CHAPTER 6INVENTORIES
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1.The receiving report should be reconciled to the initial purchase order and the vendor’s invoice before recording or paying for inventory purchases. This procedure will verify that the inventory received matches the type and quantity of inventory ordered. It also verifies that the vendor’s invoice is charging the company for the actual quantity of inventory received at the agreed-upon price.
2.A physical inventory should be takenperiodically to test the accuracy of the perpetual records. In addition, a physical inventory will identify inventory shortages or shrinkage.
3.No, they are not techniques for determining physical quantities. The terms refer to cost flow assumptions, which affect the determination of the cost prices assigned to items in the inventory.
4.a.LIFOc.LIFO
b.FIFOd.FIFO
5.FIFO
6.LIFO. In periods of rising prices, the use of LIFO will result in the lowest net income and thus the lowest income tax expense.
7.Net realizable value (estimated selling price less any direct cost of disposition, such as sales commissions).
8.a.Gross profit for the year was understated by $23,950.
b.Merchandise inventory and stockholders’ equity (retained earnings) were understated by $23,950.
9.Mistletoe Company. Since the merchandise was shipped FOB shipping point, title passed to Mistletoe Company when it was shipped and should be reported in MistletoeCompany’s financial statements at October 31, the end of the fiscal year.
10.Manufacturer’s; The manufacturer retains title until the goods are sold. Thus, any unsold merchandise at the end of the year is part of the manufacturer’s (consignor’s) inventory, even though the merchandise is in the hands of the retailer (consignee).
PRACTICE EXERCISES
PE 6–1A
Gross Profit Ending Inventory
JulyJuly 31
a.First-in, first-out (FIFO)$65 ($225– $160)$344 ($168 + $176)
b.Last-in, first-out (LIFO)$49 ($225– $176)$328 ($160 + $168)
c.Average cost$57 ($225– $168)$336 ($168× 2)
PE 6–1B
Gross Profit Ending Inventory
April April 30
a.First-in, first-out (FIFO)$19 ($29– $10)$26 ($12 + $14)
b.Last-in, first-out (LIFO)$15 ($29– $14)$22 ($10 + $12)
c.Average cost$17 ($29– $12)$24 ($12× 2)
PE 6–2A
a.Cost of merchandise sold (August 28):
20 units @ $80$ 1,600
5 units @ $85 425
25$2,025
b.Inventory, August 31:$2,975 = 35 units × $85
PE 6–2B
a.Cost of merchandise sold (March 24):
12 units @ $15 $ 180
63 units @ $18 1,134
75 $1,314
b.Inventory, March 31:$1,116 = 62 units × $18
PE 6–3A
a.Cost of merchandise sold (November 26):
$5,040 = (84 units × $60)
b.Inventory, November 30:
18 units @ $50$ 900
16 units @ $60 960
34$1,860
PE 6–3B
a.Cost of merchandise sold (January 27):
$1,440 = (80 units × $18)
b.Inventory, January 31:
15 units @ $17$ 255
45 units @ $18 810
60$1,065
PE 6–4A
a.First-in, first-out (FIFO) method: $594 = 11 units × $54
b.Last-in, first-out (LIFO) method: $495 = 11 units × $45
c.Average cost method: $550 (11 units × $50), where average cost = $50 = $2,250/45 units
PE 6–4B
a.First-in, first-out (FIFO) method: $2,722 = (20 units × $119) + (3 units × $114)
b.Last-in, first-out (LIFO) method: $2,682 = (10 units × $120) + (13 units × $114)
c.Average cost method: $2,645 (23 units × $115), where average cost = $115 = $18,400/160 units
PE 6–5A
A / B / C / D / E / F / G1 / Unit / Unit / Total
2 / Inventory / Cost / Market / Lower
3 / Commodity / Quantity / Price / Price / Cost / Market / of C or M
4 / IA17 / 200 / $40 / $38 / $ 8,000 / $ 7,600 / $ 7,600
5 / TX24 / 150 / 55 / 60 / 8,250 / 9,000 / 8,250
6 / Total / $16,250 / $16,600 / $15,850
PE 6–5B
A / B / C / D / E / F / G1 / Unit / Unit / Total
