Economic Education

http://www.ncee.net/

About Ron and things http://www.johnson.cornell.edu/news/waldman.html

“academia is often a receptacle for people who don't like competition and want more security than they'd get working in industry.” anon

As President Bill Clinton once remarked, “Promising too much can be as cruel as caring too little.”

“Thank God we don’t get all the government we pay for.”

- Will Rogers

Ronald Coase said in The Firm, The Market and the Law , "In my youth it was said what was too silly to be said may be sung. In modern economics it may be put into mathematics."

My next web rant:

How people really screw up when the benefits of a program are concentrated and the costs are widely distributed and when the costs of an action are concentrated and the benefits are widely distributed.

archive old pieces - make new web page and link to anchors on that page...

Artificially high wages in developing industrial sectors due to collective bargaining, unions … sweatshops … what to do to help the poor ???

à maybe ask simple question of what impact of boycotts will be on poor factory workers … what should we do if we care?

Next BLOG discussion

Based on your readings and some of the material covered in class, apply what you know about development and the various development theories to speculate on the following “gedankin” (i.e. thought) experiment. What if anything might be different about today’s international economic order if the Spanish had colonized North America and the English had colonized South America?

Developing countries today have an advantage over the developed countries at the time of their development because the developing countries today have the experiences of the developed countries to draw from.

Economic Historian Angus Maddison estimated economic growth and income levels for the world economy as far back as 500 A.D. According to him, average world income in 1500 was the same as it was in 500 – a growth rate of ZERO for 1,000 years. The next 320 years (to 1820) were only slightly better, with world income per capital growing at 0.04% per year for a total increase of 15%. China and India were the world’s richest countries in 1500 – but fell behind Europe and Western offshoots by 1820..Rapid economic growth as we know it began in 1820. Until 1990, avg world income grew by 1.2% per year.


BLOGS

http://www.thesportseconomist.com/

http://cafehayek.typepad.com/hayek/

http://econlog.econlib.org/

http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/

http://newmarksdoor.typepad.com/mainblog/

http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/index.html

http://www.marginalrevolution.com/

http://www.mises.org/blog/

http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/blog/blog.shtml

http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/cat_outsourcing.html

http://windsofchange.net/archives/005533.php

RESOURCES for Economists

http://www.wanniski.com/ssu.asp

http://www.econlib.org/

http://www.onpower.org/

http://www.friesian.com/econ.htm

http://www.nationmaster.com/

http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/

http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/

Links

http://www.improb.com/ig/ig-pastwinners.html

Martin Feldstein

http://www.nber.org/feldstein/index.html#papers

Steven Levitt

http://www.src.uchicago.edu/users/levit/

Caroline Hoxby

http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/

Greg Mankiw

http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/mankiw/mankiw.html

Hal Varian

http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/articles.html

Richard Wagner at George Mason

http://mason.gmu.edu/~rwagner/editorials.html

Peter Boettke

http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/pboettke/

Bryan Caplan

Freedom Links

www.cato.org

http://www.freedomworks.org/

On my desk

The Other Path

Fair Play, Landsburg

On my nightstand

It’s Not About the Bike

I am Charlotte W

Crossing to Safety-*

When Character Was King

http://ecedweb.unomaha.edu/teach-ec.htm

More about me

http://www.econphd.net/rank/rlabor.htm

News
GDP growth slows in 2Q new / CNN Economy Headline
Economy Grows at Slower Pace Than Expected
new / Yahoo (US Economy)
Economic fallout of $50 a barrel new / CS Monitor (Economy)
El Paso Could Sell More Assets new / Forbes (Economy)
Analysis and Commentary: Organizations
New Article new / Brookings: Economic Studies
Administration’s Proposed Deduction For Long-Term Care Insurance Premiums Likely To Be Ineffective and Costly, and Of Primary Benefit To Higher-Income Individuals / CBPP: Website
Brown: A Great Decision—Except for Schools / Hoover Institution (Essays)
Analysis and Commentary: Individuals
The Liberal Media: It's No Myth / Robert Barro (Website)
The Economist's Duty to Raise the Level of the Debate / Brad DeLong (Website)
Tax Cuts? new / John Irons (ArgMax.com)
America's Failing Health new / Paul Krugman (NYTimes)
The $100 Terrorist Insurance Plan / Steven E. Landsburg (Slate)
Donations Can Buy You Profits, August 25, 2004 new / Hal Varian (Web/NYTimes)

Library of economics and liberty

Alan Krueger

Media & Organizations

New York Times

Yahoo U.S. Economy News - http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=business&cat=us_economy

Hoover

CBPP

Brookings

Economics Links

http://www.dallasfed.org/

Simulations

Supply and Demand

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/equilibrium.html#1

Plotting Curves

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/graphing.html

Demand Curves – Elasticities

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/elasticity.html#1

Price Elasticity of Demand

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/elasticity_tutorial.html

Consumer Surplus

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/cs_tutorial.html

Production Possibilities

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/ppf_4010.html#1

Maximization Problem

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/optimization_x.html

Consumer Utility Max

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/co_tutorial.html

Producer Profit Max

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/po_tutorial.html

Production – Isoquants

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/prod_lr.html#1

Production and Cost

http://flashecon.org/production/production_main.html

Short Run Profit Max

http://flashecon.org/profitB/profitB_main.html

Short Run P-Max II

http://flashecon.org/profitA/profitA_main.html

Cost Curves - http://www.campbell.berry.edu/faculty/economics/CostCurves/CostCurves.htm#Footnote%201

