Managing the coordination and notification of satellite systems
8 October 2010
Canberra
PurpleBuilding
Benjamin Offices
Chan Street
Belconnen ACT
PO Box 78
Belconnen ACT 2616
T +61 2 6219 5555
F +61 2 6219 5353 / Melbourne
Level 44
MelbourneCentralTower
360 Elizabeth Street Melbourne VIC
PO Box 13112
Law Courts
Melbourne VIC 8010
T +61 3 9963 6800
F +61 3 9963 6899 / Sydney
Level 15 Tower 1
DarlingPark
201 Sussex Street
Sydney NSW
PO Box Q500
QueenVictoriaBuilding
NSW 1230
T +61 2 9334 7700
1800 226 667
F +61 2 9334 7799
© Commonwealth of Australia 2010
This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced
by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Communications and Publishing, Australian Communications and Media Authority,
PO Box 13112 Law Courts, Melbourne Vic 8010.
Published by the Australian Communications and Media Authority
acma | 1
ATTACHMENT 1 TO LETTER FROM OPTUS dated 13 January 2011
MARKED UP COMMENTS ON MANUAL OF PROCEDURES
Purpose, scope and background
Purpose
Scope
Regulatory framework
Provisions of the ITU
International space treaties
The Radiocommunications Act
The ACMA Act
The ACMA Principles for Spectrum Management
The ACMA procedures for assessing proposed new satellite systems
Application process
Limits to the number of applications
Assessment criteria
Naming conventions
Requirements for ‘planned band’ applications
Further requirements for NGSO applications
Satellite systems not subject to subsection IIA of Article 9 of the Radio Regulations
NGSO satellite systems that are subject to subsection IIA of Article 9 of the Radio Regulations
NGSO satellite systems representing a constellations of NGSO satellites
Evaluation of application
Timing/Ordering
Pre-application consultation with the ACMA
Coordination with other Australian satellite systems
Process for cases where there is a significant potential for interference
Process for cases where the potential for interference is considered not significant
The ACMA may act as a decision maker in domestic coordination disputes
Procedures for managing the coordination and notification of satellite systems
Background
Harmful interference
Ongoing obligations of the satellite operator
International Frequency Information Circular (IFIC) process
Initial IFIC advice from the ACMA
Satellite operator response to an IFIC
IFIC responses to foreign administrations
Australian satellite systems published in an IFIC
Requests from other administrations
Additional services that the satellite operator can request from the ACMA
Ongoing management of satellite systems through milestones
The need for milestones
Milestones and associated dates
Information to be provided by satellite operator regarding the potential for harmful interference and future coordination strategy
Milestone compliance
Compliance
Amendment of a milestone
Failure to meet a milestone
Notification
Resolution 49 data
Confirmation of bringing into use
Initial notification data
Suspension of services
Application of RR 11.32A and 11.33
Action prior to bringing into use
Satellite operator may conduct coordination directly
Efforts to achieve coordination agreements
Enforcement
Transfer of satellite systems
Revocable exclusive access to a satellite system
Satellite systems relinquished by operator request
Administrative provisions
Australian space objects
Associated fees
Assessment of applications for new satellite systems
Cost recovery for work performed by the ACMA
ITU cost recovery
Submission of applications
Confidentiality
Commencement of this manual of procedures
Changes to this manual of procedures
Glossary
acma | 1Purpose, scope and background
Purpose
The purpose of the manual of procedure (the manual) is to detail the ACMA’s policy and procedures regarding the coordination and notification of Australian satellite systems. The intent is to provide clear procedures for the satellite industry to follow with respect to the international coordination of satellite systems—from the initial assessment of a proposed satellite system to the eventual cessation of the satellite system.
This manual also provides a detailed explanation of the roles and obligations of the satellite operator and the ACMA.
Scope
In order to use a satellite to provide radiocommunications services to or from Australia, the following conditions must be satisfied:
the satellite system must have undergone international frequency coordination in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations (regardless of whether Australia is the responsible administration)[1] and must have completed domestic frequency coordination within Australia.
[Note: Total completion of international frequency coordination should not be a criteria for commencing the service, as in practice it is rarely if ever possible to complete these processes until well into the life of the satellite. Many delays are out of the control of the satellite operator, for example, failure of counterparts to respond.]
the radiocommunications link must be authorised by a relevant radiocommunications licence issued by the ACMA.
Before providing services to Australia, a Any satellite system which provide services to Australia must have undergone the requisite coordination and notification processes as outlined in the ITU Radio Regulations. Satellite operators must use reasonable efforts to complete this process to the extent practicable prior to providing services in Australia. This manual of procedures details the manner in which the ACMA and the satellite operator perform international frequency coordination and notification of satellite systems. This manual only applies to satellite systems where Australia is the responsible Administration.
