APPENDIX 2

March Town Plan

Vision, Aims & Objectives Consultation Exercise

Summary Schedule of Comments

Ref / Name / Address / Age Group / Previous Involvement / Agree with Vision / Comments
Made
See
Table A / Agree with Aims / Comments
Made
See
Table B / Agree with Objectives / Comments
Made
See
Table C /
Town Survey / Issues & Options /
001 / M. Moncea / Police Station / 51-65 / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES
002 / T. Watson / The Laurels / 65+ / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
003 / I. Barron / Kingsley Street / 51-65 / YES / YES / YES / YES
004 / S. Moore / St Johns Road / 51-65 / YES / YES / YES / YES
005 / L. Moore / St Johns Road / 31-50 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
006 / C. Morgan / Creek Road / 31-50 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
007 / A.Cranston / Bronze Street / 31-50 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
008 / H. North / Fleming Court / 51-65 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
009 / J. Moreland / Peterborough / 51-65 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
010 / G.Moreland / Peterborough / 65+ / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
011 / R. Kay / Chestnut Crescent / 65+ / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
012 / S. Wood / Apple Grove / 51-65 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
013 / M. Jordan / Plowright Close / 31-50 / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES
014 / A. Claridge / Russell Ave / 19-30 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
015 / R. Stenhenr / Bradshaw Court / 65+ / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
016 / J. Stagno / Huntingdon / 31-50 / YES / YES / YES / YES
017 / E. Reeve / Guyhirn / 19-30 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
018 / Z. Reeve / Gas Road / 19-30 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
019 / V. Aveyard / Gaul Road / 51-65 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
020 / S. Ringham / Milner Close / 65+ / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
021 / H. Girvan / Fleetwood Close / 65+ / YES / YES / NO / YES / YES
022 / A. Laws / Old Court Place / 19-30 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
023 / Ogden / High Street / 51-65 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
024 / Jake / Camargue Drive / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
025 / S. Clenshaw / Estover Road / 51-65 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
026 / A.Clenshaw / Estover Road / 19-30 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
027 / D. Bryant / Station Road / 19-30 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
028 / I. Thurst / Station Road / 19-30 / YES / NO / YES / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
029 / T. Day / Deerfield Road / 19-30 / YES / YES / YES / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES
030 / M. Key / Newlands Avenue / 19-30 / YES / YES / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES
031 / B. Gilabs / Deerfield Road / 19-30 / YES / YES / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES
032 / J. Bolests / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
033 / J. Hunt / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
034 / Z. Hudson / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
035 / R. Tange / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
036 / A. Hudson / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
037 / K. O’Neil / Peterborough / 31-50 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
038 / W.Ringham / 65+ / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
039 / A. Lavender / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
040 / A.Piotowicz / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES
041 / J. Smith / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
042 / I. Mawby / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
043 / J. Ketteringham / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
044 / M. Collins / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES
045 / S. Ferner / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES
046 / R. Goodman / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES
047 / A. Rakasivs / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
048 / M. Nutty / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES
049 / A. Dedman / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
050 / R. Parker / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
051 / K. Williams / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
052 / M. Deeks / 6-12 / NO / YES / NO
053 / L. Rothwell / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
054 / C. Howsem / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
055 / S. Wood / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
056 / J. Williams / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
057 / C. Luke / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
058 / J. Rout / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
059 / S. Payne / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
060 / H. Hinson / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
061 / Z. Johnson / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES
062 / J. Smith / 13-18 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
063 / A. McNamara / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
064 / L. Wallis / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
065 / J. Vaiciukas / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
066 / A. Asher / 6-12 / YES / YES / YES / YES
067 / Y. Raine / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES / YES
068 / E. Cumbridge / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
069 / C. Pearson / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
070 / J. Manalo / 6-12 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
071 / G. Phillips / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
072 / J. Grange / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
073 / K. Plaice / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
074 / N. Bridger / 6-12 / YES / YES / YES
075 / Y. Riley / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
076 / M. Brown / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
077 / J. Rankin / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
078 / L. Bulbrook / Berry Filed / 51-65 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
079 / B. Pughsley / 6-12 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
080 / J. Carse / 13-18 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
081 / L. Floro / 13-18 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
082 / A. Dring / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
083 / L. Butler / Chatteris / 51-65 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
084 / A. Oliver / 6-12 / YES / YES / YES / YES / NO / YES
085 / A. Holmes / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
086 / J. Aldridge / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
087 / N. Robinson / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
088 / J. Palmer / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
089 / L. Herrington / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
090 / G. Long / 6-12 / YES / YES / YES
091 / C. Smethurst / Station Road / 31-50 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
092 / A. Betheny / 6-12 / YES / YES / YES
093 / M. Southgate / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
094 / H. Rutter / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
095 / B. Ellen-Turner / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
096 / N. Whyte / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
097 / D. Venni / Elliott Road / 51-65 / NO / NO / YES / YES / NO / YES
098 / A. Lee / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
099 / J. Kosloueki / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES / YES / YES
100 / B. Cawley / 13-18 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
101 / L. Deighton / 13-18 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
102 / L. Thorne / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
103 / K. Grant / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
104 / K. Whitby / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
105 / T. Grocott / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
106 / I. Saywell / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
107 / R. Garford / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
108 / S. Furnell / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
109 / T. Crofts / 13-18 / YES / YES / NO / YES / YES
110 / S. Clark / 13-18 / YES / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
111 / K. McClean / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / NO / YES
112 / C. Stevens / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
113 / L. Trlylen / 13-18 / YES / NO / YES / YES / YES
114 / S. Kinsey / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES
115 / A. Lucy / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
116 / A. Lee / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
117 / A. Kyle / 6-12 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
118 / L. Banister / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / NO / YES / NO / YES
119 / A. Green / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
120 / L. Keogh / 13-18 / NO / NO / NO / YES / YES / NO
121 / B. Lister / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
122 / A. Soboleva / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES
123 / J. Neugebauer / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES / YES
124 / J. Hanadine / 13-18 / YES / YES / YES / YES
125 / T. Pearson / 13-18 / NO / NO / NO / YES / NO / YES / NO
126 / B. Hudson / 13-18 / NO / NO / YES / YES / YES / YES

