February 27, 2003
Honorable Michael Cook
Marshall Circuit Court
501 North Center Street
Suite 301
Plymouth
IN 46563
Re: Cause No. 20D050010DR640
Court Order of February 21, 2003
The Marriage of : Alison Gratzol (Petitioner) vs. Amir H. Sanjari (Respondent)
Dear Judge Cook,
This Court has committed a gross negligence and injustice against the minor children and the Respondent/Father by not setting an early date to hear the facts and evidence, not the lies the Petitioner/Mother and her husband seem to, so charmingly and disarmingly, have convinced the psychological evaluator, amongst others, of, in this case. A hearing would have shown and proved that the Petitioner/Mother, encouraged by her husband and attorney, has no interest in a reasonable accommodation (the point of mediation) as the Respondent/Father had tried to achieve with her unsuccessfully on a number of occasions.
Furthermore, any counseling by a psychologist (even by a disinterested and alert psychologist who would see, be willing to see, through the deceptive façade of the Petitioner/Mother) would only be counteracted by the children being sent back to be under the same questionable influences in this case and live under the same kind of influences in the Petitioner/Mother’s household where the latter and her husband inflict Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) upon the children. It should be noted that prior to the Petitioner/Mother’s alienating actions the minor children had NO psychological conditions warranting counseling.
Even when, in 2001, after the Petitioner/Mother started inflicting PAS, the Respondent/Father suggested that A visit a psychologist, Dr. Seldin, the Petitioner/Mother initially resisted! And when A needed further help after self-mutilation in the SOLE custody of the Petitioner (!), the latter took her to Ms. Todd instead(!).
(Please see the attached “Recent Case History”.)
Therefore, if the Court is truly interested in having this family, and particularly the minor children, be healed, it would order the removal of the children from the custody of the Petitioner/Mother and put them in the temporary custody of the Respondent/Father where they’d be provided with counseling and other appropriate help until such time that an appropriate resolution for the children is arrived at. Otherwise, this Order simply has the effect of prolonging the children’s agony.
Furthermore, as this Court is very well aware, the Respondent/Father does not have the financial resources (please see the attached documents and work sheet) to pay for the ordered counseling and mediation due to limited (non-existent) resources. This is as a direct result of the unfair, discriminatory, illegal and draconian orders against the Respondent/Father throughout this case that has inequitably burdened the Respondent/Father with most of the marital debt (Terry Shewmaker & David Denton) and similarly regressive measures and child support orders (David Denton & Michael Cook) contrary to Indiana Code [IC 31-16-6-1] and the US Constitution [ Am. 14, section 1.; Slochower v. Bd. of Higher Educ. of the City of New York, 350 U.S. 551, 76 S. Ct. 637 (1956 ), Jones v. Helms, 452 U.S. 412, 101 S. Ct. 2434 (4,5) (1981), South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Alabama, 526 U.S. 160, 119 S. Ct. 1180 (1999), Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 116 S. Ct. 1620 (1996) and Simpson v. State, 218 Ga. 337 at 339 (1962)., --- Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 120 S. Ct. 2054 (2000) and 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (U. S. 2000); Moylan v. Moylan, 384 NW 2d 859 at 866 (Minn., 1986), --- Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925), Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), --- Leary v. U.S., Western & A.R.R. v. Henderson ] and the Federal Mandate [found in 42 U.S.C.A. section 651, et seq. and 45 CFR sections 302.55 and 302.56].
As a result, the discriminatory nature of the February 21, 2003, Court Order is effectively depriving the Respondent/Father of Due Process and an opportunity to abide by that very Order !
It further deprives my minor children of Due Process in order to achieve safety, justice and peace, while still confining them to their current residence in the Petitioner/Mother’s SOLE custody.
Yours Sincerely,
Amir H. Sanjari (Dr)
CC: Elkhart Superior Court No. 5
Mr. Max Walker
Et. al.
______
Amir H. Sanjari (Dr), Member: American Nuclear Society, American Association of Physicists in Medicine
206 Berkley Manor Drive, Cranberry, PA 16066, USA
Tel: +1 (724) 741 0678