In the Circuit Court Randolph County, Missouri

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT RANDOLPH COUNTY, MISSOURI

Second Judicial Notice

“Obstruction of Justice”

Melinda Sue Harrington, sui juris Petitioner

Denny Ray Hardin, sui juris Petitioner Without prejudice of rights UCC 1-308/1-207

Vs Case # 10RA-CV00208

DEAN MINOR RESPONDENT

Second Judicial Notice

“OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE”

COMES NOW, Petitioner’s, Melinda-Sue; family of [Harrington] and Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] to notice the court of the miscarriage of Justice and the willful neglect of duty perpetrated by the corporate CIRCUIT COURT OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, MISSOURI working in concert with the corporate CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI and the corporate STATE OF MISSOURI ,to deny Petitioner Denny- Ray; family of [Hardin] , an American citizen residing in the republic of Missouri due process of law and violate his constitutional rights under the color of law.

On March 1st, 2010 the CIRCUIT COURT OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, MISSOURI received a Petition for the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus that is guaranteed by the constitution for the republic of Missouri Article I Section 12 and the constitution for the united States of America Article I Section 9. It was received by the public vessel Scott Hayes who denied petitioner the right of habeas corpus by his willful neglect of duty for 15 days. The public vessel Scott Hayes then assigned the public vessel Gary Sprick the duty of addressing the writ; which the public vessel Gary Sprick further denied the writ and delaying his duty requesting an amended petition which the public vessel received and yet again neglected his duty. On March 30th the public vessel gave the respondent 15 days to show cause why the writ should not be signed. The response from the respondents’ attorney was filed on April 12th, 2010. Petitioner replied to respondents’ attorneys’ response on April 13th, 2010, requesting the court to conduct a show cause hearing according to Rule 91.15 which allows no more than 5 days for the hearing to be conducted. On April 14th, 2010 the public vessel set a show cause hearing to be held on May 13th, 2010 , still neglecting his duty and having full knowledge that the petitioner would be released from his bondage and out on parole before he was to conduct his lawful duty and obligation to petitioner Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin]. Thus establishing that Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] would no longer be in Dean Minor’s possession; therefore the court would not have to rule on this habeas corpus.

Petitioner Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] has explicitly reserved all his rights UCC 1-308/1-207 and the public vessels have full undeniable knowledge, therefore they can only be delaying and denying petitoner’s rights with malice, intent and knowledge to deny an American citizen his constitutional rights.

Therefore, petitioner will petition the de jure grand jury of the republic of Missouri to hear the following crimes of the public vessels; Scott Hayes ; Gary Sprick ; Dean Minor and

Chris Koster, for conspiring, in concert to engage in the following criminal acts against Denny-Ray family of [Hardin] an American citizen.

1. “Piracy” 18 USC 1652

The public vessels cannot produce any cause or an injured party as to why petitioner is being restrained. They have pirated the vessel of Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] in clear acts of hostility with malice, intent and full knowledge of the criminal acts they are engaged in.

2. “Deprivation of rights under color of law” 18 USC 242

The public vessels have received personal testimony from 16 individuals describing the unlawful actions they witnessed first hand that the CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY MISSOURI and the corporate STATE OF MISSOURI have engaged in to deprive the petitioner Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] his rights under the color of law without subject matter jurisdiction; yet they continue the deprivation that holds the petitioner incarcerated without authority of law, hence they are working in concert to deprive an American citizen his right to habeas corpus when there is no injured party and without any authority of law.

3. “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241

The public vessels have gone out of their way to interpret the laws, and the constitutions to fit their own agendas. They have conspired to deny petitioner the same rights that they are supposed to uphold according to their prescribed Oaths of Office. They have conspired to delay and deny petitioner Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] the writ of habeas corpus. The public vessels have afforded special treatment to the respondent while denying petitioner his rights when no cause not to sign the writ has been produced. Petitioner has lost almost nine months of his life and sustained injuries by the public vessels who have neglected their oaths, and denied petitioner his constitutional rights. The public vessels have disgraced and manipulated the constitution for the republic of Missouri , and the constitution for the united States of America to benefit the profiteering prisons and deny petitioner his rights without an injured party.

