Project Code/ Research Area

PROJECT CODE/ RESEARCH AREA :

Kod Projek/ Bidang Penyelidikan

EVALUATION FORM

Borang Penilaian Permohonan Geran Penyelidikan Dana Kecemerlangan UiTM Kedah

(Panel Penilai )

Adapted from MOHE

A IPT :

PROJECT LEADER :

Ketua Projek

RESEARCH TITLE :

Tajuk Penyelidikan

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT (Please indicate YES (√ ) or NO ( X ) in appropriate column)/ Ringkasan Penilaian

1. TITLE

CRITERIA

SUB

ITEM OVERALL

COMMENT- A MUST FOR ( X )

OVERALL

 Specific in nature reflecting

fundamental issues to be

resolved / novelty.

 Brief and reflects the content

of the proposal

2. Executive Summary

(max 300 words)

 Problem statement

 Objectives

 Methodology

 Expected output / outcome /

implication

 Significance of output

CRITERIA

3. Research Background

 Elaboration of title

 Clarity of problem statement

and research question

/hypothesis/ theoretical

framework (if applicable)

 Cited most recent (last 5

years) related references

 In line with government policy,

national agenda and global

aspiration (can help alleviate

problems at local, national or

world level)

4. Objectives

 Specific, Measurable,

Achievable, Realistic and

within Time-frame (SMART)

 Relate to problem statement /

research question

5. Methodology

 Clear and detailed description

of methodology (may consist

of fieldwork, sampling

techniques, interview session,

analysis ; lab work of different

phases, experimental

protocol, statistical analysis)

 Able to achieve research

objectives

 Include research design, flow

chart, Gantt chart, activities

and milestones

SUB

ITEM OVERALL

COMMENT- A MUST FOR ( X )

OVERALL

CRITERIA

6. Expected Result

 New theory or newfindings/knowledge

 Publication in indexed

journals (top tier)/Intelectual

property

 Human capital – masters or

PhD

 Impact on society, economy

and nation

7.TrackRecord and

Composition of Team

 Evidenceof previous

successful research projects

 Qualification and rank of

researchers

 Well balanced team

8. Quality of Proposal

 Meticulous

 Proper use of language

(grammar, spelling, sentence

construction)

 Good formatting and

presentation

9. Elements of FRGS Criteria

 Novel, cutting edge, high

impact

 Examples provided

SUB

ITEM OVERALL

COMMENT- A MUST FOR ( X )

POLICY AND SUPPORT/ Polisi dan Cadangan

NO. CRITERIA

1 Budget Allocation And Ceiling

2 Facilities And Supporting

3 Infrastructure

4 Overlapping Topic

REMARKS (√ ) or (X)

COMMENT

OBSERVATION AND COMMENT ( FOR MOHE ASSESSOR ONLY )

NO. CRITERIA REMARKS (√ ) or (X)

1 Structure and systems of RMC

2 Commitment of University

3 Overall evaluation

COMMENT

RECOMMENDED FUNDING/ Cadangan Peruntukan

E Poor Inadequate Acceptable Good Very Good

1 2 3 4 5

1. Appropriateness of cost estimates ………………

COST CATEGORY

Vot 11000 - Salary and Wages

Vot 21000 - Travelling and Transportation

Vot 24000 - Rental

Vot 27000 - Research Materials and Supplies

Vot 28000 - Maintenance and Minor Repair Services

Vot 29000 - Professional Services

Vot 35000 - Accessories and Equipment

TOTAL

RECOMMENDED FUNDING (RM)

RECOMMENDATION BY FRGS EVALUATION COMMITTEE/Perakuan oleh Jawatankuasa Penilaian FRGS

F Please tick (√ )

Sila tandakan ( √ )

Recommended:

Diperakukan:

A. Highly Recommended

Sangat Disokong

B. Recommended

Disokong

C. Not Recommended (Please specify reason)

Tidak Disokong (Sila Nyatakan Sebab)

Comments:

Ulasan:

------

Name: Signature:

Nama: Tandatangan:

Date:

Tarikh: