ROMANIAN MONITORIN CENTRE for DRUGS and DRUG ADDICTION - ACTION PLAN 2002-2004
JANUARY- JUNE 2002
- Developing the strategy and the action plan for ROMANIAN MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION / NFP (National Focal Point)
- Presenting this strategy and the action plan to ICFAD (Inter-ministerial Committee for Fight Against Drugs)
- Identifying the main indicators in order to achieve the objectives listed in the strategy; establish the priorities- see Annex 1
- Training the national experts- courses REITOX, EMCDDA, twinning programs etc.
JULY-DECEMBER 2002
- Design a pilot study “Drug-related Treatment Demand”-see Annex 2
- Training NFP personal: databases management/ Office/ SPSS/foreign languages etc
- Edit the questionnaires for the study “Drug-related Treatment Demand”-see Annex 2
- Edit an Informational Map- data sources, contact persons etc- see Annex 3
- Edit and signing Memorandums of Understanding between the NFP and the Institutions identified in the Informational Map
- Elaborating the National Country Report on 2001; NFP becomes Monitoring Center
JANUARY- JUNE 2003
- Data collection for the study “Drug-related Treatment Demand”
- Design a pilot study “Drug-related Deaths” – Annex 4
- Meetings with all the possible data sources- reciprocal visits; checking the questionnaires etc
- Edit the questionnaires for the study “Drug-related Deaths”
- First steps in order to develop a Documentation Center- location, equipment, sources etc
- Joining a Scientific Committee for the Monitoring Center-Annex 6
JULY-DECEMBER 2003
- Data collection for the study “Drug-related deaths”
- Data analyses for the study “Drug-related Treatment Demand”
- Elaborating and publishing a report after the analyses
- Collecting some general data in order to estimate the number of HIV due to IDU; contact the County Health Services and the Ministry Of Health to gather all data available
- Elaborating the National Country Report on 2002; presenting it first to the Scientific Committee and then to ICFAD
- Elaborating a report to ICFAD, with the problems encountered in 2002, the stage of data collection, the relations between all the Institutions etc.
JANUARY-JUNE 2004
- Data collection for the study “Drug-related Deaths”
- Exploring the possibility of introducing a set of questions about drugs in the social/health studies made by the National Institute of Statistics, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education etc
- Working at the Documentation Center
- Specialized courses for NFP personal- SAS/SPSS/databases management etc
- Prospecting the possibility of collecting data about the supply indicator: arrested persons, price of drugs, captures etc
- Exploring the technical possibilities of a study about infectious drug diseases- HIV/VHB/VHC. Prospecting the financial sources- internal and external- Annex 7
JULY-DECEMBER 2004
- Data analyses for the study “Drug-related Deaths”
- Elaborating the National Country Report on 2003
- Editing an annual report for ICFAD
- First estimation about the prevalence of problematic drug users in Bucharest
- Working at the Documentation Center
ANNEX 1- SELECTING AND ARANGING THE INDICATORS
- DEMAND FOR TREATMENT
- Key indicator EMCDDA
- Illustrates the tendency of “problematic” drug abuse- Heroin, Cocaine etc
- Authorized data- Treatment Centers; “Obregia” Hospital etc
- It can be used, altogether with the Drug-related deaths to evaluate the prevalence of “ problematic” drug abuse- by using some indirect tools (capture- recapture, multipliers method etc)
- DRUG-RELATED DEATHS
- Key indicator EMCDDA
- Major problem for public health
- Cheap
- Authorized data- National Forensic Institute
- INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Key indicator EMCDDA
- There are some very serious infectious diseases like HIV/VHB/VHC related to drug abuse that caused severe public health problems in some countries
- Authorized data- Infectious diseases hospitals
- GENERAL POPULATION SURVEY
- Key indicator EMCDDA
- Expensive- possible cost reduction by using some public health general polls
- Offers the possibility to measure some unique aspects: prevalence of “legal” drug abuse like alcohol, cigarettes etc
- The only method to determine population’s attitude about drug abuse phenomenon, preventive measures and programs etc
- PREVALENCE ESTIMATE
- Key indicator EMCDDA
- It uses information provided by previous indicators
- Complex, necessitating special tools: (capture- recapture, multipliers method etc)
- DRUG SUPPLY OFFERT
- Studies the drug abuse
- SCHOLAR INVESTIGATIONS
- It studies a risk population
- ESPAD data available
- Cheap
ANNEX 2- TREATMENT DEMAND INDICATOR
- Reasons, objectives and biography
- Choosing time and area frames- Bucharest, July 2003-June 2004
- Adapting ”EMCDDA Recommended Draft Technical Tools and Guidelines Key Epidemiological Indicator: Demand for treatment by drug users” : case definition/ questionnaire/ notifications/ data sources and their characteristics etc
- Elaborating a follow-up and analyses plan
ANNEX 4- DRUG RELATED DEATHS
- Reasons, objectives and biography
- Choosing time and area frames- Bucharest, 2000-2002
- Elaborating a methodology for this indicator, based upon National Forensic Institute’s registers:
Case definition; admission criteria
Type of questionnaire- variables, drug types etc
Identifying data sources and the characteristics of them
- Adapting “EMCDDA Recommended Draft Guidelines Key Epidemiological Indicator: Drug-related deaths and mortality in drug users. a) Acute (direct) drug-related deaths”
- Elaborating a plan in order to check our methodology with the National Forensic Institute’s one
ANNEX 7- INFECTIOUS DISEASES (HIV/VHB/VHC)
- Reasons
- General and specific objectives; hypothesis
- Methodology:
Case definition (exclusion and inclusion criteria)
Sample definition
Sample size- like 150…200 persons
Methods and tools for collecting data (questionnaire, HIV test)
Data analyses
Time schedule
Available and necessaries resources
Budget