Corrections Standards Authority
Juvenile Accountability Block Grants (JABG)
2011/2012 Quarterly Progress Report
Grantee (or Applicant Agency): / Grant Award Number:(This is your current contract number)
Implementing Agency (Agency providing services): / Grant Period: to
Reporting Period: / Year: 2011/12 / Project Title:
July-Sept / 1st Qtr / Oct - Dec / 2nd Qtr
Jan - March / 3rd Qtr / April - June / 4th Qtr
Prepared by:
Title: / Date Submitted: / Phone: () -
Email:
Evidence-based Project. Project based on promising practice. Cite program model used and specify source of Model: (i.e. OJJDP Model Programs Website)
Specify Program Purpose Area(s) identified in your Application: / Federal Grant Funds Awarded this year:
$
Group(s) Served
Check all that apply / Group(s) Targeted
Check all that apply / Population
Youth population not directly served (skip to Section 2)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Asian
Black/African American
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian & other Pacific Islander
Other
White/Caucasian
Youth population not directly served
First Time Offenders
Repeat Offenders
Sex Offenders
Status Offenders
Violent Offenders
Male
Female
11 & under
12-13
14-15
16-17
18 and over
Rural
Suburban
Tribal
Urban
Mental Health
Pregnant
Substance Abuse
Truant/Dropout
Revised 2011 FOR CSA USE ONLY
Date entered in DCTAT______
Funding Year(s) ______
Field Rep/Consultant ______
Corrections Standards Authority
Juvenile Accountability Block Grants (JABG)
2011/2012 Quarterly Progress Report
SECTION 2. FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Below are Core Performance measures that are required of all grantees funded with Juvenile Accountability Block Grant funds. Please provide data in all the fields below. Should your project be unable to provide the data requested, an explanation must be provided for all zero reported data fields.
Core Measures1. / Number and percent of programs/initiatives employing evidence-based practices
/ A. / Number of program/initiatives employing best practices / 0
/ B. / Number of programs/initiatives / 0
/ C. / Percent A/B / 0
2. / Number and percent of youth with whom an evidence-based practice was used
/ A. / Number of youth with whom a best practice is used / 0
/ B. / Number of youth / 0
/ C. / Percent A/B / 0
3. / Number of youth or youth and families served
/ A. / Number of program youth (or youth and families) carried over from the previous reporting period, plus new admissions during the reporting period. / 0
4. / Number and percent of program youth completing program requirements
/ A. / Number of program youth who exited the program having completed program requirements / 0
/ B. / Number of youth who left the program / 0
/ C. / Percent A/B
5. / Number and percent of program youth who offend during the reporting period
/ A. / Total number of program youth served / 0
/ B. / Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period / 0
/ C. / Of B, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense during this reporting period / 0
/ D. / Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this reporting period / 0
/ E. / Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting period / 0
/ F. / Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period / 0
/ G. / Percent OFFENDING (C/B)
6. / Number and percent of program youth who offend during the reporting period
/ A. / Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are tracking / 0
/ B. / Of A, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense during this reporting period / 0
/ C. / Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this reporting period / 0
/ D. / Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting period / 0
/ E. / Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period / 0
/ F. / Percent of Long Term RECIDIVISM (B/A)
7. / Number and percent of program youth who re-offend
/ A. / Total number of program youth served / 0
/ B. / Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period / 0
/ C. / Of B, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense during this reporting period / 0
/ D. / Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this reporting period / 0
/ E. / Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting period / 0
/ F. / Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period / 0
/ G. / Percent RECIDIVISM (C/B)
8. / Number and percent of program youth who re-offend
/ A. / Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are tracking / 0
/ B. / Of A, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense during this reporting period / 0
/ C. / Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this reporting period / 0
/ D. / Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting period / 0
/ E. / Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period / 0
/ F. / Percent of Long Term RECIDIVISM (B/A)
9. / Number and percent of program youth who are victimized
/ A. / Total number of program youth served / 0
/ B. / Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period for (re)victimization / 0
/ C. / Of B, the number of program youth who were (re)victimized / 0
/ D. / C/B
10. / Number and percent of program youth who are victimized
/ A. / Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are tracking for victimization / 0
/ B. / Of A, the number of program youth who were victimized during this reporting period / 0
/ C. / Percent (b/a)
11. / Number and percent of program youth who are re-victimized
/ A. / Total number of program youth served / 0
/ B. / Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period for re-victimization / 0
/ C. / Of B, the number of program youth who were re-victimized / 0
/ D. / C/B
12. / Number and percent of program youth who are re victimized
/ A. / Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are tracking for re-victimization / 0
/ B. / Of A, the number of program youth who were re-victimized during this reporting period / 0
/ C. / Percent (b/a)
13a. / Antisocial behavior
/ A. / Number of program youth with the noted behavioral change during the reporting period / 0
/ B. / Number of youth in the program who received services for this behavior / 0
/ C. / Percent A/B
13b. / Antisocial behavior
/ A. / Total number of youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago who had the noted behavioral change / 0
