Short running title: Nitrate concentration of groundwater[A1]
Nitrate concentration of groundwater and its association with livestock farming in Miyakonojo Basin, southern Kyushu, Japan[A2]
Taro Kibana[A3]1, Hanako Himuka1and[A4] Ichiro Ebino2
1 Faculty of Agriculture, Xxxx University, Miyazaki, Japan[A5]
2 Faculty of Agriculture, Zzzz University, Miyazaki, Japan
Correspondence
Ichiro Ebino, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki889-2192, Japan.[A6]
Email:
Tel & fax: +81 (0)xxx xx xxxx
Abstract[A7]
Nitrate concentration of groundwater was surveyed in 741 wells in 10 districts in central Miyakonojo Basin, southern Kyushu, Japan, to determine the nitrate status in the region and to examine its association with livestock farming. Nitrate-N concentration averaged 5.4 mg L–1[A8], with 13% of the wells exceeding the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water (10 mg L–1). Wells possessed by farmers had a higher maximum (48.6 vs. 27.6 mg L–1), mean (7.4 vs. 3.6 mg L–1) and percentage above the MCL (23 vs. 5%) than those possessed by non-farmers. Occurrence of nitrate in groundwater varied not only with the ownership of wells but also among the districts (mean nitrate-N concentration = 3.0–[A9]8.6 mg L–1, percentage above the MCL = 0–32%). The mean nitrate-N concentration of individual districts was positively correlated with both excretal nitrogen output from livestock (r = 0.725, P = 0.018) and excretal nitrogen load to farmland (r = 0.864, P = 0.001). The results show that groundwater quality in central Miyakonojo Basin was considerably deteriorated mainly in farmers’ wells, with livestock farming as a responsible source of nitrate contamination.
Keywords[A10]
Animal waste; farmland; groundwater;nitrate pollution;nitrogen load.
Introduction
Nitrogen[A11] is essential to life and plays a fundamental role as a major nutrient in global ecosystems. However, for the last few decades, there has been an increasing world-wide awareness that nitrogen from agricultural activities is largely responsible for environmental degradation such as eutrophicationin streams and lakes, nitrate pollution in groundwater and globalwarming via nitrous oxide (N2O). Nitrate pollution in groundwater is taken as a most serious problem because of its direct adverse effect on human health.
Ingestion[A12] of excess nitrate in drinking water causes methemoglobinemia in infants under 6 (or 12) months of age (i.e. blue baby syndrome), and can be fatal (Addiscott[A13]et al.[A14]1990; [A15]Follett et al. 1991, [A16]1993). ···
Materials and methods[A17]
Study site
The study was conducted in 10 districts (Yokoichi, Isoichi, Tsumagaoka, Iwayoshi, Komatsubara, Himegi, Shounai, Okimizu, Shiwachi and Nakagou) in the central Miyakonojo Basin, southern Kyushu, Japan (Figure[A18] 1). Livestock farming is the major industry of this region, comprising beef and dairy cattle (mostly housed), pigs and broiler chickens.
Major land use of the region is ···
Measurements of nitrate concentration of well water
Water samples were collected in November–December 1997 from 741 wells (farmers’possessions = 358, non-farmers’possessions = 383) in the 10 districts. The sampling depth (not necessarily equal to well depth) was also recorded. These wells, accounting for 19% of wells in the whole 10 districts (Miyakonojo City Office, personal communication), were chosen as randomly as possible from wells whose owners gave permission to sample from them. The numbers of sampled wells (farmers’ and non-farmers’ possession) were: 61 (47 and 14, respectively) in Yokoichi; 79 (51 and 28) in Isoichi; 31 (8 and 23) in Tsumagaoka; 66 (14 and 52) in Iwayoshi; 62 (10 and 52) in Komatsubara; 90 (15 and 75) in Himegi; 91 (57 and 34) in Shounai; 78 (14 and 64) in Okimizu; 133 (106 and 27) in Shiwachi; and 50 (36 and 14) in Nakagou. Concentrations of nitrate and nitrite in the samples were determined by ion chromatography.
