Concept / Focus / Context / Instrument
The Dimensions of Form / Social Comment / Reaction / Folio of Work
Appraising3
(formative)
Student Name: / Teacher Use Only:
Conditions: / Bibliography - 20% book and article + 80%www referencing. Include illustrations of artworks.
Comparative analytical exposition (third person). Double spacing
Present as hard copy and on USB
Length: 800 – 1000 words plus images and in text referencing / Due date requirements met / not met
Draft (where applicable) attached / not attached
Due date requirements met / not met
Grade: / Subject Teacher: L. McClelland
Due dates: / Notes due: Mon 4 August
First draft due: Mon 18 August
Second draft in computer lab: Wed 27 August (?) / Due Date: Appraising 8 Due: Mon 9 September
(6 weeks)
You are required to use the Harvard Referencing system or APA to acknowledge your source of ideas. The details can be found at
Student Declaration: I declare that- No part of this assignment has been copied from any other person’s work, including the internet, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text.
- No part of this assignment has been written for me by any other person except where collaboration has been authorised by the teacher concerned.
- I hold a copy of this assignment which I can produce if the original is lost or damaged.
Signed: / ______
Date: / ______
N.B. / If an assignment is submitted without signing the declaration student has the responsibility of explaining to the teacher why declaration has not been signed. If the above declaration is found to be false, appropriate action will follow. This will include the need for the students to produce a new alternate assessment item.
Teacher comment:
APPRAISING CRITERIA / A / B / C / D / Ecritical analysis, interpretation, evaluation and effective synthesis of information about visual language, expression and meanings in artworks, emphasising the interrelationship between the chosen focuses, contexts and media relevant to concepts / critical analysis, interpretation and evaluation of information about visual language, expression and meanings in artworks, relevant to concepts, focuses, contexts and media / analysis and interpretation of information about visual language, expression and meanings in artworks, relevant to concepts, focuses, contexts and media / consideration of information about meanings in artworks relevant to concepts, focuses and media / description and classification of artworks related to concepts and media
an independent and informed viewpoint substantiated by comprehensive and insightful research, development, resolution / a considered viewpoint justified by effective research, development, resolution and reflection / a viewpoint justified by adequate research, development, resolution and reflection / an opinion based on some research, development, resolution and reflection / some research to identify artworks
consistently accurate and skilful use of relevant visual art terminology, referencing and language conventions. / skilful use of relevant visual art terminology, referencing and language conventions. / use of relevant visual art terminology, referencing and language conventions. / occasional use of suitable visual art terminology and language conventions. / use of some language conventions.
Choose one of the questions below:
1.Write an analytical exposition in which the art work of Mika Rottenberg is contrasted with that of Cao Fei, on the subject of Consumerism. Refer to a particular example by each artist in reference to their philosophical perspective, and the communication of meaning through media choice and use of art elements and design principles. Discuss the cultural and art historical context informing each artist’s visual expression. Both artists work within the conceptual framework. Make reference to the characteristics of conceptual art seen in these artists work.
2.Write an analytical exposition in which the art work of George Gittoes is contrasted with that of either GeorgeBasselitz, AnslemKieffer, or Max Beckmann, on the subject of War. Refer to a particular example by each artist in reference to their philosophical perspective, and the communication of meaning intended through media choice and use of art elements and design principles. Specific references need to be made to the context, to interpret the stylistic form.
3.Or, compare and contrast the work of two contemporary artists who have influenced your work (you may not have already written about these in previous appraisings). These artists must be approved by your teacher.
Specifically, the art works selected to analyse and interpret must be concerned with a social issue, and you must explore the materials, processes and procedures the artist has deliberately chosen. And their influence on meaning in the art work.
Discuss the use of art elements and design principles selected by the artists toexpress their reaction to the global concern – a universal social condition, e.g., change brought about by loss of customs, technology, dispossession or power struggles.
Possible art works to examine: Sally Smart, Takashi Murakami, Sterlac, William Kentridge, Gordon Bennett, Jeff Koons, Guerilla Girls, Andrew McLeod, Ai WeiWei...
Procedure -
- Research and explore the two artists and then chose an artwork of each. Create a Venn diagram to organise your thoughts. – differences on each side with similarities in overlapping section.
- Introduction:
Introduce each art work, and identify and classify the artwork in terms of school, movement, style, format etc, noting the historical/philosophical or cultural context each was created in. Describe each artwork in terms of what you see. Make brief comment on fundamental similarities and differences.
- Analyse each art work – use the art elements and design principles to explain what is communicated and how. Make specific reference to aspects of the art work – these detail justify your statements.
- Interpret each artwork. Now you can link use of art elements and design principles to what is actually communicated because you have evidence, found within the art work. The use of a quote by an art expert or from the artist himself will further justify your interpretations.
- The Conclusion. Make comparisons, detailing the major similarities and differences. Link your discussion back to the question with your judgement about the intended communication of meaning expressed or impact of each art work. Be sure to include your personal opinion, perhaps about the aesthetic qualities, or about the effectiveness of the artists’ methods to communicate his thoughts as they have made you think.
- Reflect on your essay’s effectiveness. Have you linked statements about meaning to specific evidence? Have you stated the key ideas?Have you made close reference to the artworks by pointing out detail in the use of art elements...
- Make improvements after submitting the draft.
- Have you effectively synthesized the breadth of information to summarize your key ideas.Make improvements. Do this again after receiving the essay back after the draft has been marked.
Characteristics of contemporary art:
Satire (the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.)
Hybrid - In art forms, hybridity could mean the blurring of traditional distinct boundaries between artistic media such as painting, sculpture, film, performance, architecture, and dance. It also can mean cross-breeding art-making with other disciplines, such as natural and physical science, industry, technology, literature, popular culture, or philosophy. Hybrid art forms expand the possibilities for experimentation and innovation in contemporary art.
irony in visual form (Poignantly contrary to what was expected or intended: madness, an ironic fate for such a clear thinker.)
message and impact through concept and text (words in art)
revolution: changing what people think and accept
the shock of the new!
symbolism and metaphor
appropriation (Artists appropriate when they borrow images from other artists and then make their own meanings by altering something)