Submission totheVictorianGovernment
VictorianInquiryin to theLabourHireIndustryand InsecureWork
27November2015
ABOUT THEHOUSINGINDUSTRYASSOCIATION...... 2
1.INTRODUCTION...... 3
2.THERESIDENTIALCONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRY...... 5
3.LABOURHIRE...... 6
4.INSECUREWORK...... 8
5.REGULATORY POWERS...... 14
HousingIndustryAssociationcontact:GilKing
ExecutiveDirector-VictoriaHousingIndustryAssociation70JolimontStreet
EastMelbourneVIC3002Phone:0392808200
-i-
ABOUTTHEHOUSING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
TheHousingIndustryAssociation(HIA)isAustralia’sonlynationalindustryassociationrepresentingtheinterestsof theresidentialbuildingindustry,includingnewhomebuilders,renovators,tradecontractors,landdevelopers,relatedbuildingprofessionals,andsuppliers andmanufacturersofbuildingproducts.
Asthevoiceoftheindustry,HIArepresentssome40,000memberbusinessesthroughoutAustralia.Theresidentialbuildingindustryincludes landdevelopment,detachedhomeconstruction,homerenovations,low/medium-densityhousing,high-riseapartmentbuildingsandbuildingproductmanufacturing.
HIAmemberscompriseadiversityofresidentialbuilders,includingtheHousing100volumebuilders,smalltomediumbuildersandrenovators,residentialdevelopers,tradecontractors,majorbuildingproductmanufacturersandsuppliersandconsultantstotheindustry.HIAmembersconstructover85percentof the nation’snew housingstock.
HIAexiststoservicethebusinessesitrepresents,lobbyforthebestpossiblebusinessenvironmentforthebuildingindustryandtoencouragearesponsibleandqualitydriven,affordableresidentialbuildingdevelopmentindustry.HIA’s missionisto:
“promotepoliciesandprovideserviceswhichenhanceourmembers’businesspractices,productsandprofitability,consistentwiththehigheststandardsofprofessionalandcommercialconduct.”
TheresidentialbuildingindustryisoneofAustralia’smostdynamic,innovativeandefficientserviceindustriesandisakeydriveroftheAustralianeconomy.Theresidentialbuildingindustryhasawidereachintomanufacturing,supply,andretailsectors.
TheaggregateresidentialindustrycontributiontotheAustralianeconomyisover$150billionperannum,withoveronemillionemployeesinbuildingandconstruction,tensofthousandsofsmallbusinesses,and over200,000sub-contractors reliantonthe industryfor theirlivelihood.
HIAdevelopsandadvocatespolicyonbehalfofmemberstofurtheradvancenewhomebuildingandrenovating,enablingmemberstoprovideaffordableandappropriatehousingtothegrowingAustralianpopulation.NewpolicyisgeneratedthroughagrassrootsprocessthatstartswithlocalandregionalmembercommitteesbeforeprogressingtotheAssociation’sNationalPolicyCongressbywhichtimeithaspassedthroughalmost1,000setsofhands.
Policydevelopmentissupportedbyanongoingprocessofcollectingandanalysingdata,forecasting,andprovidingindustrydataandinsightsformembers, thegeneralpublic andon acontractbasis.
TheAssociationoperatesofficesin23centresaroundthenationprovidingawiderangeofadvocacyandbusinesssupport,includingservicesandproductstomembers,technicalandcomplianceadvice,trainingservices,contractsandstationary,industryawardsforexcellence,andmemberonlydiscountsongoodsandservices.
1.INTRODUCTION
HIAwelcomestheopportunitytorespondtotheVictorianGovernment’sinquiryintotheLabourHireIndustryandInsecureWork (Inquiry).
HIAnotesthattheinquirywasannouncedinSeptembertoexaminethepracticesoflabourhirecompaniesandinvestigateinstancesofshamcontracting,phoenixactivityandinsecureworkinVictoria.
ABackgroundPaperentitled‘VictorianInquiryintotheLabourHireIndustryandInsecureWork’(BackgroundPaper)wassubsequently releasedinOctober.
Asageneralcomment,whilstHIArespectstheVictorianGovernment’s prerogative toinquireintothistopic,manyoftheseissueshavealreadybeenconsideredinrecentyears1andtheindustrialterms,conditionsandprotectionsforworkersarematterslargelycoveredbyfederalstatutesandthemodernawards.HIAadditionallynotesthataministerialworkinggrouponvulnerablevisaworkerschairedbyEmploymentMinisterMichaeliaCashisconsidering licensingoflabourhirecompaniesaspartofitsdeliberations.2
HIA’ssubmissiontotheInquiryrelatetotheresidentialconstructionindustry,whichreliesoncontractingandlabourhireworkarrangements,inadditiontodirectemploymenttobuildandrenovate thestate’sprivatedwellingstock.
1.1GENERALCOMMENTS
Independentcontractingisaquintessentialfeatureoftheresidentialconstructionindustry.
HIAestimatesthatindependenttradecontractorsperformupto80percentoftheconstructionworkthatoccursonadetachedhousingsite.Thissubcontractsystemcontributesstronglytotheefficiency,adaptabilityandcost-competitivenessofthehousingindustry.
Fortheirpart,contractorsinthehousingindustryareessentiallysmallbusinesspersonsworkingforthemselves.Theydonotwishtobeemployeesandmostarenotmembersofunionseventhoughtheyhave theright tobe.
Tothisend,HIAisdisappointedthattheInquiryislargelypremisedonanassumptionthatindependentcontractingandlabourhirearrangementsareinferiorto(andlesslegitimatethan) directemployment.