Results[A19]
Nitrate concentration of well water
Although nitrate toxicity is attributable to nitrite formed by reduction of nitrate, nitrite is unstable and is found only at low concentrations in nature. Therefore, to express toxicity of water, nitrate concentration is generally used instead of the total concentration of nitrate and nitrite. In fact, using ion chromatography in the present study, we detected no nitrite in groundwater samples.
Across all wells in the 10 districts ···
Excretal nitrogen output from livestock and excretal nitrogen load to farmland
Annual excretal nitrogen output from livestock in the 10 districts ranged from 21 to 1,763 t yr–1, being highest in Shiwachi (1,763 t yr–1) and lowest in Komatsubara (21 t yr–1) (Table 3). Nitrogen output was closely related to animal population (AU) in the district (Pearson’s r = 0.999, P = 0.000; Figure 5), reflecting in part the calculation of nitrogen output. The intercept (6.2) of the linear regression equation was not significantly different from zero (P = 0.583). The slope showed that one animal unit excreted 0.066 t nitrogen per annum.
Annual excretal nitrogen load to farmland ···
Discussion
The present study measured nitrate concentrations only once (November–December; no seasonal replications) in 1997 (Figures[A20] 2–4) and related them to livestock farming at that time (Tables 2–3, Figures 5–6). One may therefore have four major questions about the study. Do the data appropriately show the nitrate status of the region in 1997? Have the nitrate concentrations remained unchanged thereafter? Why did a considerable time lag exist between the data collection and publication of the paper? What is the value of the study showing such old data?
With regard to the first two questions ···
Conclusions
The results of the present study show that groundwater quality in central Miyakonojo Basin was considerably polluted by nitrate mainly in farmers’ wells, with livestock farming as a responsible source of nitrate contamination.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to xxx for cooperation during the study and xxx for reviewing the paper.
References[A21]
Addiscott TM, Whitmore AP, Powlson DS (1991) Farming, Fertilizers and the Nitrate Problem. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Barnes CJ, Jacobson G, Smith GD (1992) The origin of high-nitrate ground waters in the Australian arid zone. J Hydrol 137: 181–197.
Colleen SB, Kaneene JB (1993) The effect of nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds on animal health. Vet Hum Toxicol 35: 237–253.
Environmental Agency (2000) Report on Groundwater Quality (1999). Environmental Agency, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese.)
Follett RF, Keeney DR, Cruse RM (eds) (1991) Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability. Soil Science Society of America, Inc, Madison, USA.
Hidaka S (1987) Groundwater pollution in the Kushibiki plateau. In: Research on the Conservation of Water Quality in the Agroecosystem. Report of the Agriculture,Forestry and Fisheries Research Council, Tokyo, Japan, 46–53. (In Japanese.)
Kawashima H (1996) Food supply and the nitrogen cycle in Japan. J Soc Environm Sci, Japan 9: 27–33. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
1
Table 1[A22] Land use (ha) in the 10 districts in central Miyakonojo Basin (Miyakonojo City 1993)[A23]District / Farmland / Forest / Others / Total
Paddy / Upland / Others / Residential / Commercial / Industrial
Yokoichi / 160.9 / 370.1 / 31.6 / 124.9 / 145.8 / 12.4 / 5.2 / 850.9
Isoichi / 185.0 / 412.9 / 44.9 / 207.0 / 239.7 / 24.8 / 8.5 / 1122.8
Tsumagaoka / 185.3 / 59.5 / 2.2 / 3.2 / 192.7 / 35.5 / 7.5 / 485.9
Iwayoshi / 183.5 / 82.6 / 8.6 / 7.3 / 190.4 / 46.5 / 32.9 / 551.8
Komatsubara / 68.3 / 115.9 / 14.1 / 17.9 / 118.4 / 58.7 / 21.1 / 414.4
Himegi / 161.7 / 85.3 / 4.4 / 42.6 / 164.9 / 52.2 / 24.9 / 536.0
Shounai / 638.1 / 630.7 / 50.8 / 835.6 / 188.6 / 16.7 / 5.7 / 2366.2
Okimizu / 793.4 / 156.5 / 7.1 / 23.5 / 180.9 / 58.0 / 86.5 / 1305.9
Shiwachi / 635.4 / 847.5 / 23.0 / 548.5 / 199.3 / 15.6 / 35.9 / 2305.2
Nakagou / 555.9 / 976.0 / 45.7 / 5330.0 / 241.8 / 12.6 / 11.7 / 7173.7
1
Table 2 Livestock population in the 10 districts in central Miyakonojo BasinYear / District / Beef cattle / Dairy cattle / Pigs / Laying hens / Broilers / AU†
1995[A24] / A / 919 / 242(206)‡ / 5044(581)§ / 17308 / 50506 / 2848
B / 988 / 454(308) / 10990(1103) / 145337 / 54494 / 5638
C / 349 / 785(554) / 4(4) / 0 / 0 / 1135
2000 / A / 328 / 283(188) / 22(6) / 2000 / 0 / 635
B / 239 / 82(68) / 65(55) / 0 / 0 / 334
C / 389 / 154(107) / 56(50) / 0 / 83000 / 1384
2005 / A / 1546 / 620(495) / 3425(387) / 0 / 35000 / 3201
B / 4242 / 1785(1457) / 87337(8720) / 49100 / 273900 / 26724
C / 3157 / 806(648) / 40383(4442) / 0 / 475800 / 16798
†[A25]Animal unit (cattle = 1, pigs = 0.2, hens and broilers = 0.01).[A26]
‡Adult cows (≥ 2 years old).