The Radiocommunications Act 1992 (the Radiocommunications Act) requires that the operation of all radiocommunications devices, including Earth stations and space stations (i.e. on satellites), be authorised by a licence issued by the ACMA.[2] A radiocommunications licence may not be issued unless international frequency coordination has occurred (or in some circumstances is occurring) and the device(s) would be operated in conformity with the satellite system. Further information on this topic is available from the ACMA website, but is not discussed further in this manual.
For some satellite services, the Telecommunications Act 1997 (the Telecommunications Act) requires the authorisation of a carrier licence. Similarly, the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the BSA) may require the authorisation of a licence, for certain satellite services. Further information on these topics is available from the ACMA website, but will not be discussed further in this manual.
Regulatory framework
This manual of procedures details a process for performing satellite coordination work that is in accordance with a number of principles and obligations incumbent upon the ACMA.
These principles include those outlined in the Outer Space Treaty, which states that freedom of exploration and use of outer space is for all states, on a basis of equality, in accordance with international law. In addition, outer space is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, occupation, or other means.
Article 44 of the ITU Convention is in the same spirit, stating:
…Member States shall bear in mind that radio frequencies and any associated orbits, including the geostationary-satellite orbit, are limited natural resources and they must be used rationally, efficiently and economically, in conformity with the Radio Regulations, so that countries or groups of countries may have equitable access to those orbits and frequencies, taking into account the special needs of the developing countries and the geographical situation of particular countries.
In addition to the ITU Constitution and Convention, the ITU administrative regulations (in particular the Radio Regulations) and international space treaties, the ACMA must at all times be guided by the following:[3]
the Radiocommunications Act
the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005 (the ACMA Act)
Australian administrative law
the ACMA Principles for Spectrum Management
Provisions of the ITU
Member states of the ITU (such as Australia) are bound by the administrative regulations of the ITU. These regulations aim to facilitate the rational, efficient and equitable use of the radiofrequency spectrum and associated orbits; and to prevent instances of harmful interference. This manual of procedures will not provide a list of the ITU administrative regulations. Further information is available from the ITU.[4]
International space treaties
The Space Activities Act 1998 (the Space Activities Act) has incorporated aspects of the treaties listed below into Australian law. Some of the principles expressed in these treaties are particularly important to the international regulation of radiocommunications. The Space Activities Act outlines a separate area of domestic space regulation, with which the ACMA’s space work must interface.
Outer Space Treaty (Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies).
Rescue Agreement (Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space).
Liability Convention (Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects).
Registration Convention (Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space).
Moon Treaty (Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and other Celestial Bodies).
The Radiocommunications Act
In performing spectrum management functions such as satellite coordination, the ACMA must act in accordance with the Radiocommunications Act. Some of the relevant objectives of the Act include:
maximising, through efficient use, the overall public benefit derived from using the radiofrequency spectrum
providing a regulatory environment that maximises opportunities for the Australian communications industry (in domestic and international markets)
providing a flexible and responsive approach to meeting the needs of users of the spectrum.
The ACMA Act
Section 9 of the ACMA Act sets out the spectrum management functions of the ACMA. In principle, agreement has been given to satellite coordination and notification work being considered a spectrum management function under the ACMA Act. The fact that such work is a spectrum management function does not diminish the discretionary powers of the ACMA with respect to the assessment of applications or any management of the coordination and notification process.
The ACMA Principles for Spectrum Management
The principles are used to guide the ACMA’s management of the radiofrequency spectrum within its existing legislative responsibilities and government policy settings. The principles do not, however, override the law.
The principles give guidance on providing for the maximum overall public benefit from the use of the radiofrequency spectrum. The principles should be considered as complimentary to the Radiocommunications Act.
The principles are:[5]
- Allocate spectrum to the highest value use or uses.
- Enable and encourage spectrum to move to its highest value use or uses.
- Use the least cost and least restrictive approach to achieving policy objectives.
- To the extent possible, promote both certainty and flexibility.
- Balance the cost of interference and the benefits of greater spectrum utilisation.
The ACMA procedures for assessing proposed new satellite systems
Application process
The following sections detail the processes of the ACMA for assessing proposed new satellite systems. As a guide, an applicant—regardless of whether they have existing satellite systems filed through Australia—needs to provide information addressing the assessment criteria, and have the ACMA Authority favourably assess their application. In some cases, coordination with other Australian satellite systems is required.
Limits to the number of applications
A satellite operator may not have satellite networks in the coordination stage at more than four geostationary orbital locations. The ACMA reserves the right not to consider Aapplications containing more than four orbital locations, or applications that will take the total number of applications for orbital positions for satellite networks in the coordination phase offor a single satellite operator to more than four (not including operational satellites). , may not be considered by the ACMA. For clarity, this rule applies a count of orbital positions (not satellite networks—for example, six satellite networks at four orbital locations is considered acceptable) and does not include operational satellite networks notified to the ITU.
