Region 10 Title I, Part C - Migratory Children Report Request / 2013-2014

DISTRICT______

DueMay 30—LEA’s enrolled in 10% only

PR1200 – Part 2: Intensive Reading and Math Instruction Offered to Priority for Service Students (PFS)

What is the total number of Priority for Services (PFS) students identified in your district for the 2012-2013 school year? ______(This should be an unduplicated count.)

Has the Lea offered any MEP Funded Intensive Reading and Math instruction to PFS students ___ Yes ___No

Intensive Reading Instruction Offered to PFS students – Regular School Year / Intensive Math Instruction Offered to PFS students – Regular School Year
Grade / 1-2 hours per week / 3-5 hours per week / More than 5 hours per week / 1-2 hours per week / 3-5 hours per week / More than 5 hours per week
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Other
Out of school
Total

Part 3: Math Matters-Summer MEP Program(Summer 2013actual plus 2014projections – if using 2013-2014 funds to pay for the summer program)

Does the LEA have MAS Summer Intersession term?___ Yes ___No

MAS – Center-Base / MAS Home-Based
Ages / 1-2 hours per day / 3-5 hours per day / More than 5 hours per day / Less than ½ hour per student contact / ½ -1 hour per student contact / More than 1 hour per student contact
0-2
3-5
Kinder
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total

Part 4: Other Migrant Summer Program Data (If MAS is not implemented)

Does the LEA have another Migrant Summer Program?____Yes ____No

1. Provide the name of the scientifically based curriculum used.

______

2. Provide the names of the pre/post assessment instruments used.

______

3. Describe how the migrant summer program is supplemental to other summer programs offered by the district.______

______

4. Describe how the district evaluated the over all effectiveness of the migrant summer program.

______

______

______

Part 5: Key Migrant Education Program Funded Personnel

Does the LEA have key MEP-Funded Personnel?_____Yes ____No

Regular Term / Summer Term Intersession 2013 actual + 2014 projected (if using 13-14 funds to support current program)
Headcount / FTE / Headcount / FTE
Administrator
Teachers
Counselors
All Paraprofessionals
Recruiters
Records Transfer Staff
Totals
Qualified Paraprofessionals *from all paraprofessionals above

Part 7:

Program Coordination/Integration

1. The LEA has made adequate provision for serving the unmet educational needs of preschool migrant children. ___ Yes ___No ___NA Explanation Required:______

______

______

Needs Assessment

2. The LEA gives service priority to migrant children who are failing or most at risk of failing to meet the State’s content and performance standards and whose education has been interrupted during the regular school year. ____Yes ___No ___NAExplanation Required:______

______

______

3.The LEA identifies and addresses the special educational needs of migrant children through a comprehensive plan for needs assessment and service delivery. ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

Parent Involvement

4. The LEA has established a parent advisory council (PAC) for the migrant program and has provided for appropriate consultation in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the LEA’s migrant program. ___ Y ___ N ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

Program Evaluation

5. The LEA evaluates and improves the effectiveness of the migrant program, where feasible, using the same approaches and standards that are used to assess the performance of students under Title I, Part C, specifically, to enable all migrant students to meet the same challenging State content and performance standards that all Texas children are expected to meet. ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required.:______

______

______

6. The LEA academically assessed Title I, Part C services provided to participating private schools as agreed upon during consultation, and these results were used to improve services to private schools.

___ Y ___ N ___ NA

Explanation Required. :______

______

______

Private Nonprofit Schools

7. The LEA’s consultation with participating private nonprofit school officials regarding the development and implementation of the Migrant program was timely and meaningful. It occurred before the LEA made any decision that affected the opportunities of eligible private school children, teachers, and other educational personnel to participate in the program, and continued throughout the implementation and assessment of program activities. ___ Yes ___ No ___ NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

Use of Funds

8. Did the LEA ensure that MEP funds not consolidated in a schoolwide program were only used to carry out activities authorized under the MEP? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required: ______

______

______

9. Did the LEA ensure that all MEP-funded services and activities were supplemental?

___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required: ______

______

______

10. Did the LEA ensure that MEP-funded supplies, materials, and equipment were used only for MEP activities and to the benefit of MEP students? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required: ______

______

______

11. Did the LEA ensure that appropriate time and effort records were maintained for staff who were split-funded with Title I, Part C and other funds? ___ Yes ___ No ___ NA

Explanation Required: ______

______

______

12. Did the LEA ensure that it maintained control of Title I, Part C program funds being used to provide equitable services to private school migrant students and their teachers? ___ Yes ___No ___NA Explanation Required:______

______

______

13) Did the LEA ensure that migrant student records were requested and transferred in a timely manner? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

14) Did the LEA review Migrant Priority for Service student reports at least 9 months out of the year? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

15) Did the LEA that operated a Migrant-funded summer intersession program encode summer/intersession enrollments to NGS? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

16) Did the LEA ensure PEIMS identification numbers were reported on NGS for every enrolled Migrant student? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

17) Did the LEA have Migrant ID&R and NGS staff trained annually as required by the State MEP? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

18) Did the LEA encode Graduation Plans for Migrant students in grades 9-12 in NGS? ___ Yes ___No ___NA

Explanation Required:______

______

______

Please return completed form to Myra Scrabeck by May 30, 2014 through Google Docs submission. Email for more information.

Google Docs Link:

1