Fiscal Year 2012
Monitoring Report
on the
Wyoming Division of
Vocational Rehabilitation
Vocational Rehabilitation
Program
U.S. Department of Education
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services
Rehabilitation Services Administration
April 10, 2012
Table ofContents
Page
Section 1: Executive Summary
Section 2: Performance Analysis
Section 3: Emerging Practices
Section 4: Results of Prior Monitoring Activities
Section 5: Focus Areas
A.Organizational Structure Requirements of the Designated State Agency and Designated State Unit
B.Transition Services and Employment Outcomes for
Youth with Disabilities
C. Fiscal Integrity of the Vocational Rehabilitation Program
Section 6: Compliance Findings and CorrectiveActions
Appendix A: Agency Response
Appendix B: Legal Requirements
Section 1: Executive Summary
Background
Section 107 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation Act), requires the Commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) to conduct annual reviews and periodic on-site monitoring of programs authorized under Title I of the Rehabilitation Act to determine whether a state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency is complying substantially with the provisions of its State Plan under section 101 of the Rehabilitation Act and with the evaluation standards and performance indicators established under Section 106. In addition, the commissioner must assess the degree to which VR agencies are complying with the assurances made in the State Plan Supplement for Supported Employment (SE) Services under Title VI, part B, of the Rehabilitation Act.
Through its monitoring of the VR and SE programs administered by the Wyoming Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) in federal fiscal year (FY) 2012, RSA:
- reviewed the VR agency’s progress toward implementing recommendations and resolving findings identified during the prior monitoring cycle (FY 2007 through FY 2010);
- reviewed the VR agency’s performance in assisting eligible individuals with disabilities to achieve high-quality employment outcomes;
- recommended strategies to improve performance and required corrective actions in response to compliance findings related to three focus areas, including:
- organizational structure requirements of the designated state agency (DSA) and the designated state unit (DSU);
- transition services and employment outcomes for youth with disabilities; and
- the fiscal integrity of the VR program;
- identified emerging practices related to the three focus areas and other aspects of the VR agency’s operations; and
- provided technical assistance to the VR agency to enable it to enhance its performance and to resolve findings of noncompliance.
The nature and scope of this review and the process by which RSA carried out its monitoring activities, including the conduct of an on-site visit from December 5 through 9, 2011, is described in detail in the FY 2012 Monitoring and Technical Assistance Guide for the Vocational Rehabilitation Program located at:
Emerging Practices
Through the course of its review, RSA collaborated with DVR, the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC), the Technical Assistance and Continuing Education (TACE) center and other stakeholders to identify theemerging practice belowimplemented by the agency to improve the performance and administration of the VR program.
Transition
- Transition counselors in DVR utilizeGoogle Groups to provide the opportunity to come together online, in one place to communicate,brainstorm ideas, collaborate and post information that will be useful to all transition counselors.
A more complete description of this practice canbe found in Section 3 of this report.
Summary of Observations
RSA’s review of DVR resulted in the observation related to the focus area identified below. The entire observation and the recommendations made by RSA that the agency can undertake to improve its performance are contained in Section 5 of this report.
Transition Services and Employment Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities
- While the number of DVR transition-age youth achieving employment outcomes remained relatively stable for the period beginning in FY 2006 and ending in FY 2010, the attrition of these individuals during various stages of the VR process increased and resulted in a decreased employment rate over the same period.
Summary of Compliance Findings
RSA’s review resulted in the identification of the compliance findings specified below. The complete findings and the corrective actions that DVR must undertake to bring itself into compliance with pertinent legal requirements are contained in Section 6 of this report.
- DVR does not meet its established time standard pertaining to the development of the individualized plan for employment (IPE) for transition-age youth determined eligible for VR services.
- DVR’s interagency agreement with the Wyoming Department of Education does not include all required elements.
- DVR did not disburse all program income prior to requesting the drawdown of additional federal funds.
- DVRdoes not conduct periodic certifications for employees working solely on the VR program.
