Proposal 1: NMT, NNMC, SFCC, WNMU, NMHU, NMJC

Proposal 1: NMT, NNMC, SFCC, WNMU, NMHU, NMJC

Proposal 1: NMT, NNMC, SFCC, WNMU, NMHU,NMJC

Fiscal Agent: Bill Kunko

Budget Request: $ 366,500

Award: $

1. / Legislative Intent:
Proposal staying within the goals and objectives described in the legislation. / 15 Points
2. / Collaboration:
Consideration for Institutions who have collaborated with other Institutions to generate a combined proposal. / 25 Points
3. / Implementation Timeline:
Consideration for proposals with implementation timelines of less than one-year. / 12 Points
4. / Capture of STARS student ID:
Consideration for proposals that demonstrate creative and effective planning for how to capture the Public Education STARS unique student ID. / 15 Points
5. / Cost effective budget:
Reasonable costs, cost-sharing, and use of available resources that best leverages funding. / 20 Points
Grant Total: / 87 Points

Proposal 2: NMHU, WNMU

Fiscal Agent: Max Baca

Budget Request: $ 289,800

Award: $

1. / Legislative Intent:
Proposal staying within the goals and objectives described in the legislation. / 15 Points
2. / Collaboration:
Consideration for Institutions who have collaborated with other Institutions to generate a combined proposal. / 25 Points
3. / Implementation Timeline:
Consideration for proposals with implementation timelines of less than one-year. / 15 Points
4. / Capture of STARS student ID:
Consideration for proposals that demonstrate creative and effective planning for how to capture the Public Education STARS unique student ID. / 15 Points
5. / Cost effective budget:
Reasonable costs, cost-sharing, and use of available resources that best leverages funding. / 15 Points
Grant Total: / 85 Points

Proposal 3: CNM, NMHU, NMSU, UNM, WNMU

Fiscal Agent:

Budget Request: $ 467,550

Award: $

1. / Legislative Intent:
Proposal staying within the goals and objectives described in the legislation. / 15 Points
2. / Collaboration:
Consideration for Institutions who have collaborated with other Institutions to generate a combined proposal. / 25 Points
3. / Implementation Timeline:
Consideration for proposals with implementation timelines of less than one-year. / 12 Points
4. / Capture of STARS student ID:
Consideration for proposals that demonstrate creative and effective planning for how to capture the Public Education STARS unique student ID. / 25 Points
5. / Cost effective budget:
Reasonable costs, cost-sharing, and use of available resources that best leverages funding. / 13 Points
Grant Total: / 90 Points

Proposal 4: ENMU (Ruidoso, Roswell, Ruidoso), ClovisCommunity College

Fiscal Agent: ENMU Portales

Budget Request: $ 272,435

Award: $

1. / Legislative Intent:
Proposal staying within the goals and objectives described in the legislation. / 10 Points
2. / Collaboration:
Consideration for Institutions who have collaborated with other Institutions to generate a combined proposal. / 25 Points
3. / Implementation Timeline:
Consideration for proposals with implementation timelines of less than one-year. / 15 Points
4. / Capture of STARS student ID:
Consideration for proposals that demonstrate creative and effective planning for how to capture the Public Education STARS unique student ID. / 20 Points
5. / Cost effective budget:
Reasonable costs, cost-sharing, and use of available resources that best leverages funding. / 20 Points
Grant Total: / 90 Points