REFERENCES

Ba, H., Culp, K. M., Green, L., Henriquez, A., & Honey, M. (2001). Effective technology use in low-income communities: Research review for the American Connects Consortium. Center for Children & Technology.

Barba, R., and Clark, K. (in press). What’s a “hit”? An analysis of a web-based learning environment. To appear in Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching.

Bamberger, J. (1999). Action knowledge and symbolic knowledge: The computer as mediator. In D. A. Schon, B. Sanyal, and W. J. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology (pp. 235-262). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Beamish, A. (1999). Approaches to community computing: Bringing technology to low-income groups. In D. A. Schon, B. Sanyal, and W. J. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology (pp. 263-286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Becker, H. J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: Children’s access to and use of computer technology. Children and computer technology, v10(2).

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Bernal, V. (2001). Building online communities: Transforming assumptions into success. Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

Bolt, D. B., & Crawford, A. K. (2000). Digital Divide: Computers and our children’s future. New York, NY: TV Books.

Campbell, J. R., Hombo, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (2000). NAEP 1999 Trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. National Center for Educational Statistics.

Campbell, P. B. (1984). The computer revolution: Guess who’s left out? Interracial books for children bulletin, v15(3), pp. 3-6.

Chang, H., Honey, M., Light, D., Moeller, B., & Ross, N. (1998). The Union City story: Education reform and technology students’ performance on standardized tests. New York, NY: Center for Children and Technology

.

Children’s Partnership (2000). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: The digital divide’s new frontier. Los Angeles, CA: The Children’s Partnership.

Chow, C., Ellis, J., Mark, J., & Wise, B. (1998). Impact of CTCNet Affiliates: Findings from a national survey of users of community technology centers. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.

Clark, K. (1991). Constructing and implementing algorithms for the teaching of propositional calculus by computer. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

Clark, K. (1994). The effect of computer-assisted feedback on the problem solving ability of academically at-risk students. Journal of Resources in Education.

Clark, K. (1998). Intersection of instructional television and computer assisted learning: Implications for research paradigms. In G. Berry & J. Asamen (Eds.), Research Paradigms in the Study of Television and Social Behavior (pp. 287-304). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Clark, K., (submitted). Closing the digital divide on student at a time. Submitted to ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.

Clark, K., & Dwyer, F. (1998). The effect of different types of computer-assisted feedback strategies on achievement and response confidence. International Journal of Instructional Media, 75 (1).

Clark, K., Littlejohn-Jones, T. (submitted). The impact of technology on the self-efficacy and career selection of African American students. Submitted to ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Edutopia, spring, pp. 3-5.

Ebo, B. (Ed.) (1998). Cyberghetto or cybertopia?: Race, class, and gender on the internet. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Future of Children (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. Children and computer technology, v10(2).

Galbraith, M. W. (1995). Community-based organizations and the delivery of lifelong learning opportunities. Washington, DC: National Institute on Postsecondary Education.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gibson, C. C. (Ed.) (1998). Distance learners in higher education : Institutional responses for quality outcomes. Atwood Publishing.

Gibson, C. C. (1998). Distance learner in context. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education : Institutional responses for quality outcomes. Overland Park, KS: Atwood Publishing.

Goslee, S. (1998). Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age. Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

Honey, M. & Henriquez, A. (1996). Union City interactive multimedia education trial. New York, NY: Center for Children and Technology.

Kahn, T. M. (1999). Designing virtual communities for creativity and learning. Edutopia, v6(2).

Katz, J. & Aspden, P. (1997). Motivations for and Barriers to Internet Usage: Results of a National Public Opinion Survey. Internet Research, v7(3), pp170-88.

Longworth, N. (1999). Making lifelong learning work: Learning cities for a learning century. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.

Means, B. (Ed.) (1994). Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Muffoletto, R. (1994). Schools and technology in a democratic society: Equity and social justice. Educational Technology, (February), pp.52-54

Murrell, P. C. (1998). Like stone soup: The role of the professional development school in the renewal of urban schools. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE).

National Center on Adult Literacy (NCAL) (1999). International roundtable on the lifelong learning and new technologies gap: Reaching the disadvantaged. Philadelphia, PA.

National Science Board (NSB) (1998). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA) (1999). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1998). Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science, v280(April), pp.390-391.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001). Cities and regions in the new learning economy. Paris, France: OECD.

O’Sullivan, C. Y., Jerry, L., Ballator, N. & Herr, F. (1997a). NAEP 1996 science state report for the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

O’Sullivan, C. Y., Jerry, L., Ballator, N. & Herr, F. (1997b). NAEP 1996 science state report for the Maryland. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

O’Sullivan, C. Y., Jerry, L., Ballator, N. & Herr, F. (1997c). NAEP 1996 science state report for the Virginia. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

O’Sullivan, C. Y., Reese, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (1997). NAEP 1996 science report for the nation and states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Ralph, D. (2000). Galvanizing commitment to lifelong learning through strategic partnerships. Center for the Economics of Education and Training National Conference.

Reese, C. M., Jerry, L., & Ballator, N. (1997a). NAEP 1996 mathematics state report for the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Reese, C. M., Jerry, L., & Ballator, N. (1997b). NAEP 1996 mathematics state report for the Maryland. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Reese, C. M., Jerry, L., & Ballator, N. (1997c). NAEP 1996 mathematics state report for the Virginia. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Reese, C. M., Miller, K. E., Mazzeo, J., & Dossey, J. A. (1997). NAEP 1996 mathematics report for nation and states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Resnick, M. (1996). Towards a practice of constructional design. In L. Shauble, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in Learning: New environments for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Resnick, M.; Rusk, N., & Cooke, S.. (1999). The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city. In D. A. Schon, B. Sanyal, and W. J. Mitchell, (Eds.), High technology and low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology (pp. 263-286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Richardson, K. (1995). Human learning potential. In Bradshaw, D.(Ed.) Bringing learning to life: The learning revolution, the economy, and the individual. London, England: Falmer Press.

Robinson, P. (1998). Equity and access to computer technology for grades K-12. In Ebo, B. (Ed.) Cyberghetto or cybertopia?: Race, class, and gender on the internet (pp. 137-151). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Children and Computer Technology, v10(2), pp. 76-101.

Schon, D. A., Sanyal, B., and Mitchell, W. J. (Eds.) (1999). High technology and low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Schwier, R. A. (2001). Catalysts, emphases, and elements of virtual learning communities: Implications for research and practice. The quarterly review of distance education, v2(1), pp. 5-18.

Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture (1999). The New York public library African American desk reference. New York, NY: Stonesong Press.

Smith, M. A., and Kollock, P. (Eds.) (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. New York, NY: Routledge.

Tardieu, B. (1999). Computer as community memory: How people in very poor neighborhoods made a computer their own. In D. A. Schon, B. Sanyal, and W. J. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology (pp. 263-286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tobias, R. (1992). Nurturing at-risk youth in math and science: Curriculum and teaching considerations. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.

Wenglinsky, H. (1999). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational testing service.

Wolpert, J. (1999). Center cities as havens and traps for low-income communities: The potential impact of advanced information technology. In D. A. Schon, B. Sanyal, and W. J. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of advanced information technology (pp. 69-104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Yarnit, M. (2000). Towns, cities, and regions in the learning age: A survey of learning communities.

Zeichner, K. M. (1996). Educating teachers to close the achievement gap: Issues of pedagogy, knowledge and teacher preparation. In B. Williams (Ed.), Closing the achievement gap: A vision for changing beliefs and practices. Alexandria, VA: