February, 2001 IEEE P802.15-01/116r0

IEEE P802.15

Wireless Personal Area NetworksÔ

Letter Ballot #8

Opening Date: Friday, February 9, 2001

After filling in your name and vote, please return this page by e-mail to with a copy to and . Repeat if not acknowledged within 1 business day.

Please Note:

Ø  Voting members have an obligation to vote. Membership may be lost if two of the last three Working Group letter ballots are not returned, or are returned with an abstention other than “lack of technical expertise.”

Ø  "No" votes require the submission of detailed comments, via –01/117r0, as defined in the IEEE rules for Sponsor Ballots to be counted as valid. See the next page for further details.

Start date of ballot: Friday, February 9, 2001 12:00 pm (noon) EST USA

Closure of ballot: Sunday, March 11, 2001 12:00 am (midnight) EST USA

Ballot return

From (name of voter): ______[1]

Voting member: Yes/No[2]

Motion number / Subject / Yes[3] / No[4] / Abstain with reason[5] / Comments?
1 / To submit the contents of document IEEE P802.15.1/D0.8.0 to Sponsor Ballot [default recirculation ballot]; LB8.zip, available via (WG password required):
http://ieee802.org/15/pub/LB8/LB8.html

The following instructions are provided for the Working Group Membership:

1.  The ballot shall provide four choices:

a.  Approve (Affirmative). This vote may be accompanied by comments suggesting corrections and improvements. Action on such comments is left to the discretion of the Sponsor.

b.  Do Not Approve (Negative With Comments). This vote shall be accompanied by one or more specific objections with proposed resolution in sufficient detail in a legible form so that the specific wording of the changes that will cause the negative voter to change his or her vote to "approve" can readily be determined. The Sponsor shall encourage the submission of comments with all negative ballots.

c.  Do Not Approve (Negative Without Comments). If a negative vote unaccompanied by comments is received despite the instructions in b), the vote shall be counted in the total tally of negative votes. The Sponsor is not required to conduct a recirculation ballot of these negative votes.

  1. Abstain. This category is provided to allow for ballot returns from members who do not wish to review the document because of conflict of interest, lack of expertise, or other reasons. A reason shall be given for this vote; otherwise, the ballot shall be classified as "no response."

Source: IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual (Jan2001), PP 5.4.3.1

  1. Valid Ballot
  2. To qualify as a valid Working Group Letter Ballot, 50 % of the Voting Members must have returned their vote and no more than 30% of those returned may abstain. Based on a current roster of 74 that requires at least 37 to be returned. See appendix.
  3. If 50 % of the Voting Members have returned their ballots at the announced closing date, the ballot closes. Ballot forms received after closure do not count towards the result of the ballot and no credit is given towards voting right maintenance. However, comments may be addressed at Working Group's discretion or ballot resolution group's discretion, but.
  4. If the 50 % returns are not achieved at the announced closing date, the ballot will close at the time 50 % of the Voting Members have returned their ballot.
  5. Ballot result
  6. Motion 1 is a technical motion: from the Voting Members voting "Yes" or "No", 75 % need to vote yes in order for this motion to pass.
  7. All comments accompanying votes within the time the ballot is open, must be addressed, even if they are from non Voting Members.
  8. In case the ballot closes with less than 75 % approval, and the comment resolution group can not change sufficient No-votes to Yes-votes (confirmed in writing) to reach the 75 % boundary, the motion fails
  9. The Sponsor Executive Committee requires the highest level of consensus. So after passing the ballot with at least 75 %, but not yet 100 %, the Working Group will decide whether a Recirculation Ballot will be conducted or whether the draft is submitted to the Executive Committee.
  10. Comments accompanying NO votes will be submitted with the reason the Working Group could not accept the comment.
  11. Default Recirculation ballots
  12. If you already voted "Yes" on the subject or you changed your vote from "No" to "Yes" in writing:
  13. You do not need to vote again.
  14. You may submit a "No" vote, but only based on text that was changed after you voted "Yes" or text that was impacted by text that was changed after you voted "Yes" or based on comments on technical matters that were not resolved adequately.
  15. If you already voted "No", you are kindly requested to analyze the comment resolution file and Draft, for submitting a valid ballot:
  16. Vote "Yes" if all your concerns are solved,
  17. Otherwise, vote "No" again and REPEAT the comments that were not solved to your consent, indicating why the group's rebuttal is not acceptable to you. You may add additional comments constituting a "No" vote, but only based on text that was changed or text that was impacted by text that was changed.

c.  If you did not vote or you abstained, vote this time with a valid vote or abstain again with a valid reason to satisfy your voting credit.