§Female pigs for breeding.
1
Figure legends
Figure 1 Location of Miyakonojo Basin and 10 districts in the central Basin.[A27]
Figure 2 Frequency distribution of nitrate-N concentration of well water in central Miyakonojo Basin (data pooled over the 10 districts). SD denotes standard deviation.
Figure 3 Relationship between nitrate-N concentration and depth of well water (sampled depth) in central Miyakonojo Basin (data pooled over the 10 districts). r denotes Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Symbols show A (○), B (●), C (△), D (▲), E (▽), F (▼), G (□), H (■), I (◇) and J (◆).[A28]
1
Kibana et al. Figure 1
Kibana et al. Figure 2
Kibana et al. Figure 3
1
[A1]A short running title should comprise less than 40 characters.
[A2]Please start only the first word and proper nouns in the title with uppercase letters. A full stop (.) is not necessary at the end of the title.
[A3]First name and family name.
[A4]Please use ‘and’ between the last two authors.
[A5]No detailed address is needed for the authors; only division, organization, city, country should be supplied. State, prefecture or county can be inserted between city and country, if necessary.
[A6]Detailed address is necessary for the correspondence.
[A7]Please provide an abstract in 200–300 wordsor fewer on a separate page (100–150 wordsor fewer for short report).
[A8]Units should be expressed using an exponent, e.g. kg ha–1, not using a slash (kg/ha). Please use an en dash (–), not a hyphen (-), for the minus sign.
[A9]Please use an en dash (–), not a hyphen (-), for expressing the range of values.
[A10]Five or fewer key words in alphabetical order (three or fewer for short report).
[A11]No indention is necessary for the first paragraph after each heading.
[A12]Indention is necessary from the second paragraph onward after each heading.
[A13]References should be placed in order of the year of publication.
[A14]The name(s) of author(s) and the year of publication should be separated by a space (not a comma).
[A15]Please use a semicolon (;) between references with different authors.
[A16]Please use a comma (,) for different years.
[A17]Please start only the first word of each heading with an uppercase letter.
[A18]‘Figure’ (not Fig.).
[A19]The ‘Results’ and ‘Discussion’ sections may be combined as ‘Results and discussion’ (please start only the first word with an uppercase letter.).
[A20]‘Figures’ (not Figs.).
[A21]Please study author guidelines at the website ( for the style of the reference list.
[A22]Please turn on the grid lines showing to study the table examples on this and the next pages. Please provide a table as a text; i.e. please do not paste a table as a graphic from a spreadsheet software (e.g. Excel).
[A23]A full stop (.) is not necessary at the end of the title of a table.
[A24]Please align on the top line in each group.
[A25]Footnote symbols: †, ‡, §, ¶, should be used (in that order) and *, **, *** should be reserved for P-values.
[A26]A full stop (.) is necessary at the end of each footnote.
[A27]A full stop (.) is necessary at the end of the figure caption.
[A28]Please do not use Japanese or other Asian fonts for symbols. Please copy and use these symbols if needed.