- The expenditure of VR program funds on costs incurred under contracts with the non-profit operator of the Wyoming business leadership network are not allowable and/or allocable to the VR program to the degree that such funds were not used to provide VR services to program applicants and eligible individuals, or to benefit groups of individuals with disabilities. In addition, the non-federal expenditures incurred in connection with such expenditures are not a permissible source of match for the VR program to the extent that the expenditures are not either allowable under, and/or allocable to, the program.
- DVR does not monitor its contracts to ensure that grant-supported activities performed by the contractors comply with applicable federal requirements and that performance goals are achieved.
Development of the Technical Assistance Plan
RSA will collaborate closely with DVR and the Region 8 TACE to develop a plan to address the technical assistance needs identified by DVR in Appendix A of this report. RSA, DVR and the TACE will conduct a teleconference within 60 calendar days following the publication of this report to discuss the details of the technical assistance needs, identify and assign specific responsibilities for implementing technical assistance and establish initial timeframes for the provision of the assistance. RSA, DVR and TACE will participate in teleconferences at least semi-annually to gauge progress and revise the plan as necessary.
Review Team Participants
Members of the RSA review team included Larry Vrooman, David Wachter, and Melissa Diehl (Vocational Rehabilitation Program Unit); James Billy, Suzanne Mitchell, and Janette Shell (Technical Assistance Unit); Yann-Yann Shieh (Data Collection and Analysis Unit); and Tanielle Chandler (Fiscal Unit). Although not all team members participated in the on-site visit, each contributed to the gathering and analysis of information, along with the development of this report.
Acknowledgements
RSA wishes to express appreciation to the representatives of DVR for the cooperation and assistance extended throughout the monitoring process. RSA also appreciates the participation of the SRC, the Client Assistance Program and advocates, and other stakeholders in the monitoring process.
Section 2: Performance Analysis
This analysis is based on a review of the VR programmatic and fiscal data contained in Tables 2.1 and 2.2 below and is intended to serve as a broad overview of the VR program administered by DVR. It should not be construed as a definitive or exhaustive review of all available agency VR program data. As such, the analysis does not necessarily capture all possible programmatic trends.In addition, the data in Table 2.1 measure performance based on individuals who exited the VR program during federal fiscal year2006 through 2010.Consequently, the table and accompanying analysis do not provide information derived from DVR open service records including that related to current applicants,individuals who have been determined eligible and those who are receiving services. DVR may wish to conduct its own analysis, incorporating internal open caseload data, to substantiate or confirm any trends identified in the analysis.
Performance Analysis
VR Program Analysis
Table 2.1
DVR Program Performance Data for FY 2006 through FY 2010
TOTAL CASES CLOSED / Number / 1,640 / 1,828 / 1,824 / 2,007 / 2,262 / 622 / 281,286
Percent / 100.0% / 100.0% / 100.0% / 100.0% / 100.0% / 37.9% / 100.0%
Exited as an applicant / Number / 347 / 326 / 285 / 406 / 453 / 106 / 47,487
Percent / 21.2% / 17.8% / 15.6% / 20.2% / 20.0% / 30.5% / 16.9%
Exited during or after trial work experience/extended evaluationi / Number / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1,708
Percent / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.6%
TOTAL NOT DETERMINED ELIGIBLE / Number / 347 / 326 / 285 / 406 / 453 / 106 / 49,195
Percent / 21.2% / 17.8% / 15.6% / 20.2% / 20.0% / 30.5% / 17.5%
