The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Chapter Presentation Rubrics

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Chapter Presentation Rubrics

Kroll

English 10

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Chapter Presentation Rubrics

Presentation Rubric (25 points) – Individual Grade

Exceptional / Strong / Capable / Developing
Mastery of Chapters / Displays mastery of knowledge. Gives details from the text, analysis and explanations. / Displays above average knowledge of the subject with some use of details, analysis and explanations. / Displays basic knowledge of subject. Needs more details, analysis and explanations. / Displayed little understanding of topic. Uses minimal details, analysis and explanations.
Poise / Relaxed, confident, no fidgeting or fillers.
Appropriate movement. / Generally relaxed and confident. Some minor fidgeting or use of fillers. / Does not seem relaxed or confident. Fidgeting or filler use became distracting / Notably nervous and unsure. Excessive fidgeting or filler use
Enthusiasm/
Tone / Spoke loudly and clearly. Engaging tone that drew the audience in. / Spoke clearly with a professional tone. / Sometimes hard to hear or understand. Tone rarely engaged the audience / Hard to hear or understand. Tone did not engage the audience.
Synergy with partner(s) / Works seamlessly with partner during presentation. Actively listens to partner(s) / Works fairly well with partner(s) during presentation. Actively listening most of the time. / Rough transitions between partners or lack of support for each other. Not always paying attention. / Complete lack of fluidity between partners. Not paying attention while partner was speaking.
Audience engagement / Engages the majority of the class and gets the audience interested in topic / Engages most of the class and gets the audience open to the topic / Does not make enough of an effort to get audience engaged or interested / Does not make an effort to get audience engaged or interested

PowerPoint Rubric (25 points) – Group Grade

Exceptional / Strong / Capable / Developing
Content / Gives clear understanding of topic. Information is accurate and clearly cited.
Analysis is thoughtful and intriguing. Engages audience with ideas and/or questions. / Gives clear understanding of topic. Information is accurate and clearly cited. Analysis is well developed. / Does not fully cover topic. Information is accurate but not always cited.
Analysis lacks depth and needs more new ideas. / Does not fully cover topic. Some information is inaccurate and not cited. Analysis is missing or underdeveloped.
Writing Mechanics / The text is written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling. / The text is clearly written with little editing required. / Many errors in mechanics are distracting or impair readability / Flagrant errors in mechanics distract and impair readability.
Text/ Layout / Font sizes are easy-to-read and vary. Use of italics, bold, and bullets to enhance readability. Text length is appropriate. Layout of information is pleasing. / Some fonts are easy-to-read. Either lack of or over use of readability enhancers in some areas. Text length is appropriate. Layout of information is clear. / Overall readability is difficult. Odd font sizes, too much or too little text. Layout is too busy or too plain. / Text is extremely difficult to read due to size and amount. Either lack of or over use of readability enhancers that confuse audience.
Graphics, Sound and/or Animation / Graphics assist in presenting an overall theme and enhance the understanding ideas. Creative & clear attention to presentation. / Graphics used to create flow for the audience. Clear attention to presentation. / Graphics used but do not necessarily flow. More attention to presentation needed. / Not enough graphics used. Poorly thought out and presented. Needs more effort.
Fluidity / Both content and visuals flow seamlessly from one slide to the next. Progression of slides build from one to the next. / Both content and visuals have a sense of flow. Progression of slides makes sense. / Content OR visuals have a sense of flow. Slide order could be more fluid. / Lacks cohesion. Slide order does not make sense and is hard to follow.