HIAparticularlydisagreeswiththecharacterisationofnon-permanentworkarrangementssuchaslabourhire,independentcontractingandthoseholdingworkingvisasas‘insecurework’.Assessingnon-permanentworkarrangementsthroughthisprismismisconceivedandanimproperbasisthroughwhichtoassessorconsiderthevariousformsofworkarrangementsthatcurrentlyprevail.Theterm‘insecurework’isnotalegaltermand,as
outlinedwithintheBackgroundPaper,itis‘notaclearlydefinedconcept’.GainingprominencethroughtheACTU’sIndependentInquiryintoInsecureWork,itisatermofartdesignedto drive a certainviewofnon-permanentworkarrangements.
Similarly,termssuchasdependantcontractoraddnothingtounderstandingthenature,reasonandextentofnon-permanentworkarrangements.
HIAdoesnotsupportshamcontracting.Againhoweverthisisanareaofconfusionand,attimes,misrepresentation.Althoughshamcontractingiswhereemployees,atfactandlaw,areforcedintoservicecontractsoraredeliberatelymislabelledascontractors,ithasbeenfalselycharacterisedovertheyearstobe“dependentcontracting”and“labouronly”subcontracting.
HIAsupportsstronglawsandpenaltiesapplyingagainstbusinessesandindividualsthatevadetheirlegalobligationsbutHIAisunawareofsignificantissueswithintheVictorianresidentialconstructionindustrytojustifyfurther reforminthisalready highly regulatedarea.
Forinstance,therecentFairWorkOmbudsmanauditofresidentialbuildingbusinessesthroughoutAustralia,includingVictoria,failedtofindprimafacieevidenceof“shamcontracting”.
HIAacknowledgesthattherecanbeconfusionoverworkerstatus.TheBackgroundPaperreferencesthe variousVictorianand Commonwealthlegislationthatregulatesworker’srightsandentitlementsbutfailstonoteorobservethatoneoftheproblemsdrivingtheambiguityastoaworker’sstatusisthedivergenttreatmentandconflictingdefinitionsofwhoisacontractor/employee/workerunder the variouslegislation.
WhilsttheCommonwealthFairWorkAct2009(the‘Act’)reliesonthecommonlaw,theprogressiveuseofdeemingprovisionsinstatebasedlegislationforpayrolltaxandworkerscompensation(andotherpurposes)thatdeemindependentcontractorstobeemployeeswhentheyarenot,hascreatedconfusion,costanduncertainty.
InHIA’ssubmission,ratherthanundermineindependentcontracting,governmentpoliciesshouldrespectandpromotethechoiceofindividualstooffertheirservicesasanindependentbusiness.SuchmeasureswouldboostproductivityandcompetitivenessoftheVictorianbuildingindustry andprovidebenefitstothecommunityingeneral.
ThebalanceofHIA’s submissiontotheInquiryaddressesthefollowingmatters:
- AsnapshotoftheresidentialconstructionindustryandthecontributionitmakestotheVictorianeconomy;
- Labourhirearrangements inthe industry;
- ‘Insecurework’and ‘shamcontracting’;and
- ThelimitationsofVictoria’slegislativepowersoverindustrialrelationsandrelatedmattersandthecapacitytoregulatethesematters.
2.THERESIDENTIALCONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRY
The buildingindustryrepresentsanimportantcomponentoftheVictorianeconomy.
In2014/15privatedwellinginvestmentrepresented6.3%percentofGrossStateProductinVictoria(AustralianBureauofStatistics[ABS]5220.0).However,whencombinedwiththoseprimaryandsecondarybusinessesthatindirectlysupplytotheconstructionindustry,theoverallimpactonresidentialbuildinginvestmentisfarstrongerintermsofbothstateemploymentandproductivityoutput.Thisflow-onimpactisreferredtoasthemultipliereffect.
IndependentresearchbytheCentreforInternationalEconomics(CIE)showsthatforevery
$1increaseinconstructionactivity,GDPwillriseby$4.75asaresult.Thisclearlyhaspositiveimplicationsforemploymentattheeconomywidelevel.Theeconomicbenefitsofincreasesinconstructionactivityareevengreaterinsituationssuchasthecurrentonewhere the economyisnotatfullemployment.
Intermsofemployment,anextra$1millionofconstructionexpendituregenerates9constructionjobs.Theinitialeffectoftheadditional$1millionworthofconstructionis9positionsinconstruction-relatedfields,suchascarpenters,bricklayers,plasterers,etc.Inadditiontothisinitialeffecttherearealsoproductioninducedeffectsgenerating7jobsacrossthosebusinessesmanufacturingthematerialsneededfortheadditionalconstruction,suchasconcreteandsteelframes,andthosebusinessessupplyingandservicingtheconcreteandsteelframebusinesses,suchasaggregatequarryingandrawsteelproduction.
Inotherwords,overandabovethedirectcontributionofconstructionactivitytotheeconomy, the constructionindustryhas'flow-on'impactsontheactivities ofother industries.
Thecyclicalandprojectnatureoftheresidentialconstructionindustrydemandsflexibleformsofengagement.Businesses,particularlysmallbusiness,mustbeagiletorespondtoexternalmarketforcesand“down” cycles wherethereis alullinconstructionactivity.Operatinginaverycompetitivemarketwherelowprofitmarginsaremaintained,itisunworkableforthesefirmstomaintainfulltime,directlyengagedworkforces.Projectbasedengagementbyitsverynaturerequires‘non-permanent’workarrangements.
OfnoteisABSdataon(nationwide)dwellingcommencementsdemonstratingthesecircumstances, forexample3:
- Between December 2003 and March 2005 dwelling commencements
decreasedby15.3%;
- BetweenJune2009andJune2010dwellingscommencements
increasedby52%;
- BetweenJuneandDecember2012dwellingcommencementsdecreased
by18.1%;however
- Between March 2012 and September 2014 dwelling commencements
increasedby59.3%.
