Internal Review of Thefreedom of Information Act/ Environmental Information Regulations

Internal Review of Thefreedom of Information Act/ Environmental Information Regulations

J Taylor
Via email:
/ Your ref:
Date: / 30 June 2014
Our ref: / LBH/3127414
Direct dial: / 020 8489 2556
Email: /

Dear MrTaylor,

Internal Review of theFreedom of Information Act/ Environmental Information Regulations request reference: LBH/2986914

Thank you for giving us an opportunity to review the response we have sent to your Freedom of Information / Environmental Information Regulations request.

Your original request submitted on 29 April was for :

“...a detailed budget for both the recent Green Lanes regeneration project and the Outer London Fund grant that was awarded to the area.

I would like to be able to determine the budgeted and actual costs relating to any and all of the inputs to the schemes mentioned. For example, the costs of paving, lighting, new shopfronts, architectural fees etc.”

The response of 29 May provided the overall figures but not the detail you had requested.

On 3 June you responded as follows:

“Unfortunately the core aspect of the request appears to have been overlooked or ignored.

I had asked for a detailed breakdown of the budgets so that I would...

"... be able to determine the budgeted and actual costs relating to any and all of the inputs to the schemes mentioned. For example, the costs of paving, lighting, new shopfronts, architectural fees etc."

What I have received is the widely publicised overall budget figure.”

We therefore accepted this as an Internal Review of the previous response.

The level of detail provided in the original response was thought to be sufficient for your request however did not include the level of detail that you had requested, and for this I apologise on behalf of the service.

Further detailed breakdown is provided below.

Green Lanes Corridor Scheme

A detailed breakdown of budget and spend is provided below. In addition, please find enclosed to this response the quantified pricing document as submitted by Ringway Jacobs in accordance with LOHAC framework agreement protocol. The value of works totalled £767,349.

Original Total Budget
TfL Budget / £1,185,605
Bus Stop Accessibility / £115,200
Borough cycle parking / £30,500
Drainage Investigation / £19,125
Drainage Investigation / £0
TOTAL / £1,350,430
Green Lanes Corridor - Finance Summary / Spend 2011/12 / Spend 2012/13 / Spend 2013/14 / Under / Over Spend
Total Fees / £42,447 / £146,500 / £92,604 / £0
Construction / £0 / £767,349 / £0
6.4% Contingency (on Construction Cost only) / £0 / £0 / £49,110
Compensation Events / £0 / £28,575 / £0
Total Construction / £0 / £0 / £795,924 / £49,110
Total Surveys-Third Party-Other / £57,553 / £37,365 / £79,459 / £0
Grand Total / £100,000 / £183,865 / £967,987 / £49,111

OLF2 Programme

A detailed breakdown of budget and spend is provided below. As noted previously, the Green Lanes OLF2 programme has not yet completed. We are therefore only able to provide actual spend in 2012/13 and 2013/14. Following the erection of scaffolding at each property, and closer inspection, there has been a degree of remeasurement of the tendered Bill of Quantities, spend on provisional sums, and unforeseen additional works required. Following completion of the project, we would be happy to provide the final schedule of works should this be requested.

Original PID Budget
GLA (Capital) / £1,625,000
GLA (Revenue) / £153,507
Grantee contribution (Capital) / £224,700
London Borough of Haringey (Revenue) / £113,019
TOTAL / £2,116,226
Original PID Budget / Actual 12/13 / Actual 13/14
(£) / (£) / (£)
PROGRAMME & PROJECT MANAGEMENT / 113,019 / 27,500 / 69,573
Project management / 24,000 / 21,500 / 52,519
Programme management / 89,019 / 6,000 / 17,054
SHOP FRONT IMPROVEMENTS / 1,311,614 / 69,685 / 297,960
Professional fees / 151,035 / 58,825 / 144,857
Construction / 1,050,000 / - / 140,108
Disbursements / 19,909 / 10,860 / 12,995
Contingency / 90,670 / - / -
BRIDGE GATEWAY / 120,087 / 3,719 / 5,730
Professional fees / 12,125 / 3,719 / 5,730
Construction / 100,000 / - / -
Disbursements / 1,952 / - / -
Contingency / 6,010 / - / -
MICRO SQUARES / 571,506 / 38,010 / 300,308
Professional fees / 57,322 / 16,010 / 27,138
Construction / 475,000 / - / 273,170
Disbursements / 7,864 / 22,000 / -
Contingency / 31,320 / - / -
TOTAL / 2,116,226 / 138,914 / 673,571

Please note, following further analysis of actual spend, it has come to light that the figures provided in the earlier response did not reconcile fully with our SAP accounting system. The above figures therefore may differ slightly to those provided in the previous response. I am bringing this to your attention to avoid any confusion that this could bring.

I hope that you are satisfied with my response to the Internal Review. If you are dissatisfied, you may complain to the Information Commissioner, who may be able to help you. Please note that if you wish to refer this case to the Information Commissioner, they ask that you do so within two months of our response to you.

You can contact the Commissioner at:

Information Commissioner

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK9 5AF

Email:

Website:

Yours sincerely

Sue Dyos

Feedback Team Leader