Dossier Assessment Form for Institution: Program name

Dossier Assessment Form

Institution: Program name

Note: The lead reviewer must complete this form and submit it to the Accreditation Board Secretariat 10 days before the decision meeting.

Presenter: / Final motion:
Proposed motion:
Lead Reviewer: / Permitted motions (per CEAB policy): possible outcomes (3R, possible outcome is 1 to 3V)
Editor: / Previous Decision: insert last decision
Graduate Attributes / Issue / C / W / Institution’s response / C/W
1 / 3.1.1 / A knowledge base for engineering
2 / 3.1.2 / Problem analysis
3 / 3.1.3 / Investigation
4 / 3.1.4 / Design
5 / 3.1.5 / Use of engineering tools
6 / 3.1.6 / Individual and team work
7 / 3.1.7 / Communication skills
8 / 3.1.8 / Professionalism
9 / 3.1.9 / Impact of engineering on society and the environment
10 / 3.1.10 / Ethics and equity
11 / 3.1.11 / Economics and project management
12 / 3.1.12 / Life-long learning
Students / Issue / C / W / D / Institution’s response / C/W/D
13 / 3.2.1 / Admission
14 / 3.2.2 / Promotion and graduation
15 / 3.2.3 / Counselling and guidance
16 / 3.2.4 / Degree auditing
Curriculum Content / Issue / C / W / D / Institution’s response / C/W/D
17 / 3.3.1: / Approach/methodologies for quantifying curriculum content
18 / 3.3.3: / Mathematics and NaturalSciences minimum of 420 AU
19 / 3.3.3.1 / Mathematics minimum of 195 AU
20 / Appropriate elements of: linear algebra, differential and integral calculus, differential equations, probability, statistics, numerical analysis, and discrete mathematics
21 / 3.3.3.2 / Natural Sciences minimum of 195 AU
22 / Elements of physics and chemistry (mandatory)
23 / Life sciences and earth sciences (optional)
24 / 3.3.4 / ES and ED minimum of 900 AU
25 / 3.3.4.1 / ES minimum of 225 AU
26 / 3.3.4.2 / ES – other engineering disciplines
27 / 3.3.4.3 / ED minimum of 225 AU
28 / 3.3.4.4 / Significant design experience
29 / 3.3.4.5 / Modern engineering tools
Curriculum Content / Issue / C / W / D / Institution’s response / C/W/D
30 / 3.3.5 / Complementary Studies minimum of 225 AU
31 / 3.3.5.1 /
  1. Engineering economics

  1. Impact of technology on society

  1. Humanities and social sciences

  1. Technical communications

  1. Health and safety

  1. Professional ethics, equity and law

  1. Sustainable development & environmental stewardship

32 / 3.3.5.2 / Language instruction
33 / 3.3.6 / Entire program minimum of 1,950 AU
34 / 3.3.7 / Laboratory experience
35 / 3.3.8 / Evaluation of curriculum content (transcript analysis)
36 / 3.3.8.1 / Prior university level or post-secondary education
Program Environment / Issue / C / W / D / Institution’s response / C/W/D
37 / 3.4.1.1 / Quality, morale and commitment of:
  1. Students

  1. Faculty

  1. Support staff

  1. Administration

38 / 3.4.1.2 / Quality, suitability and accessibility of:
  1. Laboratories

  1. Library

  1. Computing facilities

  1. Other supporting facilities

Faculty / Issue / C / W / D / Institution’s response / C/W/D
39 / 3.4.2.1 / Faculty qualifications and experience
40 / 3.4.2.2 / Sufficient number of full-time faculty
41 / 3.4.2.3 / Balance of faculty duties
42 / 3.4.2.4 / Program not dependent on one individual.
43 / 3.4.3 / Leadership (Dean (or equivalent officer); program head)
44 / 3.4.4 / Expertise and competence of faculty
45 / 3.4.4.1 / The level of academic education of faculty members
46 / 3.4.4.2 / Diversity of faculty
47 / 3.4.4.3 / Ability of faculty to communicate effectively
48 / 3.4.4.4 / Experience in teaching, research, and design practice
49 / 3.4.4.5 / Level of scholarship
50 / 3.4.4.6 / Degree of participation in professional and learnedsocieties
51 / 3.4.4.7 / Support of program-related extra-curricular activities
52 / 3.4.4.8 / Attitudes to professional licensure
53 / 3.4.5 / Professional status of faculty members
54 / 3.4.7 / Authority and responsibility for the engineering program
55 / 3.4.8 / Curriculum committee
Accreditation Procedures / Issue / C / W / D / Institution’s response / C/W/D
56 / 3.5.4 / All program variations (options) meet the criteria.
57 / 3.5.5 / Program includes the word “engineering” in its title.
58 / 3.5.6 / Title is properly descriptive of the curriculum content.
59 / 3.5.7 / Program meets each engineering curriculum named
60 / 3.5.9 / Options have distinct curriculum content
61 / 3.5.10 / Program name is appropriate, regardless of option
62 / 3.5.11 / Program has/will have graduates (new programs only)

Concern: Criterion satisfied; potential exists for non-satisfaction in near future.

Weakness: Criterion satisfied; insufficient strength of compliance to assure quality of program will be maintained.

Deficiency: Criterion not satisfied.

AU summary: Program name

Total AU / Math / NS / Math + NS / ES / ED / ES + ED / CS
Original submission by institution
Revised by program visitors
Revised per institution’s response
Accreditation Board requirement / 1,950* / 195 / 195 / 420 / 225 / 225 / 900 / 225

* 1800 is acceptable until 2014

Page 1 of 6