Title:- Representation of the Other in Texts: Familiar Is Unfamiliar to Us

Title:- Representation of ‘the Other’ in Texts: Familiar is Unfamiliar to Us

Author: TanmoyKundu,

Part-Time Teacher at khatraAdibasiMahavidyalaya,Bankura,westbengal

Mob:9434243908

JaquesLacanand Levinas were instrumental in coining contemporary usage of the ‘Other’. Lacan associated the ‘Other’ with the symbolic order and language where as for LevinasThe ‘Other’ is superior to the self and connected it with the traditional God. The ‘Other’ was given much emphasis in Post-structuralist era.Then it became the focus of Post-Colonial and Feminist study. The ‘Other’ is an individual who is taken as belonging to a group who are, though constructed by society, fundamentally different in some way as they do not possess that standard norms as the gentle group do possess. They are treated as inferior to gentle folk. But under the term ‘Other’ may come Woman,Infant, Male worker, Gay or Lesbian, and actually those who are suppressed or oppressed by the society and they are called as subaltern(popularized by Antonio Gramsci) by Gayatrichakrabortyspivak.This tendency of suppression or oppression of the ’Other’ has been continuing from an early period of Colonialism and on even at the present age.My Paper will deal with the condition of the ‘Other’ as represented in various text of so many writers which include. Shakespeare, William Blake, R.Tagore,ShashiDeshpande, SumathiSudhakar, Anita Desai,Arundhati Roy and many others.

Simon de Beauvoir has proclaimed “one is not born a woman, one becomes one ‘.The male writers have tremendously reduced woman as inferior and weak.The male domination in woman’ life is a natural phenomenon in a patriarchal society and the consequent relegation of woman to a secondary position seemed to have prompted Indian woman writer to take up the cause of women as their western counterparts. They stressed their need for women to break free from the shackles of their traditional position. Feminism throws a challenge on the age long tradition of gender differentiation. It attempts to explore and enunciates a new found social order to identify pertinent resolves to the real life problems in the light of traditionally gendered role-playing. Woman has always been projected as secondary and inferior human being.This bias against woman can be seen right away from the first day of creation. It is said that God is male and it is said that God after creating man made woman from the rib of man.As Adam,the first man on the earth remarks about Eve – “This now,bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh,she shall be called woman,because she has taken out of man”. It implies woman is secondary to man. Beauvoir calls the ‘other’ the minority the least favored one and often a woman when compared to a man for a man represent both positive and the neutral whereas woman represents only the negative. They are automatically identified as the ‘Other’ without knowing.

Unlike the western feminist movements, India’s movement was imitated by men and later joined by women. The effort of this men included abolishing sati,which was a widow’s death by burning on his husband’s funeral pyres,banning the marriage of upper caste Hindu widows, the custom of child marriage,promting women’s education obtaining legal rights for women to own property and regulating the law to acknowledge women’s status by granting their basic rights in matter such as adopting,religious law and expectation of personal laws,enumerated by specific religion often conflict with the Indian Constitution,eliminating rights and power women legally should have.

Virginia woolf while defining women’s place in the prevalent patriarchal set up, voices the sentiments of millions of her sisters. She bemoans the inevitable position of women in these words:

“A very queer, composite being thus emerges. Insignificantly she is of the highest importance; practically she is completely insignificant. She provides poetry from cover to cover: she is all but absent from history. She dominates the lives of kings and conquerors in fiction; in fact she was the slave of any boy whose parents forced a ring upon her finger. Some of the most inspired words, some of the most profound thoughts in literature fall from her lips; in real life she could hardly read, could scarcely spell, and was the property of the husband”.

The description of women goes on with the same words as it used to be in woolf’s time. In reality a woman is nothing but a ‘womb’- her role is always determined by the male dominated society as secondary. Her role is felt only when it is the need to cook, food, to rear the child, to take care of the in-laws and so on and so forth. When it becomes the question to talk about a woman’ own story, everything gets blurred because there is no story of a woman’s life.

Every civilization and every culture determined certain characteristics for a woman to fit into that particular set up. The process still goes on. The following sloka will define an ideal woman of Indian civilization:

KaryesuMantri, karaneshuDaasi

RupechaLakshmi, Kshamayaadharitri

Bhojyeshu Mata, ShayentuRambha

Shat karma Yukta, Kula Dharma Patni.

It signifies that woman should serve her husband as minister while counseling, by her looks she should be as goddess Lakshmi, like the earth in forbearance, as a mother like feeding and in bed, she must be like the celestial beauty. If a woman obeys all these she is regarded only as the ‘Weaker sex’, the ’Other’, a child producing machine and so on and so forth. She never gets equality of man. She was an inanimate object, who followed five paces behind their men…they had to be gentle, patient, gracious, Bengali women were hidden behind the barred windows of half dark rooms, spending centuries in washing clothes,and murmuring alone verses from ‘ The BhagavadGita and The Ramayana’.