Comparative Advantage

http://flashecon.org/advantage/advantage_main.html

Autonomy vs. Specialization

http://flashecon.org/DIVINCI/autonomy2.html

Solow Growth Model

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/solow.html

Keynesian Cross

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/ae_4020.html#1

Multiplier

http://www.digitaleconomist.com/s_mult.html

Experiments

Libertarian test

http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi

http://www.free-market.net/

Freedom Pages

FREEDOM

Across the Atlantic
Airstrip One
Asymmetrical Information
Belmont Club
Colin Beveridge
Biased BBC
Tim Blair
Blithering Bunny
Blognor Regis
Blogs of War
Brian's Culture Blog
Brian's Education Blog
British Spin
Cafe Hayek
Mike Campbell
Antoine Clarke's Election Watch
Sasha Castel
Catallaxy Files
Centre for the New Europe
Chris' Libertarianism Blog
Civitas
The Commons
Conservative Commentary
CrozierVision
Cut on the Bias
Daily Pundit
Karen de Coster
Dissecting Leftism
Dissident Frogman
Dodgeblogium
Don't Hold Your Breath
Andy Duncan
Edge of England's Sword
End the War on Freedom
EU Referendum
Eursoc
FEE
Free Market Foundation
Sean Gabb
Gold and Silver
Harry's Place
The Holy Blog
It comes in pints?
HUBlog
David Hume Institute
Iberian Notes
IEA
Instapundit
ISIL
Joanne Jacobs
Michael Jennings
Knappster
Kolkata Libertarian
Laissez Faire Books
Ken Layne
Liberal Democrat Watch
Libertarian Alliance
The Libertarian Enterprise
Libertarian International
Libertarian Party
Libertarian UK
Liberty
The Liberty Log
Little Green Footballs
Rachel Lucas
Marginal Revolution
Alex Massie
Ilana Mercer
Mises Institute
Mises Blog
Andrew Olmsted
One Hand Clapping
On the Third Hand
Slugger O'Toole
OxBlog
Pathetic Earthlings
PC Watch
Policy Institute
The Politburo Diktat
Stephen Pollard
Virginia Postrel
Powerline
Public Interest
Random Jottings
Rantburg
Rathouse
Lew Rockwell
Lew Rockwell Blog
Samizdata
Schoolhouse
Adam Smith Blog
Adam Smith Institute
Social Affairs Unit
Social Affairs Unit Weblog
Social Scrutiny
Natalie Solent
Squander Two
Sgt Stryker
Andrew Sullivan
TaxPayers' Alliance
Transport Blog
Truck and Barter
Truth Laid Bear
Unqualified Offerings
USS Clueless
White Rose
Winds of Change

WHISKY

Bigger Government Leads to Bigger Campaign Spending

by Patrick Basham

Patrick Basham is senior fellow in the Center for Representative Democracy at the Cato Institute.

Campaign spending is skyrocketing. According to Larry Noble of the Center for Responsive Politics, the 2004 presidential and congressional campaigns will collectively cost about $3.9 billion, a 30 percent increase over 2000.

Noble attributes that spending to "the increase in giving by individuals to candidates and parties." But his reasoning confuses the symptom with the disease and reflects the conventional lack of wisdom on campaign spending.

The most important factor driving campaign spending upward isn't the increase in individual campaign donations permitted by the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation. Rather, the most important factor is bigger government.

The growth of government spending fosters the growth in campaign spending. Taxes and regulations on society have increased the ambit of government at all levels. As scholarly studies have shown, increasing government activity leads to more efforts to influence political decisions, including increased spending on campaigns. As government does and spends more, individuals try to influence government, both to advance their causes and to protect themselves from abuse.

Government has grown enormously over the past few decades. Collectively, Americans today pay more than two-and-a-half times (in real terms) the amount in federal taxes that they did in 1970. On the expenditure side, federal government spending will reach $2.4 trillion in the 2005 fiscal year, a 950 percent nominal increase in 35 years. Government has assumed the additional power to regulate all kinds of private conduct, especially regarding economic life. The cost of complying with those federal regulations exceeds $700 billion.

The high levels of taxation and regulation indicate that government has vast power over many aspects of American life -- from wealth redistribution to the nature of housing, agriculture, education and health care, to trade, energy and telecommunications, to gun ownership, to the consumption of alcohol, tobacco and drugs. Almost 70,000 government bodies are authorized to impose taxes on Americans.

So is it any wonder that several billion dollars are spent lobbying politicians during each election cycle? The desire to gain benefits or avoid costs from regulation pushes campaign contributions upward.

There is solid empirical evidence that expanding government results in increases in campaign spending. Economist John Lott Jr. found that 87 percent of the rise in federal campaign spending between 1976 and 1994 was attributable to the $1,101 per-capita rise (in real terms) in federal government spending that occurred over that time.

The recent correlation between government spending and campaign spending is even stronger. The 30 percent increase in campaign spending since 2000 closely corresponds to the 31 percent increase in federal government spending during the past four years.

Is there a solution to increased campaign spending? Within the current policy environment, it is impossible to reduce campaign spending. Our legislators' demonstrated lack of commitment to limited government ensures that the upward momentum of campaign spending will continue unabated for the foreseeable future.

We will only reduce the amount of money flowing within the tributaries of our political system by reducing the incentive for private interests to directly and indirectly support candidates and parties. Therefore, the only plausible solution is to limit the size of government. Anything else merely treats the symptom without addressing the underlying disease of the body politic.

Lower government spending will lead to lower levels of campaign contributions. In turn, that will result in lower levels of campaign spending. All other efforts to limit campaign spending will be futile.