Exited without employment after IPE, before services / Number / 0 / 5 / 4 / 4 / 10 / 10 / 5,824
Percent / 0.0% / 0.3% / 0.2% / 0.2% / 0.4% / 2.1%
Exited from order of selection waiting list / Number / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1,390
Percent / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.5%
Exited without employment after eligibility, before IPE / Number / 372 / 470 / 492 / 520 / 660 / 288 / 68,696
Percent / 22.7% / 25.7% / 27.0% / 25.9% / 29.2% / 77.4% / 24.4%
TOTAL EXITED AFTER ELIBIBILITY, BUT PRIOR TO RECEIVING SERVICES / Number / 372 / 475 / 496 / 524 / 670 / 298 / 75,910
Percent / 22.7% / 26.0% / 27.2% / 26.1% / 29.6% / 80.1% / 27.0%
Exited with employment / Number / 670 / 696 / 699 / 705 / 639 / -31 / 78,860
Percent / 40.9% / 38.1% / 38.3% / 35.1% / 28.2% / -4.6% / 28.0%
Exited without employment / Number / 251 / 331 / 344 / 372 / 500 / 249 / 77,321
Percent / 15.3% / 18.1% / 18.9% / 18.5% / 22.1% / 99.2% / 27.5%
TOTAL RECEIVED SERVICES / Number / 921 / 1,027 / 1,043 / 1,077 / 1,139 / 218 / 156,181
Percent / 56.2% / 56.2% / 57.2% / 53.7% / 50.4% / 23.7% / 55.5%
EMPLOYMENT RATE / Percent / 72.75% / 67.77% / 67.02% / 65.46% / 56.10% / -22.88% / 50.49%
Transition age youth / Number / 355 / 428 / 470 / 558 / 567 / 212 / 100,116
Percent / 21.6% / 23.4% / 25.8% / 27.8% / 25.1% / 59.7% / 35.6%
Transition aged youth employment outcomes / Number / 144 / 151 / 152 / 176 / 156 / 12 / 27,745
Percent / 21.5% / 21.7% / 21.7% / 25.0% / 24.4% / 8.3% / 35.2%
Competitive employment outcomes / Number / 661 / 687 / 689 / 696 / 624 / -37 / 73,995
Percent / 98.7% / 98.7% / 98.6% / 98.7% / 97.7% / -5.6% / 93.8%
Supported employment outcomes / Number / 81 / 57 / 48 / 77 / 58 / -23 / 7,004
Percent / 12.1% / 8.2% / 6.9% / 10.9% / 9.1% / -28.4% / 8.9%
Average hourly wage for competitive employment outcomes / Average / $10.37 / $10.90 / $11.34 / $11.71 / $12.40 / $2.02 / $11.33
Average hours worked for competitive employment outcomes / Average / 31.8 / 32.2 / 31.2 / 31.3 / 30.7 / -1.1 / 31.4
Competitive employment outcomes at 35 or more hours per week / Number / 378 / 413 / 386 / 391 / 332 / -46 / 38,784
Percent / 56.4% / 59.3% / 55.2% / 55.5% / 52.0% / -12.2% / 49.2%
Employment outcomes meeting SGA / Number / 468 / 480 / 468 / 482 / 428 / -40 / 48,900
Percent / 69.9% / 69.0% / 67.0% / 68.4% / 67.0% / -8.5% / 62.0%
Employment outcomes with employer-provided medical insurance / Number / 224 / 236 / 211 / 199 / 163 / -61 / 18,791
Percent / 33.4% / 33.9% / 30.2% / 28.2% / 25.5% / -27.2% / 23.8%
1
VR Performance Trends
Positive Trends
As shown in Table 2.1, DVR demonstrated positive trends in performance related to the provision of services to, and outcomes achieved by, transition-age youth and the average hourly wage earned by all individuals who obtained competitive employment outcomes. The percentage of transition-age youth served by DVR increased from 21.6 percent in FY 2006, to 25.1 percent in FY 2010, demonstrating continued progress toward the national combined agency average of35.6 percent in FY 2010. In addition, employment outcomes achieved by transition-age youth increased slightly from 21.5 percent in FY 2006 to 24.4 percent in FY 2010. The average wage for all individuals who achieved an employment outcomerose by $2.02 from $10.37 in FY 2006, to $12.40 in FY 2010, slightly above the national average of $11.33 for combined agencies.
DVR maintained performance above the national average in several areas. The percentage of those whose earnings were above the threshold of substantial gainful activityas defined by the Social Security Administration remained relatively stable from FY 2006 to FY 2010, above the national average of 62 percent. The percentage of individuals with competitive employment outcomes working 35 hours or more in FY 2010 was 52 percent compared to the national average for combined agencies of 49.2 percent. In summary, DVR performed better than the national average on a number of indicators RSA generally uses to measure the quality of employment outcomes.
