EMAIL THIS COMPLETED FORM TO WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR FINAL GRADES EACH TERM

SAS Core Curriculum Assessment Report / Date: / ______
Course Number & Name: / Delete all but one: 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,150______
Instructor(s): / ______
Semester / ______/ Enrollment / ______

Assessment Tool:[ x ] CRC’s Generic Rubric(s)[ ] Other: ______

Please attach syllabus, and if “Other” selected, please attach assessment instrument

Prompt [question or assignment resulting in the student work product that was assessed]:

Core Curriculum Goal(s) being Assessed: _____o______

Please indicate the total number assessed and the raw number scoring in each cell: PLEASE DO NOT USE PERCENTAGES. Detailed descriptors for each cell are included in the full rubrics.

o. Examine critically philosophical and other theoretical issues concerning the nature of reality, human experience, knowledge, value, and/or cultural production.
Criteria / NO. OF
STUDENTS ASSESSED / OUTSTANDING / GOOD / SATISFACTORY / UNSATISFACTORY
(D/F)
Summary Assessment Of Goal
Ability to identify relevant philosophical issues / Clearly and correctly identifies philosophical and other theoretical issues concerning the nature of reality, human experience, knowledge, value, and/or cultural production central to the course with depth of understanding. / Clearly and correctly identifies philosophical and other theoretical issues concerning the nature of reality, human experience, knowledge, value, and/or cultural production central to the course. / Identifies philosophical and other theoretical issues concerning the nature of reality, human experience, knowledge, value, and/or cultural production of some relevance to the course. / Fails to identify philosophical or other theoretical issues concerning the nature of reality, human experience, knowledge, value, and/or cultural production beyond a cursory mention or identifies ones not related to the course.
Ability to develop critical analysis of issues and effectively presents arguments, theories, or criticisms of these issues / Engages in sophisticated critical analysis of same indicating a deep understanding of the key elements and the ability to identify strengths and weaknesses in the arguments and/or theories. / Develops critical analysis of same that effectively presents the relevant arguments and/or theories. / Attempts analysis of at least one philosophical or other theoretical issue although the presentation of the relevant arguments and/or theories is not always clear or convincing. Nonetheless, indicates effort to draw critical conclusions that are essentially on the mark. / Fails to analyze or critique the philosophical or theoretical issue or to identify elements of a critique; makes unsubstantiated assertions or substitutes opinion for analysis.
Ability to present ideas orally or in written form clearly and fluently / Elements and implications of the issues and analyses are effectively, accurately, and persuasively presented / The discussion is fluent and correct; any errors are incidental, not affecting the presentation or argument significantly. / Factual and/or theoretical errors detract from the presentation / Significant factual and/or theoretical errors; presentation is confused, inaccurate, and/or seriously underdeveloped

If only a sample was selected for scoring, please explain fully how the sample was chosen.

If more than one person scored each work product, please indicate the number of scorers: ______

Report prepared and submitted by: ______

Plans for modification in light of results, if any: