Internationallaw shouldgovernrelease ofGMmosquitoes

SIR—YourNewsstory‘Sterile mosquitoesneartake-off’(Nature

453,435;2008)discusses

thelikelyreleaseofgenetically engineeredmosquitoesto

help containdenguefever.It demonstratesjusthowclose wearetoaradicallynewsetof

strategiesformanagingawhole rangeofdiseasesandwildlife usinggenetically

modifiedorganisms (GMOs).Butafter assessingtherisks andbenefits,nations mayreachdifferent conclusionsabout theiruse.Andthat’s quiteaproblem, consideringthat geneticallymodified

bugswon’trecognizenational borders.

Malaysiamaysuccessfully avoidspreadingthesterile mosquitoesacrosstheborder, andeveniftheydocross,any transgressionwillbelimitedto

politics,andappropriatelyso. Thepotentialforconflictover self-dispersingGMOsdemands

theattentionofinternationallaw. Unfortunately,thatlawis

BiologicalStation,CSIC,Apdo.153,

41080Sevilla,Spain

BenGilnaDepartmentofGeography, UniversityofHull,HullHU67RX,UK

housesbasedinFirstWorld countries.Atpresent,open- accesspublicationmaybehard forthoseinthedevelopingworld toafford,butinthelongrunitwill beadvantageous,offeringthem freeaccesstoeducationaland academicresources.

Mostimportant,thefutureof openaccessprobablydoesnot lieinjournalpublishingmodels. Thehugesuccessofonline

literaturedatabasessuchasarXiv ( andaccess,issignificant.Such databasescurrentlyhostmostly non-peer-reviewedpreprints,

andsoareoflittlevaluefor careerbuilding.Butacademic organizationsthroughoutthe worldcould,iftheywished, buildanequivalentarchiveof peer-reviewedpapers.

IalsodisagreewithGadagkar’s view:“IfImustchoosebetween publishingorreading,Iwould choosetopublish".Noonecan expecttodoseriousscience withoutaccesstothecurrent academicliterature.

Althoughmanysubscription journalsarefreetoaccessonline indevelopingcountries through

asinglelifespan.Strategiesthat

deficient.Themostrelevanttreaty

theHINARI,AGORA andOARE

relyongeneticallymodifying mosquitoesthatcanstill reproduce,suchasthosethatyou mentionarebeingengineeredby AustinBurt’steamformalaria control,aremorelikelytohave lingeringeffectsastheyspread amongwildpopulationsacross nationalborders.

Althougheveryonewould agreethatdiseasesarebad, nationsmayhaveverydifferent viewsabouthowtheyshouldbe prevented.Effectivecontrolof mosquito-bornediseasewillnot

istheConventiononBiological Diversityanditsinstrument,the CartagenaProtocolonBiosafety. TheprotocolincludesMalaysia andmostofitsneighbours— Thailand,Indonesia,Cambodia andVietnam—butnotSingapore orAustralia.Itfallsfarshortof

theproactiveandinstructive approach necessaryforthe deploymentofGMOsdesignedto beself-dispersingand

reproducinginthewild. Theworldneedstoget

involved.Discussionsshould

Futureofopenaccess couldbeonlineand peer-reviewed

SIR—RaghavendraGadagkar (Nature453,450;2008)argues thattheopen-access‘payto publishandreadforfree’model leadstoadisadvantagefor scientistsindevelopingcountries. Idisagree.Gadagkarcorrectly states:“pagechargesmaybe waivedforauthorswhocannot affordtopay.”Hethenadds:“a

initiativesoftheUnitedNations, theprincipleremainsthatifyou cannotaffordtoread,you automaticallycannotafford

topublish.PerhapsGadagkar willagreenexttimeheis

deniedaccesstoafundamental paperforhisresearchbecause hisinstitutiondoesnot subscribetoit.

MassimoSandalDepartmentof

BiochemistryG.Moruzzi,

UniversityofBologna,ViaIrnerio48,

40126Bologna,Italy

beachievedwithoutregionally

beformalized,ideallyunderthe

modelthatdependsonpayment

coordinatedprogrammes,soa robustframeworkisneededto accommodatethedifferences (B.G.J.Knolsetal.Am. J.Trop. Med.Hyg.77,232–242;2007).

Nationshavearighttodecide thetechnologicalriskstowhich theyexposethemselves.The factorsindecision-makinghere willnotbeonlythesimpleones ofuncontestedscience—thisis

biodiversityconvention,and widelyaccessible(forexample, throughtheconvention’s BiosafetyClearingHouse).

Thistrialwouldsetthetonefor futurenegotiationsoverthisvery newkindofbiotechnology.

ElenaAnguloLaboratoireEcologie, SystématiqueetEvolution,UMRCNRS

8079,UniversitéParisSud,91405

OrsayCedex,France,andDoñana

byauthorscanaffordonlyafew suchwaivers.” Thisisnot necessarilytrue:forexample, someopen-accessjournals providediscountstoparticular institutions.

Iwouldprefertoseewhatlittle moneyisavailabletoadeveloping countryspentonhelpingto publishtheirscientists’papers ratherthanfinancingpublishing

Genetictestingmust recognizeimpactof badnewsonrecipient

SIR—YourSpecialReport

‘Genetictestingforeveryone’ (Nature453,570–571;2008) discussesthecontentiousissue ofbreakingthenewsabout

testresults.Ourexperience