Trends Indicating Potential Risk to the Performance of the VR Program
During the five-year period between FY 2006 and FY 2010, DVR experienced several trends that indicate potential risk to VR program performance. The percentage of individuals who were determined eligible but exited the VR program prior to receiving services increased from 22.7 percent in FY 2006, to 29.6 percent in FY 2010, slightly higher than the national combined agency average of 29.0 percent in FY 2010. The percentage of individualswho received VR services from DVR under an individualized plan for employment (IPE)decreased from 56.2 percent in FY 2006, to 50.3 percent in FY 2010, lower than the national average for combined VR agenciesof 55.5 percent.
DVR experienced a significant overall decline in the percentage of individuals who achieved an employment outcome in the five years charted in Table 2.1. Total employment outcomes decreased from 40.9 percent in FY 2006,to 28.2 percent in FY 2010. The overall percentage of eligible individuals who did not achieve successful employment increased from 15.3 percent in FY 2006, to 22.1 percent in FY 2010, though this percentage remained below that for all combined agencies as shown above. As demonstrated in Table 2.1, the percentage of all individuals who received services under an IPE that exited with employmentdeclined from 72.75 percent in FY 2006, to 56.10 percent in FY 2010, although this remains above the 50.9 percent average for all combined agencies in that year. Similarly, a decrease occurred in the percentage of individuals who received employer-provided medical benefits from 33.4 percent in FY 2006, to 25.5 percent in FY 2010. Both figures, however, remain slightly above the averages for all combined agencies in FY 2010.
Throughout the course of the review, RSA discussed with DVR both the positive performance trends and those that posed potential risk to the VR program. DVR indicated its intent to conduct further analyses to determine the factors contributing to its performance related to the number and percentage of individuals exiting the VR service delivery system following application, the total number and percentage of individuals not determined eligible, and the total number and percentage of individuals exiting after eligibility prior to receiving services. DVR cited several explanations for the performance trends, including:
- premature referrals;
- lack of timely IPE development;
- delays in vocational assessment associated with restrictive policies related to professional qualifications of medical and psychological assessment providers, resulting in a dearth of such providers;
- the loss of transition coordinator positions in many local school districts;
- a recurring vacancy in the DVR transition consultant position; and
- the large geographic areas that must be covered by limited numbers of VR counselors serving transition-age students.
RSA and DVR were in agreement that continued analysis of variables that may contribute to individuals exiting from the VR program at various points in the service delivery process may assist the agency to serve more individuals and improve its employment rate.
Fiscal Analysis
The Agency Fiscal Profile data are based on the SF-269 and SF-425 reports submitted by the agency.
Fiscal Analysis
Table 2.2
Wyoming Fiscal Performance Data for Federal FY 2007 through Federal FY 2011
Grant amount per MIS / 4th / 8,519,853 / 9,058,438 / 8,832,136 / 8,912,009 / 8,920,659
Latest/ Final* / 8,519,823 / 9,058,438 / 8,832,163 / 8,912,009
Total outlays / 4th / 10,276,811 / 11,120,106 / 10,871,093 / 11,324,027 / 11,269,562
Latest/ Final* / 10,276,811 / 11,224,028 / 10,897,575 / 11,236,813
Total unliquidated obligations / 4th / 1,800,334 / 1,830,893 / 1,650,130 / 1,735,818 / 1,709,406
Latest/ Final* / - / - / - / -
Federal Share of Total Outlays / 4th / 6,967,145 / 7,617,525 / 7,533,511 / 7,540,517 / 7,423,281
Latest/ Final* / 8,087,850 / 8,833,310 / 8,576,392 / 8,843,372
Federal share of unliquidated obligations / 4th / 1,416,863 / 1,440,913 / 1,298,652 / 1,371,492 / 1,445,864
Latest/ Final* / - / - / - / -
Total federal share / 4th / 8,384,008 / 9,058,438 / 8,832,163 / 8,912,009 / 8,869,145
Latest/ Final* / 8,087,850 / 8,833,310 / 8,576,392 / 8,843,372
Recipient funds / 4th / 1,885,644 / 2,061,668 / 2,038,930 / 2,412,018 / 2,400,417
Latest/ Final* / 2,188,961 / 2,390,718 / 2,321,183 / 2,393,441
Recipient share of unliquidated obligations / 4th / 383,471 / 389,980 / 351,478 / 364,326 / 263,542
Latest/ Final* / - / - / - / -