2 / Inventory / Cost / Market / Lower
3 / Commodity / Quantity / Price / Price / Cost / Market / of C or M
4 / MT22 / 1,500 / $ 7 / $ 4 / $10,500 / $ 6,000 / $ 6,000
5 / WY09 / 900 / 22 / 25 / 19,800 / 22,500 / 19,800
6 / Total / $30,300 / $28,500 / $25,800
PE 6–6A
Amount of Overstatement
(Understatement)
Balance Sheet:
Merchandise inventory understated*...... $(7,525)
Current assets understated...... (7,525)
Total assets understated...... (7,525)
Stockholders’ equity understated...... (7,525)
Income Statement:
Cost of merchandise sold overstated...... $ 7,525
Gross profit understated...... (7,525)
Net income understated...... (7,525)
*$90,700 – $83,175 = $7,525
PE 6–6B
Amount of Overstatement
(Understatement)
Balance Sheet:
Merchandise inventory overstated*...... $35,000
Current assets overstated...... 35,000
Total assets overstated...... 35,000
Stockholders’ equity overstated...... 35,000
Income Statement:
Cost of merchandise sold understated.... $(35,000)
Gross profit overstated...... 35,000
Net income overstated...... 35,000
*($580,000 – $545,000 = $35,000)
PE 6–7A
a.Inventory Turnover20122011
Cost of merchandise sold. $882,000 $680,000
Inventories:
Beginning of year...... $200,000 $140,000
End of year...... $290,000 $200,000
Average inventory...... $245,000 $170,000
[($200,000 + $290,000) ÷ 2][($140,000 + $200,000) ÷ 2]
Inventory turnover...... 3.6 4.0
($882,000 ÷ $245,000)($680,000÷ $170,000)
b.Number of Days’ Sales in
Inventory20122011
Cost of merchandise sold. $882,000 $680,000
Average daily cost of
merchandise sold...... $2,416.4 $1,863.0
($882,000 ÷ 365 days)($680,000 ÷ 365 days)
Average inventory...... $245,000 $170,000
[($200,000 + $290,000) ÷ 2][($140,000 + $200,000) ÷ 2]
Number of days’ sales in
inventory...... 101.4 days 91.3 days
($245,000 ÷ $2,416.4)($170,000 ÷ $1,863.0)
PE 6–7A(Concluded)
c.The decrease in the inventory turnover from 4.0 to 3.6 and the increase in the number of days’ sales in inventory from 91.3 days to 101.4 days indicate unfavorable trends in managing inventory.
PE 6–7B
a.Inventory Turnover20122011
Cost of merchandise sold. $1,800,000 $1,428,000
Inventories:
Beginning of year...... $570,000 $450,000
End of year...... $630,000 $570,000
Average inventory...... $600,000 $510,000
[($570,000 + $630,000) ÷ 2][($450,000 + $570,000) ÷ 2]
Inventoryturnover...... 3.0 2.8
($1,800,000 ÷ $600,000)($1,428,000÷ $510,000)
b.Number of Days’ Sales in
Inventory20122011
Cost of merchandise sold.$1,800,000$1,428,000
Average daily cost of
merchandise sold...... $4,931.5$3,912.3
($1,800,000 ÷ 365 days)($1,428,000 ÷ 365 days)
Average inventory...... $600,000$510,000
[($570,000 + $630,000) ÷ 2][($450,000 + $570,000) ÷ 2]
Number of days’ sales
in inventory...... 121.7 days130.4 days
($600,000 ÷ $4,931.5)($510,000 ÷ $3,912.3)
c.The increase in the inventory turnover from 2.8 to 3.0 and the decrease in the number of days’ sales in inventory from 130.4 days to 121.7 days indicate favorable trends in managing inventory.
Exercises
Ex. 6–1
Switching to a perpetual inventory system will strengthen A4A Hardware’s internal controls over inventory, since the store managers will be able to keep track of how much of each item is on hand. This should minimize shortages of good-selling items and excess inventories of poor-selling items.
On the other hand, switching to a perpetual inventory system will not eliminate the need to take a physical inventory count. A physical inventory must be taken to verify the accuracy of the inventory records in a perpetual inventory system. In addition, a physical inventory count is needed to detect shortages of inventory due to damage or theft.
