Implications of riparian willow invasion to instream community structure and function; a synthesis using causal criteria analysis
Biological Invasions
Paul J. McInerney*1, 2, Gavin N. Rees1,3, Ben Gawne1, 4 and Phil Suter2
- Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, PO BOX 991, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia
- La Trobe University, P.O. Box 991, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia
- CSIRO Land and Water, P.O. Box 991, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia
- University of Canberra, Locked Bag 1, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
* Corresponding author
Email address:
Telephone: +61 2 6024 9649
Fax: +61 2 6059 7531
Online Resource 1: Weights applied to analysis from Eco Evidence
Study design type / WeightBACI or BARI MBACI or Beyond MBACI / 4
Gradient response model / 3
Before v. after (no reference/control) / 2
Reference/control vs. impact (no before) / 2
After impact only / 1
Number of independent control locations / Weight
No control locations / 0
One control location / 2
More than one control location / 3
Number of independent impact locations / Weight
One impacted location / 0
Two impacted locations / 2
More than two impacted locations / 3
Number of locations for gradient response model / Weight
3 independent locations / 0
4 independent locations / 2
5 independent locations / 4
More than 5 independent locations / 6
Online Resource 2: Individual study weights relating to each cause-effect linkage exported from Eco Evidence
Cause / Trajectory / Effect / Trajectory / Supports linkage? / Study details / Weight / Citationvegetation (exotic invasion) → ↓ algae
Willow invasion / No trajectory / No difference in chlorophyll-a concentration between open and infested sites despite significantly more shading at infested sites / No change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Lester, P.J.; Mitchell, S.F; Scott, D(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Reduced amounts of chlorophyll-a on tiles in willow infested and artificially shaded reaches compared to open reaches. / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Lester, PJ; Mitchell, SF; Scott, D(1996)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decrease in filamentous algal growth / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Glova, Gordon J; Sagar, Paul M(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Salix fragilis leaves support decreased algal biofilms in comparison to eucalyptus / Decrease / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / McInerney, P.J; Rees, G,N; Gawne, B; Suter, P(2015)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Leaf biofilms at Salix spp. sites with reduced density and diversity of diatoms / Decrease / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / Schulze, DJ.; Walker, KF.(1997)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ∆ biota (trophic structure)
Willow invasion / No trajectory / No change in proportions of functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates between infested and open sites / No change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Lester, P.J.; Mitchell, S.F; Scott, D(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Changes to habitat caused by willow infestation alter the functional organisation of macroinvertebrates / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Jayawardana, J.M.C.K. Westbrooke, Martin(2010)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / In willow infested reaches a higher proportion of macroinvertebrate diet is derived from terrestrial (allochthonous) sources than non-infested reaches / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Lester, P. J; Mitchell, S. F; Scott, D; Lyon, G. L.(1995)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Invasive Salix spp. affected abundance of different functional feeding groups / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Serra, María Noel; Albariño, Ricardo; Díaz Villanueva, Verónica(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increase in the proportion of collector gatherers and filter feeding taxa in infested reaches, while shredders more dominant in native reaches / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Miserendino M. L. and Pizzolon L. A.(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Lower proportion of scrapers at infested sites in summer, though not significant (p=0.067) / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
9(control); 9(impacted) / 8 / Read, Martin G; Barmuta, Leon(1999)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ↓ ecosystem (primary production)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / No change in primary production by algae grown on tiles at willow infested, artificially shaded and open sites. / No change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Lester, PJ; Mitchell, SF; Scott, D(1996)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Salix fragilis biofilms display decreased rates of primary production to endemic eucalypt leaves / Decrease / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / McInerney, P.J; Rees, G,N; Gawne, B; Suter, P(2015)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ↑ ecosystem (respiration)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Reduced leaf breakdown rates compared to endemic species / Decrease / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Serra, María Noel; Albariño, Ricardo; Díaz Villanueva, Verónica(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased rates of decomposition in rivers in comparison to eucalypts / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / Janssen, M.A; Walker, K.F(1999)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Salix fragilis display greater rates of decomposition per leaf mass / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / McInerney, P.J; Rees, G,N; Gawne, B; Suter, P(2015)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased processing rates of allochthonous carbon / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
17(independent) / 9 / Esslemont, Graeme; Maher, William; Ford, Phillip; Lawrence, Ian(2007)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased rates of decomposition in comparison to eucalypts / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
6(independent) / 9 / Pidgeon, R. W. J; Cairns, S.C(1981)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased decomposition rates of Salix spp. leaves in comparison to eucalyptus leaves / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / Schulze, DJ.; Walker, KF.(1997)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ∆ ecosystem (dissolved organic matter)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased rates of leaching by S. fragilisin comparison to endemic leaves / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Serra, María Noel; Albariño, Ricardo; Díaz Villanueva, Verónica(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Willow leaves exhibit increased rates of initial leaching in comparison to eucalypts / Change / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / Janssen, M.A; Walker, K.F(1999)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Salix fragilis leaves have increased rates of leaching after submersion in comparison to endemic leaves / Change / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / McInerney, P.J; Rees, G,N; Gawne, B; Suter, P(2015)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Rapid weight loss of leaves after submersion compared to Eucalyptus spp. leaves - increased rate in comparison / Change / Yes / Gradient response model
6(independent) / 9 / Pidgeon, R. W. J; Cairns, S.C(1981)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Higher rates of leaf leaching after submersion in water in comparison to endemic and other introduced leaf types - 25% after 24 hrs / Change / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / Parkyn, S.M; Winterbourn, M, J(1997)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Rapid weight loss of Salix babylonica leaves upon submersion - 19% of initial dry weight after 7 days and 31% after 18 days / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
5(independent) / 7 / Collier, KJ; Winterbourn, MJ(1986)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Evidence of rapid leaching, total carbohydrate concentration of leaves decreased from 75% AFDW to 25% in the first week. / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
