Complying with Changes in Legislation

Complying with Changes in Legislation 2013
September/ October 2013
Delegates Workbook
Facilitated by ProBeta Training (Pty) Ltd.

The views expressed in this workbook are not necessarily reflective of the official views of Fasset.

Complying with Changes in Legislation

Contents

The Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 and the Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act, 2008 8

Purpose of the Act 8

Definition of a money laundering activity 8

Money Laundering legislation in South Africa 10

The Financial Intelligence Centre (“FIC”) 10

Money Laundering Control measures 10

Registration of accountable and reporting institutions 17

Directives 17

Responsibility for supervision of accountable institutions 18

Appointment of inspectors 18

Inspections 19

Administrative sanctions 20

Appeal 21

Compliance and enforcement 22

Schedules to the Act 23

Inspections by IRBA 25

Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 26

Purpose of the Act 26

Definition of advice 26

Intermediary services 27

Authorisation of financial service providers 27

Application for authorisation 28

Lapsing of licence 28

Qualifications of representatives and duties of authorised financial service providers 29

Debarment process of representatives 29

Compliance officers and compliance arrangements 30

Accounting and audit requirements 30

Change in financial year-end 31

Exemption of FSP’s from audited financial statement requirements 31

Submission of annual financial statements 32

Submission of compliance reports 32

Reporting duty of auditors and compliance officers 34

Determination of Fit and Proper requirements 36

Application for an exemption in relation to qualifications and regulatory examinations 40

Professional indemnity and fidelity insurance cover 41

Offences and penalties 41

The National Credit Act No.34 of 2005 42

Purpose of the Act 42

Overview of the Act 42

Chapter 1 – Interpretation, Purpose and Application 42

Chapter 2 – Consumer Credit Institutions 46

Chapter 3 – Consumer Credit Industry Regulation 46

Chapter 4 – Consumer Credit Policy 47

Chapter 5 – Consumer Credit Agreements 50

Chapter 6 – Collection, Repayment, Surrender and Debt Enforcement 55

Compliance and Reporting – Chapter 8 of the Regulations 56

Debt counselling 57

Consumer Protection Act 59

Purpose of the Act 59

Application of the Act 59

Exemptions 61

Fundamental consumer rights 61

Protection of consumer rights and the consumer voice 71

Business names and industry codes of conduct 71

Protection of Personal Information Bill 73

Purpose of the Act 73

Application of the Act 73

What information is protected? 73

Exclusions 74

Conditions for lawful processing of personal information 74

Processing of special personal information 76

Information Protection Regulator 76

Information Protection Officer 76

Notification of processing 77

Rights of data subjects regarding unsolicited electronic communications and automated decision making 77

