Electronic supplementary material
LifeCycleSustainabilityAssessment
Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 2: improved extension theory
Jingzheng Ren 1,2 • Xusheng Ren3 • Hanwei Liang1 • Liang Dong1,4,5 • Long Zhang6 • Xiao Luo7,8 • Yingkui Yang9 • Zhiqiu Gao10*
Received: 2 May 2016 / Accepted: 7 December 2016
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Responsible editor: AdisaAzapagic
1Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster, School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2Centre for Sustainable Engineering Operations Management, Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
3School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, 400044 Chongqing, China
4CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
5Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba-City, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
6School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
7College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, No.1239, Siping road, Shanghai, China
8Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute, No. 1111, North Zhongshan road, Shanghai, China
9Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Niels BohrsVej 9, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
10State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Jingzheng Ren
;
Zhiqiu Gao
Appendix A
Table A1 The interval comparison matrix of the four aspects in the first hierarchy
Economic / Technological / Social / EnvironmentEconomic / 1 / <1,2>,<2,3>,<2,3>
<2,3>,<3,4> / <3,5>,<3,4>,<5,7>,<2,3>,<3,5> / <3,4>,<4,6>,<4,6>,<2,3>,<3,5>
Technological / <1/3,1/2>,<1/2,1>,<1/4,1/3>,<1/2,1>,<1/4,1/2> / 1 / <1,2>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<3,4>,<1,3> / <1,2>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<3,4>
Social / <1/5,1/4>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/5,1/3>,<1/7,1/6>,<1/5,1/3> / <1/2,1>,<1/2,1>,<1/4,1/3>,<1/3,1>,<1/2,1> / 1 / <1,2>,<2,3>,<1,2>,<1,2>,<1,2>,,<1,3>
Environment / <1/4,1/3>,<1/5,1/3>,<1/6,1/4>,<1/4,1/3>,<1/5,1/3> / <1/2,1>,<1/3,1>,<1/2,1/3>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1> / <1/2,1>,<1/3,1>,<1/2,1>,<1/4,1/2>,<1/3,1/2> / 1
(a1)
(a2)
(a3)
(a4)
CI=0.03 (a5)
CR=0.04<0.1 (a6)
(a7)
(a8)
(a9)
Table A2 The average deviation of the weights of the four aspects
Aspect / Environment / Technological / Social / EconomicThe deviation / 0.00260 / 0.00086 / 0.00031 / -0.0037
Table A3 The average weights of the four aspects
Aspect / Environment / Technological / Social / EconomicWeighting coefficient / 0.4625 / 0.2571 / 0.1573 / 0.1231
Table A4 The interval comparison matrix of the three indicators in the economic aspect
IC / NPV / IRRIC / 1 / <1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/2,1/4>,<1/2,1> / <1,2>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<1,2>,<2,3>
NPV / <1,3>,<1,2>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<1,3> / 1 / <2,4>,<2,3>,<3,5>,<3,4>,<2,4>
IRR / <1/4,1/2>,<1/2,1>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1/2> / <1/4,1/2>,<1/4,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/4,1/3>,<1/4,1/2> / 1
(a10)
(a11)
(a12)
(a13)
CI=0 (a14)
CI=0<0.1 (a15)
(a16)
(a17)
(a18)
(a19)
Table A5 The average weights of the three indicators
Indicator / IC / NPV / IRRWeights / 0.2767 / 0.5684 / 0.1549
Table A6 The interval comparison matrix of the three aspects in the social aspect
ILC / AJILC / 1 / <1/2,1>,<1/3,1>,<1/2,1>,<1/3,1/2<1/2,1>,
AJ / <1,2>,<1,3>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<2,3> / 1
(a20)
(a21)
(a22)
(a23)
CI=0 (a24)
CI=0<0.1 (a25)
(a26)
(a27)
(a28)
(a29)
(a30)
Table A7 The interval comparison matrix of the three aspects in the environment aspect
PCOP / GWP / APPCOP / 1 / <1/2,1>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/2,1>,<1/2,1/3>,<1/2,1> / <1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/4,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/3,1/2>
GWP / <1,2>,<1,2>,<2,3>,<2,3>,<1,2> / 1 / <1/2,1>,<1/3,1>,<1/3,1/2>,<1/4,1/3>,<1/4,1/2>
AP / <2,3>,<1,3>,<2,4>,<1,2>,<2,3> / <1,2>,<1,2>,<2,3>,<1,3>,<1,2> / 1
(a31)
(a32)
(a33)
(a34)
CI=0.00005 (a35)
CI=0.000086<0.1 (a36)
(a37)
(a38)
(a39)
(a40)
Table A8 The average weighting coefficients of the three indicators in environment aspect
Indicator / PCOP / GWP / APWeights / 0.1900 / 0.2955 / 0.5146