3SeeABS8752.0 -Building Activity,Australia
3.LABOURHIRE
Thetermsofreferencerefertotheextent,natureandconsequenceoflabourhireemploymentinVictoria,includingbutnotlimited to:
i.the employmentstatusofworkersengagedby labourhirecompanies;
ii.the use oflabour hireinparticularindustriesand/orregions;
iii.the useandimpactoflabourhirearrangementsin thesupplychainsofparticularsectors,andtherolesandresponsibilitiesofvariousentitiesinthosesupplychains;
iv.the applicationofindustrialrelationslawsandinstruments;
v.the legalrightsandobligationsoflabour hireemployees,companiesandhostorganisations/entitiesandanyambiguitythatexistsbetweenthem;and
vi.allegationsthatlabour hireandsham contractingarrangementsare beingused toavoidworkplacelaws,andotherstatutoryobligations,andthecurrenteffectivenessoftheenforcementofindustrialrelations,occupationalhealthandsafetyandworkerscompensationlaws.
HIArespondstotheseissuesinthe followingterms:
3.1THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF WORKERS ENGAGED BY LABOUR HIRECOMPANIES
HIAnotesthataccordingto2010ABSfigures,workerscontractedtolabourhirefirms,whoarethenhiredout toa‘host’representaround1%ofallemployed people.4
FarfromaneworemergingtypeofworkarrangementinAustralia,formanydecadeslabourhireor “on-hire” arrangements havebeeninplacein theconstructionindustry.
Theessentialqualityofalabourhirearrangementisthesplittingofcontractualandcontrolrelationships. The‘standard’arrangementis:
- theworkeratthesiteisunderthedirectionorcontrolofthehostorclientorganisationsinrelationto theperformance ofwork;
- thelabourhireagencyhasresponsibilityforthe wagesandotheron-costsofthe worker andhasadirectcontractualrelationshipwiththem;and
- theclientorhostpaysthelabourhireagencyforprovidingthelabourandthushasacontractualrelationshipwith the labour hireagency.
Thereareanumberofdifferingmodelsunderwhichworkersmaybeengagedunderlabourhirearrangementsincludinglabourhireemployeeservices;contractorservicesunder‘Odco’arrangement;and viaGroupTrainingOrganisations/Groupapprenticeshipschemes.
Undertheemployeeservicesor“onhire”model,thelabourhireagencyisemployeroftheworkerandisresponsiblefortheirentitlements.Thereisnoemploymentrelationshipbetween the hostandtheworker.
4ABSdatareferredtoin2015ProductivityCommissionInquiryintoAustralia’sWorkplaceRelationsFrameworkIssuesPaperatpg. 5
Thecontractorservicesor‘Odco’createsanindependentcontractingarrangementwheretheworkersareneitheremployeesofthelabourhireagencynorthehostbusiness,butareindependentcontractors.Thisisa legally tested andacceptedmethod ofengagement;thesekindsofarrangementswereupheldinafullFederalCourtdecision,BuildingWorkersIndustrial UnionofAustralia vOdcoPtyLtd5morethan2 decadesago.
Anotherformoflabourhire,facilitatedbygrouptrainingorganisation/groupapprenticeshipschemeshasalsoevolvedtoprovideessentialsourceofworkforcedevelopmentfortheindustry.
HIAoperatessuchascheme.Underit,apprenticesemployedbyHIAarehiredoutundercontractualarrangementstoHostTrainerswhoprovidetheactualon-the-jobtrainingtotheapprentices.
Thisisacommonarrangement,endorsedandsupportedbyallgovernments.Itallowsapprenticestoobtainandcompletetheirapprenticeshipswhilebeingexposedtoadiversityofworkopportunitiesandconstructionenvironments.Italsoallowsbuildersandcontractorstotrainapprenticeswithoutcommittingtoafull3/4yearcontractoftrainingforwhichtheremaynotbe workavailablein thefuture.
3.2THEUSEOFANDIMPACTOFLABOURHIREINTHERESIDENTIALCONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRY
Labourhireprovideseffectiveshort-termlabourtomanybuildingprojects,especiallyforspecialisedtasksandskillssetssuchasscaffoldingandexcavation.
Furtherandasreferredtoearlier,groupapprenticeshipschemesareanimportantsourceofapprenticeshipand skillsdevelopmentinthe housingindustry.
Infact,theconceptofgrouptrainingarosefromaneedexpressedbysmallbusinessemployersinthebuildingandsimilarindustrieswhofounditdifficulttocommittofixedfouryeartrainingcontracts.
GTOsareabletoplayaneffectiveroleinassistingtraineesandapprenticesfromcommencementthroughtocompletionbecausetheyhaveinplacepastoralcareandsupportmechanismsthatmay nototherwisebeinplacefordirectlyindenturedapprentices.
According toBuchananandEvesson:
‘Attheirbesttheyhelppromotedecent,sustainablework-basedlearningsituationsbyfacilitatingafairersharingoftherisksassociatedwithemploymentandskillformation.Theyareabletodothisbecausepolicyfromanearliereranurturedanetworkofgrouptrainingorganisationsbuiltaroundapracticalvocationalethic.Thisisanethicthatblendsthebestofcommercialcompetence,acommitmenttodevelopingcoherentoccupationalstructuresandanethosofcareandsupportatboththe personalandlocal level.’6
5(1991)99ALR735
6SeeJohnBuchananandJustineEvesson“Creatingmarketsordecentjobs?Grouptrainingandthefutureof work”. AustralianNationalTrainingAuthority,2004
Dependingonthetraderequiredorskillinvolved,labourhirearrangementsmaybeutilisedbythe principalcontractor/builderor tradecontractor.
