STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Jagdish Chand s/o Shri Amar Chand,
Resident of College Road, Near Rose Garden, Sunam,
District Sangrur. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Manager, Primary Agriculture Dev. Bank Ltd.,
Sangrur. ______Respondent
CC No. 1091 of 2009
Present:- Shri Jagdish Chand complainant in person.
Shri Bhupinder Singh, Manager, Primary Agriculture Development Bank Ltd., Sunam on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
Information stands provided, case stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Hussan Lal s/o Shri Dharam Chand,
Village Moga, P.O. Bhogpur, Distt. Jalandhar. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the General Manager, The Bhogpur Sugar Mills,
Bhogpur, Distt. Jalandhar. ______Respondent
CC No. 1641 of 2009
Present: Shri Hussan Lal complainant in person.
Shri Sat Pal, Head Timekeeper alongwith Shri Vipul Dharmani, Advocate on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
It was explained that stay granted by Hon’ble High Court in Hindu Cooperative Bank, Pathankot is applicable only to that particular case. Shri Dharmani, advocate wanted some time to study, if stay in any other case has been granted by the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court or Supreme Court of India in distinguishing the Cooperative Societies from others. According to the complainant, General Manager is appointed by the Sugarfed, Punjab which is controlled by the Punjab Government and its Managing Director is an IAS Officer. Sugarfed controls all the sugar mills in the State of Punjab including buying machinery and setting up plants etc. However, enabling Shri Dharmani to collect more details, case stands adjourned to 16.10.2009.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Haqiqat Singh s/o Sh. Bahal Singh,
VPO Roomi, Tehsil Jagraon, Distt. Ludhiana. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Director Public Instructions (S), Punjab,
Chandigarh. ______Respondent
CC No. 1577 of 2009
Present:- Shri Haqiqat Singh complainant in person.
Shri Charanjit Singh, Clerk on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
In his complainant, the complainant had asked that he was promoted as Senior Assistant on 11.5.1998 but has not been promoted as Superintendent. Respondent department has written to the complainant that the case is under consideration and further action will be taken in due course.
2. In view of the reply given by t0he respondent-department, there is nothing for this Commission to do. Case stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Ms. Kamaljit Kaur d/o Shri Kulwant Singh,
Lecturer in Punjabi, Government Senior Secondary School,
ISRU, District Ludhiana. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab,
Department of Education, Chandigarh. ______Respondent
CC No. 1719 of 2009
Present:- Shri Harpreet Singh on behalf of Smt. Satwinder Kaur alongwith Shri Kulwant Singh on behalf of Shri Kamaljit Kaur.
None on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
According to Shri Kulwant Singh, no reply has been received from the respondent-department. Case stands adjourned to 25.9.2009.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Gurmeet Singh s/o Sh. Natha Singh,
H.No.B-6/626/ Near Ashirwad Hospital,
Bhatinda Road, Mukatsar-152026. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Secretary to Government of Punjab,
Department of Education, Sector 9, Chandigarh. ______Respondent
CC No. 1720 of 2009
Present:- Shri Gurmeet Singh complainant in person.
None on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
Shri Gurmeet Singh complainant states that no reply has been received by him till today. Case stands adjourned to 25.9.2009 when PIO should explain the position personally.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Manjinder Singh, 28, F.F. H.I.G. Flats,
Block-A, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the District Transport Officer, Ludhiana. ______Respondent
CC No. 1660 of 2009
Present:- Shri Manjinder Singh complainant in person.
None on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
Record produced by the complainant indicates that queries were replied by District Transport Officer, Ludhiana vide their letter dated 17.7.2009. In view of the reply given, there is nothing further for the Commission to do.
2. Case stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Gurdeep Singh s/o Shri Mehar Singh,
VPO Bhutta Via Ghawaddi, Tehsil and Distt.
