The Napier District Masonic Trust

The Napier District Masonic Trust

Introduction

This report records the results of a Surveillance Audit of a provider of aged residential care services against the Health and Disability Services Standards (NZS8134.1:2008; NZS8134.2:2008 and NZS8134.3:2008).

The audit has been conducted by Health and Disability Auditing New Zealand Limited, an auditing agency designated under section 32 of the Health and Disability Services (Safety) Act 2001, for submission to the Ministry of Health.

The abbreviations used in this report are the same as those specified in section 10 of the Health and Disability Services (General) Standards (NZS8134.0:2008).

You can view a full copy of the standards on the Ministry of Health’s website by clicking here.

The specifics of this audit included:

Legal entity:The Napier District Masonic Trust

Premises audited:Taradale Masonic Residential Home & Hospital

Services audited:Hospital services - Medical services; Hospital services - Geriatric services (excl. psychogeriatric); Rest home care (excluding dementia care)

Dates of audit:Start date: 21 January 2015End date: 22 January 2015

Proposed changes to current services (if any):None

Total beds occupied across all premises included in the audit on the first day of the audit:66

Executive summary of the audit

Introduction

This section contains a summary of the auditors’ findings for this audit. The information is grouped into the six outcome areas contained within the Health and Disability Services Standards:

• consumer rights
• organisational management
• continuum of service delivery (the provision of services)
• safe and appropriate environment
• restraint minimisation and safe practice
• infection prevention and control.

As well as auditors’ written summary, indicators are included that highlight the provider’s attainment against the standards in each of the outcome areas. The following table provides a key to how the indicators are arrived at.

Key to the indicators

Indicator / Description / Definition
Includes commendable elements above the required levels of performance / All standards applicable to this service fully attained with some standards exceeded
No short falls / Standards applicable to this service fully attained
Some minor shortfalls but no major deficiencies and required levels of performance seem achievable without extensive extra activity / Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of low risk
A number of shortfalls that require specific action to address / Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of medium or high risk and/or unattained and of low risk
Major shortfalls, significant action is needed to achieve the required levels of performance / Some standards applicable to this service unattained and of moderate or high risk

General overview of the audit

Masonic Residential Home & Hospital provides residential care for up to 68 residents. On the day of audit there were 66 residents.

This unannounced surveillance audit was conducted against a sub-set of the relevant Health and Disability Standards and the contract with the District Health Board. This audit process included the review of policies and procedures, the review of residents and staff files, observations, and interviews with residents, family, management and staff.

The service is operated by a Board of Trustees, who oversees the governance of the home. There are strategic plans and a documented quality and risk plan which is monitored by the board and management team. The facility is managed by a facility manager, who also takes the role of the quality manager. The clinical leader is a registered nurse, with current practising certificate and experience in aged care. The manager has maintained eight hours of professional development relating the management of an aged care facility.Family and residents interviewed all spoke positively about the care and support provided.

Eleven of twelve shortfalls from the previous audit around, admission agreements, resuscitation consent, care plan interventions, the assessment process, six monthly evaluations, medication management chemical storage and fire evacuation have been addressed. There is still an improvement required around signing for medications. This audit identified further improvements required around incident forms and care plan documentation.

Consumer rights

Includes 13 standards that support an outcome where consumers receive safe services of an appropriate standard that comply with consumer rights legislation. Services are provided in a manner that is respectful of consumer rights, facilities, informed choice, minimises harm and acknowledges cultural and individual values and beliefs. / Standards applicable to this service fully attained.

There is an open disclosure policy which describes ways that information is provided to residents and families. Regular contact has been maintained with family including if an incident or care/ health issues arises. Document review confirms that open disclosure principles were implemented. Complaints processes were known by the staff, residents and families and the complaint register was up to date.

Organisational management

Includes 9 standards that support an outcome where consumers receive services that comply with legislation and are managed in a safe, efficient and effective manner. / Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of low risk

The service continues to implement a quality and risk management system. An annual resident and/or relative satisfaction survey has been completed. Adverse event reporting occurs and staff communicate events to relatives where appropriate. There are established human resources policies and procedures in place. New staff have been provided with a comprehensive orientation programme. There is an in-service training programme covering relevant aspects of care and support. The organisational staffing policy aligns with contractual requirements and includes skill mixes. Staffing levels are appropriate for the level of service provided.