Furtherandbyobservation,thevastmajorityofapprenticesinthebuildingandconstructionindustryaretakenonbycontractors.Oftenasinglepersonworkingasacontractorwillhaveoneor twodirectlyindenturedapprentices.
HIAsupportscontinuationofthecurrentsystemallowinglabourhirein thehousingindustry.
3.3THEAPPLICATIONOFINDUSTRIALRELATIONSLAWSANDTHELEGALRIGHTSANDOBLIGATIONS OF PARTIESTO LABOURHIRE ARRANGEMENTS
HIAdoesnotconsiderany ambiguityexistsin the applicationorunderstandingoflegalrightsandobligationsofworkersengagedunderlabourhirearrangementsinsofarastheconstructionindustry isconcerned.Thereisno “dual”or “joint” employmentrelationship.
Workersengagedunder labourhirearrangements(apart fromindependentcontracting/Odcoarrangements)areemployeesofthelabourhirefirm.Theseemployeesarecoveredbytherelevantmodernawardsand/orindustrialinstruments,theActandrelatedacts.Theyhaveaccessto unfair dismissalrights,anti-discriminationlawsandother rights.
Inturn,thelabourhirecompanies,astheemployer,areresponsibleforcompliancewiththerelevantindustriallaw,instrumentsandthemodernawards.Theyaresubjecttoextensiverulesandregulationsunder theselaws.
Hostcompanieswillhavecommonlawresponsibilitiesandstatutoryworkplacehealthandsafetyobligationswithrespect to workersundertheircontrol.
4.INSECUREWORK
Thetermsofreferencerefertotheextent,natureandconsequenceofotherformsofinsecureworkinVictoria,includingbutnotlimitedto:
i.theuseofworkingvisas,particularlyininsecure,lowpaid,unskilledorsemi-skilledjobsandtrades;
ii.exploitationofworkingvisaholdersandothervulnerableclassesofworkersincludingfemaleworkers;
iii.sham contractingand theuseof‘phoenix’corporatestructures;
iv.theimpactofinsecureworkonworkers,theirfamiliesandrelationships,andon thelocalcommunity,includingfinancialand housingstress;
v.the socialandeconomicimpactsforVictoria;and
vi.thewaysinwhichunscrupulousemploymentpracticescreateanunevenplayingfieldfor competingbusinesses.
HIArespondstotheseissuesinthe followingterms:
4.1THE USE OF WORKING VISAS, PARTICULARLY IN INSECURE, LOW PAID,UNSKILLED ORSEMI-SKILLEDJOBS ANDTRADES
HIAisnotawareofaproblemwiththeusageof 457workingvisasintheresidentialconstructionindustry.
Infact workersontemporary workvisas representonlya smallfractionoftotalworkersintheindustry.
RecentdataoftheDepartmentofImmigrationandBoarderProtectionindicatesthatonly340visasweregrantedtoconstructionworkersinVictoriain2014/2015whichissome3.6%oftemporary workvisasinthatstate.
4.2SHAM CONTRACTING ANDTHEUSE OF‘PHOENIX’CORPORATE STRUCTURES
Independent Contracting
TheBackgroundPaper statesthat:
‘Thekeyconsequenceofanindependentcontractingarrangementisthatmostemployment-relatedprotections,suchasminimumwages,paidleaveentitlements,regulatoryofengagementandnoticeofterminationdonotapply…Thisisappropriateforthosegenuinelyconductingtheirownenterpriseandconstructingouttheirservice…’7
HIAsubmitsthatwhiletheBackgroundPaperattemptstopresent‘allsides’onthisissue,itmissessomeofthekeyaspectsofthecontractingmodel,particularlyintheresidentialconstructionindustry.
TheAustralianeconomyisnotstatic–demandrisesandfallsovertime,insometimesveryunpredictableways.Inaboom,whendemandforbuildingworkishigh,contractorsareabletopickandchoosetheirwork,andcanobtainpremiumremuneration.Whentheeconomyisinrecession,demandfallsandcontractorsmaystruggletokeeptheirbusinessesafloat.Butanemployee(whiletheyremaininemployment)ispaidmoreorlessthesameregardlessofeconomicconditions.
That,andnotlegaldefinitions,istherealdifferencebetweencontractorsandemployees–contractorsareinbusinessandtakerisksinordertomakeaprofit(butsometimesincuraloss),whileemployeestakenorisksandreceivesteady,predictableremuneration.Fromtimetotime,contractorsreceiveless,overall,fortheireffortsthanwouldanemployeeperformingthesamework.Andfromtimetotimetheyreceiveconsiderablymore.Contractorschoosetoworkunderthesearrangementsbecausetheywanttoruntheirownbusinessesandmakemoney.Builderschoosetoengagethembecauseitisthemostcosteffectivewayofdoingmuchbuildingwork.Contractorsdonotwanttobetreatedasemployeesasitwouldeffectively limittheirincome.
It isalsoimportant tonotethatcontrarytotheobservationswithin theBackgroundPaper that‘thetraditionalmodelofongoing,fulltimeemploymenthasbeenunderchallenge’andthat‘formsofnon-permanentemploymenthavecombinedtoerodethattraditionalmodel’8adecadeagothe DepartmentofEmploymentandWorkplaceRelations (DEWR)statedintheirsubmissiontotheHouseofRepresentativesenquiryonlabourhireandindependentcontractingthatcontractarrangementsareessential to AustralianbusinessesastheyenablethemtocompetemoreeffectivelyinAustralianandinternationalmarketsandadapttochangingeconomicconditions.