Ex. 6–2
a.Appropriate. The inventory tags will protect the inventory from customer theft.
b.Inappropriate. The control of using security measures to protect the inventory is violated if the stockroom is not locked.
c.Inappropriate. Good controls include a receiving report, prepared after all inventory items received have been counted and inspected. Inventory purchased should only be recorded and paid for after reconciling the receiving report, the initial purchase order, and the vendor’s invoice.
Ex. 6–3
a.
Portable Video PlayersPurchases / Cost of Merchandise Sold / Inventory
Date /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost
June1 / 75 / 40 / 3,000
6 / 60 / 40 / 2,400 / 15 / 40 / 600
14 / 90 / 42 / 3,780 / 15
90 / 40
42 / 600
3,780
19 / 15
35 / 40
42 / 600
1,470 / 55 / 42 / 2,310
25 / 20 / 42 / 840 / 35 / 42 / 1,470
30 / 80 / 45 / 3,600 / 35
80 / 42
45 / 1,470
3,600
30 / Balances / 5,310 / 5,070
b.Since the prices rose from $40 for the June 1 inventory to $45 for the purchase on June 30, we would expect that under last-in, first-out the inventory would be lower.
Note to Instructors: Exercise 6–4 shows that the inventory is $5,040 under LIFO.
Ex. 6–4
Portable Video PlayersPurchases / Cost of Merchandise Sold / Inventory
Date /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost
June1 / 75 / 40 / 3,000
6 / 60 / 40 / 2,400 / 15 / 40 / 600
14 / 90 / 42 / 3,780 / 15
90 / 40
42 / 600
3,780
19 / 50 / 42 / 2,100 / 15
40 / 40
42 / 600
1,680
25 / 20
/ 42
/ 840
/ 15
20 / 40
42 / 600
840
30 / 80 / 45 / 3,600 / 15
20
80 / 40
42
45 / 600
840
3,600
30 / Balances / 5,340 / 5,040
Ex. 6–5
a.
Prepaid Cell PhonesPurchases / Cost of Merchandise Sold / Inventory
Date /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost
July1 / 800 / 45 / 36,000
10 / 500 / 50 / 25,000 / 800
500 / 45
50 / 36,000
25,000
12 / 500
200 / 50
45 / 25,000
9,000 / 600
/ 45
/ 27,000
14 / 300 / 45 / 13,500 / 300 / 45 / 13,500
20 / 450 / 52 / 23,400 / 300
450 / 45
52 / 13,500
23,400
31 / 250 / 52 / 13,000 / 300
200 / 45
52 / 13,500
10,400
31 / Balances / 60,500 / 23,900
b.Since the prices rose from $45 for the July 1 inventoryto $52 for the purchase on July 20, we would expect that under first-in, first-out the inventory would be higher.
Note to Instructors:Exercise 6–6 shows that the inventory is $25,900 under FIFO.
Ex. 6–6
Prepaid Cell PhonesPurchases / Cost of Merchandise Sold / Inventory
Date /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost /
Quantity / Unit
Cost / Total
Cost
July1 / 800 / 45 / 36,000
10 / 500 / 50 / 25,000 / 800
500 / 45
50 / 36,000
25,000
12 / 700 / 45 / 31,500 / 100
500 / 45
50 / 4,500
25,000
14 / 100
200 / 45
50 / 4,500
10,000 / 300 / 50 / 15,000
20 / 450 / 52 / 23,400 / 300
450 / 50
52 / 15,000
23,400
31 / 250
/ 50
/ 12,500
/ 50
450 / 50
52 / 2,500
23,400
31 / Balances / 58,500 / 25,900
Ex. 6–7
a.$15,540 ($84 × 185 units)
b.$15,100 [($80 × 60 units) + ($82 × 100 units) + ($84 × 25 units)] = $4,800 + $8,200 + $2,100
Ex. 6–8
a.$7,812 (12 units at $495 plus 4 units at $468) = $5,940 + $1,872
b.$6,138 (9 units at $360 plus 7 units at $414) = $3,240 + $2,898
c.$7,056 (16 units at $441; $26,460/60 units = $441)
Cost of merchandise available for sale:
9units at $360...... $3,240
18units at $414...... 7,452
21units at $468...... 9,828
12...... units at $4955,940
60...... units (at average cost of $441)$26,460
Ex. 6–9
Cost
MerchandiseMerchandise
Inventory MethodInventorySold
a.FIFO...... $4,986$9,639
b.LIFO...... 4,36510,260
c.Average cost....4,6809,945
