Exhibit 1.3.d.6

Technology Assessment

Advanced Programs

Table 1: Overall Technology Assessment 2009-20102

Table 2: Overall Technology Assessment 2010-20112

Table 3: Elementary Education M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-20112

Table 4: Special Education M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-20103

Table 5: Special Education M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-20113

Table 6: Curriculum and Instruction M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-20103

Table 7: Curriculum and Instruction M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-20114

Table 8: Educational Technology M.S. Technology Assessment 2009-20104

Table 9: Educational Technology M.S. Technology Assessment 2010-20114

Table 10: School Counseling M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-20105

Table 11: School Psychology Ed.S. Technology Assessment 2010-20115

Table 12: Educational Leadership M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-20105

Table 13Educational Leadership M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-20116

Table 13: Educational Leadership Ed.S. Technology Assessment 2009-20106

Table 15: Educational Leadership Ed.S. Technology Assessment 2010-20116

Note: E = Exceeds Expectations (numerically treated as a 3);

M = Meets Expectations (numerically treated as a 2);

D = Does Not Meet Expectations (numerically treated as a 1);

NB = No Basis for Evaluation

Table 1: Overall Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 136)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 29
21.3 / 107
78.7 / 0 / 0 / 2.21 / .41
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 23
16.9 / 113
83.1 / 0 / 0 / 2.17 / .38
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 26
19.1 / 110
80.9 / 0 / 0 / 2.19 / .40
Technology Composite / 2.19 / .37

Table 2: Overall Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 116)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 67
57.8 / 48
41.4 / 1
.9 / 0 / 2.57 / .52
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 62
53.4 / 52
44.8 / 2
1.7 / 0 / 2.52 / .54
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 56
48.3 / 58
50.0 / 2
1.7 / 0 / 2.47 / .54
Technology Composite / 2.52 / .48

Table 3: Elementary Education M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 7)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 6
85.7 / 1
14.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.86 / .38
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 6
85.7 / 1
14.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.86 / .38
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 6
85.7 / 1
14.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.86 / .38
Technology Composite / 2.86 / .38

Table 4: Special Education M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 12)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 1
8.3 / 11
91.7 / 0 / 0 / 2.08 / .29
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 2
16.7 / 10
83.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.17 / .39
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 2
16.7 / 10
83.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.17 / .39
Technology Composite / 2.17 / .27

Table 5: Special Education M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 17)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 7
41.2 / 9
52.9 / 1
5.9 / 0 / 2.35 / .61
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 7
41.2 / 9
52.9 / 1
5.9 / 0 / 2.35 / .61
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 7
41.2 / 9
52.9 / 1
5.9 / 0 / 2.35 / .61
Technology Composite / 2.35 / .61

Table 6: Curriculum and Instruction M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 5)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 5
100 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.00 / .00
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 5
100 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.00 / .00
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 5
100 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.00 / .00
Technology Composite / 3.00 / .00

Table 7: Curriculum and Instruction M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 6)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 6
100 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.00 / .00
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 6
100 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.00 / .00
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 6
100 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.00 / .00
Technology Composite / 3.00 / .00

Table 8: Educational Technology M.S. Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 28)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 19
67.9 / 9
32.1 / 0 / 0 / 2.68 / .48
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 15
53.6 / 13
46.4 / 0 / 0 / 2.54 / .51
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 15
53.6 / 13
46.4 / 0 / 0 / 2.54 / .51
Technology Composite / 2.58 / .46

Table 9: Educational Technology M.S. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 21)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 12
87.1 / 9
42.9 / 0 / 0 / 2.57 / .51
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 19
90.5 / 2
9.5 / 0 / 0 / 2.90 / .30
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 18
85.7 / 3
14.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.86 / .36
Technology Composite / 2.78 / .32

Table 10: School Counseling M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 15)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 2
13.3 / 13
86.7 / 0 / 0 / 2.13 / .35
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 1
6.7 / 14
93.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.07 / .26
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 2
13.3 / 13
86.7 / 0 / 0 / 2.13 / .35
Technology Composite / 2.11 / .30

Table 11: School Psychology Ed.S. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 9)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 6
66.7 / 3
33.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.67 / .50
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 6
66.7 / 2
22.2 / 1
11.1 / 0 / 2.56 / .73
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 6
66.7 / 2
22.2 / 1
11.1 / 0 / 2.56 / .73
Technology Composite / 2.59 / .64

Table 12: Educational Leadership M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 32)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 1
3.1 / 31
96.9 / 0 / 0 / 2.03 / .18
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 0 / 32
100.0 / 0 / 0 / 2.00 / .00
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 1
3.1 / 31
96.9 / 0 / 0 / 2.03 / .18
Technology Composite / 2.02 / .12

Table 13: Educational Leadership M.Ed. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 29)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 12
41.4 / 17
58.6 / 0 / 0 / 2.41 / .50
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 11
37.9 / 18
62.1 / 0 / 0 / 2.38 / .49
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 9
31.0 / 20
69.0 / 0 / 0 / 2.31 / .47
Technology Composite / 2.37 / .46

Table 14: Educational Leadership Ed.S. Technology Assessment 2009-2010 (N = 44)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 1
2.3 / 43
97.7 / 0 / 0 / 2.02 / .15
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 0 / 44
100 / 0 / 0 / 2.00 / .00
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 0 / 44
100 / 0 / 0 / 2.00 / .00
Technology Composite / 2.01 / .05

Table 15: Educational Leadership Ed.S. Technology Assessment 2010-2011 (N = 27)

Item / E
N/% / M
N/% / D
N/% / NB
N/% / Mean / SD
Candidate is prepared to use a variety of technology for personal productivity. / 18
66.7 / 9
33.3 / 0 / 0 / 2.67 / .48
Candidate is able to determine, when appropriate, how educational technologies can be used to augment the learning environment. / 7
25.9 / 20
74.1 / 0 / 0 / 2.26 / .45
Candidate actively encourages, when appropriate, the use and application of technology to solve problems. / 4
14.8 / 23
85.2 / 0 / 0 / 2.15 / .36
Technology Composite / 2.36 / .32

1