Continuum of service delivery

Includes 13 standards that support an outcome where consumers participate in and receive timely assessment, followed by services that are planned, coordinated, and delivered in a timely and appropriate manner, consistent with current legislation. / Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of medium or high risk and/or unattained and of low risk

Assessments, care plans and evaluations have been completed by the registered nurses. Risk assessment tools and monitoring forms are available and implemented. Care plans reviewed were individualised. Care plans have been evaluated six monthly or more frequently when clinically indicated. Activities are planned to meet the needs of the resident. Sufficient activities and outings have been provided. An appropriate medication management system is in place. Food is prepared on site by the main kitchen. Residents with special dietary needs have these needs reviewed as part of the six monthly care planning review process. Residents interviewed confirmed satisfaction with food services.

Required corrective actions from the previous audit around care plan and assessment documentation have been addressed.

Safe and appropriate environment

Includes 8 standards that support an outcome where services are provided in a clean, safe environment that is appropriate to the age/needs of the consumer, ensure physical privacy is maintained, has adequate space and amenities to facilitate independence, is in a setting appropriate to the consumer group and meets the needs of people with disabilities. / Standards applicable to this service fully attained.

The building holds a current warrant of fitness which expires on 1st Nov 2015. Fire equipment is checked by an external provider. Electrical equipment has been tested and tagged. Reactive and preventative maintenance occurs. Hot water temperature is monitored in resident areas and was within the acceptable range.

Restraint minimisation and safe practice

Includes 3 standards that support outcomes where consumers receive and experience services in the least restrictive and safe manner through restraint minimisation. / Standards applicable to this service fully attained.

The service has one resident with an enabler in the rest home and seven residents with restraint in the hospital. Policies and procedures are in place to guide staff and encourage a restraint free environment. Education has been provided as part of the annual training schedule.

Infection prevention and control

Includes 6 standards that support an outcome which minimises the risk of infection to consumers, service providers and visitors. Infection control policies and procedures are practical, safe and appropriate for the type of service provided and reflect current accepted good practice and legislative requirements. The organisation provides relevant education on infection control to all service providers and consumers. Surveillance for infection is carried out as specified in the infection control programme. / Standards applicable to this service fully attained.

The infection control programme is appropriate for the size and complexity of the service. Infection control data has been collated monthly. Results of data analysis are communicated to staff. Action is taken to reduce the infection rates according to surveillance results and any issues of urgency are dealt with in a timely manner.

Summary of attainment

The following table summarises the number of standards and criteria audited and the ratings they were awarded.

Attainment Rating / Continuous Improvement
(CI) / Fully Attained
(FA) / Partially Attained Negligible Risk
(PA Negligible) / Partially Attained Low Risk
(PA Low) / Partially Attained Moderate Risk
(PA Moderate) / Partially Attained High Risk
(PA High) / Partially Attained Critical Risk
(PA Critical)
Standards / 0 / 20 / 0 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0
Criteria / 0 / 45 / 0 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0
Attainment Rating / Unattained Negligible Risk
(UA Negligible) / Unattained Low Risk
(UA Low) / Unattained Moderate Risk
(UA Moderate) / Unattained High Risk
(UA High) / Unattained Critical Risk
(UA Critical)
Standards / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Criteria / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0

Attainment against the Health and Disability Services Standards

The following table contains the results of all the standards assessed by the auditors at this audit. Depending on the services they provide, not all standards are relevant to all providers and not all standards are assessed at every audit.

Please note that Standard 1.3.3: Service Provision Requirements has been removed from this report, as it includes information specific to the healthcare of individual residents. Any corrective actions required relating to this standard, as a result of this audit, are retained and displayed in the next section.

For more information on the standards, please click here.

For more information on the different types of audits and what they cover please click here.

