ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS

(a) Taxa and sampling

To extract genomic DNA from tissue for trans-Isthmus sister lineage pairs (Supplementary Data), we used the DNeasy tissue extraction kit (Qiagen, Valenica, CA). We amplified one mitochondrial and five nuclear markers via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 12.5 μl reactions using the following protocol: denaturation at 94 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing stage for 45 s, and 72 °C for 2 min, followed by 10 min elongation at 72 °C and 4 °C soak. We adjusted annealing temperatures for each marker: ND2 54 °C ACO1, βFib5, MYOI-2 60 °C; EEF 58 °C; ODC 65 °C (Supplementary Data). For all subsequent steps, we sent PCR products to the High-Throughput Genomics Unit (Univ. of Wash). PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT (USB Corp, Cambridge, MA), run through cycle-sequencing reactions and final products were sequenced using BigDye (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on a high-throughput capillary sequencer. We manually aligned sequences in Sequencher 4.9 (GeneCodes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI).

To resolve introns that had insertions/deletion events between homologous nuclear alleles, we used the program Indelligent [1]. To phase heterozygous sites in the nuclear introns, we performed three separate runs for each marker in the program PHASE v. 1.2 [2]. Sites that had posterior probabilities of < 0.70 were encoded as unknown. We tested for recombination using the six different recombination tests in the program RDP3 [3].

(b) Climatic assemblage assignment test

These variables were mean temperature of driest quarter (BIO9), annual precipitation (BIO12), precipitation of driest month (BIO14), precipitation seasonality (BIO15), and precipitation of driest quarter (BIO17). We downloaded locality records from the Avian Knowledge Network (www.avianknowledge.net) and assessed accuracy of the records by filtering the data. To filter the data we first plotted records on species range maps [4] and removed points that fell outside the species’ range. Second, we extracted altitudinal values from each record and discarded points that were not within the known altitudinal preferences of each species [5]. Finally, to avoid sampling bias, we used the same number of locality records for each species pair (n=20), a number that was determined by the number of available records for the less common species. To maximize geographic coverage across the more wide-spread species, we hierarchically removed redundant geographic points.

Supplementary Table 1. Speciation scenario probabilities

Speciation Scenario / # of Unique Intervals / Relative Probability Sum / Weighted Probability
Scenario A / 3 / 2.15 / 0.04
Scenario B / 4 / 10.31 / 0.19
Scenario C / 5 / 17.77 / 0.32
Scenario D / 6 / 24.69 / 0.45

Scenarios A- D represents a continuum of completely overlapping intervals or time periods (scenario A) to temporally unique intervals among habitat groups (scenario D). # of unique intervals is the number of unique intervals shared between humid and dry assemblages. To compare the probability of each scenario we converted joint probabilities into weighted probabilities. The differences between the joint probability of each permutation and the permutation with highest joint probability were estimated by . The relative probability for each permutation was calculated, . We summed the relative probabilities for each of the top 50 time interval permutations for each Scenario (Relative Probability Sum),

. This allowed us to compare models that differed by of the number of unique intervals and at the same time allow the time periods within a scenario to vary. The weighted probability for each scenario was calculated, , where = A, B, C, or D.

REFERENCES

1 Dmitriev, D. A. & Rakitov, R. A. 2008 Decoding of superimposed traces produced by direct sequencing of heterozygous indels. PLoS Comput Biol. 4, e1000113. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000113)

2 Stephens, M., Smith, N. J., & Donnelly, P. 2001 A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Amer. J. Hum. Gen. 68, 978–989.

3 Martin, D. P., Lemey, P., Lott, M., Moulton, V., Posada, D. & Lefeuvre, P. 2010 RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26, 2462–2463.

4 Ridgely, R. S., Allnutt, T. F., Brooks, T., McNicol, D. K., Mehlman, D. W., Young, B. E. & Zook, J. R. 2007 Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 3.0. NatureServe, Arlington.

5 Stotz, D. F., Fitzpatrick, J. W., Parker III, T. A. & Moskovits, D. K. 1996 Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. The University of Chicago Press.