Non-permanentformsofengagementarecriticalandsitalongsidesocalled‘traditionalforms’ofemployment.Havingavarietyofformsofengagementshouldbeencouragedinordertosuittheneedsofbothbusinessesandindividuals.Specificallyindependentcontractingisbasedonachoiceofworkoptions,forboththe hirerandthecontractor.
Contractingprovidessubstantialbenefitstosubcontractors,headcontractors/builders,consumersandtheeconomygenerallywhicharenotavailableusingemployeesalone.Thesebenefitsinclude:
- Higherlevelsofproductivity;
- Guaranteedhigherqualityofwork;
- Paymentbyresultswhichleadstostablecostsatgreaterrewardsforproductivity;and
- Capacityto organise worktosuitthemselves.
Independentresearchhasshownthatthe housingindustryissignificantlymoreefficientthancommercialconstruction.
TheProductivityCommissionfirstanalysedtheeffectsofrestrictiveworkpracticesinthecommercialsectorin1999whilstin2003Econtechconductedathoroughanalysisofthedifferentcoststructuresapplyinginthehousingandcommercialconstructionsectors.Econtechfoundthatthesametaskscostanaverageof10%moreinthecommercialsectorthanintheresidentialsector.Labourcostswereonaverage19%higherinthecommercialsector.Thisanalysisunderstatedtheactualcostdifferentialbyexcludingsiteallowanceswhichareaconsiderableadditionalcostforcommercialprojects.Ofspecificrelevanceisthatindustryestimatessuggestthattheimpactof siteallowancesforlargeprojectsinVictoriaisanadditional3to4%oftotalprojectcosts.Thisdatahasbeenregularlyupdated,the latestbeingin2013.
Inthosejurisdictionsmostaffectedbyrestrictiveworkpractices,namelyVictoriaandWesternAustralia,thecostdifferencebetweenthesectorsisevengreater.OfnoteisthatinVictoria,standardtaskssuchaslayingaconcreteslabcost19%moreinthecommercialsectorthanintheresidentialsector Victoriaalsohavemuchhigherrates ofindustrialdisputation,withanannualaverageofmorethan500workingdayslostperthousandemployees.
ShamContracting
8BackgroundPaperpg.11
Independentcontractorsarefoundinnearlyeveryindustryandacrossallsectors.HIAacknowledgesthattherearewidelydivergentviewsaboutwhethershamcontractingisinfactawidespreadproblembutinsofarasthehomebuildingsectorisconcerned,‘shamcontracting’isneither rifenor amajorproblem.
InNovember2011,thethenAustralianBuildingandConstructionCommissioner(ABCC)released a ReportofhisinquiryintoShamContractingintothe buildingindustry.The Reportfoundthat'shamcontracting'isnotrifeintheindustryoreven‘widespread’(contrarytoclaimsbytheCFMEU)andalsorejectedproposalsforradicalactionsuchaschangestolegislation.
Ofinterest,CFMEUclaimsmadeinits‘RacetotheBottom’publicationaresaidintheReport to beunsubstantiatedand involve a misuseofstatistics.
Theconceptofshamcontractingisfoundinthe“shamarrangement”provisionsoftheAct(ss.357-359),whichiswhereanemployerattemptstodeliberatelydisguiseanemploymentrelationshipasan independentcontractingrelationship.
These provisionsprohibitanemployer from:
- Representing to an individualthat thecontractofemploymentunderwhichtheindividualis(orwouldbe)employedbytheemployerisinfactacontractforservicesunderwhichtheindividualperforms(orwouldperform)workasanindependentcontractor (s.357(1)).
- Dismissing,orthreateningtodismiss,anemployeewhoperformsparticularworkfortheemployerinordertoengagethemasanindependentcontractortoperformthesameorsubstantiallythesame,work(s.358).
- Makingastatementtoanemployeeorformeremployeethatitknowsisfalseinordertopersuadeorinfluencetheindividualtoenterinto acontractforservicesunderwhichtheindividualwillperformthesame,orsubstantiallythe same,workasanindependentcontractor (s.359).
Undersubsection357(2)adefenceisavailabletoanemployerifatthetimetheymadetherepresentationtheydidnotknow,andwerenotrecklessasto,thetruenatureoftherelationshipi.e.whether contractwasacontractofemployment.
Failuretocomplywiththeshamarrangementprovisionsattractspotentialpenaltiesofupto
$51,000perbreachforcorporateentitiesandupto$10,200perbreachforinvolvedindividuals.
In2006,thethenWorkplaceRelationsMinisterdescribedthepurposeoftheseprovisions.Theyare:
‘aimedatpreventingemployersfromenteringintoshamcontractingarrangements
…whereanemployerseekstoavoidtakingresponsibilityforthelegalentitlements
duetoemployeesbyseekingtodisguiseasanindependentcontractingrelationshipwhatisinrealityanemploymentrelationship.’
Asnotedabove,shamcontractingismisrepresentinganemploymentarrangementasacontract for services.
Frequentlytheterm‘shamcontract’isincorrectlyusedaspejorativelabeltodescribeallthatisundesirablewhenworkisperformedbycontractorsasopposedtodirectlyemployedlabour.Shamcontractingisalsooftenconfusedwithunrelatedconceptssuchas‘hybridemployees’,‘dependentcontractor’,‘quasi-contractor’and ‘labouronlycontractor’.
Theconceptofa‘dependantcontractor’isspecificallyreferencedwithintheBackgroundPaperandisanotheracademicconstruct.TheconceptwasdevisedbyaCanadianacademicover50yearsagobutstillisnotanacceptedlegalcategory.Thegeneralthesisisthatifa self-employedpersonprovidestheirservicestoonlyone,orpredominantlyonlyone,organisationtheyrequireregulationundertheworkplacerelationsframework,whetherthe‘dependentcontractor’wantssuchregulationornot.