Standard with desired outcome / Attainment Rating / Audit Evidence
Standard 1.1.10: Informed Consent
Consumers and where appropriate their family/whānau of choice are provided with the information they need to make informed choices and give informed consent. / FA / The previous audit evidenced that the process for documenting resuscitation status was inconsistent. Six resident files reviewed for this audit all have resuscitation status documented and signed as per the policy. This is an improvement on the previous audit.
Standard 1.1.11: Advocacy And Support
Service providers recognise and facilitate the right of consumers to advocacy/support persons of their choice. / FA / The previous audit evidenced that complainants were not always informed regarding advocacy by the service. Three complaints reviewed for this audit all had advocacy information documented. This is an improvement on the previous audit.
Standard 1.1.13: Complaints Management
The right of the consumer to make a complaint is understood, respected, and upheld. / FA / Residents and family interviewed confirm awareness of the complaints processes and availability of the complaints form. Information is located throughout the facility to allow complaints to be made and recorded. A complaints policy that meets the health and disability code is recorded. A complaints procedure is provided to residents within the information pack at entry and displayed at the facility.Three complaints for the year 2014 reviewed. All complaints had been addressed within required timelines and all were recorded on the complaints log.
Standard 1.1.9: Communication
Service providers communicate effectively with consumers and provide an environment conducive to effective communication. / FA / There are policies and procedures in place around open disclosure, incidents and accidents and complaints. Care plans documented that the resident and family, where appropriate, and have been consulted with care plans.
Twenty one resident related incident forms for November all document that family have been informed. One form documents that the resident requested that family should not informed.
Residents interviewed state staff and management communicate well with them. Family member interviewed also stated communications are thorough and that they are informed of changes in health status. Interpreter services are available.
Non-Subsidised residents are advised in writing of their eligibility and the process to become a subsidised resident should they wish to do so. The Ministry of Health “Long-term Residential Care in a Rest Home or Hospital – “what you need to know” is provided to residents on entry.
The residents and family are informed prior to entry of the scope of services and any items they have to pay that is not covered by the agreement. Six agreements were reviewed and this was clearly communicated in each agreement. All admission agreements are signed by the resident or an EPOA this is an improvement on the previous audit.
Standard 1.2.1: Governance
The governing body of the organisation ensures services are planned, coordinated, and appropriate to the needs of consumers. / FA / The service provides residential care for up to 68 residents. On the day of audit there were 29 residents at hospital level and 37 at rest home level.
Taradale Masonic Residential Home & Hospital is operated by a Board of Trustees, who oversees the governance of the home. The Board meet monthly. The Board receives briefings from the managers at their meetings. There are strategic plans and a documented quality and risk plan which is monitored by the board and management team. Business property development s and quality objectives are clearly stated in the plans. Falls prevention and a restorative approach to care and support are included in the plan and evidenced through care plans.
The site is managed by a facility manager, who also takes the role of the quality manager. The clinical leader is a registered nurse, with current practising certificate and experience in aged care. The Manager has maintained eight hours of professional development relating the management of an aged care facility.
Standard 1.2.2: Service Management
The organisation ensures the day-to-day operation of the service is managed in an efficient and effective manner which ensures the provision of timely, appropriate, and safe services to consumers. / The Manager holds a Masters in Quality Systems and has worked for the home since April 2011; she has held the management role since August 2012. The Clinical Manager has 23 years’ experience as a registered nurse and has worked at the home for 13 years. The Clinical Manager is designated to manage in the absence of the manager.
Standard 1.2.3: Quality And Risk Management Systems
The organisation has an established, documented, and maintained quality and risk management system that reflects continuous quality improvement principles. / FA / The quality and risk management process and plan continues to be implemented. The plan has been reviewed regularly and updates made to the board on progress.
The organisation's manuals include policies and procedures that cover a broad range of clinical and management topics. These have been updated regularly if a need arises and at least every two years. Any new policies or policy changes are communicated through staff meetings and the management meeting and communicated to staff through staff meetings. Two registered nursed and four caregivers interviewed confirmed a working knowledge of polices.
Key components of the quality system and monitoring of quality are communicated through a series of meeting such as the monthly quality and management meetings, health and safety meetings, infection control meetings and monthly reports to the board. Meeting minutes reviewed all included quality outcomes and action plans as needed. Trends are analysed through collection and collation of data, examples noted were falls and infection control data.
An internal audit programme is implemented for a wide range of operational areas. Action plans were documented and implemented where necessary and communicated to staff through meetings. Thorough projects are in place where an issue poses risks.
There is a health and safety, and risk management programme being implemented. There is a safety representative who has attended training. There is a current hazard register.
The emergency management action plan amendments following a building extension were sighted and provide a good example of preventive and corrective action operation.