Assignment 2: Proposal
Due date: Week 10
Group/individual: Individual assignment
Word count: 1200-1500
Learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4], [ULO5]
Weighting: 30%
Assignment Details:
Rationale
This assessment will assess the students understanding of the theoretical learning to practical, real world situations. This is a great opportunity for the students to develop a proposal to demonstrate their awareness of:
• the complexity of the managerial role;
• the reliance of a manager on other people, both inside and outside the organisation, and
• the necessary interaction of both informal/interpersonal factors and formal/ organisational factors in fulfilling organisational purposes.
Instructions “The manager’s job in context” is an individual assignment. You are to propose your own job analysis based on the following:
• Undertake an analysis of your own job and its context.
• If you do not have managerial (or similar) experience, or if for some other reason it is not appropriate to analyse your own job, you may choose instead the job of another individual who agrees to be the focus of this assignment (current job). Your lecturer must approve your choice.
• Alternatively, you may discuss with your lecturer/tutor the possibility of analysing a position you have held in the past.
• You may change (or withhold) the names of people or organisations, if you believe anonymity is required.
Complete the following requirements:
1. Briefly describe the actual requirements of the job. Include formal requirements (such as those that may be detailed in a position/job description), and less formal requirements (for example, particular personality characteristics you think are important).
2. Identify (list) other individuals or groups from inside and/or outside the organisation with whom you interact who are important to your job. These could include your staff (perhaps of various categories), your supervisor, peers, clients/customers, suppliers, regulators and so on. Specify THE PEOPLE, not just the organisation or department, for example, ‘Sonia Mirza, Finance Manager’, ‘Type-setters in the Printing Department’ or ‘Receptionists, Department of Foreign Affairs’ (not just ‘Printing Department’ or ‘Department of Foreign Affairs’).
3. Describe the principle characteristics of these individuals or groups, particularly those characteristics that impact on their interaction with you. If your list is lengthy, select those five or six individuals or groups who are the most important, who are critical to your ability to fulfil the requirements of your job (this description should include such things as formal organisational position, demographics such as age or gender, personality, or pattern of interaction with you).If you have only identified people inside your own organisation, you should briefly explain why people outside your organisation have not been considered.
4. Describe the nature of the interdependency that exists between you and these critical groups or individuals. That is: in what way do you rely on each other? What do you expect from these groups and individuals? What do they expect from you? You may wish to include formal concepts of interdependence (e.g. pooled/sequential/reciprocal) in your analysis, but only do so if it enhances your analysis.
5. Include a diagrammatic representation of these interdependencies. Note this should not be presented as an organisational chart. A typical format for this diagram would consist of you as the focus or centre with the groups and individuals with whom you interact arranged around you. You are welcome to supply an organisational chart in addition as an attachment.
6. Evaluate the interdependent group (that is, the virtual network your diagram represents: yourself and the groups or individuals with whom you must interact) in terms of its effectiveness and efficiency and the satisfaction of those concerned.
7. Make recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction of the interdependent group. These recommendations could include such things as the redesign of the structure and work routines of your department or organisation, or preferred changes in the external environment, such as government regulation or changes in other organisations. Please note: you are not being asked to simply evaluate your managerial style or the effectiveness of your department or organisation.
The extent to which the task description was fulfilled, both in terms of quality and completeness (65%)
• Interpreted the instruction/ question appropriately
• All required tasks have been completed (adequate breadth and depth)
• Used sufficient and appropriate real-life information to effectively support the key points
The degree of conceptual clarity demonstrated (10%)
• Demonstrated understanding of the necessary concepts/ theories involved
• Demonstrated understanding of the nature and complexities of managerial work
Clarity of expression (5%)
• The writing is fluent, exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated.
• There is no spelling or typing errors and due regard is given to rules of capitalisation and abbreviation, gender neutral expression etc.
• The introduction is appropriate to the type and format of response and clearly outlines the focus.
• The body of the response is well structured, with coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections/ paragraphs.
• The conclusion is appropriate to type and format of the response, successfully summarising the key ideas/ issues/findings
Correct presentation (5%)
• The response conforms to the appropriate style guide advice and the specified format (report format) • The writing style is appropriate to the task
• Complete cover page information with signature
Citation of sources and list of references (5%)
• Key ideas from the literature are effectively paraphrased and/or quoted
• In-text citations and direct quotes follow referencing guide rules (correct and complete)
• Reference list appropriately compiled Description