Meetings: Evaluation of Content

INTERNAL EVALUATION POOLS-T 141783-LLP-1-2008-1-DK-LEONARDO-LMP

Have the contents of the meeting been well matched? / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / No answer
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Has the time for working on themes and content during the meeting been sufficient / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Your impression of inputs from partners and presentations during the meeting / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Have there been sufficient time and possibilities for discussions? / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Were your own ideas listened to and taken into account? / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Was the meeting agenda sufficiently flexible to match your expectations? / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Partners were well prepared and had carried out their tasks as agreed for the meeting / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
After the meeting you have a clear vision of your upcoming work tasks / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Was the meeting seen as a whole appropriate and productive? / 5
++ / 4
+ / 3
+/- / 2
- / 1
-- / n.a.
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
General comments
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010
Suggestion for new items in the evaluation forms
December 2008 in Hoorn
March 2009
September 2009
March 2010
September 2010

Partnership evaluation at the end of meeting Page 1 of 3