eLearning Instructor Options
eLearning Instructor Minimum Qualifications (per taskforce recommendations)
- Meets all FAU academic experience background to teach proposed course.
- Meets one of the following options to ensure instructional preparedness for online instruction.
- Completion of the abridged Online Pedagogy Series (total commitment – 8 hours)
- Overall Course/Program Design (2-hours)
- Learning Styles and Contexts (2-hours)
- Development of Objectives, Activities and Assessments (OAA)(2-hours)
- Alignment of OAA (2-hours)
- Completion of at least 6 credit hours in education courses with 3 credit hours in instructional design or technologies and 3 credit hours in pedagogy at a regional accreditedcollege/university
- Served as online faculty for at least two years at a regional accredited college/university
- Completion of an approved certification program for online instruction
- Meets one of the following options to ensure technology preparedness for online instruction.
- Completed the abridged Learning Management System (LMS) Training Series (total commitment – 8 hours)
- LMS –Blackboard Basics
- LMS – Blackboard Assignments and SafeAssign
- LMS – Blackboard Tests
- LMS – Blackboard Grade Center
- Served as online faculty for at least two years at a regional accredited college/university in a non-FAU LMS environment plus completion of:
- LMS – Blackboard Basics
- LMS – Blackboard Grade Center
- Served as online faculty for at least two years at a regional accredited college/university in an FAU LMS environment.
- Completes Legal Issues - Accessibility and Copyright Workshop
- Meets basic computer skills including:
- Basic operating system functions (file management and moving between applications)
- Word processing
- Internet (search, navigation, download, bookmarks)
eLearningInstructor CertificateProgram
Courses/programs will be developed by a collaborative effort between a faculty member and an instructional designer to be reviewed by an independent faculty member and instructional designer before going “live.” Recommendations from review are to be completed within 3 months of review and before going “live.” Final product will be presented in showcase for perspective online faculty candidates.
- ELearning Training
- Complete 30 hours of online pedagogy and technology training
- Completion of the unabridged e-learning pedagogy series (total commitment – 16 hours)
- Overviewcourse/program design
- Pros/cons of elearning
- Pros
- Wideraudience
- Empowers silent participants
- Providesunlimited review
- Supports branched (personalized) learning
- Student-driven
- Convenient – anytime/anywhere
- Non-platform dependency – PC/Mac
- Ease of use
- Ease of update/revision
- Promotes active learning
- Accommodates different learning styles
- ADA Compliance
- Advanced technical expertise
- Demographic accessibility
- Minimizes faculty/student travel costs
- Cons
- Contributes to digital divide
- Can focus on technology instead of content
- Labor-intensive
- Faculty resistance
- Intimidates luddites
- Copyright issues
- Difficulty in adapting to some disciplines
- Feedback may be delayed
- Lack of community
- No visual cues
- Limited student services
- Restrictions on lab/hands-on components
- Workload – faculty/students
- Participants
- Faculty
- Tech-savvies
- Content expertise
- Teaching style
- Characteristics
- Comfort with technology
- Plans responses
- Manages time
- Risk taker/creative
- Focused/ignore distractions
- Belief in e-learning
- Time commitment
- Student-centered adaptation
- Organized course
- Supports andragogy
- Detailed instructions
- Committed to open communication/feedback
- Fosters learning community
- Alignment
- Students
- Determine ability – diagnostic testing
- Tech-savvies – prerequisites
- Content knowledge – prerequisites
- Learning style – Gardner’s multiple intelligences
- Demographics
- Number
- Age
- Culture
- Interests
- Course relevancy
- Economic
- Other obligations
- Needs
- Relevancy
- Expectations clarity
- Feasible pace control
- Gain attention for concerns
- Testing/feedback
- Active learning
- Characteristics
- Comfort with technology
- Interacts with peers/group
- Written communication
- Plans responses
- Manages time
- Self-motivated
- Self-disciplined
- Goal oriented
- Adapt in self-study
- Time commitment
- Open to sharing
- Risk taker/creative
- Willing to speak up
- Focused/ignore distractions
- Belief in e-learning
- Student-centered adaptation
- Structure
- Environment
- Orienting – What & why?