Cost of merchandise available for sale:
21units at $180...... $3,780
29units at $195...... 5,655
10units at $204...... 2,040
15units at $210...... 3,150
75units (at average cost of $195)...... $14,625
a.First-in, first-out:
Merchandise inventory:
15units at $210...... $3,150
9units at $204...... 1,836
24units...... $4,986
Merchandise sold:
$14,625 – $4,986...... $9,639
b.Last-in, first-out:
Merchandise inventory:
21units at $180...... $3,780
3units at $195...... 585
24units...... $4,365
Merchandise sold:
$14,625 – $4,365...... $10,260
c.Average cost:
Merchandise inventory:
24units at $195 ($14,625/75 units)...... $4,680
Merchandise sold:
$14,625 – $4,680...... $9,945
Ex. 6–10
a.1.FIFO inventory> (greater than)LIFO inventory
2.FIFO cost of goods sold< (less than)LIFO cost of goods sold
3.FIFO net income> (greater than)LIFO net income
4.FIFO income tax> (greater than)LIFO income tax
b.In periods of rising prices, the income shown on the company’s tax return would be lower than if FIFO were used; thus, there is a tax advantage of using LIFO.
Note to Instructors: The federal tax laws require that if LIFO is used for tax purposes, LIFO must also be used for financial reporting purposes. This is known as the LIFO conformity rule. Thus, selecting LIFO for tax purposes means that the company’s reported income will also be lower than if FIFO had been used. Companies using LIFO believe the tax advantages from using LIFO outweigh any negative impact of reporting a lower income to shareholders.
Ex. 6–11
A / B / C / D / E / F / G1 / Unit / Unit / Total
2 / Inventory / Cost / Market / Lower
3 / Commodity / Quantity / Price / Price / Cost / Market / of C or M
4 / AL65 / 40 / $28 / $30 / $ 1,120 / $ 1,200 / $ 1,120
5 / CA22 / 50 / 70 / 65 / 3,500 / 3,250 / 3,250
6 / LA98 / 110 / 6 / 5 / 660 / 550 / 550
7 / SC16 / 30 / 40 / 30 / 1,200 / 900 / 900
8 / UT28 / 75 / 60 / 62 / 4,500 / 4,650 / 4,500
9 / Total / $10,980 / $10,550 / $10,320
Ex. 6–12
The merchandise inventory would appear in the Current Assets section, as follows:
Merchandise inventory—at lower of cost (FIFO) or market.....$10,320
Alternatively, the details of the method of determining cost and the method of valuation could be presented in a note.
Ex. 6–13
a.Balance Sheet
Merchandise inventory...... $11,350* understated
Current assets...... $11,350 understated
Total assets...... $11,350 understated
Stockholders’ equity
(retained earnings)...... $11,350 understated
*$11,350 = $451,000 – $439,650
b.Income Statement
Cost of merchandise sold....$11,350 overstated
Gross profit...... $11,350 understated
Net income...... $11,350 understated
c.Income Statement
Cost of merchandise sold....$11,350 understated
Gross profit...... $11,350 overstated
Net income...... $11,350 overstated
d.The December 31, 2013, balance sheet would be correct, since the 2012 inventory error reverses itself in 2013.
Ex. 6–14
a.Balance Sheet
Merchandise inventory...... $12,000* overstated
Current assets...... $12,000 overstated
Total assets...... $12,000 overstated
Stockholders’ equity
(retained earnings)...... $12,000 overstated
*$12,000 = $350,000 – $338,000
b.Income Statement
Cost of merchandise sold....$12,000 understated
Gross profit...... $12,000 overstated
Net income...... $12,000 overstated
c.Income Statement
Cost of merchandise sold....$12,000 overstated
Gross profit...... $12,000 understated
Net income...... $12,000 understated
d.The December 31, 2013, balance sheet would be correct, since the 2012 inventory error reverses itself in 2013.
