Skeleton for New WMO-No. 732

Skeleton for New WMO-No. 732

Skeleton for new WMO-No. 732

Index

Foreword

1General

1.1Objective of this Guide

1.1.1Target audience

1.2Definition of service objectives

1.2.1ICAO GANP KPAs

1.2.1.1WMO KPAs Safety, Regularity, Efficiency (actual out of Annex 3)

1.3MET as part of ANS

1.3.1Definition of AMSP (for the first time) as an ANSP

2Chapter 2 – Institutional and organizational arrangements

2.1International organizations, structure, regulatory framework

2.1.1ICAO

2.1.2WMO

2.1.2.1Working arrangements between ICAO & WMO

2.1.3Other regional (e.g. SES, EASA), bi-lateral

2.1.4Data policies

2.2National

2.2.1MA, MSP, MET oversight

2.2.1.1AMS being provided by airport ATC or other

2.2.1.2MET inspectorate/oversight, MET regulator (8896)

2.2.2Legislation and regulation

2.2.2.1How it appears in the national legislation

2.2.2.2Transposition from international regulation to regional/local legislation

2.2.3Aviation stakeholders

2.2.3.1Arrangements with ANSPs (law)

2.2.3.2Arrangements with (airspace) users/stakeholders

2.2.4Basic and specialized infrastructure

2.2.4.1E.g. Synoptic network, reference to No. 904

3MET service provision

3.1General functions of MET service provisioning (reference to ICAO)

3.2Business models (NMHS, others, private sector)

3.2.1See ECMA, NMHS as AMSP/ANSP, different models, governmental, commercial

3.2.2National examples for business models (choose good business models)

3.2.3Trends and regionalisation

3.2.4Multinational service (e.g. NAMCON, ASECNA)

3.3Cost recovery

3.3.1Brief general description, included continuous pressure on cost reduction

3.3.2Reference to No.-904

3.4QMS and SMS, safety oversight

3.4.1QMS, reference to 1001, 1100

3.4.2SMS, ICAO 19

3.5Users, stakeholders and use cases (how MET information is being used in…, e.g.)

3.5.1IATA information), to be proven if it isn’t causing problems)

4MET information and services

4.1International systems and facilities

4.1.1WAFS

4.1.1.1WAFC/products come out (ourselves)

4.1.2IAVW

4.1.2.1VAAC/products come out, reference to 9691

4.1.3TCAC

4.1.3.1TCAC/products come out, reference to GDPFS-Manual

4.1.4Others

4.1.4.1Radioactive information, reference to GDPFS-Manual

4.1.4.2OPMET Centres, RODBC

4.2Aerodrome information and services

4.2.1AMS

4.2.2AMO

4.2.2.1Climatological information

4.2.3MWO

4.2.3.1SIGMET

4.2.3.2AIRMET

5Technology/Methodology

5.1Observations

5.1.1Aerodrome – AMOS, LLWAS, lidar, etc.

5.1.1.1Calibration maintenance

5.1.2Aircraft-based obs

5.1.2.1AMDAR

5.1.2.2ABO (ADD)

5.1.3Areal monitoring

5.1.3.1Satellite, radar, networks

5.1.3.2VA, R/act,

5.2Forecasting

5.2.1Nowcasting

5.2.1.1How to produce TREND/SIGMET/AIRMET/Warnings etc.

5.2.2NWP/MOS

5.2.2.1(WMO-No. 770), TAF, Lower level Forecasts, GAMET

5.2.3Forecast Verification

5.3Climatological information (ET ASC)

5.4Data exchange

6Personnel

6.1General description, reference Annex 1/3, WMO Manual 1083

6.2Qualifications

6.3Competence

7MET Services for future ANS (GANP, ASBU)

7.1Needed capability for performance based MET

7.2Aviation and climate

Foreword

1General

To be finished: 15.05.2016

1.1Objective of this Guide

Set the scene

(by Dimitar)

-Why we do this guide

-How to use this guide

-Successor 732,

-survival 731 (reference in Chapter 5),

-kill 842

-Reference to 8896

1.1.1Target audience

1.2Definition of service objectives

Introduction in current guide (732)

1.2.1ICAO GANP KPAs

By Marcel

-ICAO KPAs

-Including KPIs set by ICAO for MET

1.2.1.1WMO KPAs Safety, Regularity, Efficiency (actual out of Annex 3)

By Dimitar

1.3MET as part of ANS

By Jan

1.3.1Definition of AMSP (for the first time) as an ANSP

By Jan

2Chapter 2 – Institutional and organizational arrangements

2.1International organizations, structure, regulatory framework

2.1.1ICAO

By Dimitar & Greg

2.1.2WMO

By Dimitar & Greg

2.1.2.1Working arrangements between ICAO & WMO

By Dimitar & Greg

2.1.3Other regional (e.g. SES, EASA), bi-lateral

By Jan/ET-GOV

In the Western part of the ICAO EUR Region, the European Commission (EC) launched at the end of the nineties the Single European Sky (SES) initiative to remove the fragmentation of the European Air Traffic Management (ATM) system with the ultimate objective to eventually implement an efficient, safe, integrated operating airspace functioning as if a single entity would efficiently manage European airspace. A first legislative package (SES1) was adopted in 2004 to set a harmonised regulatory framework and create a level playing field for the provision of air navigation services in view of achieving a modern European ATM system. It consisted of four Basic Regulations (N° 549/2004, 550/2004, 551/2004 and 552/2004) covering the provision of air navigation services (ANS), the organisation and use of airspace and the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management Network (EATMN).