4. “Obstruction of Justice” 18 USC 1512

The public vessels Scott Hayes and Gary Sprick have obstructed justice by allowing special and preferential treatment to respondent and his attorneys. They have ignored the Missouri Supreme Rules of court regarding habeas corpus and the timelines in which it is to be addressed. They have ignored the rules regarding time for respondent to answer show cause order. They have ignored rules addressing the timeline in which a show cause hearing is to be held. All of this has been done to obstruct justice, and deny petitioner his rightful show cause hearing. To date no cause has been shown, but yet the public vessels are still delaying the signing of the writ, when no cause not to sign has been shown. The public vessels Scott Hayes and Gary Sprick are delaying and denying petitioner Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] his show cause hearing; with the undeniable knowledge that on May 13th, 2010 he will no longer be in the custody of Dean Minor but will be in the custody of the MISSOURI PROBATION AND PAROL authorities, thus denying the writ because they will no longer have jurisdiction, and will not have to rule on this cause of action.

5. “Kidnapping” 18 USC 1201

Because the public servant Dean Minor has restrained the petitioner Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin], without authority of law, he has in fact kidnapped an American citizen and has become a “Principal” 18 USC 2(a) in this unlawful, immoral and illegal act of hostility. Because the public vessels Scott Hayes, Gary Sprick and Chris Koster have aided and abetted this criminal activity when they have a duty to correct it they have become “Accessories after the fact” 18 USC 3.

6. “Peonage” 18 USC 1581

The public vessels have kidnapped and placed in peonage an American citizen without authority of law. He has been forced to perform slave labor for the public vessel Dean Minor for private corporations for the profit of the prison. The public vessels Scott Hayes, Gary Sprick and Chris Koster have aided and abetted these crimes by continuing to deny Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin] due process of law to release him from his unlawful restraints. These public vessels are committing the crime of “Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude and forced labor” 18 USC 1590.

7. “Fraud” 18 USC 1001

Because no evidence has been produced showing the true incarceration of Denny-Ray; family of [Hardin], and since no injured party can be produced, the record of the court will reflect clear fraud in the denial and delay of habeas corpus for an American citizen.

28 USC, Part III, 636(b) 1(A)

A judge cannot give authority to a magistrate to involuntarily dismiss an action. Wherefore the judge and magistrate are in error.

WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity (See, Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.

Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 377, 382 (1894) “Due process of law and the equal protection of the laws are secured if the laws operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government."

Butz v. Economou, 98 S. Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S. Ct. at 261 (1882) "No man [or woman] in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it."

These acts clearly demonstrate the public vessel Scott Hayes and those acting in concert with him have willfully neglected their duty to act within the laws that govern their conduct. By violating the law to delay justice in these proceedings, the record clearly reflects the insurrection of the de facto STATE OF MISSOURI. To unlawfully hold an American citizen in prison in violation of lawful duty, established in Rule 91.06, is clear conspiracy against rights. The courts record is now evidence of the criminal conduct by Scott Hayes and those conspiring with him. Justice has been denied to an American citizen with malice, intent and knowledge, so the record reflects.

Wherefore it is clear that the de facto STATE OF MISSOURI and its public vessels, i.e., the corporate CIRCUIT COURTS have abandoned the constitutions , and the oaths they took to defend the constitutions and are guilty of Insurrection. Petitioner will seek his remedy by petitioning the du jure grand jury of the republic of Missouri and by forwarding criminal complaints of these treasonous acts to the Commandant of the Coast Guard for prosecution under :

TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 15 > §333

Interference with State and Federal law

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution

Wherefore, Petitioner’s demand due process of law guaranteed by the 5th amendment be administered without delay required by Article I Section 14 of the Constitution for the Republic of Missouri.

“JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED”

Respectfully submitted,

Signed:

Melinda-Sue;Harrington, sui juris

Denny-Ray;Hardin , sui juris

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT RANDOLPH COUNTY, MISSOURI

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Melinda Sue Harrington, sui juris Petitioner

Denny Ray Hardin , sui juris Petitioner

Without prejudice of rights UCC 1-308/1-207

Vs Case: 10RA-CV00208

DEAN MINOR RESPONDENT

I, Melinda Sue Harrington the power of attorney for Denny Ray Hardin certify that I have mailed a copy of the Second Judicial Notice of “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE” on April 15, 2010 to

Dean Minor

Keeper of the Key

Moberly Correctional Center

P.O. BOX 7

Moberly, Missouri 65270

Certified No# 7009 0960 0000 9903 0790

Chris Koster

Missouri Attorney General

Supreme Court Building

207 High Street

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102

Certified No# 7009 0960 0000 9903 0912

Respectfully submitted,

Signed:

Melinda Sue Harrington, sui juris

Page 7 of 7