Enforcement 77

Offences and penalties 78

Implementation timeline 78

The Companies Act, 71 of 2008 79

Categories of companies (Section 8) 79

Criteria for names of companies (Section 11) 79

Financial statements (Section 29) 81

Annual financial statements (Section 30) 82

Access to financial statements / related information (Section 31) 90

Annual return (Section 33) 91

Access to company records (Section 26) 93

Appointment of auditor (Section 90) 94

Resignation of auditors & vacancies (Section 91) 94

Rotation of auditors (Section 92) 95

Rights and restricted functions of auditors (Section 93) 95

Director's personal financial interests (Section 75) 95

Directors conduct (Section 76) 97

Liability of directors and prescribed officers (Section 77) 98

Indemnification and directors’ insurance (Section 78) 99

Financial assistance for subscription of securities (Section 44) 100

Loans or other financial assistance to directors (Section 45) 101

Distributions (Section 46) 102

Deregistration 102

Re-instatement 103

Rejections in relation to applications for close corporations amendments 104

Alternative Payment Method 105

Cash Office Closure 105

Fax to Email 105

Drop-off Box for Registration and Amendments 106

Refunding of Customer Deposits 106

New Company Registration Certificate 106

Online verification of CIPC Certificates 107

Address of Actual Business Premises Required 107

Tax Administration Act 109

General 109

Powers and duties of SARS and SARS officials 110

Registration 112

Returns and records 113

Information gathering 116

Inspections 117

Inquiries 118

Search and seizure 120

Confidentiality of information 123

Assessments 125

Tax liability and payment 127

Taxpayer account and allocation of payments 130

Deferral of payment 131

Recovery of tax 132

Interest 134

Refunds 135

Write-off or compromise of tax debts 136

Administrative non-compliance penalties 139

Percentage based penalty 141

Procedures for imposing penalty 141

Understatement penalty 143

Voluntary disclosure programme 145

Criminal offences 147

Registration of tax practitioners and reporting of unprofessional conduct 148

Tax clearance certificates 152

Estate Agency Affairs Act 153

Purpose 153

Accounting and auditing requirements 153

Educational Requirements 154

The use of professional designations by estate agents 156

Inspections 156

Licensing of businesses Bill 160

Proposed changes to B-BBEE (Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment) 162

Proposed changes 162

Fraudulent BBBEE Certificates 162

The Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 and the Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act, 2008

Purpose of the Act

The objective of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA), 38 of 2001 is to establish a Financial Intelligence Centre and a Money Laundering Advisory Council in order to combat money laundering activities. The legislation aims to combat money laundering activities by getting “accountable institutions” to report suspect and unusual transactions that may be indicative of possible money laundering opportunities to the money laundering office.

FIC ACT aims to impose certain duties on institutions and other persons who might be used for money laundering purposes.

Definition of a money laundering activity

Any person who knows or should reasonably have known that property is or forms part of the proceeds of unlawful activities and:

  Enters into any agreement or, engages in any arrangement or transaction with anyone in connection with that property whether the agreement, arrangement or transaction is legally enforceable or not or,

  Performs any other Act in connection with such property whether it is performed independently or in concert (together) with any other person, which has or is likely to have the effect of:

○  Concealing or disguising the:

―  Nature

―  Source

―  Location

―  Disposition or

―  Movement

of the property or its ownership or any interest which anyone may have in respect thereof, or:

  Enabling or assisting any person who has committed or commits an offence in the Republic or elsewhere:

○  To avoid prosecution

○  To remove or diminish any property acquired directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of an offence.

You can be guilty of an offence not only when you know that the property forms part of an illegal activity but also which you should reasonably have known and you did not report it.

You do not have to be actively involved. The mere concealing or disguising of the source, location etc. constitutes an offence. If you assist someone who has committed an offence to avoid prosecution or remove the property directly or indirectly, you are again running a risk of conviction.

Any person who knows or should reasonably have known that another person has obtained the proceeds of unlawful activities and who enters into any agreement with anyone or engages in any agreement or transaction whereby:

  The retention or the control by or on behalf of the other person of the proceeds of unlawful activities is facilitated, or

  The proceeds of unlawful activities are used to make funds available to the other person or to acquire property on his/her behalf or to benefit him/her in any way shall be guilty of an offence.

Actual knowledge again is not required. You are deemed to know when you should reasonably have known. This clause is aimed at preventing assistance to someone who was engaged in illegal activities or entering into an agreement with such a person to make the funds available to purchase property on his/her behalf or to benefit him/her in any other way.

Any person who acquires, uses, or, has possession of, property and who knows or should have reasonably known that it is, or forms part of the proceeds of unlawful activities of another person shall be guilty of an offence.

Proceeds of an unlawful activity are defined as follows:

  Any property, service, advantage, benefit reward

  Which was derived, received, retained directly or indirectly, in the republic or elsewhere at any time before or after the commencement of the Act, in connection with or as a result of any unlawful activity carried on by any person, and includes any property representing property so derived.

An unlawful activity is defined as follows:

  Conduct which constitutes a crime or which contravenes any law, whether such conduct occurred before or after the commencement of the Act and whether such conduct occurred in the Republic or elsewhere.