In case of Shakespeare we can see that in the play ‘Hamlet’ womanhood has been seen as the name of betrayal or moral weakness and it is very much clear from the speech of Hamlet that ‘Frailty, thy name is woman’. Again Arundhati Roy also speaks for women. She successfully demonstrated the injustice inflicted upon women through the means of patriarchism, caste taboos and love-laws. She regards that inequality and subordination of women is an instrument of the social structure. Her novels like The God of Small Things unfold the subjective politics which has ordered the subjection of women in a man-owned world. This novel exposes the violence imposed on women and how Ammu got victimized by the patriarchal society. She thought that after marriage she would be able to make herself free from parental tyranny and therefore she agreed to marry. Here Simon de Beauvoir remarks that’ there is a unanimous agreement that getting a husband or in some cases a protector is for her the most important of undertakings. But suffering had been pulling Ammu down for long. She became domesticated depriving of privacy and freedom. Even after marriage the fate of drudgery followed her. Atlast finding no solution to avoid her drunken husband Ammu returned to father’s home where ‘she had no position at all’ and falls in love with Velutha in search of happiness but in vain .Therefore we can see very clearly from the story that Ammu is treated as not merely as wife but as other who can be used for any purpose.

Among them Sahitya Academy award winning novelist, ShashiDeshpande is one of the most important and versatile Indian English woman writers since the 1980’s. Her novels and short stories explore the psyche of educational middle class Indian woman. With rare sensitivity and depth, she portrays the dilemma of the Indian woman trapped between her own aspiration as an individual and the forces of patriarchy which confines her.ShashiDeshpande bares the subtle processes of oppression and gender differentiation operating within the institution of family and the male centered Indian society at large. Deshpande’s feminism does not uproot the woman from her background but it only tries to expose the different ideological element that shapes her. These include social and psychological factors such as woman’s subordinate position in the family and her restricted sexuality. She seeks to expose the ideology by which a woman is trained to play her subservient role in society. Her novels eclectically employ the post modern technique of constructing patriarchal culture and customs and reveal these to be man- made constructs.

In Dark Holds No Terror’she portrays the protagonist’s fight to survive in a world that offers no easy outs. The story is mainly on the waking up of acquisitive knowledge that there is more to life than dependence on husbands or parents imposed by society, culture and free from her own fears and guilt,Saru decides to assert herself and fight her own battle. She realizes that her life is her own which she will have to shape. Saru has come to realize that her profession as a doctor in her own and she will only decide what to do with it. She will not be a puppet. Her marriage is shadow. Like Shaw,Ibsen,Tolstoy, her women characters have the independent feeling.

In Roots and ShadowsDeshpande explores the inner self of Indu,who symbolizes the new women,who are educated and married to Jayant but her feminine instinct for articulation in suppressed. In this novel the predicament of Indu represents the larger predicament of woman in contemporary Indian society where the new concept of western education, economic independence and globalization have completely shaken the roots of old Indian culture and social values.

A Matter of Time explores into the many facets of feminine experience in life which gives her a new height as awriter. The novel arises many questions by providing the reader with an insight into the problems of different roles of womanhood, has to play.Again it successfully reveals the secrets and strength of women as well as the complication of family culture. Sumi, the woman protagonist of this novel, has accepted the tragic decision taken by Gopal without questioning and opposing him. Without any prior indication,Gopal, the respected professor, devoted husband, and caring father announces to his wife that he is leaving the house for good without any reason.

ShashiDeshpande is quite down to earth in her feminist approach to the woman’s problem. For though she is aware of the seriousness of the Indian woman’s dilemma behind it, she also believes that a positive change in woman’s social status can not materialize without bringing about a change in woman’s mindset first.

Again in Rabindranath Tagore’s short story Shasti(Punishment) the female protagonist was attributed by her husband with the crime of murder done by his brother. Here we wil find that woman has no respect as she can be treated in every manner and can be given any charge the man like. Again in Dena Pownawe can see that Nirupama was married to a aged and death -stricken bridegroom and after whose death she taken to the burning ghat in order to be burned with her husband on pyre. Mulk Raj Anand places his women in the novel, in a socio-cultural milieu of a stiflingly conventional Hindu society, where she is doomed to a life of degradation and dehumanization, and life of mental subjugation and conditioned responses. Woman are unredeemed, dumb creatures caught in the Darwinian world of the survival of the fittest, unable to pull their beyond the biological factors.

If we talk about gay/lesbian we can say that they were regarded as alienated class or the ‘Other’. For example in ShyamSelvadurai’s Funny Boy Arjie’sgay relationship with the Sihala boy,Shehad,was not accepted by the family as well as society because homosexual relationships automatically signal the end of a ‘traditional’ family.Homosexuals have long been seen as the’other’.