Ludhiana. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the District Manager,
The Ludhiana Central Coop. Bank Ltd., Ludhiana. ______Respondent
CC No. 1629 of 2009
Present:- Shri Gurdeep Singh complainant in person.
None on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
According to Shri Gurdeep Singh, no information has been received except that a telephonic message that cooperative banks are not covered under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Since information asked for by the complainant relates to his personal account, he can seek the help of Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh.
2. Case stands adjourned to 19.10.2009.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Raobarinderjit Singh s/o Sh. Amrik Singh,
Village Chhapa, P.O. Baghiara, District Tarntaran. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the District Education Officer (Ele), Tarntaran.______Respondent
CC No. 1614 of 2009
Present:- None on behalf of the complainant.
Ms. Sunita Kiran, District Education Officer (E0, Tarantaran alongwith Shri Rajinder Pal Dhir, Senior Assistant on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
According to Ms. Sunita Kiran, District Education Officer, Tarantaran, asked for information has been sent to the complainant vide their letter dated 7.8.2009 by speed post. Case stands adjourned to 25.9.2009 for confirmation.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Sanjeev Kumar s/o Shri Parkash Chand,
r/o Mohabbat Nagar, Circular Road, Kapurthala. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Senior Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Kapurthala.------Respondent
CC No. 1573 of 2009
Present:- None on behalf of the complainant.
Dr. Sandeep Dhawan, Eye Specialist alongwith Shri Manohar Singh, Junior Assistant on behalf the respondent-department.
ORDER
The Will in question executed by Smt. Parbati Kaur in the year 1956 at Indore was challenged and the case is pending before the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court. The Property 16/113 opposite Hindu Putri Pathshala, Bhagat Singh Street, Kapurthala is different from the property mentioned at Sr. No.2 in the Will which is regarding some shops and some open land in Sadar Bazar, Kapurthala. This position was explained to the complainant vide respondent-department’s letter dated 22.2.2009 which was duly received by the complainant as copies are enclosed as annexures with the application submitted to the Commission. It is further explained by Dr. Sandeep Dhawan that enquiry was ordered by D.C. Kapurthala to identify the properties mentioned in the Will of Parbati Kaur executed in the year 1956 at Indore. Inquiry was conducted by S.D.M. Kapurthala and not by the Civil Hospital authorities. Since hospital authorities were not conducting any inquiry so allowing the complainant to join the inquiry does not arise.
2. In view of the facts mentioned that properties mentioned in the will are different and the case is pending before the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court about the will, I think the position has already been explained to the complainant vide respondent-department’s letter dated 22.2.2009.
3. Case stands adjourned to 16.10.2009 for confirmation.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Sukrit Sharda, President, Yogbal,
Old Shahpur Road, Pathankot-145001. ______Appellant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Employment Officer, Pathankot. ______Respondent
AC No. 387 of 2009
Present:- Shri Sukrit Sharda appellant in person.
Shri Ramesh Chand Khullar, Employment Officer, Pathankot.
ORDER
While statistics has been given to the complainant but no name and address has been. It came to light that there are only 50 recipients of unemployment allowance from the Employment Exchange, Pathankot. Shri Sukrit Sharda, appellant wants to have the detail of those 50 recipients and wants to know if deserving people are getting the unemployment allowance and this facility is not misused by unscrupulous body. This is not secret information and it should be provided to the appellant within two weeks from today.
2. Appellant has enclosed two postal orders of Rs.5/- each with the application sent to the Commission. He was told that for filing an application before the Commission, no fee is required to be paid nor any affidavit etc. is to be submitted. So the two postal orders sent with the application are returned to the appellant after retaining copies of the same.
3. Case stands adjourned to 25.9.2009.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Ms. Jaswinder Kaur, #23, Kamaon Colony,
Near Church, Naya Gaon, Chandigarh. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the District Food and Supplies Controller, Gurdaspur. ______Respondent
CC No. 1113 of 2009
Present:- None on behalf of the complainant.