/ B. / Number of youth who exited the program 6-12 months earlier and received services for this behavior / 0
/ C. / Percent (A/B)
Zero Data - Explain all zero reported data:
For each Program Purpose Area associated with your project, you must select a minimum of one output measure and report on that same measure(s) in each subsequent quarterly report. Please list here the output measures (below) on which your project will report to CSA for the duration of the grant:
Program Purpose Area: 3 Hiring Court Staff/Pretrial ServicesOutput Measures
Must select a minimum of one measure and report on the same measurement(s) in each subsequent quarterly report
Output Measure / Definition / Data Grantee Reports
1 / Number and percent of each of the following types of staff hired: judges, probation officers, defenders, special advocates, pretrial service staff / Determine the distribution of the money. Appropriate for projects that hire staff. Report the raw number of staff hired by staff type. Percent is the raw number (by staff type) divided by the total number of staff (by type). / A. Number of judges hired / 0
B. Total number of judges / 0
C. Percent (A/B) / 0
D. Number of probation officers hired / 0
E. Total number of probation officers: / 0
F. Percent (D/E) / 0
G. Number of defenders hired / 0
H. Total number of defenders / 0
I. Percent (G/H) / 0
J. Number of special advocates hired / 0
K. Total number of special advocates / 0
L. Percent (J/K) / 0
M. Number of pretrial service staff hired / 0
N. Total number of pretrial staff / 0
O. Percent (M/N) / 0
2 / Number of cases per staff member / Measure of infrastructure. Appropriate for programs that serve youth. Report the number of cases open at any point during the reporting period divided by the number of client staff (i.e., staff that work directly with clients). / A. Number of cases / 0
B. Number of court staff / 0
C. Number of cases per staff (A/B) / 0
3 / Number of different pretrial service types / Determine program scope. Appropriate for programs that offer pretrial services. Report the raw number of types of pretrial services offered. Include both service types directly delivered by the program as well as service types that youth have access to through the program. Different programs would be those, for example, that offer different services, serve different populations, have different procedures or criteria for inclusion or operation, or are run by different people/agencies/organizations. / A. Number of different types of pretrial services / 0
4 / Number of pretrial service slots / Determine program scope. Appropriate for programs that offer pretrial services. Report the raw number of different pretrial services slots that the program has at any one time. Include both services directly delivered by the program as well as services that youth have access to through the program. For example, if a program can assess 5 youth at one time and offers a drug education course for 10 youth per session, the number of slots would be 15. / A. Number of pretrial service slots / 0
For each Program Purpose Area associated with your project, you must select a minimum of one outcome measure and report on that same measure(s) in each subsequent quarterly report. Please list the output measures (below) on which your project will report to CSA for the duration of the grant:
Outcome Measures
Must select a minimum of one measure and report on the same measurement(s) in each subsequent quarterly report
Output Measure / Definition / Data Grantee Reports
1 / Number of pretrial services received per youth / Measure of program implementation and coverage. Appropriate for any program offering pretrial services or serving pretrial youth. Report the number of pretrial services (e.g., individual services, not service types) divided by the number of youth served. / A. Number of individual services delivered / 0
B. Number of youth served / 0
C. Number of services per youth (A/B) / 0
2 / Number and percent of youth assessed / Measure of program implementation. Appropriate for programs that deliver services to youth or refer youth to services. Report the raw number of youth to receive a complete assessment. Percent is the raw number divided by the total number of youth in the program. / A. Number of youth assessed / 0
B. Number of youth in program / 0
C. Percent (A/B) / 0
3 / Number of youth to receive pretrial services / Measure of program implementation and coverage. Most appropriate for local government departments or agencies, including court or prosecution units through which pretrial youth are processed. Report the raw number of youth to receive at least one pretrial service. Percent is the raw number divided by the total number of youth seen that meet the criteria for pretrial services. / A. Number of youth receiving pretrial service / 0
B. Number of youth that meet pretrial criteria / 0
C. Percent (A/B) / 0
4 / Number and percent of youth to receive mental health services / Measure of program scope. Appropriate for programs that offer pretrial services. Report the raw number of youth to receive a mental health service. Do not include mental health assessments. Do include clinical services that the client receives based on their participation in the program whether those services are delivered directly through the program or through a third-party provider. / A. Number of youth to receive mental health services / 0
B. Number of youth served / 0
C. Percent (A/B) / 0
Explain all zero reported data: (i.e. Project does not provide direct services to youth)
Other comments, if any, pertaining to data:
SECTION 3. PROJECT STATUS
A. Expenditure Status:
Federal Award Amount / $Amount Invoiced Year-to-Date (Sum of Quarterly Invoices) / $
Percent of Award Invoiced to Date (Amount above ÷ Annual Award) / %
In relation to the overall grant budget, are federal funds being expended as planned and on schedule? Yes No
If not, please explain why, and describe what expenditure plans exist for the duration of the grant period.
B. Staffing – Indicate whether all positions included in the application have been filled (other than those previously addressed through a formal program modification). If positions remain unfilled, what is the plan and anticipated outcome for staffing of the program? Are surplus funds anticipated due to salary savings, and what is the plan for these funds?