Attachment #3
2nd Year Report 2011
Construction Technology Program
Summary of Student & Industry Assessment
Survey Summary:
1. 2nd year AAS Construction Technology (CT) Students: See Attachment #4a.
Summary Items:
· 92% of AAS/CT students are enrolling in SUNY Delhi Bachelor of Technology (BT) in Const. Management for Fall 2011. (See Question #2 in Attachment # 4a)
· CT AAS Rating: 24% Exceptional; 60% Good (Q= Question #12)
· Capstone Course Rating Good (Q # 23)
· CT Technical Courses: Q #20-27: Met or Exceeded Expectations
· Note: Numbering error in survey. Please reference Question # next to charts.
Action Items:
· Revise Survey in web-based format. Review with Industry Advisory Council (IAC)
2. 4th year BT/CM Students (Completed AAS & BT Internship): See Attachment #4b.
Summary Items:
· 93% helped by AAS Program in getting Internship (Q #7)
· CT AAS Rating: 20% Exceptional; 60% Good (Q#12)
· Capstone Course Rating Good (Q # 23)
· CT Technical Courses: Q #20-27: Met or Exceeded Expectations
(Construction Scheduling Ratings too low: Q #16 & # 24: 13% Below Expectations)
Action Items:
· Construction Scheduling Ratings Need to be Increased. More Applications to be incorporated during mock-up lab activities in CNST 210: Commercial Construction. IAC to be asked for input.
· Revise Survey in web-based format. Review with IAC.
3. Industry Performance of BT/CM Students (First year after AAS completion): See Attachment #4c.
Summary Items:
· 12 Performance Evaluations Reviewed
· Part 2- Question #4: 92% of Employers would hire intern if position available.
· Part 2- Question #6: 100% of Employers would hire another SUNY Delhi intern.
Action Items:
· Final Performance Evaluation “form” to list company name. Easier to identify company.
· Check possibility of web based evaluation.
4. 5th year Graduates of AAS Construction Technology Program: Class of 2006 See Attachment #4d.
Summary Items:
· 13 graduates: 8 Graduates submitted survey answers. (62% Response Rate).
· 100% of graduates responding are working in the industry. (Q#8)
· CT AAS Rating: 62% Exceptional; 38% Good (Q#12)
· CT Technical Courses: Q #20-27: No “Below Expectations” answers.
Action Items:
· Revise Survey in web-based format. Review with IAC.
5. Performance Outcomes Summary: See Attachment #5.
· Old scoring system used checks for meeting performance outcome standards. Reference the academic data for the academic year 2009-2010.
· New scoring system for academic year 2010-2011 uses number system to measure performance outcomes. Attached chart shows data for current academic year.
Action Items:
· New scoring system to incorporate average scores for all performance outcomes. Review with IAC.
6. Enrollment Data Summary:
· The average retention rate for the AAS CT program from Fall2005 to Fall 2009 is 71.3%.This is higher than the college average.
· Fall 2005 through Fall 2008: 120 students enrolled in the AAS program: 52 have received Construction Technology degrees. 31 are still enrolled in one of Delhi’s Construction options.
· Fall 2009: 22 of 28AAS students are still enrolled as of spring 2011. Retention rate = 75%. This is higher than we've had in the past. Also, 15 of these 28 students have moved to one of our bachelor degrees.