / The post observation conferences were a valued use of time. / The mid-year conference focused on developing one's practice. / The mid-year conference made explicit connections between teaching and learning.
GECC / 2.7 / 2.7 / 2.7 / 2.9 / 2.8
KCS / 3.3 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.2 / 3.3
KHS / 3.1 / 3.0 / 2.9 / 3.0 / 3.0
KIS / 3.7 / 3.5 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.5
KMS / 3.7 / 3.6 / 3.6 / 3.5 / 3.6

1