FY2008Program Performance Plan
Strategic Goal1
Formula
ESEA, Title I, Part B-1
CFDA / 84.357: Reading First State Grants
Program Goal: / To improve kindergarten through third grade student achievement in reading by supporting state and local educational agencies in establishing reading programs that are based on scientifically based reading research.
Objective1of1: / To increase the percentage of students that learn to read proficiently by the end of third grade.
Measure1.1of16: The percentage of grade 1 students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1160
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 43 / Measure not in place
2005 / 50 / Measure not in place
2006 / 45 / 57.2 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 52 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 54 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 61 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 69 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 77 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 85 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.2of16: The percentage of grade 2 economically disadvantaged students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency in reading on Reading First measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1161Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 33 / Measure not in place
2005 / 39 / Measure not in place
2006 / 35 / 44.2 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 41 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 43 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 50 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 60 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 70 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 80 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.3of16: The percentage of grade 2 limited English proficient students in schools participating in Reading First programs who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1162Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 27 / Measure not in place
2005 / 32 / Measure not in place
2006 / 29 / 33.7 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 34 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 36 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 39 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 51 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 63 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 75 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.4of16: The percentage of grade 2 African American students in schools Reading First schools, who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First outcome measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1163Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 34 / Measure not in place
2005 / 37 / Measure not in place
2006 / 36 / 43.2 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 39 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 41 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 47 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 57 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 67 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 78 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.5of16: The percentage of grade 2 Hispanic students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1164Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 30 / Measure not in place
2005 / 39 / Measure not in place
2006 / 32 / 39.5 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 41 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 43 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 45 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 56 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 67 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 78 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.6of16: The percentage of grade 2 students with disabilities in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1165Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 17 / Measure not in place
2005 / 23 / Measure not in place
2006 / 19 / 25.9 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 25 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 27 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 30 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 44 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 58 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 72 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.7of16: The percentage of grade 3 students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading fluency. (Desired direction: increase)1166Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 36 / Measure not in place
2005 / 39 / Measure not in place
2006 / 38 / 42.7 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 41 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 43 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 60 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 68 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 76 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 84 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Measure1.8of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 1 students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1167Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 2 / Measure not in place
2005 / 14 / Measure not in place
2006 / 5 / 20 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 19 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 24 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 28 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 32 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 36 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 40 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004 only 2 states had 2 years of grade 1 comprehension data needed to show an increase.
Measure1.9of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 2 economically disadvantaged students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1168Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 4 / Measure not in place
2005 / 14 / Measure not in place
2006 / 7 / 15 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 19 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 24 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 26 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 31 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 36 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 41 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004, only 4 states had 2 years of grade 2 comprehension data for Economically Disadvantaged Students needed to show an increase.
Measure1.10of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 2 limited English proficient students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1169Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 5 / Measure not in place
2005 / 6 / Measure not in place
2006 / 10 / 15 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 15 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 20 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 24 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 29 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 34 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 39 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004, only 5 states had 2 years of grade 2 comprehension data for Limited English Proficient students needed to show an increase.
Measure1.11of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 2 African American students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1170Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 5 / Measure not in place
2005 / 16 / Measure not in place
2006 / 10 / 11 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 21 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 26 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 27 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 32 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 37 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 40 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004 only 2 states had 2 years of grade 1 comprehension data needed to show an increase.
Measure1.12of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 2 Hispanic students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1171Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 5 / Measure not in place
2005 / 9 / Measure not in place
2006 / 10 / 17 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 15 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 20 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 25 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 30 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 35 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 40 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004, only 5 states had 2 years of grade 2 comprehension data for Hispanic students needed to show an increase.
Measure1.13of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 2 students with disabilities in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1172Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 2 / Measure not in place
2005 / 12 / Measure not in place
2006 / 5 / 17 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 17 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 22 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 25 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 30 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 35 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 40 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004, only 3 states had 2 years of grade 2 comprehension data for students with disabilities needed to show an increase.
Measure1.14of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 3 students in Reading First schools who meet or exceed proficiency on Reading First measures of reading comprehension. (Desired direction: increase)1173Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 7 / Measure not in place
2005 / 19 / Measure not in place
2006 / 12 / 19 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 24 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 29 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 32 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 36 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 40 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 45 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Reading First Annual Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004, only 10 states had 2 years of grade 3 comprehension data needed to show an increase. For grade 3, 7 out of 10 States show an increase in students at proficiency.
Measure1.15of16: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of grade 3 students who score at or above proficient on state assessments in reading. (Desired direction: increase)1174Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 21 / Measure not in place
2005 / 27 / Measure not in place
2006 / 15 / 21 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 32 / (June 2008) / Pending
2008 / 37 / (June 2009) / Pending
2009 / 40 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 42 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 44 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 46 / (February 2013) / Pending
Source.U.S. Department of Education, Consolidated State Performance Report, grantee submissions.
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.For 2004 only 22 States had 2 years of proficiency data available for Grade 3. By 2006 it is anticipated that all states will be using Grade 3 Assessment Data.
Measure1.16of16: The number of days it takes for States to respond to issues identified during on-site monitoring visits. (Desired direction: increase)89a044Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2004 / 83 / Measure not in place
2005 / 65 / Measure not in place
2007 / 55 / (May 2008) / Pending
2008 / 50 / (May 2009) / Pending
2009 / 45 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 45 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 45 / (February 2012) / Pending
2012 / 45 / (February 2013) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
U.S. Department of Education / 1 / 02/07/2008