InarecentarticlefortheMelbourneUniversityLawJournalacademicShaeMcCrystalhasmused:
‘Whiletheirranksincludegenuinelyentrepreneurialworkers,increasinglyalsotheyincludelowpaid,lowstatusworkers,whomaybedependent’ononeengager(so-called‘dependentcontractors’),orwhomayworkforanumberofengagers(independentcontractors)butareentirelyreliantontheirownlabourtosupportthemselvesandtheir families …’
Thisreflectstheviewamongstmany“labourlaw”scholarsthatsuchself-employedworkersshouldbetreatedlikeemployeesandprovidedwithaccesstomainstreamcollectivebargainingrights.Inthiscontext,iteasytoconsiderthecontractualarrangementsofsuchworkersasa‘sham’or asanindicationofavoidanceoflabourlawprotections.
Thisargumentishowever flawedon anumberoflevels.
Ifapersonisinbusinessesinhisorherownaccountthentheyareofferinga“contractforservices”regardlessofwhether or notalloftheir incomecomesfromonlyonesource.
Furtheritisalsoagrossover-simplificationtoconcludethat,forexample,ifacontractorworksawholeyearforasingleprincipalorbuilderthattheyarereallyanemployeeandhenceshouldbetreatedlikeone.
Economicandbargainingpowerincontractingrelationshipswillvarywithsupplyanddemand,andisnotnecessarilyalwayswith the headcontractor or builder.
Far fromit;the headcontractor maybemuchmorerelianton the continued good workoftheso-called‘dependentcontractor’thanviceversa.Abuilderwhocannotgetgoodreliabletradespersonsisatthemercyofclientspointingtocompletiondatesanddamagesclauses.
Once a builderhasfoundsuchtradespersons,thebuildernaturallywantsandneedsto hangon tothem.
Thetermsonwhichthecontractorperformsworkmay,andnormallydo,varygreatlyovertime,and thewayinwhichtheworkisperformedisstillatthecontractor’sdiscretion.Unlikeanemployee,thecontractorstillneedstoworkproductivelyandeffectivelyiftheyaretomake aprofit.
Nordoesworkingforonlyoneheadcontractornecessarilymakeaperson‘dependent’inanypejorativesense.Anemployeemustadheretotheiremploymentorresign– acontractorcancomeandgoandhasachoiceofwheretheywork.Ifthecontractoratanyparticulartimecannotnegotiateacceptableratesandterms,theyarefreetoworkelsewhere.
Thefactthattheydonot,indicatesnotthattheyare‘dependant’or‘employee-like’andrequirethelaw’sprotection,butthattheyarehappywithinamutuallybeneficialbusinessrelationship.
Theideathatworkingforasingleheadcontractoris‘dependentcontracting’andabadthingwhichshouldbediscouragedbylawiswhollywrong,andwouldmerelyleadtothebreak-upofmanyhappyandefficientlong-standingbusinessrelationships, for novalidreason.
AgainstthisbackdropHIAconsidersthatthecurrentprovisionsprovidesoundandeffectiveprotectionsagainstshamcontractinganditisunnecessaryandundesirablefortheVictorianGovernmenttolegislateanyfurther.ThecurrentlegaldefinitionintheActisthecorrectapproachtothe issue.
TheBackgroundPapersuggeststhattheshamcontractingprovisionsapplytocircumstancesinwhicharelationshiphasbeen‘mischaracterised’9.Thisisincorrect.Amischaracterisationorthemisclassificationofanemployeeasanindependentcontractorisnotsham contracting.
TheFWOintheir2011report“Shamcontractingandthemisclassificationofworkersinthecleaningservices,hairandbeautyandcallcentreindustries”importantlydistinguishedcontraventionsoftheFWAshamarrangementsprovisionswiththemisclassificationofemployeesasindependentcontractors.
Toavoidconflatingthemintotheoneterm,theFWOusedtheterm“shamarrangements”todescribebehaviourthatcontravenestheshamarrangementsprovisionsoftheActand“misclassification”todescribeasituationwheretheworkerisconsideredanemployeebutnodeliberatefalsehoodisapparent.
TheBackgroundPaperstatesthatmisclassificationaffects13%ofcontractorswithinthebuildingandconstructionindustry.Thisfigurewastakenfromresearchentitled‘Working
Arrangementsin the BuildingandConstructionIndustry–Further researchresultingfrom the2011Sham ContractingInquiry’(Report) andHIA wouldcautionagainstrelyingonthisdata.
Firstly,theresearchwascommissionedbyFairWorkBuildingandConstructionandwasinresponsetooneoftherecommendationsarisingoutofthe2011ShamContractingInquiry.Secondly,theReportsstatedaimwasto‘capturearepresentativesnapshotofworkarrangementsintheindustry’;althoughitisarguablethatninefocusgroupseachinvolvingbetween6-8peopleand1350surveyresponsesishardly‘representative’giventhesizeoftheindustry.FinallytheReportdidnotsurveysinglydetachedhousingandindicatedthatjust5%oftherespondentswereengagedinresidentialbuildinginvolvingfourormoredwellings.
IfaproperassessmentofallegedshamcontractinginVictoriaistobeundertaken,accurateandreliabledatamustbeprocured.
Phoenixactivities
HIAsupportsgovernmentactionstoreduceanddiscouragethe use ofPhoenix companies.
