ROCK ISLAND-MILAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 41
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYYEES, AFL-CIO
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Name
Job Title Location
School Year Date
Evaluated by
INSTRUCTIONS:
· Rate the performance for each of the categories below. Consider carefully the explanation of each rating for the category.
· Refer to the definitions of the rating categories on page 3 of this Performance Review.
· In the “Comments” section:
1) site examples of the job performance
2) list recommendations for improvement
3) if the category does not apply to the position write “N/A” on the lines
Job Knowledge
· Consider the overall knowledge of every aspect pertinent to the job (methods, equipment, and product knowledge).
· Consider the efforts to keep abreast of emerging products, techniques, and procedures that create an opportunity for improved performance and working conditions.
· Consider how quickly the employee acquires and retains new knowledge, skills, and techniques.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Quantity of Work
· Consider the volume of work performed, assignments completed relative to job standards and requirements.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Quality of Work
· Consider the employee’s work in terms of neatness, accuracy, and thoroughness.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Dependability
· Consider the ability to begin and “follow through” on jobs which are the employee’s known assignments and the amount of supervision needed to get the desired results.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Cooperation
· Consider the ability to work cooperatively and harmoniously with co-workers, other staff and supervisor(s).
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Punctuality
· Consider the number of times late for work.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Communications
· Consider the ability to convey both written and verbal information clearly, concisely, and accurately.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
Attendance
· Consider the number of days the employee missed work.
q q q q
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD COMMENDABLE
Comments:
FINAL RATING
Evaluator: Circle the Final Rating
UNACCEPTABLE Consistently performs below acceptable standards; fails to meet expectations. Improvement and reevaluation are necessary.
ACCEPTABLE Demonstrates an accepted performance level; regularly meets expectations.
VERY GOOD Dependably does a good job; consistently meets and often exceeds expectations.
COMMENDABLE Demonstrates consistently effective performance which is worthy of commendation; consistently exceeds expectations and strives to increase occupational growth.
Additional evaluator’s comments should be written on a separate sheet and attached.
Sheet(s) is/are attached as part of this evaluation
(initials)
SIGNATURES
The employee’s signature on this form indicates that (s)he met with the evaluator regarding this evaluation and received a copy.
Employee Date
Evaluator Date
Note: The employee has a right to attach a written response to this evaluation within 5 days
of the evaluation.
Overall Evaluation Rating Scale
Evaluators are expected to use the below rating scale to determine an employees overall evaluation rating:
· COMMENDABLE RATING- at least 7 sections marked “commendable” and 1 section marked “very good” or higher.
· VERY GOOD- at least 6 sections marked “very good” or higher and no sections marked “unacceptable.”
· ACCEPTABLE- at least 7 sections marked “acceptable” or higher and no more than 1 section marked unacceptable.
· UNACCEPTABLE- at least 2 sections marked “unacceptable.”