Submission Page XXX of 6 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.

February, 2001 IEEE P802.15-01/116r0

Appendix

IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ Membership (Voter & Nearly Voter) as of 9Feb01 with LB3 & LB6 Vote Results

Submission Page XXX of 6 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.

February, 2001 IEEE P802.15-01/116r0

LAST / STATUS / LB3 / LB6
Aguado / Voter / y
Alfvin / Voter / n / y
Allen / Voter / n / y
Amer / Voter / f
Bailey / Voter / f / y
Barr / Voter / f / y
Batliwala / Voter / y / y
Beckmoeller / Nearly Voter
Bien / Voter / f / f
Bisdikian / Voter / n / y
Blaney / Voter / f
Camp / Voter / y
Carmeli / Voter / y
Carrafiello / Voter / a
Chen / Nearly Voter
Cheng / Nearly Voter
Cooklev / Voter / y/c / y
Crosswy / Voter / y / y
Cypher / Voter / n / y
Dabak / Voter / y
Derby / Nearly Voter
Ditch / Voter / n / y
DuVal / Voter / n / y
Dydyk / Voter / f
Eckard / Voter / f / y
Evans / Nearly Voter
Fischer / Voter / n / y
Gifford / Voter / n / y
Gilb / Voter / n / n
Golmie / Voter / n / y
Gubbi / Nearly Voter
Gutierrez / Voter / y
Hansen / Nearly Voter
Harada / Voter / y
Harrison / Nearly Voter
Heberling / Voter / n / y
Heile / Voter / y / y
Herold / Voter / y
Herve / Voter / f
Hinman / Voter / y
Ho / Nearly Voter
Hoshina / Voter / y
Ishii / Nearly Voter
Karaoguz / Voter / y
Kerry / Voter / y / y
Kinney / Voter / y / y
Kraemer / Voter / n / f
Lansford / Voter / y
Larsson / Nearly Voter
Li / Voter / y / y
Ling / Voter / f
Little / Voter / f
Marquess / Voter / n / y
Martin / Voter / f
McCorkle / Voter / f
McGlynn / Voter / y/c / n
McInnis / Voter / f / y
Middleton / Nearly Voter
Mitter / Voter / f
Miura / Voter / y / y
Morris / Nearly Voter
Murray / Voter / y / y
Music / Voter / f
Nafie / Voter / y
Noble / Voter / y / y
O'Farrell / Nearly Voter
O'Sullivan / Voter / y
Paczonay / Voter / y / f
Palin / Voter / n / y
Parks / Nearly Voter
Reede / Voter / y / y
Rios / Voter / f / a
Roberts / Nearly Voter
Roberts / Voter / f
Rofheart / Voter / f
Rosenlof / Voter / y
Rypinski / Voter / y
Schmidl / Voter / y
Schrader / Voter / a
Seals / Nearly Voter
Shellhammer / Voter / f / n
Siep / Voter / y/c / y
Stevenson / Voter / y
Takaoka / Nearly Voter
Tan / Voter / y
Thrasher / Voter / a
Torp / Voter / y / y
Tsangaropoulos / Nearly Voter
Van Dyck / Voter / y
Vishwakarma / Nearly Voter
Watanabe / Voter / n / y
Wilding / Voter / y
Williams / Voter / y
Wilson / Voter / y / y
Yee / Nearly Voter
Young / Nearly Voter

Submission Page XXX of 6 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.

February, 2001 IEEE P802.15-01/116r0

Submission Page XXX of 6 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.

February, 2001 IEEE P802.15-01/116r0

Submission Page XXX of 6 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.

[1] Fill in your name

[2] Circle or mark the applicable category, for non voters please only submit the Comment Form [-01/117r0]

[3] Mark to give your vote

[4] No votes require comments to instruct the group how they can resolve your No vote.

[5] Only counted as a valid vote if marked “lack of expertise”