Itisworthnotingthatthereisnocurrentstatutorydefinitionofwhatisa“phoenixcompany”althoughtherearearangeofcorporationsandtaxationlawstargetedtowardsfraud,directorsduties,insolventtradingandunpaidtax liabilities.
The mandatorylicensingofbuildersinVictoriaandhomeownerswarrantyinsurancesystemreducesthe ability ofdirectorstoutilisephoenixarrangements.
Inordertobelicensedresidentialbuildersaresubjecttostrictfinancialandpersonalprobityrequirements.Directorswhohavecontrolledaninsolventcompanymayalternativelybeautomaticallyexcludedfromconsiderationorwilltypicallyfailthe“fitandproper”personrequirements,forexampletheBuildingPractitionersBoard(BPB)mayrefusetoregisteranapplicantifanumber‘goodcharacter’requirementsarenotmet(s170(c))andinstancesofinsolvencyunderadministrationisa relevantfactor.
5.REGULATORYPOWERS
Thetermsofreferencehighlightthatinmakingrecommendations,theInquiryshouldhaveregardtomatters including:
i.thelimitationsofVictoria’slegislativepowersoverindustrialrelationsandrelatedmattersandthecapacitytoregulatethesematters;
ii.the powersof the Commonwealthastheyextendto workvisas;
iii.regulationinotherAustralianjurisdictionsandinothercountries,includinghowother jurisdictionsregulatelabourhire;
iv.theimpact,benefits,orpossibledrawbacksofanyregulatoryregimeapplyingtolabourhirebusinesses,onVictorianbusiness;
v.the abilityofanyVictorianregulatoryarrangementstooperatein theabsenceofanationalapproach;
vi.regulatory mechanisms to meet the objectives of protecting the rights ofvulnerableworkers;and
vii.Australia’s obligations under international law, including International LabourOrganisationConventions.
HIArespondstotheseissuesinthe followingterms:
5.1THELIMITATIONSOFVICTORIA’SLEGISLATIVEPOWERSOVERINDUSTRIALRELATIONSANDRELATEDMATTERSANDTHECAPACITYTO REGULATETHESEMATTERS
Referralof powers
HIAnotesthatin1996,Victoriawasthefirststatetoreferitsindustrialrelationspowerstothe Commonwealth.
HIAsupportsthisongoingreferral.CommunityandeconomywidebenefitshaveflowedfromVictoriaadoptinganationalapproachtotheregulationofindustrialrelationsmattersincludinggreaterefficiencies,lessuncertaintyforworkersandbusinessesandtheminimisationof“forum shopping”.
HIAdoesnotsupportanyfurtherunderminingofthenationalsystembypiecemeal,statebasedlegislation.
Independent Contracting
InHIA’ssubmission,anyfurtherstatelegislativeinterventiontoregulatetheroleofcontractorswillimposemorecostandunnecessaryconfusionandinconsistency.
Contrarytotheperceptionthatthereisalackofentitlementsfornon-permanentformsofwork,thecurrentregulatoryregimeprovidesarangeofentitlementswhichflowfromthedifferingtreatmentanddefinitionsof‘employee’,‘independentcontractor’and‘employer’across Commonwealthandstatejurisdictions.
Asnotedearlier,independentcontractorandworkerarrangementsareregulatedat anumber oflevels,leading toa variety ofassessmentmethods including:
- Thecommonlawforworkplacerelationspurposes.
- TheCommonwealthsuperannuationguaranteelawswhichunfortunatelymovebeyondthecommonlawprovidingthatifapersonworksunderacontractthatiswhollyorprincipally(morethanhalf)forthelabouroftheperson,thepersonisdeemedtobeanemployeeoftheotherpartytothecontract.
- TheincometaxlegislationadoptstheAlienationofPersonalServicesIncomeTest(APSI).Thistestdifferentiatesindependentcontractorarrangementsinrelationtotaxationfrom PAYGemployees.
- Atastatelevel,acontractorcanbeseparatelydefinedunderpayrolltaxlaws,workplacehealthandsafetylaws,workerscompensationlaws,longserviceleave:
- workplacehealthandsafetylegislationimposesdutiesonbeyondthetraditionalconceptof theemploymentrelationshipapplyingobligationson“personascarryingoutabusinessorundertaking”regardless ofwhetherornottheyarean employer;
- workers’compensationlegislationappliesbenefitstocertainworkersunder a“contract for service”;
- harmonisedpayrolltaxprovisionscoverscontractorsperformingworkotherthanpursuanttoatradeorbusinesswhichtheycarryonanddonotsub-contract to anyoneelse;
- anti-discriminationlegislationappliestobothcontractorsandemployees;and
- constructionindustrylongserviceleaveinsomejurisdictionsextendsto“labour only” subcontractors.
BecauseofthedifferinglegislativeapproachatastateandCommonwealthlevels,uncertaintiesaboutthestatusofcontractors,haveimposedconsiderablecostsonindustryandprogressively eroded theindependentstatus ofsubcontractors.
TheIndependentContractorsAct2006issquarelyaimedatrecognisingcontractingasalegitimateway ofperformingworkintoday’seconomy,itsobjectivesbeing:
- toprotectthefreedomofindependentcontractorstoenterintoservicescontracts;and
- torecogniseindependentcontractingasalegitimateformofworkarrangementthatis primarily commercial;and
- to preventinterferencewith thetermsofgenuineindependentcontracting.
TheseobjectivesreflecttheExplanatoryMemorandum(EM)totheIndependentContractorsBill2006which statedthat:
‘[theBillwill]enshrineandprotectthestatusofindependentcontractorsandencourageindependentcontractingasawhollylegitimateform ofwork’.