Shri Munish Narula, District Food and Civil Supplies Controller, Gurdaspur on behalf of the respondent-department..
ORDER
Today this case was fixed for confirmation; nothing contrary has been reported on behalf of the complainant, case stands disposed of accordingly.
2. It was also brought to the notice of the Commission by Shri Narula that papers which were sent to the complainant through courier have been returned as the complainant was not found at the given address. Shri Narula may send the same by registered post through postal authorities.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Sukrit Sharda, President Yogbal,
Old Shahpur Road, Pathankot-145001. ______Appellant.
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the District Food and Civil Supplies Controller,
Gurdaspur. ______Respondent
AC No. 275 of 2009
Present:- Shri Sukrit Sharda appellant in person.
Shri Munish Narula, District Food and Civil Supplies Controller, Gurdaspur on behalf of the respondent-department..
ORDER
Shri Munish Narula appearing on behalf of the respondent-department has given reply to queries raised by the appellant. I have seen the office copy vide which reply has been sent to the appellant and read out the same to appellant. Shri Narula stated that reply has been sent to the appellant two days before but the appellant stated that he has not received the same. From the office copy produced for my perusal, a copy of the same has been prepared and handed over to the appellant.
2. In view of the above, case stands disposed of.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Balbir Rai Verma s/o Sh. Balwant Rai,
#61, Urban Estate, Phase-1, Dugri, Ludhiana. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Punjabi University, Patiala. ______Respondent
CC No. 1224 of 2009
Subject:- Shri Balbir Rai Verma complainant in person.
Shri Vikrant Sharma, Advocate on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
Correct position has been explained by the university authorities to the complainant vide their letter dated 13.8.2009 through speed post, which was confirmed by the complainant.
2. In view of the detailed reply, case stands disposed of.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Raghubir Mehta, H. No.21085, Ajit Road,
Gli No.9-B, Bhatinda. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Director Food and Civil Supplies, Punjab,
Chandigarh. ______Respondent
CC No. 725 of 2009
Present:- None on behalf of the complainant..
Shri Iqbal Singh, Superintendent-cum-APIO on behalf of the respondent-department.
ORDER
Reply on the queries raised by the complainant has been prepared and sent to him under registered cover.
2. Case stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Shri Niranjan Singh, Vocational Teacher,
H.No.3497, Sector 38-D, Chandigarh. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Economic & Statistical Adviser,
26, Ranjit Garden, Near College, Patiala. ______Respondent
CC No. 2682 of 2008
Present: Shri Niranjan Singh complainant in person.
Mrs. Surinder Kaur, District Education Officer (SE), Patiala alongwith Shri Gurdev Singh, Asstt. Sub Inspector, Police Station, Patiala, Shri Balwant Singh, Clerk, Ms. Manjit Kaur, APIO o/o the District Education Officer (SE), Patiala and Shri Jagdeep Singh, Senior Assistant o/o the Deputy Economics and Statistical Advisor, Patiala,
ORDER
In pursuance of the order dated 27.7.2009, police has registered as case vide FiR No.341 dated 28.7.2009 in Police Station, Patiala. Final outcome of the investigation will be known in due course. This position has been explained to the complainant Shri Niranjan Singh. As requested by the complainant, a copy of the FIR has been prepared and handed over to the complainant.
2. In view of the order dated 27.7.2009 and contents noted above, nothing further is possible to do in this case. Case stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.K. Gupta)
State Information Commissioner.
Dated: 21.8.2009
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 32-33-34, 1st Floor Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
Dr. Krishan Thakur,
r/o Gali Fire Brigade, Opp. State Bank of India,
Mahan Singh Gate, Amritsar. ______Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
o/o the Director, Public Instructions (SE), Punjab,
Chandigarh. . ______Respondent
CC No. 1072 of 2009
Present:- Dr. Krishan Thakur on behalf of the complainant.