NADCAP TASK GROUP CHAIR/STAFF ENGINEER ROUNDTABLE

JUNE 2011

UNCONFIRMED MINUTES

JUNE 22, 2011

Grand Connaught Rooms

London, England

These minutes are not final until confirmed by the Task Group in writing or by vote at a subsequent meeting. Information herein does not constitute a communication or recommendation from the Task Group and shall not be considered as such by any agency.

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 2011

The meeting was called to order @ 1:00PM.

The following representatives were in attendance:

Task Group Chairs in Attendance:

Alessandra / D’Ambrosia-Furman / Cessna Aircraft Company
David / Day / GE Aviation
Kent / DeFranco / Lockheed Martin
Kevin
Phil / Dowling
Keown / Spirit AeroSystems
GE Aviation
Ralph / Kropp / MTU Aero Engine
Doug / Matson / The Boeing Company
Jerry / Satchwell / Rolls-Royce
Jack / Saunders / Honeywell
Verl / Wisehart / Rolls-Royce Corp.
Dewey / Whittaker / Honeywell

Other Attendees:

Ken
Pascal / Abram
Blondet / Honeywell
Airbus
Robin / Borrelli / Boeing
Michael / Coleman / Boeing
Karyn
Scott / Deming
Meyer / Goodrich
Goodrich
Tim / Myers / Honeywell
Mitch / Nelson / Cessna Aircraft Company
Tim / Pruitt / Rolls Royce
Steve / Tooley / Rolls-Royce
Angelie
Kevin / Vincent
Ward / Spirit AeroSystems
Goodrich

PRI Staff in Attendance:

Jerry / Aston
Mark / Aubele
John / Barrett
Rebekah / Braun
Will / Calvert
Nigel / Cook
Marcel
Bill / Cuperman
Dumas
Phil / Ford
Susan / Frailey
Michael / Graham
Rob / Hoeth
Sarah / Jordan
Rhonda / Joseph
Scott / Klavon
Jim / Lewis
Bob / Lizewski
Kellie / O’Connor
Keith / Purnell
Glenn / Shultz
Ian / Simpson
Richard / Sovich
Andy / Statham
Kevin / Wetzel

1.0  Opening Comments

The Nadcap Personal Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest and the agenda were reviewed.

2.0 Informal Dialog- During Lunch

I.  Brainstorm future meeting topics

II.  Feedback from Pascal’s email (NMC Seating Plan & TG Report Out):

It was reported that Task Group Chairs will not be in the middle of the meeting room.

III.  Feedback on Nadcap Meeting Template (Positive/Negatives)

AQS & Composites provided negative feedback on the new format. The new format didn’t meet the task group’s needs. Heat Treatment did like the need format.

3.0  NMC Auditor Consistency - Proposed New Auditor Training

I.  NMC Sub-team Proposal- Advised group that training should be for initial and season auditors. Mike asked what should the content of the training be and how should the training be handle.

II.  Discussion and Feedback

Concerns:

-What would the training covered.

-50% of the group voted that the training should be face to face training.

-What would the time frame and what would be covered and what is the effective date.

Mike advised it would be 12 months.

-Would like to see more Quality Systems training.

ACTION ITEM: All members should send suggestions on training to Mike Graham (DUE DATE: 6-JUL-11)

4.0 Failure / Suspension Process

I.  NMC Sub-team Proposal

II.  Discussion and Feedback- Some concern with the new proposal on allowing the supplier to respond and keeping the audit open

ACTION ITEM: Mike Graham to send the Presentation to all members (DUE DATE: 6-JUL-11)

5.0  NMC Equitable Contribution (20 Min)

I.  NMC Sub-team Proposal

II.  Discussion and Feedback – Discussion Tabled at this time, the team will continue to review.

Pascal Blondet reviewed all the current sub-teams and the purpose of the teams.

6.0  Wrap Up

I.  Action Item Summary

II.  Meeting Feedback

Concerns:

Follow Up on agenda items with group

Make group aware of agenda items so they can prepare

7.0  Adjourn

Minutes prepared by:

Rhonda Joseph

Page 1 of 3