MYP Mathematics Rubric Criterion C – Communication in Mathematics
Assessment Name
Student Name
This rubric is for Task 1. We suggest the task wording be slightly modified to “Make an A3 poster explaining how codes work.”
AchievementLevel / Level Descriptor / Task Specific Clarification
0 / The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1-2 / The student shows basic use of mathematical language and/or forms of mathematical representation. The lines of reasoning are difficult to follow. / There is representation of codes, but the mathematical and real world links are difficult to follow. The demonstration of how codes are created and decoded is limited. The reader is left with questions about how codes work.
3-4 / The student shows sufficient use of mathematical language and forms of mathematical representation. The lines of reasoning are clear though not always logical or complete. The student moves between different forms of representation with some success. / Student explains how codes work and how they’re used in real life with some success. Student demonstrates how codes are created and decoded as a mathematical process. Appropriate pictorial examples are included and may enhance the explanation. The limitations of the codes are included and explained. The reader can understand and use the code after reading the explanation.
5-6 / The student shows good use of mathematical language and forms of mathematical representation. The lines of reasoning are concise, logical and complete. The student moves effectively between different forms of representation. / Student clearly explains how codes work and how they’re used in real life. Student clearly demonstrates how codes are created and decoded as a mathematical process. Appropriate pictorial examples enhance the explanation. The limitations of the codes are included and clearly explained. The reader can easily understand and use the code after reading the explanation.