To conclude we can say that still women are considered as ‘Other’ in the term of Louis Irrigray, Julia Kristeva. They are not given any respect, social justice and educational opportunities as mass media bring to us how women are victimized in our civilized world. Children are oppressed in the society, also pitiless to bar dancer, gay, lesbian.They are not given any focus. All these people are familiar to us but they are not given any respect or sympathy, justice. They are treated as unfamiliar to us as if they are inhabitant of Other society of other planate. All these are considered as ‘Other’ and as Literature is a kind of reflection of a society, all these categories are described by any writer in their texts. This subaltern categories, the Unrepresented are represented by the literary person in their written texts, unconsciously or consciously.

Reference:

1)Mary WoollStonecraft. “A Vindication of the Rights of women (1792).

2)Fullers, Margaret, “Woman in the 19th century,” 1845.

3)Stuart, Mills John, The subjection of women” (1869).

4)Engel’s, Fredrick’s, “The origin of the Family (1884).

5)Scheiners’ olive, “Women and labour” (1911).

6)Ramanamma, and Bambawale, Usha “Family Mobility and the position of womenin the Indian family,” The Indian family in Transition, ed. Johu.S.Augustine (New Delhi: Vikas, 1982.

7)Bhattacharya Bhabani, “Women in Mysteries” Journal of Indian Writing in English, Ed G.S.Balaram Gupta, Gulbarga, India. Vol. 3 No 2, July 1975.

8)Hooks. Bell. Feminist Theory: From Margin To center, London; Pluto Press, 2000.

9)Khan.A.G. “ShashiDeshpande Heroines; Prisoners by choice” Ed Pathak.R.S, The Fiction of ShashiDeshpande, New Delhi, Creative Books, 1998.

10)Indira’s. “A Bond or A Burden? A Studyof ShashiDeshpande’sThe BindingVine.” Indian Women Novelists, Ed, R.K.Dhawan, set 3 Vol 6, New Delhi: Prestige, 1995.

11)Rich Andrinee, Quoted in IndiraNityanandham article, ShashiDeshpande’s – TheBinding Vine; silent No More, Indian Women Novelists, Ed R.K.Dhawan Set 3 Vol 4, New Delhi: Prestige Books. 1995.

12)Lakshmi, C.S. The Face behind the mask-women in Tamil literature. New Delhi; Vikas, 1984.

13)Anand, Mulk Raj, In Yoma’s “Hell, Between Spaces of Silence”, women creative writers, Ed KaminiDinesh, New Delhi: Sterling publishers, 1994.

14)SivaRamanShanti. Women in the Binding Vine, ed. R.S.Pathak, The Fiction ofShashiDeshpande. New Delhi. The Creative Books, 1998.

15)Tripathi.J.P. “The Binding Vine and the Indian Ethos, Ed R.S.Pathak, the Fiction of ShashiDeshpande, New Delhi: Creative books, 1998.

16)VanamalaVishwanath interview with ShashiDeshpande, A woman’s world…Allthe way ‘Literature Alive’ 1:3(1987).

17)Simone de Beauvoir, “The second sex” transH.M.Parshley, London: Foursquare Books limited 1961.

18)Kulkshreshtha Indian, That long silence “Women in the novels of ShashiDeshpande”-A study.

19)Writing the Female: Akademi Awarded Novels in English. Mithilesh.K.Pandey. A.N.Dwivedi’sShashiDeshpande-That long silence (88): A Feminist Reading.

20)Derrida Jacques—Dissemination. Trans Barbara Johnson, Chicago: University of Chicago press 1981.

21)Literary Review, The Hindu, 5th September 2004.

22)Chanchala.K.Naik, ‘Moving On Individual Autonomy and self—Realization,’ writing Difference-The novels of ShashiDeshpande.

23)Deshpande, Shashi, “Why I am Feminist in writing from the margin” New Delhi: Penguin. 2003.

24)Bartley Sandra Lee. “Body Politics,” in a companion to Feminist Philosophy, Oxford; Black well. 1998.

25)Soumya Bhattacharya: “Death Shall Have No Dominion,” The Hindustan Times, 14th May 2000.

26)Heideggers, Being and Time, translated by J.Macquarrie and E.S Robinson, New York: Harper & Row, 1962 and London: SCM Press 1962.

27)Beauvior De Simonne. The Second sex, Picador classics, Edition, London: Pan Books Ltd. Cavaye Books 1988.

28)Patil, Ujwala, ´The Theme of marriage and selfhood in Roots and Shadows,’ Indian Women novelists, Ed R.K.Dhawan, Set 1 Vol 5 New Delhi. Prestige Books, 1997.

29)Tambe, Usha “ShashiDeshpande as a Feminist and a Novelist” Indian English Fiction 1980-90.An Assessment, Ed Nilufer. E. Bharucha and Vila Sarang, New Delhi: B.R.Publishing Corporation, 1994.

30)SandhuSarabjit, The Image of women in the novels of ShashiDeshpande, New Delhi: Prestige Books, 1991