A second legislative package (SES2) was adopted in 2009 focussing at increasing the overall performance of the air traffic management system in Europe and also extending the competences of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to cover ATM/ANS and airports. Among the key regulatory and operational instruments introduced by SES2 were a "performance scheme", based on EU-wide performance targets to be met over specific time periods (1st period: 2012-2014 and 2nd period: 2015-2019); the establishment of Functional Airspace Blocks (FAB's) on the basis of operational requirements and across States boundaries; the "Network Manager", established in 2011, to perform some operational tasks at EU wide level (ATS route design, air traffic flow management, SSR transponder codes and frequency management co-ordination, crisis co-ordination, etc.)

A good example of a multinational air navigation service unit established in the ICAO EUR Region is the Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC), set up in 1972. MUAC, operated by EUROCONTROL on behalf of four States, provides air traffic control for the upper airspace (above 24,500 feet) of Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and north-west Germany. The international area of responsibility covered by MUAC is a perfect example of the harmonisation of airspace and a model for cross-border projects in the spirit of the Single European Sky (MUAC is a member of FAB Europe Central (FABEC)).

Add one paragraph on regional MET cooperation

2.1.4Data policies

Reference ET-Gov report Wellington & Resolution 40, Annex 3

Open DATA by Jaako

2.2National

2.2.1MA, MSP, MET oversight

By Jan

Reference 8896, ET-GOV actions

2.2.1.1AMS being provided by airport ATC or other

By Jan

2.2.1.2MET inspectorate/oversight, MET regulator (8896)

By Jan

Reference 8896, ET-GOV action, explain what does it mean

2.2.2Legislation and regulation

WMO lawyer

2.2.2.1How it appears in the national legislation

2.2.2.2Transposition from international regulation to regional/local legislation

2.2.3Aviation stakeholders

Just general knowledge

By Greg

2.2.3.1Arrangements with ANSPs (law)

2.2.3.2Arrangements with (airspace) users/stakeholders

2.2.4Basic and specialized infrastructure

WMO, link to WIGOS, OSCAR

2.2.4.1E.g. Synoptic network, reference to No. 904

3MET service provision

Reference to 8896

3.1General functions of MET service provisioning (reference to ICAO)

By Greg

3.2Business models (NMHS, others, private sector)

Initial draft by Dimitar

3.2.1See ECMA, NMHS as AMSP/ANSP, different models, governmental, commercial

3.2.2National examples for business models (choose good business models)

3.2.3Trends andregionalisation

3.2.4Multinational service (e.g. NAMCON, ASECNA)

3.3Costrecovery

ByJaako

3.3.1Brief general description, included continuous pressure on cost reduction

3.3.2Reference to No.-904

3.4QMS and SMS, safety oversight

By Dimitar

3.4.1QMS, referenceto 1001, 1100

3.4.2SMS, ICAO 19

3.5Users, stakeholders and use cases (how MET information is being used in…, e.g.)

Request to IATA, IFALPA

Ask Dennis

By Dimitar/Jan

3.5.1IATA information), to be proven if it isn’t causing problems)

4MET informationandservices

By Dimitar/Greg

4.1International systemsandfacilities

4.1.1WAFS

By Dimitar (write to WAFCs)

4.1.1.1WAFC/products come out (ourselves)

4.1.2IAVW

By Ian Lisk

4.1.2.1VAAC/products come out, reference to 9691

4.1.3TCAC

By Dimitar

4.1.3.1TCAC/products come out, reference to GDPFS-Manual

4.1.4Others

4.1.4.1Radioactive information, reference to GDPFS-Manual

By Dimitar

4.1.4.2OPMET Centres, RODBC

4.2Aerodromeinformationandservices

4.2.1AMS

4.2.2AMO

4.2.2.1Climatologicalinformation

4.2.3MWO

4.2.3.1SIGMET

4.2.3.2AIRMET

5Technology/Methodology

5.1Observations

By HKO

5.1.1Aerodrome – AMOS, LLWAS, lidar, etc.

Reference to ICAO 9837, WMO-No 8, RVR Guide 9328

5.1.1.1Calibrationmaintenance

5.1.2Aircraft-basedobs

5.1.2.1AMDAR

5.1.2.2ABO (ADD)

5.1.3Areal monitoring

5.1.3.1Satellite, radar, networks

5.1.3.2VA, R/act,

5.2Forecasting

By Herbert Puempel

5.2.1Nowcasting

By Peter Lee

5.2.1.1How to produce TREND/SIGMET/AIRMET/Warnings etc.

5.2.2NWP/MOS

By Matthew Hort

5.2.2.1(WMO-No. 770), TAF, Lower level Forecasts, GAMET

5.2.3Forecast Verification

5.3Climatologicalinformation (ET ASC)

By Herbert Puempel

  1. Current Annex 3 provisions
  2. Developingneeds -> ET-ASC

5.4Data exchange

6Personnel

By ET-ETC/Chris Webster

6.1General description, reference Annex 1/3, WMO Manual 1083

6.2Qualifications

6.3Competence

7MET Services for future ANS (GANP, ASBU)

By Greg

7.1Needed capability for performance based MET

7.2Aviation and climate