Table A - Comments made on the proposed Vision

Reference number of respondents / Detailed comment made / Initial response
025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030, 069. / ·  The Estover playing field must be retained as a playing field.
·  Development on Estover playing field would be socially harmful.
·  Playing fields must be protected from windfall development.
·  The town needs more play areas. / These comments were made by a total of 23 respondents, some of who either did not comment on whether they agreed or disagreed with the draft Vision, and some who actually objected to it. It is clear that for some the question was misunderstood, as the draft Vision would not prevent any of this from happening, and the draft Aims and Objectives actually provide a planning context to encourage it. On this basis, although the level of support for the draft Vision overall is very high (96%), but for this confusion, this would be even higher.
031, 067, 068, 073, 080, 081, 084, 094, 105, 109, 110, 120, 123, 125, 126. / ·  Agreement that the town centre should be improved.
·  The town centre needs better shopping, including fashion outlets and a McDonalds.
·  Improvements to the town centre will attract more visitors.
·  The town centre wont be improved.
·  A cinema and better swimming pool is needed.
078, / ·  The town needs more circular walks and cycle ways.
·  The town needs better public transport.

Table B - Comments made on the proposed Aims

Reference number of respondents / Detailed comment made / Initial response
001, 013, 020, 021, 026, 027, 030, 031, 106, / ·  More park space is required.
·  Estover playing filed should be retained and improved for future generations.
·  Estover playing field is not a windfall development site. / These comments were made by a total of 22 respondents, some of who either did not comment on whether they agreed or disagreed with the draft Aims, and some who actually objected to it. For a significant amount, there is an inaccurate perception that the town council is promoting development on Estover playing field, despite a key Aim of the Plan being to increase and improve the level of provision of recreational land. Although support for the draft Aims is high (93%), but for this confusion this would be even higher.
003 / ·  Small-scale solar power is acceptable.
008, / ·  Development should not be to the detriment of natural areas.
028, 029, / ·  There is insufficient infrastructure to support growth.
042, 043, 071, 078, 084, 094, 112, 118, 125. / ·  There should be a better range of smaller and accessible shops in the town.
·  Better sporting facilities are needed.
·  There is a need for a multi-storey car park.
·  The Aims will attract more people to the town.

Table C - Comments made on the proposed Objectives

Reference number of respondents / Detailed comment made / Initial response
001, 011, 078, / ·  A second town bridge crossing is required.
·  An eastern bypass is required.
·  New development should provide adequate off-road parking and private amenity space. / These comments were made by a total of 26 respondents, a significant proportion of which objected to the draft Objectives.
Although support for the draft Aims is high (89%), this could have been higher had the Objectives been better understood as these would address some of the points raised. However, some of these comments refer to works and actions that go beyond the reasonable scope of the plan and planning control. Some are also venting frustration with the strategic context for growth set in the Fenland Local Plan.
002, 007, 008, 013, 020, 021, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030, 031, 038, 069, 084, 097, 103, 104, 114, 118, / ·  The scale of growth proposed for the town is too high.
·  Development should not result in the loss of valuable open space (especially Estover playing field), and more open space is needed.
·  Housing on the other side of the bypass would alleviate traffic congestion in the town.
·  Places for dog exercise is need in our parks.
·  Cyclists should be prevented from using footpaths.
·  More shops are needed.
111, / ·  Objectives not understood.
124, / ·  More housing is needed to combat high house process.