NAME______Date______

Shirley Jackson, "The Lottery" – Discussion and Analysis Questions

Answer the following questions on the paper.

1. Why hasJackson chosen commonpeople for her characters? Could she have chosen characters from otherlevels of sophistication with the same effect? What is the irony of the

tone of this story?

2. What seems to have been the original purpose of the lottery? What dopeople believe about it?

3. What is the significance of Tessie's final scream, "It isn't fair, it isn'tright"? What aspect of the lottery does she explicitly challenge; what aspectgoes unquestioned?

4. This is a different sort of story when you read it for the second time. What elements (such as Mrs. Hutchinson's attempt to have her daughter, Eva, draw with the family) might take on a different meaning the second time through?

5. Describe the point of view of the story. How does the point of view affect what we know about the situation? How does it preserve the story's suspense?

6.Is there a dynamic character? Why or why not?

7. Cite textual evidence of an example of an indirect characterization of Mrs. Hutchinson.

8. Do you think Mrs. Dunbar really couldn't keep up? Cite evidence.

9. What kind of conflict is present in this story?

10.Situational irony is when the unexpected happens. What is ironic about the boys' stones from the beginning?

Answers to Discussion Questions

1. Why hasJackson chosen commonpeople for her characters? Could she have chosen characters from otherlevels of sophistication with the same effect? What is the irony of the

tone of this story?

By choosing common people, Jackson is attempting to have the general reader relate to the grotesque situation at hand. The dangers of blind allegiance to tradition become more “close to home” when an average, small-town American population is the center of the action. It becomes more general and all-applicable. (Lines 1-17)

2. What seems to have been the original purpose of the lottery? What dopeople believe about it?

The original purpose of the lottery seems to have been some twisted sort of rain dance ritual. As Old Man Warner explains, the old saying used to exclaim, “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” (line 122). It takes on an air of Aztec/ritualistic sacrifice, that by performing the blood ritual and sacrificing one, the needs of the majority will be met. If the ritual is not followed, society will collapse – or so the townsfolk believe.

3. Is it important that the original paraphernalia for the lottery had beenlost? What do you suppose the original ceremony was like? Why have some of the villages given up this practice? Why hasn't this one?

The loss of the original ceremonial paraphernalia is significant, as it suggests that the original meaning and reasons for the lottery have been lost to time. It is a ritual with no true purpose, other than that of blind allegiance to tradition. Some villages presumably have matured beyond this ritual, but this one has not.

4. What is the significance of Tessie's final scream, "It isn't fair, it isn'tright"? What aspect of the lottery does she explicitly challenge; what aspectgoes unquestioned?

There are two ways to approach this question.

1) From an in-character perspective, Tessie is objecting to the fact that she is the subject of the sacrifice, having been the “winner” of the lottery. She doesn’t want to die, and is protesting merely the fact that she has to die, not that people die in general.

2) From an authorial / reader response perspective, Jackson challenges the reader to question the idea of conformity and blind allegiance to tradition. If we don’t know why we observe a specific tradition, perhaps we should question its usefulness. Besides, it’s good to question and analyze.

5. This is a different sort of story when you read it for the second time. What elements (such as Mrs. Hutchinson's attempt to have her daughter, Eva, draw with the family) might take on a different meaning the second time through?

Tessie’s attempt to have her daughter draw with the family is a half-baked (and somewhat heartless) attempt to have a larger pool of “winners” (victims) to draw from. While reading, it sort of sounds like she wants an extra chance to win some money or something of that nature. In reality, she is trying to provide more of a buffer between herself and being murdered.

6. Is the lottery a collective act of murder? Is it morally justified? Istradition sufficient justification for such actions? How would you respond tocultures that are different from ours that perform "strange" rituals?

Effectively, the lottery is by definition a collective act of murder, regardless of the reason it is held. Its existence does, however, beg the question of whether tradition (and, by extension, moral relativism) supersedes any sort of universal morality. Is killing wrong no matter what, or does its intended purpose – prosperity for the many at the expense of the few – justified? Regardless of the answer, Jackson’s message is that doing anything simply because it’s “what always has been done” is not an acceptable approach to life. We should question and analyze our traditions, and understand why we continue to observe them.

7. What is the point of view of the story. How does the point of view affect what we know about the situation? How does it preserve the story's suspense? It's written in 3rd person. We are not given the thoughts of any character. This affects what we know about the story because we watch the story unfold, but since we are not in anyone's head, we have no idea what is about to happen. This creates suspense because we don't know what is about to happen. Not allowing us to know what is going on builds until the very end.

8. Ms. Hutchinson is a dynamic character because she changes. At the beginning of the story, she is all for the lottery and for participating. However, when her family is selected she begins to view the lottery selection as unfair.

9. REMEMBER STEAL! Any example of what Ms. Hutchinson Says Thinks Effect on others Actions or Looks. Kids should give cited textual evidence not just vague responses about the story.

10. Mrs. Dunbar doesn't seem like she believes in the lottery. She only selects because she must and her husband isn't present. She chooses only two little small stones instead of the like Mrs. Delacroix who selects a giant one. Perhaps she slows down because she doesn't want to have to participate.

11. man vs. society—The entire society is backwards. It seems that this used to be a pagan ritual for some sort of rain dance. Old Man Warner says, " Used to be a saying about 'Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.'" However, the real reasons for why they even do the lottery is lost. They simply do it because they have always done it. Ms. Hutchinson doesn’t even cry out against the lottery itself. She still doesn't see the problem with the lottery. She simply claims that their selection in the lottery was unfair.

12. We didn't know what the boys' stones were for, but we assumed they were for children playing. We had no idea that they would be used to stone someone to death with rocks, so it was UNEXPECTED.