3(independent) / 3 / Lester, P. J; Mitchell, S. F; Scott, D(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased rates of initial leaching (soluble components) of Salix spp. leaves in comparison to eucalyptus leaves / Change / Yes / Gradient response model
4(independent) / 5 / Schulze, DJ.; Walker, KF.(1997)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ∆ invertebrates (assemblage)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Changes to habitat caused by willow infestation alter the functional organisation of macroinvertebrates / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Jayawardana, J.M.C.K. Westbrooke, Martin(2010)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Invasive Salix spp. affected invertebrate composition / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Serra, María Noel; Albariño, Ricardo; Díaz Villanueva, Verónica(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increase in the proportion of collector gatherers and filter feeding taxa in infested reaches, while shredders more dominant in native reaches / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Miserendino M. L. and Pizzolon L. A.(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decreased site to site variability of macroinvertebrate assemblage at willow and willow removal sites in comparison to reference (native) sites / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
6(control); 6(impacted) / 8 / Becker, A; Robson, B. J(2009)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Distinct groupings of canopy arthropods in willow riparian zones than in native riparian zones / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Greenwood, H; O'Dowd, D.J; Lake, P.S(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Habitat structure had a significant effect on macroinvertebrate assemblage / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Jayawardana, J. M. C; K Westbrooke; M Wilson; M Hurst, C(2006)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Minor differences in composition and diversity of invertebrates at willow invaded sites, and different assemblages in willow and redgum leaf packs. / Change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Schulze, DJ.; Walker, KF.(1997)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ↓ invertebrates (abundance)
Willow invasion / No trajectory / Decrease in macroinvertebrate density in autumn winter and summer / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Lester, P.J.; Mitchell, S.F; Scott, D(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decreased abundance of macroinvertebrates at infested sites / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Lester, PJ; Mitchell, SF; Scott, D(1996)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Abundance similar / No change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Serra, María Noel; Albariño, Ricardo; Díaz Villanueva, Verónica(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Density similar / No change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Miserendino M. L. and Pizzolon L. A.(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decreased abundance in summer / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
9(control); 9(impacted) / 8 / Read, Martin G; Barmuta, Leon(1999)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / No significant difference in abundance between treatments / No change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
6(control); 6(impacted) / 8 / Becker, A; Robson, B. J(2009)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decreased abundance of canopy arthropods in willow riparian zones than in native riparian zones / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Greenwood, H; O'Dowd, D.J; Lake, P.S(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Macroinvertebrate abundance significantly lower at densely infested sites than non–infested sites (however, only in one stream, no densely infested sites at the other two test streams) / Decrease / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 1(impacted) / 5 / Glova, Gordon J; Sagar, Paul M(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased macroinvertebrate abundance associated with willow infestation, mostly of an invasive snail / Increase / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Wahizatul, A.A; Jennings, J(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Abundance and biomass of invertebrates effected by level willow infestation, but not consistent / Change / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Sagar, P. M. Glova, G. J.(1995)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → NC invertebrates (diversity)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Taxa richness similar / No change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Serra, María Noel; Albariño, Ricardo; Díaz Villanueva, Verónica(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Diversity similar / No change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Miserendino M. L. and Pizzolon L. A.(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decreased taxa richness in summer / Decrease / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
9(control); 9(impacted) / 8 / Read, Martin G; Barmuta, Leon(1999)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / No significant difference in taxa richness between treatments / No change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
6(control); 6(impacted) / 8 / Becker, A; Robson, B. J(2009)
willow invasion / No trajectory / Decreased morphospecies richness of canopy arthropods in willow riparian zones than in native riparian zones / Decrease / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Greenwood, H; O'Dowd, D.J; Lake, P.S(2004)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Macroinvertebrate diversity greater in willow reaches / Increase / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 1(impacted) / 5 / Glova, Gordon J; Sagar, Paul M(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Decreased macroinvertebrate diversity associated with willow infestation / Decrease / No / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
1(control); 1(impacted) / 4 / Wahizatul, A.A; Jennings, J(2013)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / No significant difference in diversity / No change / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Schulze, DJ.; Walker, KF.(1997)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ∆ invertebrates (growth)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / 56 day old aged willow leaves may provide a preferred food source for some macroinvertebrates in place of periphyton / Change / Yes / Gradient response model
3(independent) / 3 / Lester, P. J; Mitchell, S. F; Scott, D(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased growth rates of invertebrates feeding on green willow leaves compared green eucalyptus leaves and senescent leaves of willow and eucalyptus. Speculate that willows may provide a preferred food source, but that it will be available for less time. / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
10(independent) / 9 / Yeates, L.V; Barmuta, L.A(2009)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ∆ water quality (nutrients)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased nitrogen, phosphorous and biologically reactive carbon entering Australian Rivers / Increase / Yes / Gradient response model
17(independent) / 9 / Esslemont, Graeme; Maher, William; Ford, Phillip; Lawrence, Ian(2007)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ↑ physical habitat
Willow invasion / No trajectory / Increased shading - incident stream illumination decreased by 80% due to willows, although comparison made with tussock grass riparian zone, not forest / Increase / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 3(impacted) / 8 / Lester, P.J.; Mitchell, S.F; Scott, D(1994)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased shading / Increase / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
2(control); 2(impacted) / 7 / Lester, PJ; Mitchell, SF; Scott, D(1996)
Willow infestation / No trajectory / Increased shading / Increase / Yes / Reference/control vs. impact (no before)
3(control); 1(impacted) / 5 / Glova, Gordon J; Sagar, Paul M(1994)
vegetation (exotic invasion) → ∆ ecosystem (nutrient processing)
No evidence items were included for this linkage