CDC Call – Pilot Surveillance Course Debriefing
June 17, 2013
Attendees:
· CDC
o Bridget Canniff
o Holly Billie
o Nancy Bill
o Jon Peabody
o Celeste Davis
o Siona Willie
o Jacey McCurtain (One of instructors for pilot course)
o Donna Gilbert (One of instructors for pilot course)
· Falmouth
o Marguerite Carroll
o Basla Andolsun
Items Discussed:
1. Holly: Short debrief on big picture items (see PowerPoint presentation called “Pilot Surveillance Course Debriefing”)
- Some folks had not had L1 or L2 training, although it was a pre-requisite (attended for local political reasons)
- Most of detailed comments came from folks who had attended L1 and L2, with exception of Del Yazzie
- Ended about 3:30 each day to spend a little time debriefing (30 min – 1 hour with participants and 30 min – 1 hour with instructors)
- Some exercises need more explanation
- Purpose
- Implementation
- U-shaped formation worked well for room setup
- Works well to ask group what they learned rather than doing recap of session
- Agenda should be more specific
- Course could be 2 days (maybe 2.5)
- Previous day review/recap was helpful
- Format of manual hard to follow
- Too many pages (308 participant, 456 instructor manual)
- Manuals not in sync in participant and instructor’s manual
- No instructions on how to put manuals together
- Slides weren’t consistent – some too much text, some too little
- Just include key words to prompt them and references to the appendix
- Easier to have materials in L2 format – Slide, and then notes next to it
- Content:
- Less review. Explicit note to instructor saying “brief review.”
- Need to teach concepts before questions/exercises
- Need more examples (like in the mean, median, and mode section). One instructor made some calculations, we can add those.
- Pare down appendices, give opportunity to use local examples
- Layman’s terms needed in some places
- Exercises
- E-codes not very complete. Too big of a jump to introduce it and then try to code. Most folks wouldn’t have to actually code anything. Should not be exercise for e-codes. Just know what an e-code is and how to recognize it.
- Otherwise, liked exercises and class discussions.
- Answering questions right after content is done works best rather than at end of course.
- Exercises need explicit instructions.
- One person thought final exercise should be more of a challenge since most of work had already been done.
- Other
- Good info in course
- Need to give folks tools to take back to use
- To discuss with workgroup:
- Pre- and post-test
- Screenshots and links on slides
- Add videos
2. Feedback from Jayce and Donna
- Flipping back and for the between pages was hard. Needed notes on slides
- Asking participants specific questions was helpful in generating discussion
- Ex. Switching from “summary” to “what did you learn?”
- Instructor PPT needed tables listened (page numbers need to be referenced)
- Overall content was good, folks were interested in it.
- Too much of a repeat?
- No
- Put in instructor notes to incorporate local examples if it isn’t in there already
- Nancy: Question – did people get new tools/ideas in developing surveillance systems?
- Jayce: Learned about steps in terms of new tools, ecological model was useful. Need more time spent on this. People didn’t remember this from L1 and L2.
- Nancy: Question – could people start a surveillance system after this?
- Jayce: Yes
- Jayce: would help to give them a different project at the end. An additional challenge. People wanted more for a final exercise.
- Marguerite: Question – How long would you give section 1 and 2 review?
- Jayce: Less than 2 hours for both sections
- Marguerite: Question – Sections 3-4 have enough time?
- Jayce: 4 and 5 were larger sections. More time on statistics/methodology one. More examples needed. Needed more info to do Section 5.
- Holly: Sections 4-5 are meat of course. Spend more time here. Break up into smaller sections.
- Nancy: ICD-10 exercise. Could have been about understanding e-coding transfer to ICD-10.
- Ex. 825 Pedestrian – what is difference between 9/10? Discussion exercise rather than coding exercise
- Holly: Someone wanted to understand e-code by the time they left. Intimidated by it. Going through anatomy of e-code. Explain what each part is would be helpful. Last part of code – initial or follow-up visit. What does “1” or “2” mean and why this is important. (Important for avoiding duplication)
- Jayce: We confused them with too much info in too little time. Should give ICD history and what it means. Background info on ICD-9 then exercise, then ICD-10 info then exercise
- Nancy: ICD-11 is being worked on for future.
3. Review of feedback on coverage of objectives
- Holly: hard to separate teaching style from what’s in content. Folks didn’t have material right there because they were flipping back and forth.
- Jayce: Section 6 on models, we need to add the logic model.
- Jayce: Basic statistics section – terminology was too advanced.
- Ex. “frequency”
- Nancy: There’s a website to help with that. Print it as part of reference.
- Marguerite: Question – appendix, was it helpful to find examples like that in appendices?
- Jayce: Just one example is good – too long as is.
- Marguerite: better if on a disk or website?
- Jayce: yes, that’s better
- Marguerite: handout or appendix better?
- Jayce: handout is better. We ended up using flip chart.
4. Jon: What next?
- Marguerite: I’ll work on redoing manual. Nancy, can you help explain L2 “manual” to me? Don’t think I ever saw one.
- Marguerite: Next meeting: specific issues like do we want pre-test/post-test? How to address ICD code.
5. Next meeting:
- July 9, 1:00 EDT. Keep it under 1 hr.
To Do: Holly, please ask the instructor who made calculation examples to share them.
1
CDC Call – Pilot Surveillance Course Debriefing
6/17/13