The Authority of the ACMA may decide to relax this limitation in cases where the application of this rule could seriously impact major national interests—for example, to allow the Department of Defence to provide adequate communications infrastructure for Defence requirements or to allow a satellite operator to provide enhanced communication services for Australia.
[Comment: Optus supports limitations on speculative applications in principle subject to the following:
- operational satellites should not be taken into account;
- the ACMA should have discretion to accept the application if the ACMA is satisfied that the network is likely to become operational.]
Previously, there was no limit to the number of satellite networks submitted through Australia. The ACMA wishes to limit the number of paper satellites filed through Australia, without impacting operators with real satellites.
Assessment criteria
Potential satellite operators are required to address the following assessment criteria when requesting that the ACMA submit a new satellite system to the ITU on their behalf. This requirement is irrespective of whether or not the potential satellite operator already has satellite systems filed through the Australian administration.
The application must be complete and of sufficient detail to allow a formal assessment of the proposal by the ACMA.
The proposed satellite system must be in conformity with:
the ITU Radio Regulations, any relevant administrative regulations of the ITU and the ITU Rules of Procedure, and
the Australian Radiofrequency Spectrum Plan (to the extent the proposed satellite network covers Australia).
The proposed satellite system will need should aim to be consistent with all relevant Australian domestic radiocommunications policies (such as Radiocommunication Assignment and Licensing Instructions and Spectrum Embargoes) and legislative instruments (such as Frequency Band Plans and Class Licences) at the time that the system becomes operational. Any inconsistencies between the proposed system and current domestic policy and legislation should be noted in the application, along with proposed methods to resolve the inconsistency (for example, the satellite operator may plan to provide the ACMA with a sharing scenario between current systems and their proposed system with a view to encouraging changes to domestic policy.) The satellite operator is strongly encouraged to be proactive in this area.
[Comment:
- Simple compliance with the Radio Regulations should be sufficient for services not involving Australia.
- In some cases it may be impossible to be consistent with all conflicting policies.
- We note that currently the bands 3575 to 3710 MHz and 5850 to 5925 MHz are subject to embargoes. However both these bands are subject to current ACMA work which hopefully will remove or relax these embargoes in the short term. The current wording in the manual, does not offer sufficient security for an operator to include these bands on a future spacecraft.]
ACMA policy is extended to include all domestic policy documents. If proposed satellite systems don’t currently comply with domestic policy, the satellite operator needs to suggest how such compliance would come about.
The satellite operator must be a company that is incorporated in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Corporations Act), carries on business in Australia and has management staff employed in Australia.
A similar provision was included in Deeds of Agreement. Allows Australian jurisdiction.The satellite operator must remain able to exercise operational control of the satellite system from within Australia.[6] This provision does not preclude the use of outsourced telemetry tracking and control (TT&C); the satellite operator, however, is still the responsible party for fulfilling this provision should such arrangements be made.
If requested by the ACMA, tThe applicant must be able to demonstrate that it has the technical and financial credentials required for the coordination of the satellite system and design of the physical satellite.[7]
[Comment: we do not think existing satellite operators should have to provide this detail unless there is a reason to have doubts.]
The application may provide detail of Tthe services that would be provided by the proposed satellite system, should it be brought into use, and the extent to which those services must provide substantive Australian benefit. This benefit should be limited only to that derived from the use of the radiofrequency spectrum. Applicants must provide detailed claims against this assessment criterion. Examples of services which might be considered to provide substantive Australian benefit include:
the provision of a service to the majority of Australians, particularly if this addresses an issue of consumers that are under-served or not served
a service which assists a government (or government agency) of Australia in performing its activities.[8]
Radiocommunications links to be used by recognised research bodies for the purposes of scientific research or environmental monitoring, or Australian industries providing commercial services either exclusively into Australia or into other countries in addition toAustralia.
[Comment:
- Optus suggests that Australian benefit should be one of the criteria that is weighed up together with other factors. If there is no demonstration of Australian benefit of any kind, this may be a factor leading to a rejection of the application.
- Including a payload that also services other countries should not rule out acceptance of an application, as sometimes a hosted payload is necessary in order to make local services financially viable.
- If there are two applications within a similar timeframe for competing spectrum, we would suggest that Australian benefit be a factor that is considered, rather than simply a ‘first come first served’ approach.;
- Broader categories of Australian benefit should also be considered. For example, providing jobs for Australians or maintaining scarce technical expertise in Australia both provide substantial benefits.]
The ACMA suggests that Australian benefit apply only to the actual service intended to be provided.
The following list of information is considered to be the minimum amount of information to be supplied in an application, in order for the ACMA to be able to make an informed assessment of the request.