TheEMfurtherobservedthat:
‘Facilitatingtheuseofindependentcontractorsandtheflexiblearrangementsaffordedbythemisimperativetocontributingtothedynamicefficiencyoftheeconomy.StatelawswhichcreatebarrierstotheuseofindependentcontractorsinAustralianworkplacesmeanthattheseflexiblearrangementsarestifled.
…
However,contractingrelationshipscontinuetobedraggedintothesphereofemploymentlawbyvirtueofStatedeemingprovisionswhichdeterminecertainindependentcontractorstobeemployees.Thisdistortsflexibilityandchoiceandinterfereswiththeintentionof thepartiestothe originalcontract.’
Page16of19|
HIAwouldalsohighlightthatallegationsofshamcontractingandOdcostylearrangementsare ‘oftensubject to closescrutinybythe courts’10, infact the FWO hasappealed to the HighCourtinthematterofFairWorkOmbudsmanvQuestSouthPerthHoldingsPtyLtdOrs11toscrutinisesucharrangements.InthatcasetheHighCourtisbeingaskedtoconsiderthe‘triangular’relationshipbetweenabusiness,alabourhirecompanyandanindividualinthecontextofthecurrentshamcontractingprovisions.Itisofnote,thatanearlierdecisiontheFull FederalCourtheldthatsucharrangements did notcontravenethe law.12
Whereacontroversyexists,inHIA’sviewthecourtsaretheappropriateplaceforthistobedealtwith,particularlyintheseoftencomplexsituations.Thisisevenmore relevantgiventhealreadysaturatedlegislativeframeworkandthelimitsonthestate’slegislativepoweroverindustrialmatters.
PhoenixActivities
Asnotedabove,thereisnodefinitionofa ‘phoenixcompany’howeverthereare a number ofCommonwealthlawsinplace to addressandregulatecorporateinsolvencies.
UndertheCorporationsAct2001,directorshaveadirectandpositivedutytopreventtheircompanyfromtradingifitisinsolvent.Acompanyisinsolventifitisunabletopayallitsdebtswhentheyaredue.Directorsmustpreventtheircompanyfromincurringdebtswherethecompanyisinsolvent,orbecomesinsolventbyincurringthedebt(s)andatthattime,therearereasonablegroundsforsuspectingthecompanyisinsolvent,orwouldbecomeinsolvent.
Therearevariouspenaltiesandconsequencesofinsolventtrading,includingcivilpenalties,compensationproceedings,criminalchargesand/ordisqualificationfrommanagingacorporation.
Acompanymustalsokeepfinancialrecordsto correctlyrecordandexplaintransactionsandthecompany’sfinancialpositionandperformance.Afailureofadirectortotakeallreasonablestepsto ensure acompanyfulfilsthisrequirementcontravenesthelegislation.
Directors’alsohavefiduciarydutieswhichincludethedutiestoactingoodfaithinthebestinterestsofthecompany,toactforpropercorporatepurposesandtoavoidconflictsofinterest.Ithasbeenheldthatthedutyofdirectorstoactingoodfaithandinthebestinterestsof the companyincludesconsiderationof the interestsofcreditorsuponinsolvency.Undertaxationlaws,directors’personalliabilitymay arisewheretheCommissioner ofTaxationissuesaDirectorLiabilityNotice(“DLN”)underSection222AOEoftheITAAtothedirectorsatatimewhenthecompanyhasfailedtoremittax.Theobjectivesoftheseprovisionsaretoensurethatacompanysatisfiesparticularincometaxobligationsorispromptlyplacedintovoluntaryadministrationor liquidation.
10BackgroundPaperpg.12
11HCATrans284(4Novembers 2015)
12FairWorkOmbudsmanvQuest SouthPerthHoldings PtyLtd OrsNo.P16of2015
LiquidatorsandexternaladministratorshaveobligationstoinvestigatecausesoffailureandidentifyandreportbreachesoflawtoASIC.Thisisaimedatensuringinappropriatedirector/corporatebehaviour is identifiedandaddressedbythepartycapableof takingdisciplinaryaction,generally the corporateregulator.
Liquidatorsalsohavepowerstoinvestigateandvoidcertaintransactionssuchasunfairpreferencepayments.
ASIC,inturn,hasanumberofpowerstotakeactionagainstsuchreportedbreachesanditisimportantthatASICtakeeffectiveactionagainstreportedbreachesinordertoensurethedeterrentintentofthecurrentlawsisbeingmet.
Itisclearthatthecurrentlegislativeschemeisintendedto‘coverthefield’.Theabovelawsprovideasolidandsoundregulatoryframeworkforregulatinginsolvenciesandcallsbyvariouspartiesforfurtherlawsorregulatorypowersareusuallymadeincircumstanceswhereexistingpowershavenotbeeneffectivelyused.
5.2THEIMPACT,BENEFITS,ORPOSSIBLEDRAWBACKSOFANYREGULATORYREGIME APPLYING TOLABOUR HIREBUSINESSES,ON VICTORIANBUSINESS
TheBackgroundPaper observesthat:
- Nootherstatejurisdictionregulateslabourhirecompanies.Infact,WAandSAprovidespecificexclusionsforthe industry;and
- Whereanissuehasbeenidentifiedwithinasector,specificmechanismshavebeenputinplacetoaddressthoseconcernsspecificsectorialconcerns.Thissuggeststhatanindustrybyindustryapproachismoreappropriatewhenassessinglabourhirearrangementsandbroadgeneralisationsaddlittle.
Asnotedinearliersubmissions,theCommonwealthcurrentlyhasaministerialworkinggroupconsideringtheoptionsofregulatinglabourhirebusinesses.HIAdoesnotconsideritappropriatethattheVictoriangovernmenttakestandaloneactionswithrespecttotheseissuesatthistime.