- Instructional – Where & when?
- Transfer – How?
- Fundamentals
- JIT technical support
- JIT resources
- Framework
- Linear
- Branched
- Hypercontent/categorized/modular
- Student-directed
- Units, modules, topics, oh my! (UMT) – get out of the week (weak) format!
- Layout
- 1 module per week
- Weekly asynchronous communication
- Weekly synchronous communication
- 2-3 discussions per topic, 6-10 per week
- Instructor discussion participation
- Progress report/two weeks
- No dumping
- Organized course
- Expectations clarification
- Purpose
- Audience
- Examples
- Resource links
- Caveats
- Required components
- Criteria
- Due date
- Point value
- Submission instructions
- Constant informative communication
- Focus on outcomes
- Application, not rote memory
- Integrated Internet
- Andragogic principles
- Extend beyond the text
- Advantage of CMS technology
- Think globally
- Learning theories
- Objective taxonomy
- Affective – Krathwohl
- Psycho-motor – Simpson
- Cognitive – Bloom, Anderson, Krathwohl, Fowlkes, Marzano, Webb
- Ecological Systems Theory – Bronfenbrenner
- Scaffolding – Bruner
- Assimilation/accommodation – Piaget
- Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) – Vygotsky
- Andragogy – Knowles
- Multiple Intelligences - Gardner – other resource
- Design models
- ADDIE
- Dick & Carey
- 4MAT System - McCarthy
- ISD
- Component Display (Design) Theory (CDT) – Merrill
- Criterion Referenced Instruction (CRI) – Mager
- Conditions of Learning – Gagne
- Backward Design – Wiggins, McTighe
- Iterative Design
- Rapid Prototyping – Tripp, Bichelmeyer
- Spiral Model – Boehm
- Learning environments
- Learning styles
- David Kolb’s Model
- Honey & Mumford’s Model
- Anthony Gregorc’s Model
- Sudbury Model
- Fleming’s VAK/VARK Model
- Designing for interactivity
- Forms of interactivity
- Modes of interactivity
- Academic integrity and assessment
- Variable stakes assessment
- Preventing cheating
- Preventingplagiarism
- Methods of assessment
- Make it personal
- Types ofassessment
- Legal issuesregulations
- Accessibility
- Copyright
- Intellectual property
- Student services
- SACS
- Content
- Before it begins
- Email students with access instructions, basic course/ faculty introductions, course materials (textbooks, etc.), hardware/software requirements, prerequisites and expectations
- Orientation
- Syllabus
- Logistics
- Course number, title, prerequisites, credits
- Date/times/ locations
- Instructor information
- Office hours
- Course materials
- Policies
- Attendance
- Homework
- Participation
- Instructional activities
- Schedule
- Description
- Goals/objectives
- Reading assignments
- Development of objectives, activities and assessments (OAA)
- Writing objectives/outcomes
- Student action
- Measureable
- Condition
- Criteria
- Developing assessments
- Expectations
- Parameters
- Stake-level
- Ill-formed
- Real-world
- Global
- Creating learning activities – Fink
- Get out of the monitor
- Faculty-driven to student-driven
- Just-in-time linking
- Ensuring alignment of OAA
- Completion of the unabridged learning management system (LMS) series (total commitment – 14 hours)
- LMS – Basics
- LMS – Posting Content
- LMS – Collaboration Tools
- LMS – Group Collaboration
- LMS – Assignments and SafeAssign
- LMS – Tests
- LMS – Grade Center
- ELearning experience
- Participate in at least one collaborative course/program design project.
- Course/program is developed by a collaborative effort between faculty and instructional designer.
- Course/program reviewed by an independent faculty member and instructional designer before going “live.”
- Recommendations from review are completed within one semester of review and before going “live.”
- Final product is presented in showcase for perspective online faculty candidates.
- Teach at least one course for two semesters in an e-learning environment.
- Participate in one review of an online course/program using either Blackboard Exemplary Course Program or Quality Matters.