Meaning of knowledge of a fact:

  The person who has actual knowledge of that fact or the Court is satisfied that the person believes that there is a reasonable possibility of the existence of the fact, and that the person fails to obtain information or confirm or refute the existence of the fact.

The Act says if the conclusions that he/she should have reached are those which would have been reached by a reasonably diligent and vigilant person having both the general knowledge, skill, training and experience that may reasonably be expected of a person in his/her position, and the general knowledge, skill, training and experience that he/she in fact has.

Money Laundering legislation in South Africa

The Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA) came into being in 1998.

This Act defines offences relating to proceeds of unlawful activities that are punishable. This includes money laundering, assisting another to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities and acquisition as well as possession or use of proceeds of unlawful activities.

As a result of international pressure, this legislation was clearly not enough to conform to world standards in combating money laundering. The Financial Intelligence Centre Act 2001 (FICA) was passed and needs to be read in conjunction with POCA.

The Financial Intelligence Centre (“FIC”)

The principal objective of the Centre is to assist in the identification of the proceeds of unlawful activities and the combating of money laundering activities.

The other objectives of the Centre are:

  To make information collected by it, available to investigating authorities, supervisory bodies, the intelligence services and the South African Revenue Service to facilitate the administration and enforcement of the laws of the Republic;

  To exchange information with bodies with similar objectives in other countries regarding money laundering activities, the financing of terrorist and related activities, and other similar activities;

  To supervise and enforce compliance with this Act or any directive made in terms of this Act and to facilitate effective supervision and enforcement by supervisory bodies.

Money Laundering Control measures

The principal money laundering control measures as contained in the Act are:

  Duty to identify clients (section 21);

  Duty to keep records of transactions and business relationships (section 22);

  Reporting cash transactions above a prescribed limit (section 28);

  Reporting duties and access to information (section 29 and others);

  Formulation and implementation of internal rules (section 42);

  Training and compliance (section 43).

Duty to identify clients

An accountable institution is obligated to establish the identity of any prospective client before any business relationship is established with the client. This must be done even if only one transaction will be concluded with the client. This will include establishing the identity of a person on whose behalf the client may be acting. If any transactions have taken place before the FIC ACT took effect, the institution must trace all accounts at the institution that were involved in such a transaction.

A business relationship will be deemed to have been established if an arrangement exists with a view of concluding transactions on a regular basis.

In addition to establishing and verifying the identity of existing clients, accountable institutions will also be required to trace all accounts that they have that are involved in transactions concluded in the course of the business relationship with that client.

Board/senior management approval of an accountable institution’s anti-money laundering and terrorist financing policies and procedures.

Board of directors’/senior management’s approval of an accountable institution’s own internal policies and procedures to address money laundering and terrorist financing is critical if an accountable institution wishes to be considered serious about its appreciation of, and willingness to, mitigate money laundering and terrorist-financing risks in its daily operations.

The Centre therefore expects that the internal anti-money laundering and terrorist financing policies and procedures of an accountable institution should be adopted and approved by the board of directors of that accountable institution.

Risk-based approach

Accountable institutions are not required to follow a “one size fits all” approach in the methods that they use and the levels of verification that they apply.

Application of a risk-based approach to the verification of the relevant particulars implies that an accountable institution can accurately assess the risk involved. It also implies that an accountable institution can take an informed decision on the basis of its risk assessment as to the appropriate methods and levels of verification that should be applied in a given circumstance.

An accountable institution would need to document and make use of a risk framework. Such a risk framework should form part of the accountable institution’s internal policies and procedures.

Duty to keep records

This duty placed on accountable institutions must be performed as soon as a business relationship exists or a transaction has been concluded with a client. The details that should be included in the records are:

  Identity of the client;

  Where a client is acting on behalf of another person:

○  Identity of such a party; and

○  The client’s authority to act on behalf of another person.

  The manner in which the identities were established;

  The nature of the business relationship or transaction;