Agency actual match (total recipient share) / 4th / 2,269,115 / 2,451,648 / 2,390,408 / 2,412,018 / 2,400,417
Latest/ Final* / 2,188,961 / 2,390,718 / 2,321,183 / 2,393,441
Agency required match / 4th / 1,885,644 / 2,061,668 / 2,038,930 / 2,040,826 / 2,009,096
Latest/ Final* / 2,188,961 / 2,390,718 / 2,321,184 / 2,393,441
Over/under match / 4th / -383,471 / -389,980 / -351,478 / -371,192 / -391,321
Latest/ Final* / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0
MOE** / 4th
Latest/ Final* / 2,321,183 / 2,393,441
Unobligated funds qualifying for carryover / 4th / 135,845 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 51,514
Latest/ Final* / 432,003 / 225,128 / 225,771 / 68,637
Total program income realized / 4th / 110,517 / 88,124 / 72,876 / 255,853 / 115,708
Latest/ Final* / 110,517 / 88,124 / 72,876 / 255,853
Total indirect costs / 4th / 683,209 / 978,580 / 777,219 / 632,772 / 980,233
Latest/ Final* / 670,229 / 965,477 / 770,185 / 627,461
*Denotes Final or Latest SF-269 or SF-425 Submitted
** Based upon Final or Latest SF-269 or SF-425 Submitted
RSA reviewed fiscal performance data from FY 2007 through FY 2011. Based on the data in the table above, the agency met its match requirement in each of the years reviewed using state appropriations. The agency’s carry-over increased from $135,845 in FY 2007 to $432,003 in FY 2008, representing an increase from 1.6 percent to 5 percent of the total federal award. For FY 2007 through FY 2011, the agency continued to report large amounts of carry-over after the fourth quarter. Carry-over levels fluctuated from a low of $68,637 in FY 2010 to a high of $432,003 in FY 2007. The agency reported both liquidated non-federal and federal funds with $0 in unliquidated obligations in either category from FY 2007 through FY 2011. The agency met its maintenance of effort requirements, both as an agency and on a statewide basis for the period reviewed.
Section 3: Emerging Practices
While conducting the monitoring of the VR program, the review team collaborated with DVR, the SRC, the TACE, and agency stakeholders to identify emerging practices in the following areas:
- strategic planning;
- program evaluation and quality assurance practices;
- financial management;
- human resource development;
- transition;
- the partnership between the VR agency and SRC;
- the improvement of employment outcomes, including supported employment and self-employment;
- VR agency organizational structure; and
- outreach to unserved and underserved individuals.
RSA considers emerging practices to be operational activities or initiatives that contribute to successful outcomes or enhance VR agency performance capabilities. Emerging practices are those that have been successfully implemented and demonstrate the potential for replication by other VR agencies. Typically, emerging practices have not been evaluated as rigorously as "promising," "effective," "evidence-based," or "best" practices, but still offer ideas that work in specific situations.
As a result of its monitoring activities, RSA identified the emerging practicebelow.
Transition
To enhance communication and the exchange of information related to the provision of transition services in a state where the vast geographic area inhibits regular face-to-face interaction, DVR permits its transition counselors to use Google Groups. This method of communication provides counselors in all areas of Wyoming the opportunity to come together online to communicate confidentially and securely, making the best use of available resources to better provide services to individuals receiving VR services. Google Groups allows counselors to communicate and post important information, new legislation or other pertinent information that is useful to all counselors. Counselors discuss how issues and challenges are addressed in different areas, brainstorm ideas and share techniques for providing services when working with schools, communities and colleges.
Additionally, the high demand on each individual counselor’s time makes conference calling difficult to coordinate and Google Groups offers an effective alternative. Its e-mail notification allows the counselors to follow discussions and respond in their own time.
To ensure confidentiality, Google Groups is password protectedand accessible to Wyoming VR counselors by invitation only, requiring permission to add a member to the group. As a further security measure, counselors do not reveal any specificpersonallyidentifiable information regarding individuals receiving services.