Ex. 6–15
When an error is discovered affecting the prior period, it should be corrected. In this case, the merchandise inventory account should be debited and the retained earnings account credited for $18,000.
Failure to correct the error for 2011 and purposely misstating the inventory and the cost of merchandise sold in 2012 would cause the income statements for the two years to not be comparable. The balance sheet at the end of 2012 would be correct, however, since the 2011 inventory error reverses itself in 2012.
Ex. 6–16
a.Apple: 48.5 {$23,397,000,000/[($455,000,000 + $509,000,000)/2]}
American Greetings: 3.9 {$809,956,000/[($203,873,000 + $216,671,000)/2]}
b.Lower. Although American Greetings’ business is seasonal in nature, with most of its revenue generated during the major holidays, much of its non-holiday inventory may turn over very slowly. Apple, on the other hand, turns its inventory over very fast because it maintains a low inventory, which allows it to respond quickly to customer needs. Additionally, Apple’s computer products can quickly become obsolete, so it cannot risk building large inventories.
Ex. 6–17
a.Number of Days’ Sales in Inventory =
Kroger, 30 days
Safeway, 31 days
Winn-Dixie, 46 days
Inventory Turnover =
Kroger, 12.1
Safeway, 11.7
Winn-Dixie, 8.0
b.The number of days’ sales in inventory and inventory turnover ratios are relatively the same for Kroger and Safeway. Winn-Dixie has significantly higher number of days sales in inventory and significantly lower inventory turnover than Kroger and Safeway. These results suggest that Kroger and Safeway are more efficient than Winn-Dixie in managing inventory.
Ex. 6–17(Concluded)
c.If Winn-Dixie matched Kroger’s days’ sales in inventory, then its hypothetical ending inventory would be determined as follows,
Number of Days’ Sales in Inventory =
30 days =
X = 30 × ($5,269/365) = 30 × $14.4 per day
X = $432
Thus, the additional cash flow that would have been generated is the difference between the actual average inventory and the hypothetical average inventory, as follows:
Actual average inventory...... $657 million
Hypothetical average inventory...... 432
Positive cash flow potential...... $225 million
That is, a lower average inventory amount would have required less cash than actually was required.
Appendix Ex. 6–18
$507,000 ($780,000 × 65%)
Appendix Ex. 6–19
$380,000 ($475,000× 80%)
Appendix Ex. 6–20
$648,000 ($900,000× 72%)
Appendix Ex. 6–21
A / B / C1 / Cost / Retail
2 / Merchandise inventory, November 1 / $ 300,000 / $ 400,000
3 / Purchases in November (net) / 2,100,000 / 2,800,000
4 / Merchandise available for sale / $2,400,000 / $3,200,000
5 / Ratio of cost to retail price:
6 / Sales for November (net) / 2,750,000
7 / Merchandise inventory, November 30, at retail price / $ 450,000
8 / Merchandise inventory, November 30,
at estimated cost ($450,000 × 75%) / $ 337,500
Appendix Ex. 6–22
a.
A / B / C1 / Cost
2 / Merchandise inventory, January 1 / $ 500,000
3 / Purchases (net), January 1–December 11 / 4,280,000
4 / Merchandise available for sale / $4,780,000
5 / Sales (net), January 1–December 11 / $6,500,000
6 / Less estimated gross profit ($6,500,000× 36%) / 2,340,000
7 / Estimated cost of merchandise sold / 4,160,000
8 / Estimated merchandise inventory, December 11 / $ 620,000
b.The gross profit method is useful for estimating inventories for monthly or quarterly financial statements. It is also useful in estimating the cost of merchandise destroyed by fire or other disasters.
Appendix Ex. 6–23
Merchandise available for sale...... $3,380,000
Less cost of merchandise sold [$5,260,000 × (100% – 40%)]...... 3,156,000
Estimated ending merchandise inventory...... $ 224,000
Appendix Ex. 6–24
Merchandise available for sale...... $1,400,000
Less cost of merchandise sold [$2,080,000 × (100% – 37%)]...... 1,310,400
Estimated ending merchandise inventory...... $ 89,600